Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Metallic Li Anodes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

An Inorganic-Rich Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Advanced Lithium-Metal Batteries in Carbonate Electrolytes

In carbonate electrolytes, the organic-inorganic solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formed on the lithium (Li) metal anode surface is strongly bonded to Li and experiences the same volume change as Li, thus it undergoes continuous cracking/reformation during plating/stripping cycles. Here we report, an inorganic-rich SEI is designed on a Li metal surface to reduce its bonding energy with Li metal by dissolving 4 M concentrated LiNO 3 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as an additive for a fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) based electrolyte. Due to the aggregate structure of NO 3 - ions and its participation in the primary Li + solvation sheath, abundant Li 2 O, Li 3 N, and LiN x O y grains are formed in the resulting SEI, in addition to the uniform LiF distribution from the reduction of PF 6 - ions. The inorganic-rich SEI’s weak bonding (high interface energy) to Li can effectively promote Li diffusion along the SEI/Li interface and prevent Li dendrite penetration into the SEI. As a result, our designed carbonate electrolyte enables a Li anode to achieve a high Li plating/stripping CE of 99.55% (1 mA cm -2 , 1.0 mAh cm -2 ) and the electrolyte also enables a Li||LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) full cell (2.5 mAh cm -2 ) to retain 75%of its initial capacity after 200 cycles with an outstanding CE of 99.83%.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Fundamental Understanding of “Fresh” Lithium Nucleation and Growth in Sulfide-Based Anode-Free Solid-State Batteries: Effects of Substrate, Current Density, and Li + Supply

Understanding the electrochemical extraction and deposition of lithium (Li) from cathode is crucial for advancing anode-free solid-state batteries (AFSSBs). Herein, cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and electrochemical studies are employed to investigate how current collector surface properties, current densities, and cathode loadings influence the morphology of fresh electrochemically deposited Li and the electrochemical performance in sulfide-based AFSSBs. Cryo-TEM reveals that Cu current collectors induce irregular, dendritic Li deposits due to their lithiophobic nature and reactivity with Li 5.4 PS 4.4 Cl 1.6 (LPSC), while Ni and Au facilitate more uniform, planar-like Li growth. The morphology of the deposited Li also depends on current density: higher rates produce smaller, porous particles versus larger, denser deposits at lower rates. Importantly, for the first time, we discovered that low cathode loadings lead to poor cycling stability due to insufficient Li + supply for complete anode coverage, contrary to conventional solid-state batteries with preloaded Li metal anodes. This finding establishes a design principle where adequate cathode Li + reservoirs are essential for anode interface stability in AFSSBs. Overall, this work elucidates the interplayed effect of current collectors, current densities, and cathode loadings on Li morphology and cycle stability, offering fundamental insights into cathode-derived Li behavior and practical guidelines for optimizing AFSSBs performance through nucleation control and interface engineering.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High-performance all-solid-state Li–S batteries enabled by an all-electrochem-active prelithiated Si anode

The development of all-solid-state Li–S batteries has been greatly impeded by dendrite growth and dendrite penetration, which are both related to the Li metal anode. As a compromised alternative, we report lithium silicide (Li x Si) as a dendrite-free and high-capacity anode with Li source. Here, the as-synthesized Li x Si is relatively soft, highly electronically conductive, and with a high Li diffusivity. These distinctive properties make Li x Si anode viable as an “all-electrochem-active” electrode (consisted of 100 wt.% Li x Si). Compared with the typical composite electrode, the all-electrochem-active electrode not merely maximizes the electrode-level energy density but also minimizes the electrolyte-related interfacial degradation. Li x Si symmetric cell demonstrates a reversible cycling at 4 mA cm –2 for over 320 h. Stress change and morphological evolution of the Li x Si electrode are investigated upon dealloying/alloying. When paired with a S cathode (active mass loading of 3 mg cm –2 ), Li x Si–S full cell shows a good cycling behavior over 500 cycles and rate performance (69% capacity retained at 1.2C) even at 25 °C.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Fluoride-Rich Solid-Like Electrolyte Stabilizing Lithium Metal Batteries

