Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ORBITAL ASSEMBLY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1988

User assembly and servicing system for Space Station, an evolving architecture approach

On-orbit assembly and servicing of a variety of scientific and applications hardware systems is expected to be one of the Space Station's primary functions. The hardware to be serviced will include the attached payloads resident on the Space Station, the free-flying satellites and co-orbiting platforms brought to the Space Station, and the polar orbiting platforms. The requirements for assembly and servicing such a broad spectrum of missions have led to the development of an Assembly and Servicing System Architecture that is composed of a complex array of support elements. This array is comprised of US elements, both Space Station and non-Space Station, and elements provided by Canada to the Space Station Program. For any given servicing or assembly mission, the necessary support elements will be employed in an integrated manner to satisfy the mission-specific needs. The structure of the User Assembly and Servicing System Architecture and the manner in which it will evolved throughout the duration of the phased Space Station Program are discussed. Particular emphasis will be placed upon the requirements to be accommodated in each phase, and the development of a logical progression of capabilities to meet these requirements.

Lavigna, Thomas A.↗
NASA NTRS1990

On-orbit assembly/servicing task definition study

The OEXP vehicles being envisioned to carry out the Presidential space goals of a lunar outpost and human exploration of Mars will require on-orbit assembly, refurbishment, checkout, and launch. The On-orbit Assembly/Servicing Task Definition Study applies the space vehicle processing experience and procedures archives resident at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC) to determine the task flows, and resources/facilities necessary to process the OEXP vehicles at Space Station Freedom (SSF). This data base is examined to find the closest analogies to OEXP vehicle components and assembly/refurbishment tasks. Transition tables are generated to provide traceability from KSC hardware processing experience to analogous on-orbit processing of the OEXP vehicles. Iterations in which the task flows are broken down into realistic extravehicular activity (EVA) primitive subtasks and times, and to apply automation and robotic technology to reduce crew risks and minimize EVA time, will enhance the value and accuracy of the predicted flows. These processing scenarios and the resulting resource/facility requirements are used to determine impacts of SSF, resulting in change requests to SSF requirements for provision of 'hooks and scars' to evolve the assembly complete Space Station into a transportation node. Study results to date include assembly analysis of the Martin Marietta Phobos Gateway Vehicle, refurbishment analysis of the Martin Marietta Lunar Evolution Piloted and Cargo Vehicles, and assembly analysis of the Boeing Mars Evolution Vehicle. The results of this study will be accumulated into the vehicle processing operations data base for subsequent modeling, life cycle cost, vehicle growth, and SSF impact analysis.

Vargo, Rick↗
NASA NTRS1992

Space Habitat, assembly and repair facility

Integrated Space Systems (ISS) has designed a Low Earth Orbit Assembly Facility for submission in the 1992 AIAA/LORAL Team Space Design Competition. This facility, the Space Habitat, Assembly, and Repair Center (SHARC), will be used to construct, assemble, and service space vehicles. SHARC's primary mission will be the construction of interplanetary vehicles, but it will also be able to perform repair and refueling operations of craft which are in an Earth orbit. This facility has been designed using only present and near-present technology. The emphasis is on minimizing cost.

Colangelo, Todd A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

On-orbit/On-surface Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (OSAM) Architecture Simulation System (OASiS)

On-orbit/on-surface servicing, assembly, and manufacturing (OSAM) –recently renamed“in-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing”(ISAM) –will aid in the development of vital research-enabling structuresin space, such as the In-space Assembled Telescope, the Lunar Gateway, and the Lunar Safe Haven. As these structures become larger and more complex, developers will need new methods for verifying and validating their OSAM mission architectures at full-scale prior to launch, without paying for extensive facility upgrades or additional hardware prototypes. Under the OSAM Architecture Simulation System (OASiS) project, modular OSAM modeling and simulation capabilities were developed to help rapidly prototype and evaluate OSAM technologies and operational concepts.Theywerethenusedto demonstrate and evaluate data from the simulation of a simpleOSAM operation against ananaloghardware setup. Using collected test data, the teamevaluatedthe accuracy of the simulation environment against the behavior of real hardwareandgainedinsight on how to further improve OSAM modeling and simulation. With thesenewcapabilities and many more to come, developers will be able to test complex OSAM operations on multiple scales, iterate on technology designs faster, achieve higher operational accuracy, and ultimately reduce mission development costs. A comprehensive, high-fidelity simulation environment will ensure the successful servicing, assembly, and manufacturing of structures that help us study and explore our universe.

isam↗
NASA NTRS1983

Advanced LOX/H2 engine technologies for future OTVs

It is pointed out that NASA and DOD missions of the near future include, by current estimates, approximately 50 highly energetic missions to geosynchronous orbit. Advanced concepts make use of the Space Shuttle to transport the assembled orbital transfer vehicle (OTV) to low earth orbit (LEO) or to bring components and propellants from which to assemble the OTV in LEO. An advanced expander cycle engine based upon the RS-44 engine design has been planned for ultimate use with advanced space-based OTVs. Its design features complement the characteristics of manned space-based aeroassist vehicles which will provide the most cost-effective means for payload transfer between LEO and GEO orbits. A test-bed program is planned for early demonstration of the advanced expander cycle engine operation.

