A concept for a learning attitude control system for launch vehicles
Adaptive digitalized learning control system for launch vehicles
Baumeister, K. J.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Learning control”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Chapter 2-1: Learning from the Biological Viewpoint: Adaptive Control and Learning Systems - Part 2
Adaptive patterns in central nervous tissue learning process
Adey, W. R.↗
A learning flight control system for the F8-DFBW aircraft
This report contains a complete description of a learning control system designed for the F8-DFBW aircraft. The system is parameter-adaptive with the additional feature that it 'learns' the variation of the control system gains needed over the flight envelope. It, thus, generates and modifies its gain schedule when suitable data are available. The report emphasizes the novel learning features of the system: the forms of representation of the flight envelope and the process by which identified parameters are used to modify the gain schedule. It contains data taken during piloted real-time 6 degree-of-freedom simulations that were used to develop and evaluate the system.
Montgomery, R. C.↗
Adaptive Control Using Reinforcement Learning Augmented Model Predictive Control
Hedrick, E., K. Reynolds, D. Bhattacharyya, S.E. Zitney, and B.P. Omell, "Adaptive Control Using Reinforcement Learning Augmented Model Predictive Control," Advanced Manufacturing and Processing Conference 2022, Bethesda, MD, June 1-3 (2022).
Hedrick, Elijah↗
Self-learning fuzzy controllers based on temporal back propagation
This paper presents a generalized control strategy that enhances fuzzy controllers with self-learning capability for achieving prescribed control objectives in a near-optimal manner. This methodology, termed temporal back propagation, is model-insensitive in the sense that it can deal with plants that can be represented in a piecewise-differentiable format, such as difference equations, neural networks, GMDH structures, and fuzzy models. Regardless of the numbers of inputs and outputs of the plants under consideration, the proposed approach can either refine the fuzzy if-then rules if human experts, or automatically derive the fuzzy if-then rules obtained from human experts are not available. The inverted pendulum system is employed as a test-bed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme and the robustness of the acquired fuzzy controller.
Jang, Jyh-Shing R.↗
Physics-informed Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Control in Power systems
Incorporating physics information into the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) process is a promising approach for addressing the challenges faced in learning-based control design problems for physical systems. Power grid dynamics, being a physical system, adheres to specific physical laws, constraints, as well as operational and control rules. Therefore, consideration of such physics-based law improves the learning process drastically. In general, traditional grid control schemes rely on rule-based mechanisms that cannot adapt to changing operating conditions. To improve the adaptability and computation time, recent research has seen a surge of DRL-based applications in power grid control. A generic DRL-based control design imposes the system performance requirements through the design of reward functions. In some cases, some of the important physics information is injected through this reward function. However, due to the complex dynamics and large state-action space, learning an optimal DRL policy often becomes challenging. Inspired by the latest developments in general machine learning (ML) research, power system researchers have been investigating more direct ways of incorporating physics knowledge into DRL training. This chapter specifically focuses on these aspects of physics-informed DRL designs in grid control. It discusses the significance, applications, research gaps, and open problems that need to be addressed in future research.
artificial intelligence, machine learning↗
Online Learning Flight Control for Intelligent Flight Control Systems (IFCS)
The research accomplishments for the cooperative agreement 'Online Learning Flight Control for Intelligent Flight Control Systems (IFCS)' include the following: (1) previous IFC program data collection and analysis; (2) IFC program support site (configured IFC systems support network, configured Tornado/VxWorks OS development system, made Configuration and Documentation Management Systems Internet accessible); (3) Airborne Research Test Systems (ARTS) II Hardware (developed hardware requirements specification, developing environmental testing requirements, hardware design, and hardware design development); (4) ARTS II software development laboratory unit (procurement of lab style hardware, configured lab style hardware, and designed interface module equivalent to ARTS II faceplate); (5) program support documentation (developed software development plan, configuration management plan, and software verification and validation plan); (6) LWR algorithm analysis (performed timing and profiling on algorithm); (7) pre-trained neural network analysis; (8) Dynamic Cell Structures (DCS) Neural Network Analysis (performing timing and profiling on algorithm); and (9) conducted technical interchange and quarterly meetings to define IFC research goals.
