Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Additive Manufacturing (AM)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental Characterization of Additively Manufactured Nickel-Titanium Shape Memory Alloy Heat Pipes

Shape memory alloys (SMA) have been identified for use in spacecraft components as replacement for conventional deployment mechanisms. They may be used in thermal management components such as radiators to create self-deploying radiators. One SMA, NiTi, has also been developed for additive manufacturing processes. Heat pipes are a common way to create highly effective and lightweight spaceflight radiators, and heat pipes can also be made from NiTi and related alloys. The wick is the critical element of a functioning heat pipe, and recent progress over the past years has led to the development of additively manufactured heat pipe wicks in various materials. The combination of these efforts is the focus of this project: creating an additively manufactured, shape memory alloy self-deploying heat pipe radiator. This paper will focus on the experimental characterization of these additively manufactured NiTi heat pipes. The heat pipe coupons were additively manufactured by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), with an integral liquid cooled condenser. Heat is input to the heat pipe via a thin film heater. Thermocouples were spot welded to the heat pipes to measure temperature at several axial locations. The heat pipes were tested with two working fluids: water and ethanol. Ethanol is not an ideal working fluid for heat pipes but is useful in characterizing them because it wets well to a wide variety of surfaces. Water is in general a superior working fluid for heat pipes, but its contact angle and therefore wicking performance strongly depends on the surface chemistry of the surface it is in contact with. A particular measurement of interest in this test is the evaporator to condenser thermal conductance, which will be compared in the full paper to recently published correlations for additively manufactured heat pipes. Experimental results for two straight geometry and one bellows geometry heat pipe will be presented. The bellows geometry is of interest for condenser of the self-deploying radiator design.

Additive manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufacturing of Electronics for Space Applications

Additive manufacturing techniques for electronics will enable new detector and electronic assemblies that were not previously possible with traditional assembly processes. This technology has the potential to reduce mass and volume for fabrication and assembly of detector, instrument, and electronics concepts by printing fine feature sizes, printing on complex geometries, and allowing new concept production. This presentation summarizes efforts developing printing techniques to manufacture detectors and circuitry for two different space applications.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancing GRCop-based Bimetallic Additive Manufacturing to Optimize Component Design and Applications for Liquid Rocket Engines

Additive manufacturing (AM) is advancing many applications of component design for liquid rocket engines. The ability to rapidly design and manufacture components has provided significant opportunities for development and flight programs across the propulsion industry. AM has demonstrated significant advantages that include cost and schedule savings in addition to performance improvements through new design opportunities. While these performance advantages can be in the characteristics of complex design features, they can also be in the form of new materials. AM has been demonstrated in these various component applications using a variety of metal alloys, many of which are traditional alloys for extreme environments. Additional developments were completed using AM to provide new alloys and maturing these material uses for high performance applications. Almost all of the prior developments across component applications have focused on single-alloys in these AM processes. NASA and industry partners have focused in recent years to advance processing to create bimetallic and multicomponent AM processes and materials. The role of multi-alloy AM offers advantages since it can further optimize weight, optimize reliability and performance by increasing the strength to weight ratio of a component, and can optimize materials for various engineering requirements. This is particularly important in liquid rocket engine combustion devices that must reject heat in high heat flux environments yet maintain adequate structural margins under high operational pressure. NASA has been exploring several AM processes, materials, and applications for combustion devices, specifically combustion chambers, injectors, nozzles, and ignition systems. These components require fine geometric features for internal flow or cooling functionality. They experience high thermal gradients across thin-walls and must survive high pressures and temperatures from propellants and the combustion process. A copper-based alloy is normally used to provide high thermal conductivity, but at the detriment of increased weight if used as a single alloy in an AM chamber. Various AM processes were demonstrated on these components using a copper-based alloy/superalloy bimetallic solution. The AM processes being explored individually and in combination for bimetallic applications include Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition (LP-DED), and cold spray. The combination of bimetallic material combinations explored in this research include copper-based material primarily and superalloys, Inconel 625 or NASA HR-1. The various aspects of the additive manufacturing processes and challenges, materials characterization, and the testing of bimetallic components in a relevant environment will be discussed.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2024

