Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Aerocapture”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Aerosciences Implications for Uranus Aerocapture

Exploration of Uranus has been indicated as the highest priority new flagship planetary science missions for NASA in the 2022 Decadal Survey. Due to Uranus’ location as the second furthest planet from the Sun, interplanetary flight times of a traditional propulsive-capture orbiter can expect to take 13-15 years to reach Uranus while requiring up to two-thirds of the launch mass budget to be allocated to propellant alone. Aerocapture presents an alternative means to capture orbit around Uranus by using aerodynamic forces generated from flight through the planetary atmosphere to decelerate to orbital insertion while reducing time in interplanetary transit time and increasing on-orbit payload mass. To date, only one spacecraft (Voyager 2) has visited Uranus, and there have been no missions which have entered its atmosphere. While knowledge of planetary entry at rocky terrestrial planets with Air (N2/O2) and CO2 dominated atmospheres has greatly advanced over the past decades with a variety of missions to learn from, the H2/He composition and much larger atmosphere of ice giants such as Uranus poses new aerosciences implications which are not fully understood. These implications must be better understood not only for aerocapture, but for planetary entry at Uranus as a whole (such as a Uranus probe, as proposed by the 2022 Decadal Survey), as well as other ice giants like Neptune. To conduct a proper analysis of aerocapture methods, aerodynamic and aerothermal analysis of flight trajectories in Uranus atmosphere are required. Previous work has investigated aerocapture at Neptune (with similar atmosphere to Uranus) using a Mid-L/D configuration. Additional previous work considers the convective heating experienced in H2/He atmospheres. The current work looks to use heritage Low-L/D configurations, adding technical depth and maturation to analysis previously performed by Girija. Atmospheric flight at ice giants presents unique challenges, including but not limited to: fidelity of atmospheric models, large entry velocities due to location in the solar system, extended flight in rarefied flow conditions due to atmospheric scale, and unusual aerodynamic flow properties specific to Uranus and Ice Giant atmospheres.

Eli Shellabarger↗

Aerodynamic Implications of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters

Exploration of the Ice Giants, Uranus in particular, has been indicated as the highest priority new flagship-class mission by the 2022 Planetary Science Decadal Survey. However, due to it’s location in the solar system, extensive travel time and resources are required for a mission to reach Uranus. Aerocapture offers shorter interplanetary transit times and reduced propellant requirements for such a mission when compared to a traditional propulsive-capture orbiter. Considerations for the aerodynamics of an aerocapture system enabling flagship-class science mission to Uranus are presented. The applicability of a low lift-to-drag entry vehicle aeroshell with flight heritage to a new planet and atmosphere is evaluated. A preliminary aerodatabase is formulated from low-fidelity methods and heritage flight mission data to provide initial estimates of trajectory space to be considered for inserting a spacecraft into orbit at Uranus using aerocapture. Computational fluid dynamics calculations in the free molecular, transitional, and continuum regimes using Direct Simulation Monte Carlo and Navier-Stokes solutions are used to assess the validity of this preliminary aerodatabase. The considered entry vehicle is found to varying levels of agreement with work done by previous flight missions when evaluated for flight in Uranus’ atmosphere. Implications for the aerodynamics of this vehicle as applied in an aerocapture system in flight at Uranus as found by the current work are discussed.

Eli R. Shellabarger↗

Design Implications for Aerocapture Systems Placing Flagship-class Uranus Orbiters

Aerocapture has the capability to deliver spacecraft to Ice Giant orbits while increasing on-orbit payload mass. Due to the aerodynamic forces and heat loads encountered during an aerocapture maneuver, the spacecraft must be contained by an entry vehicle, such as a typical rigid aeroshell used for planetary entry. This paper provides a preliminary design concept for an aerocapture system capable of delivering a flagship-class orbiter and planetary probe to Uranus orbit using heritage flight systems. The constraints of packaging large subsystems (radioisotope power systems, high gain antennas) and their effect on final aerocapture system design will be discussed. Mass properties will be presented for the system, with mass risks evaluated by margin policy implemented using standard mass properties control.