Niewoehner, Kevin R.↗
Development of a Reinforcement Learning-Based Control Strategy for Load Following in Supercritical Pulverized Coal (SCPC) Power Plants
Presented by NETL at Clearwater Clean Energy Conference, 06/19
Supercritical pulverized coal, load following, dyn↗
Multi-layer neural networks for robot control
Two neural learning controller designs for manipulators are considered. The first design is based on a neural inverse-dynamics system. The second is the combination of the first one with a neural adaptive state feedback system. Both types of controllers enable the manipulator to perform any given task very well after a period of training and to do other untrained tasks satisfactorily. The second design also enables the manipulator to compensate for unpredictable perturbations.
Pourboghrat, Farzad↗
Adaptive Reinforcement Learning (ARL) Control of a Multi-port Resonant Converter in UAV Systems
This study presents an adaptive reinforcement learning (ARL) control framework for a multi-port resonant converter used in hybrid unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) power systems. The converter integrates high-frequency half-bridge input ports connected to a rectified engine–generator set and a battery energy storage system, along with a semi-bridgeless active rectifier supplying the propulsion load. A deep RL agent is trained to dynamically regulate inter-port phase-shift commands in real time based on flight conditions and load power demand. The ARL controller autonomously identifies phase-shift combinations that maximize conversion efficiency while maintaining stable and coordinated power flow, even under rapidly varying operating scenarios. This data-driven approach eliminates the need for explicit system modeling or extensive manual tuning and enables coordinated control among multiple power ports without inter-port communication. Experimental results validate that the ARL based strategy achieves reliable power sharing and consistently high-efficiency operation across diverse UAV operating conditions.
Asa, Erdem [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000190884812)↗
Design issues of a reinforcement-based self-learning fuzzy controller for petrochemical process control
Fuzzy logic controllers have some often-cited advantages over conventional techniques such as PID control, including easier implementation, accommodation to natural language, and the ability to cover a wider range of operating conditions. One major obstacle that hinders the broader application of fuzzy logic controllers is the lack of a systematic way to develop and modify their rules; as a result the creation and modification of fuzzy rules often depends on trial and error or pure experimentation. One of the proposed approaches to address this issue is a self-learning fuzzy logic controller (SFLC) that uses reinforcement learning techniques to learn the desirability of states and to adjust the consequent part of its fuzzy control rules accordingly. Due to the different dynamics of the controlled processes, the performance of a self-learning fuzzy controller is highly contingent on its design. The design issue has not received sufficient attention. The issues related to the design of a SFLC for application to a petrochemical process are discussed, and its performance is compared with that of a PID and a self-tuning fuzzy logic controller.
Yen, John↗
Design issues for a reinforcement-based self-learning fuzzy controller
Fuzzy logic controllers have some often cited advantages over conventional techniques such as PID control: easy implementation, its accommodation to natural language, the ability to cover wider range of operating conditions and others. One major obstacle that hinders its broader application is the lack of a systematic way to develop and modify its rules and as result the creation and modification of fuzzy rules often depends on try-error or pure experimentation. One of the proposed approaches to address this issue is self-learning fuzzy logic controllers (SFLC) that use reinforcement learning techniques to learn the desirability of states and to adjust the consequent part of fuzzy control rules accordingly. Due to the different dynamics of the controlled processes, the performance of self-learning fuzzy controller is highly contingent on the design. The design issue has not received sufficient attention. The issues related to the design of a SFLC for the application to chemical process are discussed and its performance is compared with that of PID and self-tuning fuzzy logic controller.
Yen, John↗
An application of adaptive learning to malfunction recovery
A self-organizing controller is developed for a simplified two-dimensional aircraft model. The Controller learns how to pilot the aircraft through a navigational mission without exceeding pre-established position and velocity limits. The controller pilots the aircraft by activating one of eight directional actuators at all times. By continually monitoring the aircraft's position and velocity with respect to the mission, the controller progressively modifies its decision rules to improve the aircraft's performance. When the controller has learned how to pilot the aircraft, two actuators fail permanently. Despite this malfunction, the controller regains proficiency at its original task. The experimental results reported show the controller's capabilities for self-organizing control, learning, and malfunction recovery.