Evaluation of an Al-Cu-Zn-Mg Alloy for Wire-Fed Additive Manufacturing

A collaborative research study was conducted to evaluate an experimental Al-Cu-Zn-Mg alloy, designated Al C380H, developed by Arconic Corporation for wire-fed additive manufacturing (AM) techniques such as NASA’s electron beam freeform fabrication (EBF 3 ) process and the wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process. The goal of the study was to determine, based upon metallurgical properties, whether additively manufactured Al C380H represented a viable alternative for applications currently using wrought 7xxx series aluminum. Al 2319 and Al 7075 were also deposited as AM-compatible and non-AM-compatible baselines, respectively. Evaluation was based on tensile, fracture, and corrosion properties. The strength and ductility of Al C380H-T6 materials produced by EBF3 and WAAM were sufficiently lower than typical values for Al 7050-T7 to indicate that additively manufactured Al C380H is not a viable replacement for current parts fabricated with Al 7050, due largely to the significant losses in Zn and Mg and development of porosity during deposition. EBF 3 parameters that reduced porosity, such as increasing electron beam current, higher raster frequency, sharper beam focus, and slower travel speed, augmented de-alloying of fugitive solute. Further enhancement of Zn and Mg content in Al C380H feedstock wire combined with adjustments to deposition conditions to minimize porosity may enable production of Al C380H parts by EBF 3 or WAAM that are viable replacements for current Al 7050 wrought products.

electron beam freeform fabrication (EBF3)↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Combustion Behavior in Promoted Oxygen Environments

Promoted combustion testing is a vital tool for engineers to establish the combustion and flammability characteristics of materials (metallic or otherwise) in oxygen enriched environments. Historically, much of the established data for metallic promoted combustion has been with regards to cast and wrought forms. However, with the emergence of additive manufacturing as a preferred method of fabrication, the need exists to evaluate how metals in that form behave. This paper will serve as a review of the work that has been done and an analysis of the nickel-based superalloy Inconel 718, a material popular for aerospace applications such as liquid fueled rocket components and turbine engines. Promoted combustion testing (per the ASTM G124 standard) was conducted on samples of both wrought and selective laser melted fabrication, to provide comparison of flammability response between materials produced by each manufacturing method. Additionally, post-build treatments were applied to test samples to identify any effects on performance provided by hot isostatic pressing, oxygen-getting wrap during HIP, stress relieving, and solutionizing/aging heat treatments. This study will utilize optical and scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction, and metallography to identify the differences in behavior of additively manufactured and wrought Inconel 718.

Additively Manufactured↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Component Applications using Metal Additive Manufacturing Techniques and Materials for Rocket Propulsion

The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has been involved with various forms of metallic additive manufacturing for use in liquid rocket engine component design, development, and testing since 2010. These AM techniques have been demonstrated to significantly reduce hardware cost, shorten fabrication schedules, increase reliability by reducing the number of joints, and improve hardware performance by allowing fabrication of designs not feasible by conventional means. The focus at the NASA MSFC for these metal additive manufacturing techniques include laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF), blown powder directed energy deposition (DED) and arc-based deposition. A variety of components have been evaluated and tested including thrust chamber injectors, injector components such as faceplates, regeneratively-cooled combustion chambers, regeneratively-cooled nozzles, gas generator and preburner hardware, and augmented spark igniters. To support these component applications in harsh environments, NASA has advanced a variety of “standard” additive manufacturing alloys such as those in the superalloy-family and also evolved new alloys including GRCop-84, GRCop-42, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the various programs at the NASA MSFC using AM to develop, fabricate, and test combustion devices hardware and the evolution of the new additive alloys. Additional information will be provided on the development of multi-metallic additive manufacturing, post-processing of AM techniques including surface enhancements (polishing) techniques, material and process characterization, future development programs, and dissemination of data to industry partners.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2014

