DOE OSTI2019
This project involves making measurements of contaminated areas using portable radiation detectors and small robots. Tasks involve operating detectors and small robots, combining data acquisition for the two systems, and automating the systems. The end result is a radiation map of contamination areas. Localization of radioactive sources and mapping of contamination distribution is essential when responding to emergencies, or when dealing with cleanup efforts. Radiation maps are used for situational awareness and for establishing a safe perimeter. However, it may be hazardous or impossible for humans to safely enter the site and survey the area. Informative Path Planning (IPP) is used to design a path for a robotic sensor platform to gather the most information about the radiation distribution while operating under the set of constraints given by the dynamics of the robot and other requirements such as minimizing the overall mission time. The key challenge for IPP is the tight coupling in multiple layers of decisions: Selection of locations to visit; Allocation of sensors to those locations; Processing of information gathered. Given a robot equipped with a basic gamma detector and Lidar sensor, how can we efficiently explore an unknown environment in such a way that we can satisfy the robot's constraints while simultaneously maximizing the accuracy of the map and minimizing the total runtime? This work presents a systematic procedure for IPP and environmental mapping that: Selects the best locations at which to sample; Finds the best path for robots; Estimates the measurement value at unknown locations using a Gaussian Process regression framework. Given a set of points where radiation measurements were taken, we are utilizing a Gaussian Process Regression with a Matern kernel to reconstruct the shape of the underlying ground truth. Mapping is done via the Robot Operating System's OpenSlam Gmapping package, which creates a 2D occupancy grid map. Simulated trials were run with a radiation source placed at random locations, and allowing the robot to select and move towards 20 samples at separate locations, as well as sampling along the path while moving. The simulated sensor model assumed an efficiency of 0.3, collection time of 1 second. Various weighting schemes were tested and compared. Quantitative evaluations often favored exploitation-heavy weighting schemes where μ was emphasized, with the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) quickly tending towards 2, whereas qualitative comparisons would favor exploration-biased schemes with greater weight on σ. The difference comes from operators often favoring knowing the general location of a source, rather than the exact properties of a source. Weighting of the path-length π often reduced the quality of the regression as less exploration occurred, however this may be deemed a worthwhile trade-off under certain circumstances, such as with sensitive robots. Successfully developed a methodology for informative path-planning for a robot to efficiently gather information and create a map of radiation. In the future, we would like to focus on: Hardware trials with integration of the robot platform and the IPP software; More refined sensor and environmental modeling; Multiple robot platforms.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