Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Programming Practices”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49

A Comparative Study of Interface Techniques for Transmission and Distribution Dynamic Co-Simulation

Transmission and distribution (T&D) dynamic co-simulation is a practical and effective approach to leverage existing simulation tools for transmission and distribution systems to simulate dynamic stability and performance of T&D systems in a systematic manner. Given that these tools are developed as stand-alone programs and there are inherent differences between them, interface techniques become critical to “bridge” them. Two important unsolved questions are: 1) which interface technique is better and should be used, and 2) how the modeling and simulation capabilities in these tools that are available and can be exploited for co-simulation should be considered when selecting an interface technique. This paper presents a comprehensive study for different interface techniques that can be employed for T&D dynamic co-simulation. The study provided insights to the pros and cons of each interface technique, and helped researchers make informed decisions on choosing a proper interface technique.

Huang, Qiuhua↗

SU-E-P-20: Personnel Lead Apparel Integrity Inspection: Where We Are and What We Need?

Purpose: In recent years, tremendous efforts have been devoted to radiation dose reduction, especially for patients who are directly exposed to primary radiation or receive radiopharmaceuticals. Limited efforts have been focused on those personnel who are exposed to secondary radiation while fulfilling their work responsibilities associated with diagnostic imaging and image-guided interventions. Occupational exposure is compounded in daily practice and can lead to a significant radiation dose over time. Personnel lead apparel is a well-accepted engineering control to protect healthcare workers when radiation is inevitable. The question is, do we have a nationally established program to protect personnel? This study is to investigate the lead apparel inspection programs among the USA. Methods: A series of surveys of state regulations, the University Health System Consortium, and federal regulations and regulations determined by accrediting bodies were conducted. The surveys were used to determine the current status of lead apparel programs regarding integrity inspections. Based on the survey results, a thorough program was proposed accordingly. Results: Of 50 states, seventeen states and Washington D.C. require lead apparel integrity inspections within their state regulations. Eleven of these states specify that the inspection is required on an annual basis. Two of these states require lead apron integrity checks to be performed semi-annually. Eleven out of the two hundred academic medical centers surveyed responded. The results show that the method (visually vs. fluoroscopy) used to conduct lead apparel integrity checks differ greatly amongst healthcare organizations. The FDA, EPA, CRCPD and NCRP require lead apparel integrity checks. However, the level of policies is different. A standard program is not well established and clearly there is a lack of standardization. Conclusion: A program led by legislative (state or federal government) and with specific frequency, methods, tracking and criteria is needed to ensure the integrity of personnel lead apparel.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

Final Technical Report - Clean Technology Accelerator Program (CLEANTAP)

Formerly known as the Clean Technology Accelerator Program (CleanTAP), the Incubatenergy Network was proposed via the National Incubator Initiative for Clean Energy (NIICE) to improve coordination and collaboration amongst incubators and accelerators from across the country, and to assist in developing a set of best practices to help improve incubator performance standards. Support networks are in place in many areas around the United States to help guide entrepreneurs along their paths to success. Through knowledge sharing and access to best practices, the clean energy developer community, and thus the public at large, will benefit from improvements in incubators and accelerators to support the entrepreneurial ecosystem and facilitate the commercialization of clean energy technologies. The Incubatenergy Network’s objective was three-fold: It was to serve as a comprehensive source of information about US clean energy incubators, to foster engagement and communication between clean energy incubators, and to provide a rich resource of experts and mentors. Launched in 2014 through a partnership among the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Incubatenergy Network is a network of approximately 25 technology incubators and accelerators located across the U.S., and expanding internationally, that supports more than 500 startup companies focused on a wide variety of cleantech solutions.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Physical Security Model Development of an Electrochemical Facility.

Nuclear facilities in the U.S. and around the world face increasing challenges in meeting evolving physical security requirements while keeping costs reasonable. The addition of security features after a facility has been designed and without attention to optimization (the approach of the past) can easily lead to cost overruns. Instead, security should be considered at the beginning of the design process in order to provide robust, yet efficient physical security designs. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate how modeling and simulation can be used to optimize the design of physical protection systems. A suite of tools, including Scribe3D and Blender, were used to model up a generic electrochemical reprocessing facility. Physical protection elements such as sensors, portal monitors, barriers, and guard forces were added to the model based on best practices for physical security. One outsider theft scenario was examined with 4-8 adversaries to determine security metrics. This work fits into a larger Virtual Test Bed 2020 Milestone in the Material Protection, Accounting, and Control Technologies (MPACT) program through the Department of Energy (DOE). The purpose of the milestone is to demonstrate how a series of experimental and modeling capabilities across the DOE complex provide the capabilities to demonstrate complete Safeguards and Security by Design (SSBD) for nuclear facilities. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was funded by the Materials Protection, Accounting, and Control Technologies (MPACT) working group as part of the Nuclear Technology Research and Development Program under the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

O(N) Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) Algorithms, Code Requirements, Release Notes, and Library Deployment