Andrew Gomez-Delrio↗

6-DoF Uranus Aerocapture Trajectory Analysis

The Uranus Orbiter and Probe mission has been identified as the highest priority flagship mission for this decade. Delays in launch opportunities may make existing fully-propulsive orbit insertion mission types unfeasible. Aerocapture can potentially alleviate these challenges while providing a solution flexible to different launch opportunities. While the space technology that aerocapture leverages have been flight-proven, aerocapture as-a-whole has not been formally demonstrated. This paper presents a novel 6-DoF aerocapture trajectory analysis applied to Uranus. The paper presents the 6-DoF simulation framework, inspired from Mars Science Laboratory. Trajectory comparisons, including Monte Carlo simulations, to existing 3-DoF solutions are presented to understand the information learned from increasing the modeling level-of-fidelity.

Rohan G Deshmukh↗

Aerocapture Solutions for Uranus Flagship-class Orbiter and Probe

Recent planetary mission assessments, such as the 2022 Planetary Science Decadal Survey released by the National Academies of Science, have focused on the need for a flagship-class mission to the Ice Giant planets, particularly Uranus. The Uranus Orbit and Probe mission proposal was used by the National Academies of Science as the baseline while making its recommendation as the top flagship-class mission for NASA in the 2020-2030\'s. This mission which was based on a launch date of 2031 or 2032, used a fully-propulsive orbit insertion maneuver at Uranus (requiring 60-70% of total mass for propellant), and reached the planet after 13 years of interplanetary cruise before the 2049 equinox, a goal of the science community. A pre-2033 launch date is required to conduct a necessary Jupiter fly-by as the giant planet will be not be in the proper alignment for a later launch date. However, as the budget constraints of the NASA budget have pushed back the start date of a Uranus mission, a launch date of a flagship mission before 2033 seems unreasonable. Aerocapture, an orbit insertion maneuver that uses the atmosphere to decelerate, can reduce the propellant load needed for a captured orbit. Additionally, the aerocapture maneuver can decelerate safely while approaching the planet at higher arrival velocities, thus allowing a mission to use a highly energetic trajectory and reduce the cruise time by several years. An aerocapture-enabled solution has launch opportunities in the mid 2030's, including as late as 2038 to reach Uranus by 2049. This paper will discuss the feasibility of an aerocapture option for a Flagship-class mission to Uranus.

Soumyo Dutta↗

Aerocapture Solutions for Uranus Flagship-class Orbiter and Probe

Recent planetary mission assessments, such as the 2022 Planetary Science Decadal Survey released by the National Academies of Science, have focused on the need for a flagship-class mission to the Ice Giant planets, particularly Uranus. The Uranus Orbit and Probe mission proposal was used by the National Academies of Science as the baseline while making its recommendation as the top flagship-class mission for NASA in the 2020-2030\'s. This mission which was based on a launch date of 2031 or 2032, used a fully-propulsive orbit insertion maneuver at Uranus (requiring 60-70% of total mass for propellant), and reached the planet after 13 years of interplanetary cruise before the 2049 equinox, a goal of the science community. A pre-2033 launch date is required to conduct a necessary Jupiter fly-by as the giant planet will be not be in the proper alignment for a later launch date. However, as the budget constraints of the NASA budget have pushed back the start date of a Uranus mission, a launch date of a flagship mission before 2033 seems unreasonable. Aerocapture, an orbit insertion maneuver that uses the atmosphere to decelerate, can reduce the propellant load needed for a captured orbit. Additionally, the aerocapture maneuver can decelerate safely while approaching the planet at higher arrival velocities, thus allowing a mission to use a highly energetic trajectory and reduce the cruise time by several years. An aerocapture-enabled solution has launch opportunities in the mid 2030's, including as late as 2038 to reach Uranus by 2049. This paper will discuss the feasibility of an aerocapture option for a Flagship-class mission to Uranus.

Soumyo Dutta↗

Aeroheating Environments of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters

Aeroheating environments for an aerocapture system enabling flagship-class science at Uranus are presented. Applicability of a low lift-to-drag entry vehicle aeroshell with flight heritage for Martian entries is considered in the context of an end-to-end Uranus orbiter and probe mission design using aerocapture for orbit insertion. A feasible trajectory space for aerocapture orbit insertion based on various launch opportunities and interplanetary trajectories yield atmosphere-relative entry velocities between 22 km/s and 31 km/s with maximum freestream densities on the order of 10−5 kg/m3. A preliminary study of the aerothermal environments for the entire trajectory space is discussed followed by a more detailed study of the nominal design trajectories. Design conditions are based on laminar, thermochemical nonequilibrium Navier-Stokes flowfield simulations with coupled radiation transport for full lift-up (deep) and lift-down (shallow) design trajectories. Convective heating is found to be the dominant heating mode, with radiation accounting for only 1 % to 5 % of the total heat flux for the design trajectories. The peak design conditions are found to be 422 W/cm2 for heat flux, 10.5 kPa for pressure, 149 Pa for shear stress, and 88.1 kJ/cm2 for the total heat load.