Martinez, A.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Development of assembly and joint concepts for erectable space structures

The technology associated with the on-orbit assembly of tetrahedral truss platforms erected of graphite epoxy tapered columns is examined. Associated with the assembly process is the design and fabrication of nine member node joints. Two such joints demonstrating somewhat different technology were designed and fabricated. Two methods of automatic assembly using the node designs were investigated, and the time of assembly of tetrahedral truss structures up to 1 square km in size was estimated. The effect of column and node joint packaging on the Space Shuttle cargo bay is examined. A brief discussion is included of operating cost considerations and the selection of energy sources. Consideration was given to the design assembly machines from 5 m to 20 m. The smaller machines, mounted on the Space Shuttle, are deployable and restowable. They provide a means of demonstrating the capabilities of the concept and of erecting small specialized platforms on relatively short notice.

Jacquemin, G. G.↗
NASA NTRS1997

The International Space Station Assembly on Schedule

As engineers continue to prepare the International Space Station (ISS) for in-orbit assembly in the year 2002, ANSYS software has proven instrumental in resolving a structural problem in the project's two primary station modules -- Nodes 1 and 2. Proof pressure tests performed in May revealed "low temperature, post-yield creep" in some of the Nodes' gussets, which were designed to reinforce ports for loads from station keeping and reboost motion of the entire space station. An extensive effort was undertaken to characterize the creep behavior of the 2219-T851 aluminum forging material from which the gussets were made. Engineers at Sverdrup Technology, Inc. (Huntsville, AL) were responsible for conducting a combined elastic-plastic-creep analysis of the gussets to determine the amount of residual compressive stress which existed in the gussets following the proof pressure tests, and to determine the stress-strain history in the gussets while on-orbit. Boeing, NASA's Space Station prime contractor, supplied the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model geometry and developed the creep equations from the experimental data taken by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and Langley Research Center. The goal of this effort was to implement the uniaxial creep equations into a three dimensional finite element program, and to determine analytically whether or not the creep was something that the space station program could live with. The objective was to show analytically that either the creep rate was at an acceptable level, or that the node module had to be modified to lower the stress levels to where creep did not occur. The elastic-plastic-creep analysis was performed using the ANSYS finite element program of ANSYS, Inc. (Houston, PA). The analysis revealed that the gussets encountered a compressive stress of approximately 30,000 pounds per square inch (psi) when unloaded. This compressive residual stress significantly lowered the maximum tension stress in the gussets which decreased the creep strain rate. The analysis also showed that the gussets would not experience a great deal of creep from future pressure tests if braces or struts proposed by Boeing were installed to redistribute stress away from them. Subsequent analysis of on-orbit station keeping and reboost loads convinced Boeing that the gussets should be removed altogether.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1988

Space Station assembly sequence planning - An engineering and operational challenge

This paper discusses the Space Station assembly sequence planning and development process. It presents the planning methodologies from both historial and current perspectives. It is shown that planning the assembly sequence is a new and unique challenge and its solution requires the simultaneous satisfaction of many diverse variables and constants. The considerations which influence the development of the assembly sequence include launch vehicle integration and lift capabilities, on-orbit assembly flight operations, vehicle flight dynamics, spacecraft system capabilities and resource availability. Many of these considerations are described in this paper. In addition, the examples presented demonstrate the current process for assembly sequence planning and show many of the complex trade-offs that must be performed.

Kaidy, James T.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Results of the M.I.T. Beam Assembly Teleoperator and Integrated Control Station

To examine the issues of optimum human-machine mixtures for orbital assembly operations, a full six degree-of-freedom teleoperator system for assembly of large space structures has been developed by the Space Systems Laboratory. This consists of a free-flying neutrally buoyant Beam Assembly Teleoperator (BAT) with two manipulators, and a modular Integrated Control Station (ICS). The design and configuration of both the BAT and the ICS are described in some detail in this paper. In addition, qualitative results from early tests of the system are presented. These tests concentrated mostly on free-flying operations and grasping. Future tests will involve complete teleoperated assembly.

Spofford, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1981

The Marshall Center: Its place in NASA

The organizational structure and facilities available at the Marshall Space Flight Center are described and the role of the Center in NASA program management is demonstrated in a review of the Center's past history and current development projects. Particular attention is given to space shuttle and the space transportation system; the preparation of experiments and management of Spacelab missions; and the development of the space telescope. Energy related activities discussed include the automatic guidance and control of the longwall shearing machine for coal extraction, systems for the solar heating and cooling of buildings, and the design of the solar power satellite. Products developed by Center personnel highlighted include the power factor controller to reduce electrical consumption by motors and the image enhancement process being used to restore early historical photographs. A free flying solar power source to increase mission duration of the orbiter and its payloads; techniques for the orbital assembly of large space structures; facilities for materials processing in space; the orbit transfer vehicle, solar electric propulsion systems; and the preparation of science and applications payloads are also described.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2006

Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter interplanetary injection period analysis

