Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “surface temperature”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

FY2021 Progress Report on BISON Metallic Fuel Model Development and V&V Using EBR-II Legacy Data

In this report, the activities and achievements made by Argonne National Laboratory for the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) BISON code metallic fuel validation and verification project in FY2021 are summarized. The cladding degradation model based on the FCCI/CCCI wastage calculations has been developed and implemented into BISON. A comprehensive evaluation of the cladding degradation model was performed based on FIPD data of the IFR experiment X447. BISON objects were also developed to enable direct use of time-varying cladding outer surface temperature profile as temperature boundary conditions, which proved to provide more accurate temperature predictions for the metallic fuel pins irradiated in EBR-II. Additionally, a new BISON object was implemented to enable direct comparison between BISON predicted data and FIPD-based post-irradiation examination (PIE) results, which would significantly facilitate BISON metallic fuel verification and validation (V&V) activities. These new BISON-FIPD integration features were used in the establishment of a low-burnup fuel swelling evaluation framework as demonstration. The framework was successfully used to evaluate current fuel swelling models based on the IFR experiment X423.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Divertor Component Testing

Power exhaust is an immense challenge in tokamaks. Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), in collaboration with MIT and others, is working on the design of a compact (R 0 = 1.85 m), high-field (B 0 = 12 T) tokamak for the demonstration of net fusion energy, called SPARC. Empirical scaling laws indicate that the unmitigated heat flux in the boundary plasma will exceed 10 GW/m 2 . Such high heat fluxes will be a formidable challenge. The scope of this work is to utilize the HHF testing expertise maintained by ORNL, used in support of NSTX-U and to demonstrate the thermal performance of tungsten-coated graphitic foam targets, to help CFS and its collaborators to assess the performance of (1) base materials (tungsten and its alloys) and (2) divertor mockups under SPARC-like divertor heat flux conditions. These activities will be performed by ORNL personnel using electron beam exposure facilities at the Pennsylvania State University’s Applied Research Laboratory (ARL). ARL is a Department of Defense University Affiliated Research Center where ORNL has successfully executed NSTX-U and graphitic foam high heat flux testing using electron beam (e-beam) facilities, which is a nonstandard service. For the assessment of base materials, CFS will do an initial thermal analysis, in consultation with ORNL, to understand under what scenarios the materials are most likely to fail. CFS will supply to ORNL various tungsten-based material samples to test with testing taking 3 weeks. ORNL will thermally stress the samples under SPARC divertor-like conditions to either failure or to a prescribed number of pulses. ORNL will record experimental data, including IR surface temperature and embedded thermocouple readings, and report results to CFS

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Simulating target tests at AP0 facility for Mu2e

The predicted production of muons and energy deposition for the production target of the Mu2e experiment are dependent on the documentation of cross-sections values, the properties of the target’s material, etc. Hence, making real tests on similar targets before its use on Mu2e will be a good indicator of the accuracy of the simulations done for the experiment. The main goal of the project is to simulate a target test at the AP0 Target Facility, previously used to create the muon beam for the Muon g-2 experiment. Results from these simulations will be used as input to engineering models of the target to produce predicted stress and surface temperature distributions, parameters that will later be measured in future beam runs to validate underlying cross section models.

Delgado, Amii Matamoros↗
DOE OSTI2023

Validation of LOCA2 and STAR-ESDM Statistically Downscaled Products

The National Climate Assessment (NCA) is the preeminent national report examining current and future risks posed by climate change. Countless agencies, policymakers, stakeholders and other end-users rely upon guidance from the NCA to plan for an uncertain future. These groups all depend on modern curated data, provided alongside the NCA, to quantify the impact of climate change on metrics of relevance for their decision processes. In its fifth iteration (NCA5), two statistically downscaled ensemble products, each providing data at grid spacing of approximately 5km over the contiguous United States, were selected to accompany the report. These include LOCalized Analogs version 2 (LOCA2) and Seasonal Trends and Analysis of Residuals Empirical-Statistical Downscaling Model (STAR-ESDM). Both data products are produced through a process known as statistical downscaling, where relatively coarse Global Climate Model (GCM) data is refined to locally relevant scales through the application of scientifically-supported empirical and algorithmic relationships. In support of the NCA effort, this report provides an independent validation of these two products against historical observations, with a focus on precipitation and near-surface temperature variables. Based on the results of this validation, several recommendations are provided related to the use of these data products. The structure of this report is as follows: In section 2, we review three gridded observational products that are used as part of our intercomparison. In section 3, we describe the two statistical downscaling techniques and their corresponding datasets that are the focus of this study. In section 4, the methodology we employ for validation is described. Section 5 provides results of the validation, which in turn motivate our recommendations on the use of these data products. A brief summary is provided in section 6.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

ESMs Latent Space Exploration for Uncertainty Quantification and Spatiotemporal Downscaling

