SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lithium”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2025

Self-consistent modeling of tokamak edge plasma transport with lithium sources

Magnetic confinement fusion devices require effective heat and particle exhaust solutions on the divertor plates to operate sustainably, especially under reactor-relevant conditions. Liquid lithium divertors have been proposed to address two major challenges: control of excessive heat flux to plasma-facing components through vapor shielding and minimization of core plasma contamination from impurities. The National Spherical Torus Experiment-Upgrade (NSTX-U) will explore lithium as a divertor material due to its potential to meet both objectives. We present a self-consistent coupling framework between the plasma boundary transport code UEDGE and the lithium wall transport code Wall–Li to evaluate the feasibility and operational limits of lithium-based divertors. The model aims to optimize lithium sourcing levels to prevent core plasma contamination via fuel dilution while ensuring divertor protection through vapor shielding. This integrated framework, applicable to any tokamak with lithium sources, dynamically adjusts lithium sourcing based on local plasma conditions and surface temperature. The coupled model is tested using NSTX-like geometry and plasma conditions to assess its performance and reliability. Wall–Li calculates lithium fluxes from plasma-facing components, incorporating physical sputtering, thermally enhanced sputtering, and evaporation driven by surface temperature and ion flux. These fluxes are reintroduced into UEDGE as neutral lithium atoms, enabling simulation of their transport and distribution within the plasma. UEDGE computes plasma and neutral transport, surface heat flux, and iteratively feeds this information back to Wall–Li. A small time step is employed to ensure numerical stability and convergence, enabling accurate simulations over typical tokamak discharge durations. This integrated modeling approach provides a robust tool for identifying operational regimes that balance effective lithium sourcing with minimal core plasma contamination, offering critical insights for optimizing lithium-based divertor systems in current and future fusion devices.

Magnetic confinement fusion↗

DOE OSTI2023

Composite Lithium Metal Structure to Mitigate Pulverization and Enable Long‐Life Batteries

In lithium metal batteries, non‐uniform stripping of lithium results in pit formation, which promotes subsequent non‐uniform, dendritic deposition. This viscous cycle leads to pulverization of lithium which promotes cell shorting or capacity degradation, symptoms further exaggerated by high electrode areal loading and lean electrolytes. Here, to address this challenge, a composite lithium metal anode is engineered that contains uniformly distributed, nanometer‐sized carbon particles. This composite lithium is shown to strip more uniformly since the growth of non‐uniform pits is intercepted by the carbon particles. This mechanism is corroborated by a continuum electrochemical model. Subsequent lithium deposition on carbon particles is also found to be more uniform than on the surface with irregular pits. Notably, the pulverization rate of composite lithium is 26 times slower than that of commercial lithium. Moreover, in a Li‐S battery with sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode, the use of the composite anode extends the cycle life by three times when the areal capacity is 8 mAh cm −2 . The approach of using an engineered lithium composite structure to address challenges during both stripping and plating can inform future designs of lithium metal anodes for high areal capacity operations.

high areal capacity↗

DOE OSTI2026

Extraction of lithium from battery recycling wastewater using synergistic D2EHPA and TBP

The recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) poses significant challenges, including the generation of large volumes of chemically complex wastewater. The composition of this wastewater is influenced by both the intrinsic chemistry of the batteries and the specific recycling processes employed. Notably, this wastewater contains economically valuable components, such as lithium, which can be recovered. Here, in this study, a solvent extraction (SX) process was investigated as a method to recover lithium from battery recycling wastewater, especially from anode-washing stage. Initially, various commercial extractants were evaluated, including di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA), mono-2-ethylhexyl (2-ethylhexyl)phosphonate (PC88A), bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272), 2-hydroxy-5-nonylacetophenone oxime (LIX 84-I), tri-butyl phosphate (TBP), and their combinations. Among these, D2EHPA + TBP demonstrated a synergism to advance and maximize the lithium extraction. Subsequently, the effects of key parameters, including D2EHPA concentration, TBP concentration, contact time, initial pH, and aqueous-to-organic (A/O) phase ratio, were systematically investigated and optimized. A two-stage SX approach was employed to enhance lithium recovery. Under the optimized conditions of 30.0 vol% D2EHPA, 10.0 vol% TBP, 10 min of contact time, and a 1:1 A/O phase ratio, a lithium extraction efficiency of more than 88% in a two-stage solvent extraction was achieved. Lithium was subsequently stripped from the loaded organic solution using sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ). Using 2.0 M H 2 SO 4 , lithium stripping was achieved after two counter-current stripping stages at an organic-to-aqueous (O/A) phase ratio of 6:1. This stripping process enriched the lithium concentration by a factor of four compared to the original lithium concentration in the anode-washing wastewater. The recyclability of the synergistic D2EHPA + TBP system was also evaluated over four extraction-stripping cycles. The results demonstrated that the system maintained high extraction and stripping efficiencies.

