Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Ground Support Equipment”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1959

LUNAR SOFT LANDING STUDY

The information contained in this document is intended primarily for use of ABMA in the preparation of a “Luna Soft Landing Study” for the National Aeronautical and Space Administration. However, it may be of interest to other personnel concerned with the development of the SATURN system and with other space projects. Material in this document is presented in three sections: Section I, Ground Support Equipment; Section II, Manned Lunar Capsule Recovery; and Section III, Lunar Roving Vehicle. It should be pointed out that a majority of the ground support equipment described in Section I has already been developed or has been designed for use in the overall SATURN Vehicle Program. Therefore, most of this section is a proposal only in the sense that it is proposed to use existing SATURN Ground Support Equipment in the Lunar Soft Landing System. However, the information presented in Section II and Section III is based on preliminary design studies only and is submitted as a proposal subject to a complete R&D Program. Since information presented herein is very general in nature it is not intended for use as final design criteria.

Owen L. Sparks↗
NASA NTRS1982

KSC ground support operations and equipment for the space transportation system

A significant element of the Kennedy Space Center's ground support equipment for the Space Shuttle is the Launch Processing System, which provides a high level of automation for all operations, including the checkout of the Orbiter, Solid Rocket Boosters, and External Tank. Other direct support elements of the Ground Support Equipment accomplish environmental conditioning, provide and control power, gases, and fluids, and supply vehicle facility and personnel fire protection. Attention is given to the prelaunch functions of the Launch Control Center's Firing Rooms, which contain minicomputers, a data recording area, the Hardware Interface Modules, a Common Data Buffer, and Front End Processors.

Utsman, T. E.↗
NASA NTRS1971

A Saturn launched X-ray astronomy experiment. Volume 1: S-027

The S-027 X-Ray Astronomy Experiment originally proposed in early 1966, was developed to detect X-rays in the 2 keV to 10 keV range. Both a prototype unit and flight unit were constructed with the prototype unit also serving as the engineering model, the qualification test unit, and after refurbishment, as the back-up flight unit. Two Ground Support Equipment consoles were built to verify the experiment operation. A photograph of one experiment package with its Ground Support Equipment is shown. The S-027 experiment was scheduled for launch in 1968/69 and although both units were completed and tested to the extent that either would be ready for the scheduled launch, delays in the space program resulted in a launch date slip of several years. When the 1968/69 launch delay became official, provisions were made for storage of the two experiment packages at SCI Electronics in Huntsville, Alabama until a new launch date could be established.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1973

Skylab Medical Experiments Altitude Test /SMEAT/ facility design and operation.

This paper presents the design approaches and test facility operation methods used to successfully accomplish a 56-day test for Skylab to permit evaluation of selected Skylab medical experiments in a ground test simulation of the Skylab environment with an astronaut crew. The systems designed for this test include the two-gas environmental control system, the fire suppression and detection system, equipment transfer lock, ground support equipment, safety systems, potable water system, waste management system, lighting and power system, television monitoring, communications and recreation systems, and food freezer.

Hinners, A. H., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2010

26th Space Simulation Conference Proceedings. Environmental Testing: The Path Forward

