DOE OSTI2017
U.S. government agencies, particularly the Dept. of Energy, need robotic tools to handle and inspect high-consequence materials - materials for which mishandling would result in great risk to both application operators and the general public. The remediation and documentation of nuclear waste has become a problem of national significance and it cannot be addressed without robotic tools. The use of robots bypasses the danger and decreases the preparation time to handle harmful materials. In the 1980's and 90's, the US Dept. of Energy (DOE) invested heavily in robotic technologies as part of a comprehensive program of research and development aimed at enabling safer and more efficient cleanup of nuclear waste sites. For the next generation of harder, more complex clean-up problems, there is a clear need for more R and D. There is a clear need for flexible, quickly deployable robotic technologies that can be configured to respond to unforeseen situations -- or can be purpose-built for planned activities -- while keeping human workers safe, yet effective. Modularity and inter-operability are core capabilities for inspection tasks in contaminated facilities with a large variety of inspection problems. With any tool, familiarity breeds ingenuity, and ingenuity leads to new innovations in efficiency, effectiveness, safety, and performance. For example, the simple screwdriver can be held fourteen different ways by an experienced machinist who knows exactly what he or she wants to accomplish at any given moment. As a tool, robots are no different. To maximize the efficiency, effectiveness, safety and performance, redeployment and reuse of familiar tools is essential. Modularity can assist with re-deployment and modularity manifests itself in both hardware and software. In some applications of inspection of high-consequence materials, a common concern has been the simplicity of the tool -- often correlated with cost (which is not always accurate) -- in case it becomes unrecoverable. In the case of robots, which have complex user interfaces and complex dynamics of interaction, the lack of familiarity can lead to clumsy operations and reduced accumulation of knowledge. As a result, while incremental successes may be achieved with sequential uses of different robots, there often is little knowledge gain that is generalizable across multiple uses. Total cost often goes down when a more sophisticated, but more familiar tool, can be used more frequently.An example is the inspection of the H-Canyon Exhaust Air Tunnel at the Savannah River Site nuclear waste facility in the United States [1]. This is a particularly nasty environment, due to the acidic gases, large amounts of erosion and debris, and wet, mucky puddles. Over the past twelve years, six inspections have been attempted with five different robotic vehicles. In fact, these inspections have been successful with their limited, but progressively increasing objectives, although most robots have been abandoned in the tunnel. While each vehicle has cost less than $75,000 (the sacrificial part), the total costs of development have been much higher. The robots used to investigate changed much from iteration to iteration and it is not clear a strong body of generalizable expertise was built up across trials. The authors of this study demonstrated the combination of two types of modular, serpentine, re-configurable robots for locomotion over complex terrains and the inspection of hard-to-reach areas. The MOTHERSHIP is a tread/limb/serpentine hybrid robot design for locomotion over complex terrains, while the CMU snake robot provides highly articulated inspection of highly confined spaces. The demonstration at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant involves a combination of the two whereby gross locomotion is achieved with the MOTHERSHIP and the CMU Snake deploys a sensor package to gather data from behind and under obstacles. Although statically configured in its present state, the combined robot is built of individual modules for which reconfiguration has been demonstrated in both labs at Purdue and CMU. In future work, much higher degrees of reconfiguration and re-purposing of both software and hardware are easily achievable with these unique platforms. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