Additive Manufacturing Design Considerations for Liquid Engine Components

The Marshall Space Flight Center's Propulsion Systems Department has gained significant experience in the last year designing, building, and testing liquid engine components using additive manufacturing. The department has developed valve, duct, turbo-machinery, and combustion device components using this technology. Many valuable lessons were learned during this process. These lessons will be the focus of this presentation. We will present criteria for selecting part candidates for additive manufacturing. Some part characteristics are 'tailor made' for this process. Selecting the right parts for the process is the first step to maximizing productivity gains. We will also present specific lessons we learned about feature geometry that can and cannot be produced using additive manufacturing machines. Most liquid engine components were made using a two-step process. The base part was made using additive manufacturing and then traditional machining processes were used to produce the final part. The presentation will describe design accommodations needed to make the base part and lessons we learned about which features could be built directly and which require the final machine process. Tolerance capabilities, surface finish, and material thickness allowances will also be covered. Additive Manufacturing can produce internal passages that cannot be made using traditional approaches. It can also eliminate a significant amount of manpower by reducing part count and leveraging model-based design and analysis techniques. Information will be shared about performance enhancements and design efficiencies we experienced for certain categories of engine parts.

Whitten, Dave↗
NASA NTRS2014

Additive Manufacturing Modeling and Simulation A Literature Review for Electron Beam Free Form Fabrication

Additive manufacturing is coming into industrial use and has several desirable attributes. Control of the deposition remains a complex challenge, and so this literature review was initiated to capture current modeling efforts in the field of additive manufacturing. This paper summarizes about 10 years of modeling and simulation related to both welding and additive manufacturing. The goals were to learn who is doing what in modeling and simulation, to summarize various approaches taken to create models, and to identify research gaps. Later sections in the report summarize implications for closed-loop-control of the process, implications for local research efforts, and implications for local modeling efforts.

Seufzer, William J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

AMEBoP: Additive Manufacturing Enabled Biofilm Prevention

Objective: Leverage additive manufacturing to fortify Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) manifolds and other vulnerable components against biofilm growth during dormancy by eliminating dead legs to reduce total stagnate fluid volume and available nutrients and by printing from inherently biocidal materials.

ECLSS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufacturing for Rocket Propulsion Applications

Metal Additive manufacturing (AM) is changing how components are being fabricated for current and next generation spaceflights. AM provides many advantages including cost and schedule reduction, enhanced complexity for light-weighting, consolidation of parts, and improved performance using novel alloys and improved designs. This presentation will highlight some of the use cases of AM in rocket propulsion applications, the various processes and attributes for proper selection, and the integrated lifecycle for proper AM use. As AM evolves, there is a need to better understand these lifecycle design constraints such as geometry, microstructure and resulting properties, and surface texture for proper implementation. Ongoing research is being conducted on integral channel heat exchangers, such as combustion chambers and nozzles, using some of the AM processes. The presentation will conclude with a focus on this AM heat exchanger research and how it may be applied for future spaceflight.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2019

Nasa's Plans for Development of a Standard for Additively Manufactured Components

The current version of NASA standards for manned spaceflight hardware do not contain sufficient detail for the certification of additively manufactured components. The development of additively manufactured standards is currently in work by several standards organizations. However, NASA cannot wait on these organizations to develop such standards. NASA and its program partners in manned spaceflight (Commercial Crew, Space Launch System and the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle) are actively developing additively manufactured components for flight as early as 2019.

Russell, Richard W.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Efforts to Explore Additively Manufactured Thermal Protection Systems