Topics covered include: A Multifunctional Space Environment Simulation Facility for Accelerated Spacecraft Materials Testing; Exposure of Spacecraft Surface Coatings in a Simulated GEO Radiation Environment; Gravity-Offloading System for Large-Displacement Ground Testing of Spacecraft Mechanisms; Microscopic Shutters Controlled by cRIO in Sounding Rocket; Application of a Physics-Based Stabilization Criterion to Flight System Thermal Testing; Upgrade of a Thermal Vacuum Chamber for 20 Kelvin Operations; A New Approach to Improve the Uniformity of Solar Simulator; A Perfect Space Simulation Storm; A Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility; Collimation Mirror Segment Refurbishment inside ESA s Large Space; Space Simulation of the CBERS 3 and 4 Satellite Thermal Model in the New Brazilian 6x8m Thermal Vacuum Chamber; The Certification of Environmental Chambers for Testing Flight Hardware; Space Systems Environmental Test Facility Database (SSETFD), Website Development Status; Wallops Flight Facility: Current and Future Test Capabilities for Suborbital and Orbital Projects; Force Limited Vibration Testing of JWST NIRSpec Instrument Using Strain Gages; Investigation of Acoustic Field Uniformity in Direct Field Acoustic Testing; Recent Developments in Direct Field Acoustic Testing; Assembly, Integration and Test Centre in Malaysia: Integration between Building Construction Works and Equipment Installation; Complex Ground Support Equipment for Satellite Thermal Vacuum Test; Effect of Charging Electron Exposure on 1064nm Transmission through Bare Sapphire Optics and SiO2 over HfO2 AR-Coated Sapphire Optics; Environmental Testing Activities and Capabilities for Turkish Space Industry; Integrated Circuit Reliability Simulation in Space Environments; Micrometeoroid Impacts and Optical Scatter in Space Environment; Overcoming Unintended Consequences of Ambient Pressure Thermal Cycling Environmental Tests; Performance and Functionality Improvements to Next Generation Thermal Vacuum Control System; Robotic Lunar Lander Development Project: Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stability Testing and Analysis; Thermal Physical Properties of Thermal Coatings for Spacecraft in Wide Range of Environmental Conditions: Experimental and Theoretical Study; Molecular Contamination Generated in Thermal Vacuum Chambers; Preventing Cross Contamination of Hardware in Thermal Vacuum Chambers; Towards Validation of Particulate Transport Code; Updated Trends in Materials' Outgassing Technology; Electrical Power and Data Acquisition Setup for the CBER 3 and 4 Satellite TBT; Method of Obtaining High Resolution Intrinsic Wire Boom Damping Parameters for Multi-Body Dynamics Simulations; and Thermal Vacuum Testing with Scalable Software Developed In-House.

Packard, Edward A.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Initial Pre-Launch Imaging and Spectral Characterization of Landsat 9 Thermal Infrared Sensor-2

The Thermal Infrared Sensor-2 (TIRS-2) scheduled to launch in December 2020 aboard Landsat 9 will continue Landsat's four decade-long legacy of providing moderate resolution thermal imagery from low earth orbit (at 705 km) for environmental applications. Like the Thermal Infrared Sensor aboard Landsat 8, it is a pushbroom sensor with a cross-track field of view of 15 and provides two spectral channels at 10.8 and 12 micrometers To ensure radiometric, spatial, and spectral performance, a comprehensive pre-launch testing program is being conducted at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at the component, subsystem, and instrument level. This effort will focus on the results from the subsystem level testing to assess TIRS-2 imaging performance including focus, spatial performance, and stray light rejection. It is also used to provide a preliminary assessment of spectral performance. The TIRS-2 subsystem is placed in a thermal vacuum chamber with the calibration ground support equipment, which provides a flexible blackbody illumination source and optics to assess imaging performance. Spectral performance is tested using a spectral response test setup with its own illumination source outside the chamber that propagates through the calibration ground support equipment in an optical configuration designed for this purpose. The results show that TIRS-2 performance is expected to meet all of its performance requirements with few waivers and deviations.

Landsat 9↗
NASA NTRS2018

Landsat 9 Thermal Infrared Sensor 2 Pre-Launch Characterization: Initial Imaging and Spectral Performance Results

The Thermal Infrared Sensor-2 (TIRS-2) scheduled to launch in December 2020 aboard Landsat 9 will continue Landsat's four decade-long legacy of providing moderate resolution thermal imagery from low earth orbit (at 705 km) for environmental applications. Like the Thermal Infrared Sensor aboard Landsat 8, it is a pushbroom sensor with a cross-track field of view of 15 and provides two spectral channels at 10.8 and 12 micrometers. To ensure radiometric, spatial, and spectral performance, a comprehensive pre-launch testing program is being conducted at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at the component, subsystem, and instrument level. This effort will focus on the results from the subsystem level testing to assess TIRS-2 imaging performance including focus, spatial performance, and stray light rejection. It is also used to provide a preliminary assessment of spectral performance. The TIRS-2 subsystem is placed in a thermal vacuum chamber with the calibration ground support equipment, which provides a flexible blackbody illumination source and optics to assess imaging performance. Spectral performance is tested using a spectral response test setup with its own illumination source outside the chamber that propagates through the calibration ground support equipment in an optical configuration designed for this purpose. The results show that TIRS-2 performance is expected to meet all of its performance requirements with few waivers and deviations.