Cruz, R. E.↗
L1 Adaptive Control with Switched Reference Models: Application to Learn-to-Fly
Learn-to-Fly (L2F) is a new framework that aims to replace the traditional iterative development paradigm for aerial vehicles with a combination of real-time aerodynamic modeling, guidance, and learning control. To ensure safe learning of the vehicle dynamics on the fly, this paper presents an L1 adaptive control (L1AC) based scheme, which actively estimates and compensates for the discrepancy between the intermediately learned dynamics and the actual dynamics. First, to incorporate the periodic update of the learned model within the L2F framework, this paper extends the L1AC architecture to handle a switched reference system subject to unknown time-varying parameters and disturbances. The paper also includes analysis of both transient and steady-state performance of the L1AC architecture in the presence of non-zero initialization error for the state predictor. Second, the paper presents how the proposed L1AC scheme is integrated into the L2F framework, including its interaction with the baseline controller and the real-time modeling module. Finally, flight tests on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) validate the efficacy of the proposed control and learning scheme.
Steven Snyder↗
Adaptive Load Shedding for Grid Emergency Control via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Emergency control, typically such as under-voltage load shedding (UVLS), is broadly used to grapple with low voltage and voltage instability issues in real-world power systems under contingencies. However, existing emergency control schemes are rule-based and cannot be adaptively applied to uncertain and floating operating conditions. Here, we propose an adaptive UVLS algorithm for emergency control via deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and expert systems. We first construct dynamic components for picturing the power system operation as the environment. The transient voltage recovery criteria, which poses time-varying requirements to UVLS, is integrated into the states and reward function to advise the learning of deep neural networks. The proposed method has no tuning issue of coefficients in reward functions, and this issue was regarded as a deficiency in the existing DRL-based algorithms. Case studies illustrate that the proposed method outperforms the traditional UVLS relay in both the timeliness and efficacy for emergency control.
24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Control of Energy Storage for Interarea Oscillation Damping
With the increasing electricity consumption and lack of transmission investment, today's power systems are operated much closer to their limits, raising concerns of inter-area oscillations that deteriorate the system stability. Here, this article presents a novel energy storage placement and control approach for enhanced damping of interarea oscillations. Combining the residual analysis and dominant mode analysis, we are able to identify the advantageous locations for placing energy storage that achieve improved damping performance. To overcome the challenges, such as fixed control parameters and insufficient damping, we propose to use a deep reinforcement learning-based approach for energy storage control. A state-of-the-art guided surrogate-gradient-based evolutionary strategy is used to train a learning agent in a robust, efficient, and reproducible manner. Parallel computing is also adopted to speed up the training process. The proposed strategy has been tested on both medium and large-scale systems. The proposed methods have demonstrated their effectiveness in mitigating various interarea oscillations within a timeframe of 20 s, thereby averting system collapse and enhancing power grid stability effectively.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Data Driven Temperature Control of Heat Exchangers
The following poster presents a couple of approaches for temperature control at heat exchanger’s exit. One of the approaches is based on using n-step ahead neural network while the other approach utilizes a combination of control + learning module for temperature control. Designing robust controllers for typical heat exchangers is very challenging primarily because of complexities associated with the synthesis of dynamics of industrial heat exchangers. Even if a dynamics model is synthesized, the accuracy of it would be called into question as there can be lot of unmodeled system dynamics and random noise in input parameters. In many situations, the degree of uncertainty in the model of system being controlled limits the utility of optimal control design. Controller can be manually tuned on the field but it is very difficult to determine manual adjustments that result in overall improvement. These practical challenges call for learning based approaches for temperature control that would result in optimal heat exchanger performance. We utilize the existing mathematical model for air-water system synthesized by Underwood and Crawford for testing our algorithms. Underwood and Crawford developed a model of heating coil by fitting a second-order non-linear equations to measurements of air and water temperature and flow rates obtained from the actual coil. The uncertainties in the model include air and water inlet temperatures and air-flow rate. These uncertainties are modeled as random variables that are sampled from a uniform distribution. The control variable is the water flow rate which is controlled for regulating the air-outlet temperature. Neural networks are frequently used in various literatures for learning time-series. We propose a modified version of neural networks known as n-step ahead neural network that take the state variables and output at time t as input to successfully predict output at time t+n. The variable n is a hyper-parameter which can be optimized based on performance constraints. The n-step ahead neural network was then trained on training data generated from experimental model to high training accuracies. This trained model performed appreciably in its objective to regulate outlet temperature of a heat exchanger. The second approach uses a combination of control and learning module for temperature regulation. The control module used is a proportional controller while the learning module used is steady state neural network. The steady state neural network is used to learn the controller output as a function of random variables and temperature set-point. The proportional controller is then used to compensate for transient behavior of linearized system around various operating points. The algorithm works effectively for temperature regulation as neural network captures the non-linear input-output behavior of closed loop system leaving proportional controller to compensate for steady state errors of a linearized plant. The proposed algorithm’s performances were evaluated against the performance of a PI controller. Further, the robustness of the algorithms were also studied in great detail under small perturbations around tuned parameters of the proposed algorithms.