Uranus↗

Aeroheating Environments of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters

Aeroheating environments for an aerocapture system enabling flagship-class science at Uranus are presented. Applicability of a low lift-to-drag entry vehicle aeroshell with flight heritage for Martian entries is considered in the context of an end-to-end Uranus orbiter and probe mission design using aerocapture for orbit insertion. A feasible trajectory space for aerocapture orbit insertion based on various launch opportunities and interplanetary trajectories yield atmosphere-relative entry velocities between 22 km/s and 31 km/s with maximum freestream densities on the order of 10 −5 kg/m 3 . A preliminary study of the aerothermal environments for the entire trajectory space is discussed followed by a more detailed study of the nominal design trajectories. Design conditions are based on laminar, thermochemical nonequilibrium Navier-Stokes flowfield simulations with coupled radiation transport for full lift-up (deep) and lift-down (shallow) design trajectories. Convective heating is found to be the dominant heating mode, with radiation accounting for only 1 % to 5 % of the total heat flux for the design trajectories. The peak design conditions are found to be 422 W/cm 2 for heat flux, 10.5 kPa for pressure, 149 Pa for shear stress, and 88.1 kJ/cm 2 for the total heat load.

Aerocapture↗

Onboard Navigation Error Analysis for Aerocapture at Uranus

Capturing into an orbit around Uranus using aerocapture allows one to design a mission with faster interplanetary trajectories and less propellant requirements. Such an aerocapture mission would rely on the onboard Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) subsystems to successfully capture into an orbit around Uranus. Uncertainty in the state information and the noise in the sensor measurements induce navigation errors in the guidance and control subsystems, which can affect the overall performance of the aerocapture mission at Uranus. Understanding the effect of these navigation errors on mission performance is essential. To this end, this work considers different sensors with varying quality to understand their impact on the overall mission performance. In addition, this paper studies the impact of the uncertainty in the initial states used to initialize the onboard navigation filter and understands their effect on mission performance. This paper also shows the onboard navigation errors obtained from the Linear Covariance (LinCov) analysis and uses them for verification and validation (V\&V) of the results from Program to Optimize and Simulate Trajectories-II (POST2).

Aerocapture↗

The aerocapture vehicle mission design concept

Aerocapture is a mission design concept which uses an aerodynamically controlled atmospheric entry to capture payloads into orbit as opposed to a completely propulsive orbit insertion. Results are presented which demonstrate great performance gains and good accuracy using aerocapture. These results deal only with projected Mars missions; therefore, the aerocapture vehicle system design requirements deal only with Mars. It will be evident, however, that this concept can be readily applied to other atmosphere-bearing celestial bodies.

Cruz, M. I.↗

Aerothermodynamic environment and thermal protection for a Titan aerocapture vehicle

This paper presents thermal protection system (TPS) requirements for a potential Titan aerocapture vehicle. Shock-layer solutions are obtained for a nominal trajectory through the current Titan model atmosphere. Fully laminar and fully turbulent solutions are presented along the blunted fore-cone in the windward symmetry plane of a bent-biconic vehicle. Using these solutions to define the aerothermodynamic environment, transient material-response solutions are obtained for a Galileo-type TPS with a carbon-phenolic ablator heat shield. Shock-layer results indicate that turbulent flow is the more realistic flow condition. They also show that the lengthy aerocapture heating pulse is dominated by convective heating. The TPS results show that the required insulation thickness is uniformly about 4 cm along the fore-cone because of the long heat-soak period. The total heat-shield thickness is 6.4 cm at the stagnation point, and 4.7 cm near the end of the fore-cone. These TPS requirements are greater than those presented in a previous Titan aerocapture study.