To address the problems associated with Li metal anodes, a fluoride-rich solid-like electrolyte (SLE) that combines the benefits of solid-state and liquid electrolytes is presented. Its unique triflate-group-enhanced frame channels facilitate the formation of a functional inorganic-rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), which not only improves the reversibility and interfacial charge transfer of Li anodes but also ensures uniform and compact Li deposition. Furthermore, these triflate groups contribute to the decoupling of Li + and provide hopping sites for rapid Li + transport, enabling a high room-temperature ionic conductivity of 1.1 mS cm -1 and a low activation energy of 0.17 eV, making it comparable to conventional liquid electrolytes. Consequently, Li symmetric cells using such SLE achieve extremely stable plating/stripping cycling over 3500 h at 0.5 mA cm -2 and support a high critical current up to 2 mA cm -2 . Here, the assembled Li||LiFePO 4 solid-like batteries exhibit exceptional cyclability for over 1 year and a half, even outperforming liquid cells. Additionally, high-voltage cylindrical cells and high-capacity pouch cells are demonstrated, corroborating much simpler processibility in battery assembly compared to all-solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Electrochemically Stable High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-Sulfur batteries (LSB) have emerged as one of the strong contenders for high energy density rechargeable batteries in the Li-ion battery domain. The LSB system is considered as the most promising to achieve the next milestone in energy density of 500 Wh/kg. However, the LSB system is plagued with problems of polysulfide formation which are soluble in the organic electrolyte leading to loss in capacity and eventual cell failure. The problem is further compounded by dendrite formation on the Li anode during electrochemical cycling leading to puncturing of the separator causing eventual short-circuiting of the cell and consequent heat generation resulting in major safety hazards of flammability of the organic liquid electrolyte and impending explosion. This chapter describes various approaches developed to combat both cathode and anode issues. These involve synthesis and characterization of complex framework materials (CFMs) for confining the polysulfides and sulfur in the LSB cathodes. The CFMs include a CFM host and a coating applied to the CFM host, which includes one or more form of an electronic conductor, a lithium-ion conductor and a functional electrocatalyst for electrocatalytically converting the soluble polysulfides to Li 2 S. Further, sulfur is infiltrated into the CFM host creating a sulfur-carbon linkage serving as effective anchors for trapping the ensuing polysulfides. The systems have been tested in coin cells and pouch cells with metallic Li anodes under lean electrolyte conditions of 3-4 μl/mg of electrolyte (E) to sulfur (S) ratios showing promise and feasibility. New emergent dendrite-free alloys have also been identified to test against pure Li and CFM cathodes in coin cell and pouch cell configurations under lean electrolyte conditions. Results of these studies are described and discussed with thoughts on future directions.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Chemical Vapor Transformation of Lithium Metal: Mechanism and Enhanced Stability

Constructing a stable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) with high productivity and scalability is essential for the practical application of thin Li metal anodes. Here, in this work, we report a chemical vapor transformation (CVT) strategy in which Li metal is exposed to trimethylaluminum (TMA), inducing a rapid and spontaneous surface reaction that forms a robust, multilayered SEI. In situ quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS), combined with ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), UV Raman spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, reveal that TMA removes the native passivation layer, reacts with Li metal, and drives a coupled bulk-surface transformation involving Li–Al interdiffusion. The resulting SEI exhibits a chemically graded structure consisting of an inner Li–Al alloy and an outer amorphous carbon layer formed via demethylation and ligand-exchange pathways. This modified surface exhibits significantly enhanced stability compared to that of bare Li in electrochemical cycling using liquid and solid-state electrolytes. This work unveils a unique surface-mediated bulk transformation mechanism for lithium metal and establishes CVT as a scalable and fundamentally distinct approach for the interfacial engineering of reactive metals.

Li metal↗

Floatable Protective Layers: a Strategy to Minimize Solid Electrolyte Interphase Growth and Maximize the Lithium Utilization

Abstract Maximizing lithium (Li) utilization is crucial for enhancing the long‐term stability of Li‐based batteries. In anode‐free Li batteries (AFLBs), although the initial formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is beneficial on limiting further reaction between Li and electrolyte, large volume change of Li metal anode (LMA) during cycling often leads to continuous breakdown and re‐formation of SEI and formation of inactive Li, hindering its efficiency. In this study, a novel strategy is presented to protect Li metal by applying a floatable protection layer (FPL) on a copper substrate, enabling large Li particles to be primarily deposited below FPL, but SEI to be primarily formed above FPL. This approach effectively minimizes the direct contact between electrolyte and freshly deposited Li, therefore mitigating the continuous side reactions and early failure of AFLBs. As a result, Li consumption is minimized, and the overall stability of the battery is significantly enhanced. Further development of this approach can also be used to improve the performance of other Li‐based batteries for large‐scale applications.