This paper investigates the sensitivity of the planned Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter mission to variations in interplanetary injection date, magnitude, and direction, starting in a low-Earth assembly orbit. These results are used to determine the frequency and number of injection opportunities from a processing assembly obit. It is shown that the use of a low-thrust propulsion system with a nuclear-electric power source would allow the interplanetary trajectory performance to be relatively insensitive to variations in injection conditions. This result yields many injection opportunities due to the long injection period and consecutive orbits with favorable geometry.

trajectory↗
NASA NTRS1988

Pathfinder: Surface exploration, in-space operations and space transfer

Viewgraphs on the Pathfinder program are presented. Information is given on technology needs, a planetary rover, program management, an autonomous lander, mission applications, orbital assembly, cryogenics, space nuclear reactors, space manufacturing, optical communications, spacecraft propulsion, aerobraking, and orbital transfer vehicles.

Mankins, John↗
NASA NTRS1991

Global change technology architecture trade study

Described here is an architecture trade study conducted by the Langley Research Center to develop a representative mix of advanced space science instrumentation, spacecraft, and mission orbits to assist in the technology selection processes. The analyses concentrated on the highest priority classes of global change measurements which are the global climate changes. Issues addressed in the tradeoffs includes assessments of the economics of scale of large platforms with multiple instruments relative to smaller spacecraft; the influences of current and possible future launch vehicles on payload sizes, and on-orbit assembly decisions; and the respective roles of low-Earth versus geostationary Earth orbiting systems.

Garrett, L. Bernard↗
NASA NTRS1988

Nuclear reactor power as applied to a space-based radar mission

A space-based radar mission and spacecraft are examined to determine system requirements for a 300 kWe space nuclear reactor power system. The spacecraft configuration and its orbit, launch vehicle, and propulsion are described. Mission profiles are addressed, and storage in assembly orbit is considered. Dynamics and attitude control and the problems of nuclear and thermal radiation are examined.

Jaffe, L.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Neutral buoyancy evaluation of extravehicular activity assembly of a large precision reflector

A procedure that enables astronauts in extravehicular activity (EVA) to perform efficient on-orbit assembly of large paraboloidal precision reflectors is presented. The procedure and associated hardware are verified in simulated Og ~ (neutral buoyancy) assembly tests of a 14m-diameter precision reflector mockup. The test article represents a precision reflector having a reflective surface which is segmented into 37 individual panels. The panels are supported on a doubly curved tetrahedral truss consisting of 315 struts. The entire truss and seven reflector panels were assembled in three hours and seven minutes by two pressure-suited test subjects. The average time to attach a panel was two minutes and three seconds. These efficient assembly times were achieved because all hardware and assembly procedures were designed to be compatible with EVA assembly capabilities.

Heard, Walter L., Jr.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Understanding Dynamic Challenges of In-Space Modular Assembly and Reconfiguration of Flexible Structures from Early Efforts

A review of 1980s to early 2010s research supporting and documenting successful missions for on-orbit assembly of large space structures was conducted to bring together flexible space structure dynamics challenges and progress toward solutions. Research in this period focused on issues ranging from ground validation via unique test beds to in-space modal characterization and model adjustment. The phased assembly of the International Space Station (ISS), along with its evolving structural loads and dynamics, provides the central example, with ground and on-orbit tests of other systems providing contributing and contrasting examples of potential value for researchers facing today’s challenges.

Modal Space Testing↗
NASA NTRS1980

The assembly of large structures in space - An evaluation of hardware configurations and assembly techniques through neutral buoyancy simulation

The implementation of NASA's Space Transportation System (STS) presents the opportunity for the on-orbit assembly of structures which, before the advent of multi-launch missions, were not possible because of their physical size. This report presents the results of an eight-month effort in the investigation of assembly techniques and hardware configurations used in assembly of the basic tetrahedral cell by A7LB pressure-suited subjects in Marshall Space Flight Center's Neutral Buoyancy Simulator. Eleven subjects participated in assembly procedures which investigated two types of structural members and two configurations of attachment hardware. The assembly was accomplished through extra-vehicular activity (EVA) only, EVA with simulated manned maneuvering unit (MMU), and EVA with simulated MMU and simulated remote manipulator system (RMS). Assembly times as low as 10.20 minutes per tetrahedron were achieved.

Loughead, T. E.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Space Operations Center - A concept analysis

The Space Operations Center (SOC) which is a concept for a Shuttle serviced, permanent, manned facility in low earth orbit is viewed as a major candidate for the manned space flight following the completion of an operational Shuttle. The primary objectives of SOC are: (1) the construction, checkout, and transfer to operational orbit of large, complex space systems, (2) on-orbit assembly, launch, recovery, and servicing of manned and unmanned spacecraft, (3) managing operations of co-orbiting free-flying satellites, and (4) the development of reduced dependence on earth for control and resupply. The structure of SOC, a self-contained orbital facility containing several Shuttle launched modules, includes the service, habitation, and logistics modules as well as construction, and flight support facilities. A schedule is proposed for the development of SOC over ten years and costs for the yearly programs are estimated.

Source record↗