This final report for DOE Award DE-SC0023044 presents advances in two key areas of climate modeling: (1) representative climate model selection and (2) Earth System Model (ESM) downscaling using hybrid AI methods. The first section introduces a reordered, three-stage workflow to select representative GCM runs that more effectively balance historical skill with ensemble spread, validated across Texas, Bihar, and New York. The second section introduces two novel super-resolution frameworks, ViSIR and ViFOR, that integrate Vision Transformers with sinusoidal and Fourier-based implicit neural representations. These models achieve state-of-the-art reconstruction accuracy for ESM variables including surface temperature and heat fluxes. The report includes detailed methodology, benchmarks, and results, demonstrating significant gains in uncertainty quantification, spatial fidelity, and scalability for climate-impact studies.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

Atmospheric Gases as Quantitative Indicators of Urbanization Across Land-Use Gradients

The urban heat island (UHI) effect is a significant phenomenon characterized by higher surface temperatures in cities compared to surrounding rural areas. This change in the Earth's energy balance presents considerable challenges for urban populations, increasing heat exposure, straining energy infrastructure, and exacerbating health vulnerabilities. Quantifying UHI intensity is challenging due to blurred distinctions between urban and rural areas as land-use patterns evolve. To address this challenge, the present study builds on the framework established by Salvador et al. (2025) and investigates the use of atmospheric constituents, specifically volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inorganic gases, as tracers of urbanization levels. A key improvement in this approach is the inclusion of a designated true rural site for comparison. Field measurements were conducted at two locations in the Southeastern United States during the summer of 2025. Inorganic gases were monitored continuously, while VOC samples were collected biweekly and analyzed using a proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The urban site exhibited elevated concentrations of anthropogenic inorganic gases, with carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide averaging 878 ppb and 17.99 ppb, respectively. In contrast, the rural site showed lower levels of these pollutants, 796 ppb for carbon monoxide and 12.46 ppb for nitrogen dioxide, while displaying higher concentrations of biogenic VOCs, including isoprene and monoterpenes at 1.24 ppb and 0.08 ppb, respectively. Extended mass spectral analyses revealed distinct chemical differences between the two sites, supporting the observed variability of major gases. Overall, these findings are consistent with our previous research and highlight the value of atmospheric constituents as effective indicators of urbanization, thereby improving our understanding of UHI dynamics.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

High-Latitude, Low-Altitude SAI: Overview of G6-1.5K-HiLLA Simulations in E3SMv3

This report details a contribution of Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 3 (E3SMv3) simulations to a proposed model intercomparison project funded and organized by Reflective, a nonprofit group studying the possible global impacts of SAI. Using annual feedback control and seasonally-variable injection sites to achieve a desired global near-surface temperature target, the simulated SAI campaign indicates robust maintenance of the 2020-2039 climatic state over 60 years into the future.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

Scalable Solar Fuels Production in A Reactor Train System by Thermochemical Redox Cycling of Novel Nonstoichiometric Perovskites

Hydrogen production via two-step thermochemical water splitting redox cycles using nonstoichiometric redox-active metal oxides has the potential to dramatically increase fuel production rates. At moderate-to-low water splitting temperatures, surface reaction kinetics co-limit the process. In such cases, stable and high surface area microstructures that allow exploitation of the full thermodynamic potential of the materials are essential as is tight thermal integration of the reactor module. This project’s goals were the development of novel nonstoichiometric perovskite oxides with high stability and favorable thermodynamic and kinetic properties, to optimize their microstructure for maximizing the fuel productivity, and to build a prototype reactor train system (RTS) comprising at least one reactor to meet specific performance targets: (1) capable of an in-house solar thermochemical hydrogen (STCH) productivity ≥ 12 mL g -1 for stable continuous operation ≥ 20 cycles; and (2) demonstration of scalable solar fuels production at practical solar reactor level in an industrial-scale concentrated solar tower (CST) using developed perovskites to achieve a hydrogen production rate ≥ 1 g h -1 .

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2026

Deflagration to Detonation Transition Update: XDDT Code Modularization

A legacy FORTRAN 77 implementation of the Baer–Nunziato two-phase mixture theory for deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials—hereafter the XDDT (eXplosive DDT) code—has been modularized to Fortran 90 with modular structure, external input files, and adaptive mesh capability. During validation, two code defects were identified and corrected: an inconsistency in the nodal solid pressure evaluation and a nonphysical burn-front tracking criterion. The ignition criterion was also corrected to use the granular surface temperature from the interface heat transfer model, matching the original Baer implementation. An initial attempt to validate against Figure 3 of the original Baer and Nunziato (1986) paper revealed that the code’s detonation velocity on a 201-node mesh (5.5 km/s) was approximately 21% below the expected Chapman–Jouguet value for 70% TMD HMX (∼7 km/s). Validation was redirected to the piston-driven DDT experiments of McAfee et al. (1989), Shot B-9036, for which well-characterized ionization-pin data are available. With the compaction-burn coefficient calibrated to 𝐶 𝛼 = 75, the XDDT code reproduces the DDT transition time to within 0.4% and produces a steady-state detonation velocity within 4% of the McAfee experimental value of 6.36 km/s. The burn model was generalized to support pressure-dependent exponents, enabling application to nitrocellulose-based ball propellants (TS3659) with a cube-root pressure dependence. Validation against the Sandusky/Baer PDC82 piston-impact experiment yielded a reactive wave velocity of 2.3–2.8 km/s, in good agreement with the experimental value of ∼2.2 km/s, and wave coalescence within 5% of the experimental timing. The mathematical model, input parameter requirements, and a roadmap for extending XDDT to PETN with an autocatalytic burn model are presented.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2023

Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Buoy 028

The Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) is an extensive network for monitoring waves and beaches along the coastlines of the United States. The buoy primarily collects wave and sea surface temperature information. These data are collected as a part of an observational database to support the floating offshore wind research and industry along the coast of California within the ORACLE project funded by DOE-WETO.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Gulf of Mexico Turbulence Intensity Model Data

The dataset is a subset of simulations carried out for the Gulf of Mexico region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing. Simulations are performed from January through June in 2020 and output every 10 minutes, which permits comparison with corresponding lidar observations.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Gulf of Mexico Turbulence Intensity Model Data

The dataset is a subset of simulations carried out for the Gulf of Mexico region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from the NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing. Simulations are performed from January through June in 2020 and output every 10 minutes, which permits comparison with corresponding lidar observations.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Gulf of Mexico Turbulence Intensity Model Data in Observational Space

The dataset archives model-simulated turbulence intensity and meteorological profiles and timeseries at the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars. The simulated data are interpolated in time and/or space according to observed quantities. The simulations were carried out for the Gulf of Mexico region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mid-Atlantic Turbulence Intensity Model Data

The dataset is a subset of simulations carried out for the mid-Atlantic region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the Air-Sea Interaction Tower (ASIT) of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing. Simulations are performed from February through June in 2020 and output every 10 minutes, which permits comparison with corresponding lidar observations.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mid-Atlantic Turbulence Intensity Data in Observational Space

The dataset archives observed and model-simulated turbulence intensity and meteorological profiles and timeseries at the Air-Sea Interaction Tower (ASIT) of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s Martha’s Vineyard Coastal Observatory (MVCO). The observational data were measured by lidar and buoy deployed at ASIT. The simulated profiles and timeseries data are interpolated in time and/or space according to observations. Simulations were carried out for the mid-Atlantic region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles at the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Northern Pacific Turbulence Intensity Model Data

The dataset is a subset of simulations carried out for the northern Pacific region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the lidar buoys deployed off the coast of California (Humbolt and Morro Bay) are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing. Simulations are performed from November to December in 2020 and May through June in 2021. Model outputs every 10 minutes, permitting comparison with corresponding lidar observations.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Northern Pacific Turbulence Intensity Model Data in Observational Space

The dataset archives model-simulated turbulence intensity and meteorological profiles and timeseries at the lidar buoys sites off the coast of California (Humboldt and Morro Bay). The simulated data are interpolated in time and/or space according to observed quantities. The simulations were carried out for the north Pacific region using the revised Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 that incorporates the implementation of online turbulence intensity (TI) calculations (Tai et al. 2023). The simulated atmospheric profiles near the Shell Exploration and Production Corporation's Tension Leg Platforms Ursa and Mars are archived. Physics parameterizations chosen for the simulations include the Thompson microphysics parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi Niino (MYNN) boundary layer parameterization, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic surface layer parameterization, Unified Noah land-surface parameterization, and the RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation parameterization. Initial and boundary conditions are taken from NOAA’s High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) product. The JPL 0.01-degree Level 4 Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analysis (V4.1) data are used as the model’s SST forcing.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

NREL ASSIST Barge / Thermodynamic retrievals TROPoe v0.19

This dataset contains daily files with thermodynamic profiles retrieved with the optimal estimation physical retrieval TROPoe v0.19 (Turner and Löhnert, 2014; Turner and Blumberg, 2019; Turner and Löhnert, 2021). The profiles are retrieved every 10 minutes from instantaneous observations from the NREL ASSIST-II (SN 12) infrared spectrometer. Observations are noise-filtered but not averaged in time to minimize errors due to non-uniform clouds. Additional input data in TROPoe are cloud base height from a collocated NREL Vaisala CL51 ceilometer (when available) or vertically staring Halo XR lidar, and surface temperature, relative humidity, and pressure from the collocated Oregon State University met tower. The full pipeline to run the retrieval is available at https://github.com/StefanoWind/TROPoe_processor. In addition to these temporally resolved input data, TROPoe requires an a priori dataset (prior) that provides mean climatological estimates of thermodynamic profiles and specifies how temperature and humidity covary with height as an input (for details see, e.g., Djalalova et al., 2022). The prior is a key component of the retrieval and provides a constraint on the ill-posed inversion problem. A monthly prior was computed from operational radiosonde launches at Upton, NY.

17 WIND ENERGY↗