Landsat 9↗
NASA NTRS2018

Landsat 9 Thermal Infrared Sensor 2 Pre-Launch Characterization: Initial Imaging & Spectral Performance Results

The Thermal Infrared Sensor-2 (TIRS-2) scheduled to launch in December 2020 aboard Landsat 9 will continue Landsat's four decade-long legacy of providing moderate resolution thermal imagery from low earth orbit (at 705 km) for environmental applications. Like the Thermal Infrared Sensor aboard Landsat 8, it is a pushbroom sensor with a cross-track field of view of 15 and provides two spectral channels at 10.8 and 12 um. To ensure radiometric, spatial, and spectral performance, a comprehensive pre-launch testing program is being conducted at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center at the component, subsystem, and instrument level. This effort will focus on the results from the subsystem level testing to assess TIRS-2 imaging performance including focus, spatial performance, and stray light rejection. It is also used to provide a preliminary assessment of spectral performance. The TIRS-2 subsystem is placed in a thermal vacuum chamber with the calibration ground support equipment, which provides a flexible blackbody illumination source and optics to assess imaging performance. Spectral performance is tested using a spectral response test setup with its own illumination source outside the chamber that propagates through the calibration ground support equipment in an optical configuration designed for this purpose. The results show that TIRS-2 performance is expected to meet all of its performance requirements with few waivers and deviations.

scatter↗
NASA NTRS2018

Creating the Required Deep Space Environments for Testing the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) at NASA Johnson Space Center's Chamber A

NASA is the mission lead for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the next of the "Great Observatories", scheduled for launch in 2021. NASA was directly responsible for the integration and test (I&T) program that culminated in an end-to-end cryo vacuum optical test of the flight telescope and instrument module in Chamber A at NASA Johnson Space Center. Historic Chamber A is the largest thermal vacuum chamber at Johnson Space Center and one of the largest space simulation chambers in the world. Chamber A has undergone a major modernization effort to support the deep cryogenic, vacuum and cleanliness requirements for testing the JWST. This paper will discuss the thermal vacuum test of the Optical Telescope Element (OTE) plus Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) (OTIS) as well as the extensive series of tests that were performed to incrementally validate the operations and performance of the Chamber and Ground Support Equipment (GSE). Each test required a unique thermal vacuum profile for cool down and warm up, steady state operations, GSE testing and contamination control. Select results will be presented on Facility Functional Testing, Chamber Bake-out, GSE Cryo-Proof Testing, Chamber Commissioning, the Optical Ground Support Equipment (OGSE) Test series and the final thermal vacuum test of the OTIS with respect to facility operations to meet JWST program test requirements.

Francis, Andrew↗
NASA NTRS1966

Saturn V launch vehicle report.

Ground testing, development of engines, stages and ground support equipment of Saturn V launch vehicle

GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 16 Mission Anomaly Report No. 1: Oxidizer Deservicing Tank Failure

The command module reaction control system is emptied of all remaining propellant using ground support equipment designed to provide an acid/base neutralization of the propellant in both the liquid and gaseous phases so that it may be disposed of safely. During the deactivation operation of the oxidizer from the Apollo 16 command module on 7 May 1972, the scrubber tank of the decontamination unit exploded, destroying the ground support equipment unit and damaging the building that housed the operation. Only minor injuries were received by the personnel in the area and the command module was not damaged. Test results show that the failure was caused by an insufficient quantity of neutralizer for the quantity of oxidizer. This insufficiency lead to exothermic nitration-type reactions which produced large quantities of gas at a very high rate and failed the decontamination tank.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2015

Thermal Testing and Integration: Magnetospheric MultiScale (MMS) Observatories with Digital 1-Wire Sensors