Lim, Hyung‐Seok [Energy and Environment Directorat↗

A Universal Design of Lithium Anode via Dynamic Stability Strategy for Practical All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery (ASSLB) chemistry with thin solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) membranes features high energy density and intrinsic safety but suffers from severe dendrite formation and poor interface contact during cycling, which hampers the practical application of rechargeable ASSLB. Here, we propose a universal design of thin Li‐metal anode (LMA) via a dynamic stability strategy to address these issues. The ultra‐thin LMA (20 μm) is in situ constructed with uniform highly Li‐ion conductive solid‐electrolyte interphase and composite‐polymer interphase (CPI) via electroplating process. As a result, the passivation layer with poor Li‐ion conduction on Li anode can be dissolved and small surface resistance can be achieved due to the good compatibility of CPI to SSEs. The cycling of Li symmetric cell with Li 6 PS 5 Cl thin film electrolyte (<100 μm) shows a high critical current density of >2.0 mA cm −2 with excellent cycling stability at 1.0 mA cm −2 . The ASSLBs paring with Ni‐rich LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode demonstrated the feasibility of engineered LMA design by presenting good rate capability from 0.1 C to 1.0 C at room temperature, as well as long‐term cycling stability (81 % retention after 100 cycles). This work represents a general pathway to make thin dendrite‐free LMA available for high‐energy‐density ASSLBs.

Deng, Tao [Department of Chemical and Biomolecular↗

A Universal Design of Lithium Anode via Dynamic Stability Strategy for Practical All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery (ASSLB) chemistry with thin solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) membranes features high energy density and intrinsic safety but suffers from severe dendrite formation and poor interface contact during cycling, which hampers the practical application of rechargeable ASSLB. Here, we propose a universal design of thin Li‐metal anode (LMA) via a dynamic stability strategy to address these issues. The ultra‐thin LMA (20 μm) is in situ constructed with uniform highly Li‐ion conductive solid‐electrolyte interphase and composite‐polymer interphase (CPI) via electroplating process. As a result, the passivation layer with poor Li‐ion conduction on Li anode can be dissolved and small surface resistance can be achieved due to the good compatibility of CPI to SSEs. The cycling of Li symmetric cell with Li 6 PS 5 Cl thin film electrolyte (<100 μm) shows a high critical current density of >2.0 mA cm −2 with excellent cycling stability at 1.0 mA cm −2 . The ASSLBs paring with Ni‐rich LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode demonstrated the feasibility of engineered LMA design by presenting good rate capability from 0.1 C to 1.0 C at room temperature, as well as long‐term cycling stability (81 % retention after 100 cycles). This work represents a general pathway to make thin dendrite‐free LMA available for high‐energy‐density ASSLBs.

Deng, Tao [Department of Chemical and Biomolecular↗

Performance Leap of Lithium Metal Batteries in LiPF 6 Carbonate Electrolyte by a Phosphorus Pentoxide Acid Scavenger

Phosphorus pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ) is investigated as an acid scavenger to remove the acidic impurities in a commercial lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ) carbonate electrolyte to improve the electrochemical properties of Li metal batteries. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements reveal the detailed reaction mechanisms of P 2 O 5 with the LiPF 6 electrolyte and its impurities, which removes hydrogen fluoride (HF) and difluor-ophosphoric acid (HPO 2 F 2 ) and produces phosphorus oxyfluoride (POF 3 ), OF 2 P-O-PF 5 - anions, and ethyl difluorophosphate (C 2 H 5 OPOF 2 ) as new electrolyte species. The P 2 O 5 -modified LiPF 6 electrolyte is chemically compatible with a Li metal anode and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC622) cathode, generating a PO x F y -rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) that leads to highly reversible Li electrodeposition, while eliminating transition metal dissolution and cathode particle cracking. The excellent electrochemical properties of the P 2 O 5 -modified LiPF6 electrolytes are demonstrated on Li||NMC622 pouch cells with 0.4 Ah capacity, 50 mu m Li anode, 3 mAh cm -2 NMC622 cathode, and 3 g Ah -1 electrolyte/capacity ratio. The pouch cells can be galvanostatically cycled at C/3 for 230 cycles with 87.7% retention.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Editors’ Choice—Methods—Pressure Control Apparatus for Lithium Metal Batteries