Green, M. J.↗

A comparison of aerobraking and aerocapture vehicles for interplanetary missions

Several design features for employing aerobraking and aerocapture techniques on interplanetary spacecraft are described. Recent studies have identified silica fabrics mounted on carbon composite ribs as suitable aerobraking spacecraft shield materials. Aerocapture is best achieved with a biconic aeroshell design, with the aeroshell supported by Al honeycomb panels and allowing primitive aerodynamic maneuverability. The aeroshell would be covered with thermal protection materials capable of elevated temperatures of magnitudes that are a function of the expected atmospheric density, the surface area, the entry speed, spacecraft mass and maneuverability. Both technologies are concluded ready for implementation and development costs are estimated for various missions, showing that aerocapture will provide for greater payload masses, except for a Jupiter mission.

Hoffman, S.↗

Manned Mars mission vehicle design requirements for aerocapture

The goal of this study was to define vehicle design requirements of a reusable system for manned Mars missions which employ aerocapturlng techniques to obtain desired orbital velocities. Requirements for vehicle L/D and ballistic coefficient are determined for expected aerocapture velocities. This paper presents conclusions concerning g-loads environment and TPS requirements for a vehicle that aerocaptures at Mars and Earth. Although the goal of a reusable system (based on current state-of-art technologies) was not obtained, the viability of aerocapture at Mars and Earth was established.

Oliver Hill↗

Physiologically constrained aerocapture for manned Mars missions

Aerobraking has been proposed as a critical technology for manned missions to Mars. The variety of mission architectures currently under consideration presents aerobrake designers with an enormous range of potential entry scenarios. Two of the most important considerations in the design of an aerobrake are the required control authority (lift-to-drag ratio) and the aerothermal environment which the vehicle will encounter. Therefore, this study examined the entry corridor width and stagnation-point heating rate and load for the entire range of probable entry velocities, lift-to-drag ratios, and ballistic coefficients for capture at both Earth and Mars. To accomplish this, a peak deceleration limit for the aerocapture maneuvers had to be established. Previous studies had used a variety of load limits without adequate proof of their validity. Existing physiological and space flight data were examined, and it was concluded that a deceleration limit of 5 G was appropriate. When this load limit was applied, numerical studies showed that an aerobrake with an L/D of 0.3 could provide an entry corridor width of at least 1 degree for all Mars aerocaptures considered with entry velocities up to 9 km/s. If 10 km/s entries are required, an L/D of 0.4 to 0.5 would be necessary to maintain a corridor width of at least 1 degree. For Earth return aerocapture, a vehicle with an L/D of 0.4 to 0.5 was found to provide a corridor width of 0.7 degree or more for all entry velocities up to 14.5 km/s. Aerodynamic convective heating calculations were performed assuming a fully catalytic, 'cold' wall; radiative heating was calculated assuming that the shock layer was in thermochemical equilibrium. Heating rates were low enough for selected entries at Mars that a radiatively cooled thermal protection system might be feasible, although an ablative material would be required for most scenarios. Earth return heating rates were generally more severe than those encountered by the Apollo vehicles, and would require ablative heat shields in all cases.

Lyne, James Evans↗

Earth Return Aerocapture for the TransHab/Ellipsled Vehicle

The current architecture being considered by NASA for a human Mars mission involves the use of an aerocapture procedure at Mars arrival and possibly upon Earth return. This technique would be used to decelerate the vehicles and insert them into their desired target orbits, thereby eliminating the need for propulsive orbital insertions. The crew may make the interplanetary journey in a large, inflatable habitat known as the TransHab. It has been proposed that upon Earth return, this habitat be captured into orbit for use on subsequent missions. In this case, the TransHab would be complimented with an aeroshell, which would protect it from heating during the atmospheric entry and provide the vehicle with aerodynamic lift. The aeroshell has been dubbed the "Ellipsled" because of its characteristic shape. This paper reports the results of a preliminary study of the aerocapture of the TransHab/Ellipsled vehicle upon Earth return. Undershoot and overshoot boundaries have been determined for a range of entry velocities, and the effects of variations in the atmospheric density profile, the vehicle deceleration limit, the maximum vehicle roll rate, the target orbit, and the vehicle ballistic coefficient have been examined. A simple, 180 degree roll maneuver was implemented in the undershoot trajectories to target the desired 407 km circular Earth orbit. A three-roll sequence was developed to target not only a specific orbital energy, but also a particular inclination, thereby decreasing propulsive inclination changes and post-aerocapture delta-V requirements. Results show that the TransHab/Ellipsled vehicle has a nominal corridor width of at least 0.7 degrees for entry speeds up to 14.0 km/s. Most trajectories were simulated using continuum flow aerodynamics, but the impact of high-altitude viscous effects was evaluated and found to be minimal. In addition, entry corridor comparisons have been made between the TransHab/Ellipsled and a modified Apollo capsule which is also being considered as the crew return vehicle; because of its slightly higher lift-to-drag ratio, the TransHab has a modest advantage with regard to corridor width. Stagnation-point heating rates and integrated heat loads were determined for a range of vehicle ballistic coefficients and entry velocities.