Sundar, Sreenath↗
AEOLUS: Advances in Experimental Design, Optimal Control, and Learning for Uncertain Complex Systems
Sustained advances in the mathematics of modeling and simulation have resulted in the capability today for routine simulation of a number of large scale complex DOE-relevant systems. As remarkable as this capability for solving the so-called forward problem is, it is typically only the first step-an inner loop within an outer loop that explores the simulation model's parameter space and decision space to characterize uncertainty in the model's predictions, learn unknown model parameters from data, design the most informative experiments, determine optimal control strategies, and create optimal designs. Broadly, what unifies all of these outer loop problems is that they are, in one form or another, optimization problems over parameter/control/design space that are constrained by complex uncertain models. To fully realize the power of scientific simulation as a basis for scientific discovery, technological innovation, and rational decision-making, it is imperative to move beyond simulation to tackle the outer loop of optimization for learning from data, experimental design, and control with complex uncertain models. When the models under consideration are large-scale and complex, and when the optimization variable and uncertain parameter spaces are high (or infinite) dimensional, this constitutes a grand challenge of the highest order, and is intractable with conventional methods. To overcome these challenges, the AEOLUS Center was established to develop a unified mathematical, computational, and statistical framework for (1) Learning predictive models from complex data via Bayesian inference and optimization, and (2) Optimizing experiments, processes, and designs using the resulting uncertain models. These problems are intractable with conventional methods, for several reasons: (1) The simulation problems that govern the inner loops of the optimization problems are expensive to execute (due to severe nonlinearity, heterogeneity, multiphysics/multiscale coupling); (2) The optimization variable and uncertain parameter spaces are high dimensional, often stemming from discretizations of infinite dimensional fields such as initial conditions, sources, or material properties. We argue that the key to overcoming these challenges is to develop new mathematical, computational, and statistical methods that exploit the structure of the Bayesian inference and optimization problems mediated by their underlying complex uncertain models. This structure includes the regularity, sparsity, geometry, low intrinsic dimensionality, and multifidelity nature of the maps from uncertain parameter/optimization variable spaces to the specific objectives targeted: Bayesian inference, optimal experimental design, and optimal control design. Black box methods developed as generic tools are incapable of exploiting this structure. To be successful, we must create, integrate, and cross-fertilize ideas across multiple areas of applied math--including approximation theory, Bayesian inference, data science, experimental design, information theory, machine learning, model reduction, optimal control theory, parallel algorithms, PDE-constrained optimization, randomized algorithms, stochastic optimization, and uncertainty quantification--all while exploiting the structure of the problems at hand. With this goal in mind, we have marshaled a team of leading authorities in these areas. While the methods we develop will be broadly applicable across a wide spectrum of DOE problems in which experiments inform models and the systems those models describe must be optimized under uncertainty, we have chosen a specific area, advanced manufacturing and materials, to drive our work. AMM is characterized by complex models across multiple scales, and is a rich source of challenging problems in inference, experimental design, and optimal control, requiring multifaceted and integrated advances in applied mathematics. As such, AMM serves as an excellent vehicle to motivate and demonstrate the advances in applied mathematics developed by our center.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