Optical Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Opposite Directions through the Same Bridge That Follows Different Pathways
The electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of eight bis(tridentate) cyclometalated Ru II compounds covalently linked by a phenyl- or xylyl-thiophene bridge to a pendant triphenylamine (TPA) were characterized in fluid solution and immobilized on metal oxide surfaces. Upon surface immobilization, the TPA +/0 reduction potentials of the phenyl-bridged compounds exhibited large changes, ±100 mV, relative to solution-based values, yet those observed for the xylyl-bridged compounds were relatively unchanged. Additionally, the highest occupied molecular orbital of the surface-immobilized compounds was associated with either TPA or Ru II , enabling the study of the electron transfer in opposite directions. Electron transfer in the mixed-valent states of the compounds was found to proceed by different optical pathways for Ru II → TPA + relative to TPA → Ru III . Mulliken–Hush analysis of intervalence charge transfer bands for the phenyl-bridged compounds revealed that the electronic coupling matrix element, H DA , was ~950 cm –1 for Ru II → TPA + , while H DA for TPA → Ru III appeared to be 2500 cm –1 . In contrast, the xylyl-bridged compounds were weakly coupled. A superexchange analysis, where unoccupied bridge orbitals were taken directly into account, led to a very different conclusion: H DA did not depend on the charge-transfer direction or path. In conclusion, the results imply that the electron-transfer direction can alter optical charge transfer pathways without influencing the electronic coupling.