Thermocouples require two thin wires to be routed out of the spacecraft to connect to the ground support equipment used to monitor and record the temperature data. This large number of wires that exit the observatory complicates integration and creates an undesirable heat path during testing. These wires exiting the spacecraft need to be characterized as a thermal short that will not exist during flight. To minimize complexity and reduce thermal variables from these ground support equipment (GSE) wires, MMS pursued a hybrid path for temperature monitoring, utilizing thermocouples and digital 1-wire temperature sensors. Digital 1-wire sensors can greatly reduce harness mass, length and complexity as they can be spliced together. For MMS, 350 digital 1-wire sensors were installed on the spacecraft with only 18 wires exiting as opposed to a potential 700 thermocouple wires. Digital 1-wire sensors had not been used in such a large scale at NASAGSFC prior to the MMS mission. During the MMS thermal vacuum testing a lessons learned matrix was formulated that will assist future integration of 1-wires into thermal testing and one day into flight.

Sensors↗
NASA NTRS2022

Defining Pupil Knowledge Requirements for Roman Space Telescope Integrated Payload Assembly Testing

This thesis examines the use of phase retrieval to characterize an optical system under testing conditions with pupil knowledge error. The purpose of this research is to define pupil knowledge requirements for the integrated payload testing of the Roman Space Telescope (RST). I have conducted a Monte Carlo study to determine how uncertainty in the location of the ground support equipment relative to the payload will affect the ability to use image-based wavefront sensing during the test to characterize system alignment. This test will be conducted in the Space Environment Simulator (SES) with the presence of Wavefront Error (WFE) due to gravity sag on the primary mirror. In this study, I incrementally decentered a piece of ground support equipment, the SubAperture Metrology System (SAMS), and evaluated how the phase retrieval algorithm attempted to fit the wavefront with the pupil mismatch. The results of this study are a factor in the overall Integrated Payload Assembly (IPA) testing WFE budget.

Roman Space Telescope↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Defining Pupil Knowledge Requirements for Roman Space Telescope Integrated Payload Assembly Testing

This thesis examines the use of phase retrieval to characterize an optical system under testing conditions with pupil knowledge error. The purpose of this investigation is to define pupil knowledge requirements for the integrated payload testing of the Roman Space Telescope. We have conducted a Monte Carlo study to determine how location uncertainty of the ground support equipment relative to the payload caused by the temperature deformation in the Space Environment Simulator will affect our ability to use image-based wavefront sensing during the test to characterize system alignment. This test will be conducted with significant wavefront error (WFE) present due to gravity sag on the primary mirror. The study incrementally decenters two pieces of ground support equipment and evaluates how the phase retrieval algorithm attempts to fit the wavefront. We conducted this investigation in two steps. First, we used an ideal optical model of the test configuration without the gravity sag on the primary mirror to see the fitting effects related only to pupil knowledge error introduced by the decentering. Then, we used perturbed and gravity sag models to investigate the effects of decentering dependent wavefront effects in addition to pupil knowledge error. The results from the ideal model provided a clear limit of the amount of pupil knowledge error that can be present before seeing significant WFE in the phase retrieval. For the second study, we used the decentering tolerances from the ideal model results to determine the WFE effects of decentering in the presence of gravity sag and system misalignments. The second part of this study will be factored into the overall integrated payload assembly testing WFE budget.

Roman Space Telescope↗
NASA NTRS1972

Energetic particle flux experiment (IMP-F and G)

The technical aspects of the University of California IMP-F experiment aboard the Explorer-34 and the University of California IMP-G (S1) and (S2) experiments aboard the Explorer-41. The experiment detectors and electronics are discussed for each experiment as well as the fabrication, preflight and post-flight history. A description of the ground support equipment is also given for each experiment. These three experiments were essentially all different. The IMP-G experiment was essentially the IMP-F experiment with the addition of four Geiger-Mueller detectors. The IMP-G (S-2) was a supplementary experiment and differed completely from the IMP-F and IMP-G experiments. It was concluded that the ground support equipment approach used for the IMP-F and IMP-G experiments where emphasis was placed on a thorough exercise and monitoring of the experiment operation during various testing phases provided a high degree of confidence and reliability in these experiments. No known electronic failures have occurred during the spacecraft lifetime although some detector problems were experienced.

Anderson, K. A.↗