Muth, W. D.↗

Mars Aerocapture Analysis For MESUR/Mars-Pathfinder Aeroshells Using Un-modulated Control in Low L/D Configurations

Aerocapture scenarios are examined to determine the feasibility of using MESUR/Mars Pathfinder aeroshell designs to capture spacecraft aerodynamically into Mars orbit. Using lift over drag (L/D) ratios up to 0.3, entry trajectories were simulated over a range of entry vehicle masses and entry velocities. Entry corridor widths were calculated for undershoot and overshoot trajectories yielding Mars parking orbits having periods from 2 to 20 hours. For entries with L/D = 0.3, entry corridor widths of about 1.2 degrees are possible over entry velocities from 5.5 to 9.0 km/sec. The design constraints for an aeroshell used for orbital aerocapture are less severe than a ballistic entry for a surface lander mission such as Mars Pathfinder, because the aerothermodynamic heating and deceleration loads are smaller. The mass savings from aerocapture orbit insertion versus propulsive insertion into Mars orbit could result in significantly reducing program costs and increasing mission capabilities.

Wercinski, Paul F.↗

Atmospheric Models for Aerocapture

There are eight destinations in the solar System with sufficient atmosphere for aerocapture to be a viable aeroassist option - Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and its moon Titan, Uranus, and Neptune. Engineering-level atmospheric models for four of these targets (Earth, Mars, Titan, and Neptune) have been developed for NASA to support systems analysis studies of potential future aerocapture missions. Development of a similar atmospheric model for Venus has recently commenced. An important capability of all of these models is their ability to simulate quasi-random density perturbations for Monte Carlo analyses in developing guidance, navigation and control algorithm, and for thermal systems design. Similarities and differences among these atmospheric models are presented, with emphasis on the recently developed Neptune model and on planned characteristics of the Venus model. Example applications for aerocapture are also presented and illustrated. Recent updates to the Titan atmospheric model are discussed, in anticipation of applications for trajectory and atmospheric reconstruct of Huygens Probe entry at Titan.

Justus, C. G.↗

Aerocapture Performance Analysis for a Neptune-Triton Exploration Mission

A systems analysis has been conducted for a Neptune-Triton Exploration Mission in which aerocapture is used to capture a spacecraft at Neptune. Aerocapture uses aerodynamic drag instead of propulsion to decelerate from the interplanetary approach trajectory to a captured orbit during a single pass through the atmosphere. After capture, propulsion is used to move the spacecraft from the initial captured orbit to the desired science orbit. A preliminary assessment identified that a spacecraft with a lift to drag ratio of 0.8 was required for aerocapture. Performance analyses of the 0.8 L/D vehicle were performed using a high fidelity flight simulation within a Monte Carlo executive to determine mission success statistics. The simulation was the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST) modified to include Neptune specific atmospheric and planet models, spacecraft aerodynamic characteristics, and interplanetary trajectory models. To these were added autonomous guidance and pseudo flight controller models. The Monte Carlo analyses incorporated approach trajectory delivery errors, aerodynamic characteristics uncertainties, and atmospheric density variations. Monte Carlo analyses were performed for a reference set of uncertainties and sets of uncertainties modified to produce increased and reduced atmospheric variability. For the reference uncertainties, the 0.8 L/D flatbottom ellipsled vehicle achieves 100% successful capture and has a 99.87 probability of attaining the science orbit with a 360 m/s V budget for apoapsis and periapsis adjustment. Monte Carlo analyses were also performed for a guidance system that modulates both bank angle and angle of attack with the reference set of uncertainties. An alpha and bank modulation guidance system reduces the 99.87 percentile DELTA V 173 m/s (48%) to 187 m/s for the reference set of uncertainties.

Starr, Brett R.↗