Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PARKING ORBIT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Shuttle/Centaur Upper Stage Capability

A joint project to design, develop, procure, and produce Centaur upper stages for use with the Space Shuttle is discussed. A common Centaur G stage 6 meters (19.5 feet) in length is being jointly developed. A longer version designated Centaur G Prime is being developed by NASA to accomplish the Galileo and International Solar-Polar Mission flights in 1986. The Centaur G and G Prime will have the capability to place, respectively, approximately 4540 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and 5910 kilograms (13,000 pounds) into geosynchronous orbit from a standard Shuttle parking orbit of 278 kilometers (150 nautical miles) and Shuttle performance (lift) capability 29,500 kilograms (65,000 pounds). The advent of high energy upper stage capability in 1986 will permit space users and spacecraft developers to utilize spacecraft growth, stage combination concepts with storage modules, teleoperator systems, and other mission peculiar devices to satisfy complex mission demands. These capabilities should greatly enhance the usefulness of the space environment and stimulate mission planners toward conception of innovative means to meet ever increasing mission requirements.

Clark, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Manned Mars mission sunlight and communication occultations

Calculations are presented for the 1999 opposition class mission and a procedure for obtaining singlar occultation data for any other given Mars mission is given. Occultation data for a Mars orbiter in a 24.5 hour parking orbit and a Mars base were calculated for: sunlight occultation - the time in darkness; and radio communication occultation - the communication losses between the lander and the orbiter, the lander and Earth, and orbiter and Earth.

Jack Mulqueen↗
NASA NTRS2017

Automation of POST Cases via External Optimizer and "Artificial p2" Calculation

During early conceptual design of complex systems, speed and accuracy are often at odds with one another. While many characteristics of the design are fluctuating rapidly during this phase there is nonetheless a need to acquire accurate data from which to down-select designs as these decisions will have a large impact upon program life-cycle cost. Therefore enabling the conceptual designer to produce accurate data in a timely manner is tantamount to program viability. For conceptual design of launch vehicles, trajectory analysis and optimization is a large hurdle. Tools such as the industry standard Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST) have traditionally required an expert in the loop for setting up inputs, running the program, and analyzing the output. The solution space for trajectory analysis is in general non-linear and multi-modal requiring an experienced analyst to weed out sub-optimal designs in pursuit of the global optimum. While an experienced analyst presented with a vehicle similar to one which they have already worked on can likely produce optimal performance figures in a timely manner, as soon as the "experienced" or "similar" adjectives are invalid the process can become lengthy. In addition, an experienced analyst working on a similar vehicle may go into the analysis with preconceived ideas about what the vehicle's trajectory should look like which can result in sub-optimal performance being recorded. Thus, in any case but the ideal either time or accuracy can be sacrificed. In the authors' previous work a tool called multiPOST was created which captures the heuristics of a human analyst over the process of executing trajectory analysis with POST. However without the instincts of a human in the loop, this method relied upon Monte Carlo simulation to find successful trajectories. Overall the method has mixed results, and in the context of optimizing multiple vehicles it is inefficient in comparison to the method presented POST's internal optimizer functions like any other gradient-based optimizer. It has a specified variable to optimize whose value is represented as optval, a set of dependent constraints to meet with associated forms and tolerances whose value is represented as p2, and a set of independent variables known as the u-vector to modify in pursuit of optimality. Each of these quantities are calculated or manipulated at a certain phase within the trajectory. The optimizer is further constrained by the requirement that the input u-vector must result in a trajectory which proceeds through each of the prescribed events in the input file. For example, if the input u-vector causes the vehicle to crash before it can achieve the orbital parameters required for a parking orbit, then the run will fail without engaging the optimizer, and a p2 value of exactly zero is returned. This poses a problem, as this "non-connecting" region of the u-vector space is far larger than the "connecting" region which returns a non-zero value of p2 and can be worked on by the internal optimizer. Finding this connecting region and more specifically the global optimum within this region has traditionally required the use of an expert analyst.