Lithium (Li) metal anodes are essential for developing next-generation high-energy-density batteries. However, Li dendrite/whisker formation caused short-circuiting issue and short cycle life have prevented lithium metal from being viably used in rechargeable batteries. Numerous works have been done to study how to regulate the Li growth in electrochemical cycling by using external stacking forces. While it is widely agreed that stack pressure positively affects the lithium plating/stripping process, the optimized pressure range provided by different works varies greatly because of the difference in the pressure control setup. In this work, a pressure control apparatus is designed for Li metal batteries with liquid and solid-state electrolytes (SSE). With considerations of minimizing cell to cell variation, a reusable split cell and pressure load cell are made for testing electrochemical cells with high precision pressure control. The capability of the designed setup is demonstrated by studying the pressure effect on the Li plating/stripping process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Phase Transfer‐Mediated Degradation of Ether‐Based Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes in Alkali Metal Batteries

Abstract Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have attracted interest in alkali metal batteries due to the advantages of forming stable solid‐electrolyte interphases (SEIs) on anodes and good chemical/electrochemical stability. Herein, a new degradation mechanism is revealed for ether‐based LHCEs that questions their compatibility with alkali metal anodes (Li, Na, and K). Specifically, the ether solvent reacts with alkali metals to generate solvated electrons (e s − ) that attack hydrofluoroether co‐solvents to form a series of byproducts. The ether solvent essentially acts as a phase‐transfer reagent that continuously transfers electrons from solid‐phase metals into the solution phase, thus inhibiting the formation of stable SEI and leading to continuous alkali metal corrosion. Switching to an ester‐based solvating solvent or intercalation anodes such as graphite or molybdenum disulfide has been shown to avoid such a degradation mechanism due to the absence of e s − .

Chen, Xiaojuan↗

Phase Transfer‐Mediated Degradation of Ether‐Based Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes in Alkali Metal Batteries

Abstract Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have attracted interest in alkali metal batteries due to the advantages of forming stable solid‐electrolyte interphases (SEIs) on anodes and good chemical/electrochemical stability. Herein, a new degradation mechanism is revealed for ether‐based LHCEs that questions their compatibility with alkali metal anodes (Li, Na, and K). Specifically, the ether solvent reacts with alkali metals to generate solvated electrons (e s − ) that attack hydrofluoroether co‐solvents to form a series of byproducts. The ether solvent essentially acts as a phase‐transfer reagent that continuously transfers electrons from solid‐phase metals into the solution phase, thus inhibiting the formation of stable SEI and leading to continuous alkali metal corrosion. Switching to an ester‐based solvating solvent or intercalation anodes such as graphite or molybdenum disulfide has been shown to avoid such a degradation mechanism due to the absence of e s − .

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Hyperconjugation-controlled molecular conformation weakens lithium-ion solvation and stabilizes lithium metal anodes

Tuning the solvation structure of lithium ions via electrolyte engineering has proven effective for lithium metal (Li) anodes. Further advancement that bypasses the trial-and-error practice relies on the establishment of molecular design principles. Expanding the scope of our previous work on solvent fluorination, we report here an alternative design principle for non-fluorinated solvents, which potentially have reduced cost, environmental impact, and toxicity. By studying non-fluorinated ethers systematically, we found that the short-chain acetals favor the [gauche, gauche] molecular conformation due to hyperconjugation, which leads to weakened monodentate coordination with Li + . The dimethoxymethane electrolyte showed fast activation to >99% coulombic efficiency (CE) and high ionic conductivity of 8.03 mS cm -1 . The electrolyte performance was demonstrated in anode-free Cu$∥$LFP pouch cells at current densities up to 4 mA cm -2 (70 to 100 cycles) and thin-Li$∥$high-loading-LFP coin cells (200–300 cycles). Overall, we demonstrated and rationalized the improvement in Li metal cyclability by the acetal structure compared to ethylene glycol ethers. We expect further improvement in performance by tuning the acetal structure.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Interfacial Pressure Improves Calendar Aging of Lithium Metal Anodes