D2EHPA↗

DOE OSTI2025

Strain-associated nanoscale fluctuating lithium transport within single-crystalline LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 cathode particles

Solid-state lithium diffusion dynamics are critical for the rate capability and longevity of Li-ion batteries. Conventionally, nanoscale lithium diffusion within individual battery particles has been simplified as being primarily driven by concentration gradients, despite the associated processes inducing local lattice expansion, contraction, and strain fields. Using operando scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy with high spatial resolution and chemical sensitivity to track nanoscale intraparticle lithium transport, and post-cycling Bragg coherent diffraction X-ray imaging to directly reveal three-dimensional intraparticle strain fields, we uncover strain-associated lithium transport dynamics within single-crystalline LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 (scNMC) particles during cycling. Contrary to the expected thermodynamic solid-solution behavior of scNMC, our observations reveal near-uniform but fluctuating regions of lithium-dense and lithium-dilute areas during cycling. These fluctuations suggest that nanoscale lithium diffusion can proceed counter to concentration gradients. Additionally, we demonstrate that an increased presence of lithium-dilute regions near the surface enhances lithium surface insertion kinetics, emphasizing the importance of controlling surface lithium distribution to improve rate performance. Our study provides insights into nanoscale solid-state ion transport, with potential applications in batteries, solid-state fuel cells, and memristors.

Lee, Danwon [Seoul National Univ. (Korea, Republic↗

DOE OSTI2025

Visualizing diverse lithium growth and stripping behaviors in anode-free solid-state batteries with operando X-ray tomography

Anode-free solid-state batteries (SSBs), which eliminate the need for lithium metal use during cell assembly, have the potential to enable high energy densities and simplified manufacturing. However, the factors that control lithium growth/stripping at the anode current collector are not well understood. Here, we use operando X-ray microcomputed tomography to comprehensively image and quantify lithium deposition and stripping under various conditions in three different Li|Li 6 PS 5 Cl|current collector cells, revealing diverse behavior that depends on interface morphology, cell resistance, and solid-state electrolyte (SSE) microstructure. A cell with high resistance exhibits extensive lithium filament growth across the entire current collector interface, with filaments that grow around pre-existing pores in the SSE rather than lithium filling these pores. Lithium filament formation is partially reversible, with the cracks shrinking as lithium metal is stripped. Uniform lithium deposition is achievable at low current densities in low-resistance cells, whereas higher current densities in these cells cause an increase in interfacial roughness, which is correlated with subsequent filamentary growth at the edges of the cell. These results provide insight into filamentary vs. planar lithium growth and highlight that the evolution of lithium is sensitively dependent on SSE microstructure and electrochemical processes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2025

Unveiling the Role of Lithium Iodide in Stabilizing Solid Interfaces in All-Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

A critical challenge in all-solid-state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) is achieving a stable interface between the lithium metal anode and the solid electrolyte. Leveraging its success in Li/I 2 batteries, lithium iodide has garnered significant attentions for its potential to enhance interfacial stability and overall cell performance in ASSLMBs. Here, we elucidate the role of lithium iodide in stabilizing the solid interface in all-solid-state Li metal batteries with a Li argyrodite electrolyte, particularly focusing on its influence on lithium deposition behavior and interfacial evolution. Through in situ optical imaging, we demonstrate more uniform lithium deposition on an iodide-contained argyrodite electrolyte compared to a chloride-based counterpart. Complementary density functional theory calculations attribute improved lithium plating behavior to the enhanced lithiophilicity and better ionic conductivity of lithium iodide at the solid interface, effectively reducing localized current density. In conclusion, these findings provide useful insights into the mechanisms through which lithium iodide enhances the interfacial stability in ASSLMBs.