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) Co-design Center for Particle Applications (CoPA) is addressing the challenges for particle applications to run on upcoming exascale computing architectures. This includes short- and long-range molecular dynamics (MD), particle-in-cell (PIC), and quantum molecular dynamics (QMD). This document addresses $\mathcal{O}(N)$ QMD. The goal of this CoPA team is to develop $\mathcal{O}(N)$ linear scaling methods for QMD optimized for new and next generation architectures. This will provide the capability to simulate larger systems and run for longer timeframes than is possible today. Focus is initially on the density matrix construction. This requires efficient matrix formats and linear algebra operations for distributed architectures. A significant reduction in the wallclock time for an MD timestep is necessary to achieve practical large scale QMD. Equally challenging is to develop scalable distributed implementations. This requires the exploration of efficient data formats (dense, sparse, etc.), data decomposition and distribution across compute nodes using block- and graph-based methods. Traditional programming models such as MPI/OpenMP, hybrid MPI/OpenMP/Accelerator, as well as asynchronous task-based models will be explored to achieve maximum parallelism. Parallelism at the level of a matrix operation, solver, and/or application needs to be explored to gain the most benefit on new and emerging architectures. This report serves as a “living document” of the additions and enhancements throughout the ECP CoPA project for $\mathcal{O}(N)$ QMD. The following sections address the applications we are working with, the quantum chemistry libraries (BML and PROGRESS), and our co-design exploration through the use of a proxy application.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Dataset Repository for Investigating Suicide Risk Using Social and Environmental Determinants of Health

Suicide is frequently modeled as a function of genetics and environment, where the latter refers to factors other than direct biological consequences, such as air quality, financial level, social connectivity, transportation and food access, and homelessness status. According to the World Health Organization, clean air, a stable climate, adequate water, sanitation and hygiene, safe chemical use, radiation protection, healthy and safe workplaces, sound agricultural practices, health-supportive cities and built environments, and a preserved natural environment are all prerequisites for good health. Understanding the relationships between these determinants and mental health outcomes requires standardized data that can be included in healthcare programs and health outcome models. There is a wealth of publicly available data on social and environmental factors provided by various US organizations that can benefit the design of health care systems and public health interventions, as well as improve our comprehension of factors that impact health. Such information would not only help improve the understanding of individual and community risk but also identify new risk factors that have not previously been therapeutically targeted, especially in terms of their impact on mental health. However, curating and standardizing such datasets is challenging because they are often recorded at numerous geographical and temporal resolutions and with varying spatial and temporal granularities. To address this challenge, we launched an endeavor in conjunction with the Veterans Health Administration to collect publicly available socioeconomic and environmental determinants of health statistics in the US. In this manuscript, we describe a social and environmental determinants of health (SEDH) datasets repository, data curation documentation, and a pipeline framework for data generation; This effort started in 2020, when we began constructing a scalable pipeline to automate the download, extraction, preparation, analysis, and production of datasets. These datasets have been made available to the VHA and may be shared upon agreement with collaborating organizations.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

E2C Cohorts: Overview of Project Procurement, Performance Monitoring, and O&M [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation is focused on project performance, monitoring, and O&M. This workshop is on May 27.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Data for Resilience and Reliability [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Planning for Major Energy Disruptions in the Southeast" focuses on strategies for entities in the Southeast to quickly recover from impacts to energy infrastructure caused by extreme events, such as severe weather and natural disasters. This presentation focuses on the data available related to energy disruptions. The workshop is on April 23, 2026.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Engaging with Utilities and Key Stakeholders [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation overviews the interconnection process for distributed energy resources and how to engage well with utilities. The workshop will be held on March 25, 2026.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Strategies for Successful Energy Project Financing [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers.This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation focuses on strategies for successful project financing. This workshop is on April 29, 2026.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Energy Project Siting, Permitting, and Community Impacts [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers.This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation focuses on strategies for successful project financing. This workshop is on April 29, 2026.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

E2C Cohort on Major Energy Disruptions in the Southeast: Trade-Offs and Feasibility of Energy Sector Investment for Community Resilience [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Planning for Major Energy Disruptions in the Southeast" focuses on strategies for entities in the Southeast to quickly recover from impacts to energy infrastructure caused by extreme events, such as severe weather and natural disasters. This presentation focuses on the tradeoffs and relative costs of different strategies to improve outcomes from these extreme events. The workshop is on May 21, 2026.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Utilities' Role in Major Grid Disruptions [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Planning for Major Energy Disruptions in the Southeast" focuses on strategies for entities in the Southeast to quickly recover from impacts to energy infrastructure caused by extreme events, such as severe weather and natural disasters. This presentation focuses on the role of utilities in preparing for and responding to major energy disruptions. The workshop is on April 23, 2026.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Overview of Community Solar Project Development [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation overviews the basics of developing community solar projects with emphasis on technical scope and ownership structures.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

E2C Successful Project Implementation Cohort: Overview of Solar, Microgrid and Resilience Project Development [Slides]

