Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Neural-Network”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

74 records · Page 5

A Machine Learning Approach for the Remote Sensing Retrieval of Oil Spills from Polarimetric Measurements

The Fresnel laws of specular reflection directly connect remote sensing observations of light polarization within the sunglint region to the ocean surface refractive index. This parameter is instrumental to identify areas affected by oil, or any other floating substance capable of modifying the refractive index of pure seawater. In preparation for the NASA Plankton, Aerosol, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission, we are developing an advanced retrieval scheme that exploits such measurements to deliver the refractive index as an operational product. The original method was developed based on observations of the airborne Research Scanning Polarimeter. Here we present several aspects related to the extension of this technique to the PACE HARP-2 sensor (especially regarding the projected accuracy), and discuss preliminary results obtained by applying neural-network trainings to look-up tables produced with the forward radiative transfer code, with the goal of improving the computational performance. Success in the final implementation will guarantee a version of the retrieval algorithm suitable to fast-response needs and disaster management.

machine learning↗

Benchmarking Bayesian Optimization Frameworks and Acquisition Strategies for Materials Discovery and Autonomous Laboratories

Bayesian optimization (BO) can accelerate materials discovery by guiding expensive experiments toward the most promising processing conditions. We systematically compare five BO surrogate and framework combinations (Gaussian processes in Ax, Gaussian processes and Monte-Carlo neural networks in BayBE, random forests in Lolopy, and tree-structured Parzen (TPE) estimators in Hyperopt) on three benchmarks that mimic common materials design tasks (a discrete solid-electrolyte composition space, a hybrid discrete/continuous laminate-composite design problem solved with micromechanics modeling, and the continuous Ishigami analytic function which is a standard optimization benchmark). Each BO surrogate is paired with posterior mean, probability of improvement, and expected improvement acquisition functions and run for 100 trials from randomized initial samples with uniform random search providing a control. Across five random seeds per setting, BayBE’s Gaussian-process surrogate with expected improvement consistently reached ≥95 % of the known optimum in the fewest evaluations, while Lolopy’s random forest matched or exceeded GP performance on purely categorical or mixed spaces at a higher computational cost. Posterior mean alone often stagnated at local optima, underscoring the need for exploration, whereas probability and expected improvement balanced exploration and exploitation leading to better optimization in fewer trials. Execution times ranged from milliseconds for TPE to minutes for neural-network and random-forest surrogates. These results establish baseline expectations for BO in automated materials laboratories and highlight expected improvement with Gaussian processes as a reliable first choice, with random forests offering a strong alternative when categorical variables dominate. The benchmark suite and code are released to facilitate future surrogate, acquisition, and constraint-handling research in data-driven materials optimization.

Bayesian optimization↗