Anions↗

DOE OSTI2024

Optimization of lithium vapor box divertor evaporator location on NSTX-U using SOLPS-ITER

Commercial fusion reactors will be faced with extremely high divertor target heat fluxes that will require mitigation. Simulations of detachment in an NSTX-U scenario projected to have 92 MW/m 2 unmitigated peak target heat flux are presented, which reaches sub-10 MW/m 2 target heat flux using a highly dissipating lithium vapor box divertor design. The lithium vapor box is a detached divertor design which employs lithium vapor evaporation and condensation to contain lithium below the X-point. Previous SOLPS modeling has indicated a lithium vapor box can reduce the heat flux down to 10 MW/m 2 via simultaneous evaporation from the Private Flux Region (PFR) and the Common Flux Region (CFR) sides of the vapor box. It is found here that PFR evaporation has improved access to the separatrix leading to significantly more efficient power dissipation than CFR evaporation. Simulations of target evaporation with an evaporation distribution that is self-consistent with the temperature of a Capillary Porous System with Fast flowing liquid lithium (CPSF) could reach n Li / n e ~ 0.025-0.030 at the Last Closed Flux Surface (LCFS) depending on the liquid metal flow speeds and lithium sputtering yield, while PFR-side evaporation can reach acceptable heat fluxes with n Li / n e ~ 0.038 at the LCFS. However, PFR evaporator performance can be improved if the target is allowed to be hot enough such that it reflects lithium, reaching n Li / n e ~ 0.028 and reducing required lithium evaporation. Ultimately PFR evaporation and target evaporation are found to have similar ability to produce acceptable heat flux solutions with minimal upstream concentration.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

NASA NTRS1971

Research, Development and Fabrication of Lithium Solar Cells

This report continues studies on cells made with low temperature (<400degC) single-cycle, lithium diffusion schedules. Measurements of concentration of lithium at the back surface showed that C(sub S) changes with time consisting of a build-up to a maximum value (above 10(exp 17) cm(exp -3)) with gradual decrease at longer diffusion times. Using the estimated C(sub S) values, theoretical lithium profiles were calculated. The calculated concentration near the PN junction was higher than those measured by the capacitance voltage (C-V) technique. The calculated concentration gradients were one-seventh of those measured by C-V methods. Both the concentration and its gradient were proportional to C(sub S). Estimates of C(sub S) obtained by extrapolating from C-V measured values of concentration and gradient near the PN junction, showed a decrease in C(sub S) for longer diffusion times. This fact supported the trend observed in Shipment C-13, where,, at longer times, the spread in values of V(sub oc), lithium concentration, and gradient became greater. The general conclusion was that the I-V characteristics were well controlled, with good cell output, but for longer diffusion times the lithium concentration gradient could have wider spread. The work described has led to greater insight into the lithium distribution dependence on the surface conditions. The surface conditions could be changed by varying the method used to apply lithium. Vacuum evaporation of lithium shows promise, and another exhaustive test of this method is in progress. Shipment C-13 is summarized, and the succeeding lots (C-14, C-15) are described. It is felt that improved monitoring of cell properties is at hand, and that the control of cell fabrication processes has advanced to where the effects of subtle differences in lithium distribution can now be seen. Evaluation is continuing on the best method to scale up the fabrication steps. A different sequence of fabrication is planned for Shipments C-14 and C-15.

Iles, Peter A.↗

NASA NTRS2004

Nickel-Hydrogen and Lithium Ion Space Batteries

The tasks of the Electrochemistry Branch of NASA Glenn Research Center are to improve and develop high energy density and rechargeable, life-long batteries. It is with these batteries that people across the globe are able to power their cell phones, laptop computers, and cameras. Here, at NASA Glenn Research Center, the engineers and scientists of the Electrochemistry branch are leading the way in the development of more powerful, long life batteries that can be used to power space shuttles and satellites. As of now, the cutting edge research and development is being done on nickel-hydrogen batteries and lithium ion batteries. Presently, nickel-hydrogen batteries are common types of batteries that are used to power satellites, space stations, and space shuttles, while lithium batteries are mainly used to power smaller appliances such as portable computers and phones. However, the Electrochemistry Branch at NASA Glenn Research Center is focusing more on the development of lithium ion batteries for deep space use. Because of the limitless possibilities, lithium ion batteries can revolutionize the space industry for the better. When compared to nickel-hydrogen batteries, lithium ion batteries possess more advantages than its counterpart. Lithium ion batteries are much smaller than nickel-hydrogen batteries and also put out more power. They are more energy efficient and operate with much more power at a reduced weight than its counterpart. Lithium ion cells are also cheaper to make, possess flexibility that allow for different design modifications. With those statistics in hand, the Electrochemistry Branch of NASA Glenn has decided to shut down its Nickel-Hydrogen testing for lithium ion battery development. Also, the blackout in the summer of 2003 eliminated vital test data, which played a part in shutting down the program. from the nickel-hydrogen batteries and compare it to past data. My other responsibilities include superheating the electrolyte that is used in the nickel-hydrogen cell in a calorimeter to test its performance under various conditions. 1 used a program called Arbin to study my data. The Arbin allows me to look at different parameters such as pressure and time and how they affect the changing temperature of the electrolyte that is being tested. In addition, I had the responsibility of taking apart and modifying battery coolers that would be used. My mentors told me that the batteries kept shutting down, so it was my responsibility to remove excess fan grilles, rotate the fans, and then switch the aluminum standoffs with nylon ones so that the coolers could operate without problems. My last task is to collect all the battery test data and organize them into charts using Microsoft Excel, before the Branch is able to conduct its research on lithium ion batteries. Therefore, during my tenure, it is my responsibility to take down final test data