The Energy to Communities (E2C) peer-learning cohort program provides technical assistance to groups of 15 community entities around a common energy topic over the course of 6 months. Every month, participants join a virtual meeting where they hear from experts and exchange strategies and best practices with their peers. This cohort, "Successful Energy Project Implementation" will explore common challenges in implementing energy projects and learn strategies to turn project plans into reality. Each participant will focus on a local energy project or priority as a cornerstone for their learning throughout the series. This presentation overviews the basics of developing solar, microgrid and resilience projects with emphasis on understanding the project development process.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Optimal Design of Food Packaging Considering Waste Management Technologies to Achieve Circular Economy

Plastic packaging plays a fundamental role in the food industry, avoiding food waste and facilitating food access. The increasing plastic production and the lack of appropriate plastic waste management technologies represent a threat to the environmental and human welfare. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify sustainable packaging solutions. Circular economy (CE) promotes reducing waste and increasing recycling practices to achieve sustainability. In this work, we propose a CE framework based on multi-objective optimization, considering both economic and environmental impacts, to identify optimal packaging designs and waste management technologies. Using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and life cycle assessment (LCA), this work aims to build the first steps in packaging design, informing about the best packaging alternatives and the optimal technology or technologies to process packaging waste. For the economic analysis, we consider the minimum increase in price (MIP) when adding recycling to the cost of each packaging solution, while for the environmental analysis, the greenhouse gas emissions impact was considered. A case study on ground coffee packaging is used to illustrate the proposed framework. The results demonstrate that the multilayer bag option is the most convenient when considering both the chosen economic and environmental impacts.

Life Cycle Analysis↗

Hanford site asbestos management lessons learned - 15183

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the environmental cleanup of the Hanford Site central plateau. As part of this responsibility, DOE contractors conduct deactivation, decommissioning, decontamination, and demolition (D4) of retired/inactive facilities, including very large chemical processing facilities. To date, DOE contractors have demolished hundreds of facilities, reducing baseline site maintenance costs and reducing the environmental threats and hazards that the degrading buildings present. Many of these Hanford facilities include asbestos-containing materials (as well as other hazardous components), which must be managed in compliance with applicable regulations and standards. In most cases, the facilities are demolished as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) removal or remedial actions. In an effort to streamline cleanup operations and to utilize site cleanup funding more efficiently, while still being protective of personnel and the environment, agreements were reached between the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Hanford Project Office, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), the Benton Clean Air Agency (BCAA) and the US Department of Energy Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) on approaches to be utilized for demolition. One of these approaches would involve leaving cement asbestos board siding (e.g. transite), an EPA National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Category II non-friable asbestos-containing material, in place during demolition using heavy equipment, employing a set of controls that would maintain protection of personnel and the environment. This agreement was documented in a number of formal communications, including Notices of Intent issued as required by the asbestos NESHAP regulation, letters between the various agencies, CERCLA work plans, and the approved contractor baselines. A large number of buildings were demolished with transite siding in place, using the agreed upon controls and approaches. Personnel breathing zone and work area perimeter monitoring verified that the controls employed were protective in that there were no exceedances of permissible exposure limits during or after the demolition operations. EPA later reconsidered their previous concurrence with demolishing transite materials in place and issued a joint letter with Ecology revoking concurrence on any of the aforementioned CERCLA decision documents and associated work plans. DOE and their contractors took action to comply with the approach to demolition preferred by EPA for future demolitions, and initiated a series of actions to modify asbestos management practices in their operations accordingly. This paper will discuss both the actions taken to address EPA concerns with sites where transite materials were left in place for demolition and actions taken to ensure that the central plateau D4 program complies with the 40 CFR 61 Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos, (Asbestos NESHAP) methods for asbestos management. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Classic and Quantum Task-Based Intelligent Runtime for QIRs Running on Multiple QPUs

High-performance computing systems are rapidly evolving into heterogeneous platforms that fuse quantum accelerators with traditional classical processing units (CPUs) and graphical processing units (GPUs). This convergence calls for runtimes capable of managing both classical and quantum workloads in a unified manner. We introduce an intelligent, task-based runtime that marries the Intelligent RuntIme System (IRIS) asynchronous scheduler with a quantum programming stack through the Quantum Intermediate Representation Execution Engine (QIR-EE). Our design allows programs written in the quantum intermediate representation (QIR) to be dispatched concurrently to a variety of back-ends, including multiple quantum simulators and nascent quantum processors, enabling genuine hybrid execution on a single node. To illustrate its practicality, we partition a 4-qubit and 20-qubit circuit into three sub-circuits using quantum circuit cutting via the QCut library. Each sub-circuit is simulated independently by the QIR-EE driver within IRIS, after which a classical post-processing step merges the simulation results to recover the outcome of the original full-circuit computation. This case study demonstrates how finer task granularity can enable the parallel execution and lower the simulation burden per quantum task while preserving overall accuracy, highlighting the feasibility of our hybrid approach.

Miniskar, Narasinga Rao [ORNL] (ORCID:000000018259↗