Lithium metal is a very attractive anode material because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately 10 times higher than conventional graphite anodes. Despite great promise, Li anodes suffer from capacity fade due to instabilities with the electrolyte as well as stranding of active Li. We have previously shown that applied interfacial pressure improves Li anode cycling because the pressure reduces the propensity for Li isolation and enables easier reconnection. Many researchers have also shown that calendar aging can lead to Li capacity loss and this has been attributed to either electrolyte decomposition with concurrent Li corrosion or to the formation of stranded Li. Our prior research focused on calendar aging during cycling suggests the mechanism for calendar aging is largely related to stranding of Li during rest and reconnection of the stranded Li upon further cycling, evidenced by similar average Coulombic efficiencies and Li loss in cells with and without rest. Because our calendar aging studies suggest Li stranding as a major cause of Coulombic efficiency drops and our Li cycling studies suggest this can be mitigated partially through applied interfacial pressure, we hypothesized that applied pressure would improve calendar aging by reducing stranded Li and enabling reconnection. We systematically varied applied pressure (0-1000 kPa) on Li metal anodes during cycling tests with and without intermittent calendar aging periods. Though the Coulombic efficiency decreases during aging periods, the lost capacity is recovered during subsequent cycles, as shown though average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity loss analysis. We find that application of pressure partially mitigates calendar aging, in accordance with our hypothesis that calendar aging is caused by Li standing and can be mitigated to some degree with interfacial pressure. This is further supported by our results showing that the average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity losses are similar over 50 cycles for cells that were continuously cycled and cells with periodic calendar aging periods. This result indicates that the losses during aging are reversible, which is consistent with Li stranding and reconnection. We show that pressure is one mitigation technique that helps reduce Li calendar aging in this study, but our finding that calendar aging is primarily governed by the stranding and reconnection of dead Li has wider implications. This research suggests that other mitigations which have been shown to prevent dead Li formation or encourage reconnection during cycling would also likely be successful for the purpose of improving calendar aging. The authors were supported by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (NTESS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) under contract DE-NA0003525. This written work is authored by an employee of NTESS. The employee, not NTESS, owns the right, title and interest in and to the written work and is responsible for its contents. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the written work do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Government.

applied pressure↗

Current Status and Future Directions of All-Solid-State Batteries with Lithium Metal Anodes, Sulfide Electrolytes, and Layered Ternary Oxide Cathodes

All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) offer great promise as a next-generation energy storage technology with higher energy density, wider operating temperature range, and improved safety for electric vehicles. ASSBs employing lithium metal anodes (Li), sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSE), and Ni-rich layered transition metal oxide cathodes (LiMO 2 , M = Ni, Mn, Co, Al) are particularly promising due to its superior electrochemical performance compared to other solid-electrolyte systems. However, the battery cycle life at high cathode mass loading and high current is still limited because the failure mechanism is not fully understood. Lithium dendrite growth at the anode or inside a solid electrolyte still represents as a serious risk of cell failure. Interfacial resistance increases attributed to electrolyte decomposition and interfacial void formation at both cathode–electrolyte and anode–electrolyte interfaces lead to gradual capacity fading. In this Review, we present the fundamental challenges and recent scientific understandings of each component in ASSBs. The novel diagnostic tools for these components, especially the interfaces buried under the surface that are often hard for characterization are mainly examined. Lastly, we offer a perspective for future research directions. We hope this Review will provide a timely snapshot of state-of-the-art research progress in ASSBs to accelerate the development of ASSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Visualizing electrode assembly movement and lithiation heterogeneity in lithium-metal batteries using operando energy dispersive X-ray diffraction

There is renewed interest in Li-metal anodes in order to increase the energy density of battery cells. Here, we demonstrate an operando X-ray crystallography method to visualize lithiation gradients and electrode assembly movement during electrochemical cycling of a Li-metal cell containing a Ni-Mn-Co layered oxide cathode (NMC811). During charge, deposition of Li + ions from the cathode increases the Li foil thickness; during discharge, the thickness decreases as Li + ions are stripped off the foil. Additionally, the resulting periodic movement is observed through tracking of Bragg peaks from the ordered phases of the cathode and separator. In addition to this 3.6 μm/mAh displacement, continuous mossy Li build-up on the anode causes an irreversible drift of the assembly, which is similar to 11.3 μm/cycle. Furthermore, our data indicate significant lithiation gradients in the NMC811 cathode during the oxide relithiation, which is not observed during the delithiation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Dual–Phase Electrolyte for High–Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) is essential for fast cathode kinetics, but detrimental for anode stability, especially under lean electrolyte conditions. Here in this work, the phase separation phenomenon between solvents with different polarities (tetramethyl sulfone [TMS] and dibutyl ether [DBE]) is utilized to enable the design of a dual-phase electrolyte. High-polarity, high-density TMS–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–ammonium trifluoroacetate as the cathode electrolyte strongly solvates LiPSs, which propel the sulfur redox reaction. Moreover, the composite of DBE and a polymeric ion conductor serves as the anode electrolyte. The addition of DBE in the anode side effectively prevents the crossover of corrosive species (LiPSs and ammonia trifluoroacetate), enabling a significant improvement in Li-metal anode stability. The electrode-specific dual-phase electrolyte design provides electrochemical performance superior to conventional electrolytes. Without additional electrode engineering, pouch cells assemble with the dual-phase electrolyte cycle under a lean electrolyte (4 µL mg –1 ) and low-Li-excess condition (N/P = 3) for 120 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