Reid, Robert O., II↗

NASA NTRS2001

Chemical State of Surface Oxygen on Carbon and Its Effects on the Capacity of the Carbon Anode in a Lithium-Ion Battery Investigated

In a lithium-ion battery, the lithium-storage capacity of the carbon anode is greatly affected by a surface layer formed during the first half cycle of lithium insertion and release into and out of the carbon anode. The formation of this solid-electrolyte interface, in turn, is affected by the chemistry of the carbon surface. A study at the NASA Glenn Research Center examined the cause-and-effect relations. Information obtained from this research could contribute in designing a high-capacity lithium-ion battery and, therefore, small, powerful spacecraft. In one test, three types of surfaces were examined: (1) a surface with low oxygen content (1.5 at.%) and a high concentration of active sites, (2) a surface with 4.5 at.% -OH or -OC type oxygen, and (3) a surface with 6.5 at.% O=C type oxygen. The samples were made from the same precursor and had similar bulk properties. They were tested under a constant current of 10 mA/g in half cells that used lithium metal as the counter electrode and 0.5 M lithium iodide in 50/50 (vol%) ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate as the electrolyte. For the first cycle of the electrochemical test, the graph describes the voltage of the carbon anode versus the lithium metal as a function of the capacity (amount of lithium insertion or release). From these data, it can be observed that the surface with low oxygen and a high concentration of active sites could result in a high irreversible capacity. Such a high irreversible capacity could be prevented if the active sites were allowed to react with oxygen in air, producing -OH or -OC type oxygen. The O=C type oxygen, on the other hand, could greatly reduce the capacity of lithium intercalation and, therefore, needs to be avoided during battery fabrication.

Hung, Ching-Cheh↗

NASA NTRS2014

Lithium-Based High Energy Density Flow Batteries

Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention implement a lithium-based high energy density flow battery. In one embodiment, a lithium-based high energy density flow battery includes a first anodic conductive solution that includes a lithium polyaromatic hydrocarbon complex dissolved in a solvent, a second cathodic conductive solution that includes a cathodic complex dissolved in a solvent, a solid lithium ion conductor disposed so as to separate the first solution from the second solution, such that the first conductive solution, the second conductive solution, and the solid lithium ionic conductor define a circuit, where when the circuit is closed, lithium from the lithium polyaromatic hydrocarbon complex in the first conductive solution dissociates from the lithium polyaromatic hydrocarbon complex, migrates through the solid lithium ionic conductor, and associates with the cathodic complex of the second conductive solution, and a current is generated.

Bugga, Ratnakumar V.↗

DOE OSTI2026

Synthesis, Characterization, and Testing of High-Lithium-Density Composite Breeders