Development of the thermal protection system (TPS) needed to protect external and internal surfaces during launch, ascent, cruise, and reentry, is a very specialized field with expertise developed over seven decades and has enabled successful robotic as well as human exploration. Well known examples are: 1) the ablative heatshield that protected Apollo Astronauts during reentry in 1960’s, 2) reusable TPS used on the Space Shuttle Orbiter, which is now sought after by commercial space industry, and 3) hot structures, such as Carbon-Carbon and other high temperature materials needed to operate control surfaces and sharp leading edges during hypervelocity flight. TPS function demands fail-safe design to ensure mission success. One TPS does not fit all, and each application requires a unique material along with manufacturing and integration approach. TPS mass is a key metric. A robust but inefficient TPS reduces payload mass. Mission- and domain-unique TPS development and flight certification efforts have been expensive with long lead times. As a result, there are limited TPS choices with high cost. For future commercial efforts to be successful, the ability to rapidly develop TPS, based on specific needs and at a lower cost, without compromising either mass efficiency or functionality is necessary. NASA is looking into this. Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques have shown their utility in making complex parts and, through automation, the potential to reduce cost and schedule in some applications. The promise of additive manufacturing to TPS, while exciting, is unexplored. In the past several years, NASA has made exploratory investments in internal development as well as in small business and universities through SBIR and STTR programs. In addition, NASA is bringing together the TPS as well as Additive Manufacturing communities to explore approaches to prioritize focus areas for broad benefits. The very first “Additively Manufactured Thermal Protection System Workshop,” to be held at NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston at the end of March of this year, is the culmination of a year-long effort to engage the research, development, and user communities involved in both TPS as well as additive manufacturing. The workshop participants include representatives from large and small commercial space industry, DoD, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, University Researchers and NASA personnel. The proposed talk will highlight future TPS needs of both emerging commercial and Government interests, NASA’s development efforts in additively manufactured TPS, and the findings and recommendations from the first AM TPS Workshop.

Ethiraj Venkatapathy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Impact of Powder Supply Variation on Mechanical Properties for Additive Manufacture of Alloy 718

The Additive Manufacturing Structural Integrity Initiative (AMSII) examined how a number of different Alloy 718 powder lots can create variation in microstructure and mechanical properties in parts fabricated using Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Being a common alloy, Alloy 718 powder can be found in a variety of compositions, fabrication techniques, and powder size distribution. Sixteen virgin powders, and three recycled powders were used to build samples for microstructure analysis, fatigue and tensile testing. The major impacts of the different powders manifested in variations in the microstructure, such as minor phases and grain size variation. There were corresponding variations in mechanical properties. A down-selection of powders were chosen for additional analysis, and a powder recyclability study was completed to look at the effect of reused powder.

Alloy 718↗
NASA NTRS2019

Fracture Control for Additive Manufactured Spacecraft Structures

Final Paper is attached. This paper discusses how the intent of current NASA fracture control requirements may be applied to "fracture critical" additive manufactured spacecraft hardware. Fracture control is a multi-discipline design and certification methodology that is applied in order to mitigate catastrophic failure of structures resulting from growth of an undetected crack-like defect. The methodology is defined in existing spacecraft standards and is required by NASA on all human-rated space structures. Recently, standards have been published by NASA to define materials and processes requirements for certain metallic additive manufactured hardware, but procedures for fracture control implementation on additive manufactured parts are not yet addressed in detail in any standard or guidance document.The discussion contained herein is necessary at this time as new guidance in this area should be founded collaboratively by the technical community at large including industry, academia, and government. Three Fracture Control Certification Methods are proposed for discussion. Additionally, a concept for "Design for AM fracture control" is introduced. The goals of this paper are to further expose the need for maturing additive manufacturing fracture control guidance in the spacecraft industry and to generate discussion on what this guidance should consist of.

McElroy, Mark↗
NASA NTRS2023

CALPHAD Models to Guide Refractory Alloys Additive Manufacturing: In-Situ Compounds Formation, Nanoparticles, and Impurities Considerations

This technical memorandum (TM) seeks to model and discuss aspects of nanoparticle and micrometer-scale particle or ‘microparticle’ inclusions in refractory metal alloy manufacturing, via a currently used additive manufacturing (AM) method that results in equivalent wt.% addition of dissolved elements in the melt pool composition and subsequent formation of nanometer-scale MC and MO inclusions. Additionally, the authors begin to consider the effects of oxygen (O), a ubiquitous impurity, in AM; and seek to understand a combined optimization of alloying, nano- and micro strengthening and refinement, elemental additions, and even in-situ compounds and alloys species formation. To gain insights, this TM focuses on a pair of refractory alloys currently of interest to NASA: tungsten-rhenium-tantalum carbide (with O impurities) (W-Re-TaC(-O)) and tungsten-rhenium-tantalum-carbon (with O impurities) (W-Re-Ta-C(-O)), which are processed via powder bed fusion (PBF)-SLM.