Solid tritium breeder materials must first and foremost have sufficiently high concentrations of lithium to enable a plant-scale tritium breeding ratio greater than 1:1. However, in addition to lithium content, such breeder materials must also meet other performance metrics including high tritium release rates, thermal conductivities, and irradiation damage tolerance. Perhaps most importantly, tritium breeders must maintain their mechanical integrity during reactor operation so as to avoid degradation which can jeopardize the functionality of the tritium breeder blanket module, which in most designs takes the form of a pebble bed geometry. Unfortunately, the mechanical robustness of most lithium-bearing ceramics under investigation for fusion applications is often inversely related to the lithium atom density. For example, a material such as lithium oxide (Li2O), which has one of the highest lithium atom densities, has a much lower mechanical splitting strength than lithium metatitanate (Li2TiO3), though Li2TiO3 has less than half the lithium atom density of Li2O. This work seeks to provide an alternative to monolithic ceramic tritium breeders, in the form of metal-reinforced composite tritium breeders. Specifically, composite tritium breeders have been synthesized combining Li2O with various ferrous metal reinforcements via electric field assisted sintering (EFAS), also known as spark plasma sintering (SPS). As the metal reinforcement content is increased, metallic networks are observed, via electron microscopy and X-ray computed tomography, to form throughout the composite material. Through destructive mechanical testing, even dilute metal reinforcement loading enables drastic mechanical strength improvements over pure Li2O while higher loadings give rise to quasi-ductile behavior and higher ultimate strengths than Li2TiO3 – while still maintaining a higher density of lithium atoms than Li2TiO3 and many other breeder candidates. In addition to microstructural characterization and mechanical testing, thermal property measurements and hydrogen permeability testing are underway to further assess the suitability of such composites for fusion reactor applications.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Membranes for Lithium Recovery From Conventional and Unconventional Sources

Lithium has been deemed a critical mineral of national importance that finds uses in a wide range of applications, and its demand has been rising significantly in recent years. The urgency of meeting this demand requires lithium extraction from various aqueous sources such as continental brines, geothermal brines, seawater, produced water, and battery waste. While direct lithium extraction (DLE) technologies such as adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction have emerged as possible solutions, membrane technologies are also being investigated for various sources and at different stages of the recovery process. Here, we analyze the application of membranes for pretreatment of lithium source waters, bring management, lithium/magnesium separation, lithium/sodium separation, and lithium hydroxide conversion, and evaluate performance metrics for critical lithium separations from the literature. We explore the potential of membranes at every stage of the recovery process and describe their current status and future prospects. We describe hypothetical process trains with integrated membrane technologies for each source type and address their feasibility and challenges. The potential energy and water impacts of membrane-integrated and conventional DLE processes are also critically considered alongside performance and selectivity metrics, and this is illustrated using examples and calculated from published technical reports. This paper thus provides a comprehensive overview of the application of membranes along every stage of the lithium recovery process, emphasizing the versatility and potential of membrane technologies for critical mineral recovery.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2025

Mechanism of Lithium Ion Exchange Into Spinel Manganese Oxide

Lithium manganese oxide (LMO) is an effective absorbent for lithium recovery from brines, characterized by its high adsorption capacity, excellent regeneration performance, and selectivity. Here, this study investigates the mechanisms of material degradation during lithium loading and unloading in LMO, employing a combination of time‐resolved Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Key findings reveal that the A 1g vibrational mode wavenumber shifts from 635 cm −1 at the onset of lithium ion exchange to 656 cm −1 after 12 min, indicating local symmetry loss and manganese (Mn) loss during lithium intercalation. The proposed lithium exchange mechanism involves initial occupation of tetrahedral interstitial voids, followed by migration into interstitial sites between Mn octahedral sites. Computational modeling suggests that the loss of symmetry in MnO cubane‐like groups occurs as lithium migrates, significantly affecting the Raman spectra. Importantly, the study demonstrates that after 100 cycles of lithium/hydrogen loading, a 24% loss in Mn is observed, which correlates with decreased structural stability; however, the structural integrity of LMO is enhanced when subjected to multiple cycles without complete loading. Here, these insights contribute to the understanding of LMO's performance in lithium recovery applications and highlight potential strategies to optimize its use in future technologies.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2025

Lithium Recovery and Conversion from Wastewater Produced by Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries via Two-Stage Electrodialysis

Electrodialysis (ED) is a membrane separation technique that has been well-established in various applications such as desalination, drinking water production, wastewater treatment, and lithium salt production. A limited number of studies have explored its application in lithium salt production, especially from secondary resources like wastewater. This study investigated a route to recover lithium from wastewater generated from the recycling of end-of-life Li-ion batteries. Two electrodialysis methods, namely standard electrodialysis (ED) and bipolar-membrane electrodialysis (BPED), were combined to concentrate lithium ions and convert them to lithium hydroxide (LiOH), a valuable product that can be fed back into the supply chain for manufacturing Li-ion batteries. Lithium (Li⁺) concentration in recycling wastewater was successfully increased by 58% using ED and converted to LiOH (>96% purity) with a further increase in Li⁺ concentration by 67% using BPED. The Coulombic efficiency of the experiments was 91.0 and 92.2%, with specific energy consumption of 1 and 2.5 kWh/kg, and a production rate of 1.01 and 0.14 kg/h/m 2 for the ED and BPED processes, respectively. In addition, preliminary techno-economic and environmental impact analyses show a significant improvement (GHG emission reduction by 77% and total energy reduction by 53%) by producing LiOH via electrodialysis compared to conventional lithium production via brine extraction. The process was assessed to be beneficial for lithium extraction from secondary resources and to enhance overall battery recycling efforts.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2025

Selectively extracting lithium from single and mixed cathode materials

With the burgeoning reliance on lithium-ion batteries for sustainable energy solutions and electric transportation, the environmental and resource management associated with battery disposal are increasingly critical. Addressing these challenges necessitates innovative recycling techniques that recover valuable battery components, particularly lithium. This research introduces a universal, eco-friendly approach tailored for the efficient selective extraction of lithium from both single and mixed cathode materials, achieving impressive selective leaching efficiencies of lithium (99.51 % for LFP, 90 % for NMC, and 97.24 % for mixed cathode). Surprisingly, leaching efficiency of lithium from NMC can be significantly improved by introducing LFP since LFP can remove the dense transition-metal salts on the surface of NMC. The extracted lithium is recovered as lithium carbonate with battery-grade purity. This study also highlights the reuse of formic acid and the adoption of oxygen as an oxidizing agent to prevent wastewater production. Therefore, this method provides a robust foundation for sustainable lithium battery recycling.

economically and environmentally feasible↗

DOE OSTI2025

Tailoring copper current collector roughness and crystallographic orientation to improve lithium plating

Secondary lithium metal batteries are of great interest due to a high theoretical energy density, but rechargeability is limited by the formation of lithium dendrites that lead to internal short circuits and catastrophic cell failure. Mitigating dendrites through uniform current distribution at the current collector is a promising solution to enabling long cycle life of lithium metal electrodes. Here, the impact of copper crystal orientation and roughness on electrochemically deposited lithium morphology is studied. For 50 cycles, the capacity retention from greatest to least followed polycrystalline copper 95 ± 1 % (MC-PC) ≥ 94.55 ± 0.01 % Cu (110) > 93.0 ± 0.4 % Cu(111) > 75.8 ± 0.1 % Cu(100). Cu(100) performed the worst in all cases with shorts occurring frequently before reaching 50 cycles. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy images showed that after 50 cycles, MC-PC Cu had the best lithium morphology, but at early cycles, Cu(111) formed the densest lithium layer. MC-PC Cu had the most uniform lithium nucleation which may have been caused by increased roughness relative to the single crystal samples. When polycrystalline Cu (F-PC) roughness was systematically controlled, the cumulative Coulombic efficiency increased from about 0.3–0.5 with increasing roughness from an Ra of about 10–40 nm. Lastly, plating rates were studied. Slower rates of 0.25 mA/cm 2 exhibited denser lithium morphology in all cases as compared to 0.5 and 1.0 mA/cm 2 , but the relative porosity of Li deposited on the different current collectors depended on the rate applied.

Copper↗

DOE OSTI2025

New directions and principles for solvent extraction for recovery of lithium from aqueous brines and mineral leachates: A brief review

Increasing demand for lithium for manufacturing of batteries is fueling the unprecedented search for improved recovery and alternative sources. Wider source distribution, lower energy consumption, and greater sustainability make extraction of lithium from brines, both natural and process-derived, an attractive alternative to mineral ores. Solvent extraction, used industrially for production of metals, salts, and pharmaceuticals, has been investigated as a methodology for lithium recovery for several decades. However, industrial application of solvent extraction for lithium recovery has so far been limited. In contrast, direct lithium extraction using adsorbents based on inorganic minerals has rapidly advanced from research to commercialization. A comparison of solvent extraction processes to adsorption highlights these issues and explains the preference for adsorbents. Although the application of solvent extraction has been criticized for use of large amounts of acid, alkali, and organic solvents, steady progress has been made to improve its potential for industrial lithium production, spurred on generally by the advantages of solvent extraction in selectivity and throughput. Previously developed beta-diketone, organophosphate, and crown ether ligands are being adapted and improved. Their novel use with ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and membrane technologies promises to expand capabilities for extraction of lithium from dilute aqueous sources while improving sustainability. Possibilities for further discovery and innovation abound. In this review, we provide a unique perspective from the field of solvent extraction starting with fundamentals such as ion-transfer theory and apply them to understanding lithium selectivity and extraction behavior. In conclusion, the results are cast in the light of the practical realities of developing economical solvent extraction processes.

Brine↗