ICME integrated computational materials engineerin↗
NASA NTRS2015

Computational Process Modeling for Additive Manufacturing (OSU)

Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing (AM) through Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) or Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is being used by NASA and the Aerospace industry to "print" parts that traditionally are very complex, high cost, or long schedule lead items. The process spreads a thin layer of metal powder over a build platform, then melts the powder in a series of welds in a desired shape. The next layer of powder is applied, and the process is repeated until layer-by-layer, a very complex part can be built. This reduces cost and schedule by eliminating very complex tooling and processes traditionally used in aerospace component manufacturing. To use the process to print end-use items, NASA seeks to understand SLM material well enough to develop a method of qualifying parts for space flight operation. Traditionally, a new material process takes many years and high investment to generate statistical databases and experiential knowledge, but computational modeling can truncate the schedule and cost -many experiments can be run quickly in a model, which would take years and a high material cost to run empirically. This project seeks to optimize material build parameters with reduced time and cost through modeling.

Bagg, Stacey↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility Study to Dissolve Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Support Structures

Additive manufacture (AM) component design face constrains due to support structure removal. Interior passages or delicate geometries require supports yet cannot be removed without compromising the design or complicating post-processing. A process was developed to dissolve metal AM supports where a sensitizing agent is applied post-build. During stress relief the sensitizing agent diffuses into the surface and alters the chemical composition of the top 100 to 200 μm. During an electrochemical dissolution process the sensitized region is susceptible to corrosion/dissolution and the etching reaction self-terminates once the sensitized region is dissolved. Support thickness varies from 80 to 200 μm, resulting in total dissolution or sufficiently weakened to facilitate removal. The objective of this project was to demonstrate a support structure dissolution process for IN718 components built using AM and to characterize the impact on mechanical properties, microstructure, and surface finish.

Omar R Mireles↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancing GRCop-based Bimetallic Additive Manufacturing to Optimize Component Design and Applications for Liquid Rocket Engines

Additive manufacturing (AM) is advancing many applications of component design for liquid rocket engines. The ability to rapidly design and manufacture components has provided significant opportunities for development and flight programs across the propulsion industry. AM has demonstrated significant advantages that include cost and schedule savings in addition to performance improvements through new design opportunities. While these performance advantages can be in the characteristics of complex design features, they can also be in the form of new materials. AM has been demonstrated in these various component applications using a variety of metal alloys, many of which are traditional alloys for extreme environments. Additional developments were completed using AM to provide new alloys and maturing these material uses for high performance applications. Almost all of the prior developments across component applications have focused on single-alloys in these AM processes. NASA and industry partners have focused in recent years to advance processing to create bimetallic and multicomponent AM processes and materials. The role of multi-alloy AM offers advantages since it can further optimize weight, optimize reliability and performance by increasing the strength to weight ratio of a component, and can optimize materials for various engineering requirements. This is particularly important in liquid rocket engine combustion devices that must reject heat in high heat flux environments yet maintain adequate structural margins under high operational pressure. NASA has been exploring several AM processes, materials, and applications for combustion devices, specifically combustion chambers, injectors, nozzles, and ignition systems. These components require fine geometric features for internal flow or cooling functionality. They experience high thermal gradients across thin-walls and must survive high pressures and temperatures from propellants and the combustion process. A copper-based alloy is normally used to provide high thermal conductivity, but at the detriment of increased weight if used as a single alloy in an AM chamber. Various AM processes were demonstrated on these components using a copper-based alloy/superalloy bimetallic solution. The AM processes being explored individually and in combination for bimetallic applications include Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition (LP-DED), and cold spray. The combination of bimetallic material combinations explored in this research include copper-based material primarily and superalloys, Inconel 625 or NASA HR-1. The various aspects of the additive manufacturing processes and challenges, materials characterization, and the testing of bimetallic components in a relevant environment will be discussed.

Additive Manufacturing↗