Dees, Patrick D.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Magellan Prelaunch Mission Operations Report

The Magellan spacecraft will be launched from Kennedy Space Center (KSC) within a 31-day overall launch period extending from April 28 to May 28, 1989. The launch will use the Shuttle Orbiter Atlantis to lift an Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) and the Magellan Spacecraft into low Earth orbit. After the Shuttle achieves its parking orbit, the IUS and attached Magellan spacecraft are deployed from the payload bay. After a short coast time, the two-stage IUS is fired to inject the Magellan spacecraft into an Earth-Venus transfer trajectory. The Magellan spacecraft is powered by single degree of freedom, sun-tracking, solar panels charging a set of nickel-cadmium batteries. The spacecraft is three-axis stabilized by reaction wheels using gyros and a star sensor for attitude reference. The spacecraft carries a solid rocket motor for Venus Orbit Insertion (VOI). A hydrazine propulsion system allows trajectory correction and prevents saturation of the reaction wheels. Communication with Earth through the Deep Space Network (DSN) is provided by S- and X-band telemetry channels, through alternatively a low, medium, or 3.7 m high-gain parabolic antenna rigidly attached to the spacecraft. The high-gain antenna also serves as the radar and radiometer antenna during orbit around Venus.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1988

Mars Exploration: Mission and System Analysis of the Split Sprint Mission

The information presented in this report provides detailed mission and system analysis of the Split Sprint Mission to Mars. These data were generated from September 1987 through July 1988 and involved numerous individuals within Program Development. This mission derives its name from the fact that the total mission payload is split between two vehicles, a cargo vehicle, and a piloted vehicle. The cargo vehicle carries the Mars lander and propellant for the piloted vehicle return to Earth. Then approximately 1 1/2 years later, the piloted vehicle carries the crew on a higher energy "sprint” trajectory to Mars. The advantages of the Split Sprint Mission is that the payload for the piloted vehicle is minimized and the crew would be in space for only 14 months. Mission and system data are presented for a Sprint Mission in the year 2004. Many important aspects of the mission were studied in detail. These include orbital lighting and lifetime analysis, Mars parking orbit selection, Earth departure window analysis, lander descent and ascent performance, vehicle aerobraking requirements, mission orbital maneuvers, and many other analyses listed in the Table of Contents. Emphasis was placed on vehicle performance analysis which ranged from recovery of the Earth departure stages to aerocapture of the Earth Return Capsule. There is also a section describing the computer programs that were used for this study. These programs provide many useful tools for future studies of manned planetary missions. This introductory section will give an overall view of the Split Sprint Mission and describe the orbital operations and vehicles that were studied.

Mars Architecture Team↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 16 Press Kit

The Apollo 16 spacecraft is scheduled for launch on Apr. 16, 1972 from Complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida by the Saturn V launch vehicle. Crewmen are mission commander John W. Young, command module pilot Thomas K. Mattingly II and lunar module pilot Charles M. Duke Jr. Objectives of the mission, to last up to 12 days, as outlined by NASA: to perform selenological inspection, survey and sampling of materials in a preselected region of Descartes using a lunar roving' vehicle; deploy and activate Apollo surface experiments; develop man's capability to work in the lunar environment; obtain photographs of candidate exploration sites; and toconduct inflight experiments and photographic tasks in lunar orbit. Following launch, the spacecraft will reach Earth Parking Orbit and remain in orbit for about two and one-half revolutions prior to Translunar Injection. Next, the Command and Service Module docks with the Lunar Module and the spacecraft "coasts" to the moon. In orbit around the moon, the Command and Service Module/Lunar Module combination will descend to within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface before undocking. The Lunar Module will continue to descend while the Command and Service Module returns to an orbit approximately 60 miles high. Stay time on the lunar surface is scheduled for approximately 73 hours. The ascent stage of the Lunar Module then lifts the astronauts back into lunar orbit where they will dock with the Command/Service Module. The Lunar Module is jettisoned and Transearth Injection follows. Just prior to reentry into the earth's atmosphere, the Service Module is jettisoned, and the astronauts in the Command Module splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. The target point for end-of-mission splashdown is at 05 degrees 0 minutes north latitude and 158 degrees 40 minutes west longitude or approximately 985 nautical miles south of Honolulu, Hawaii. Splashdown is scheduled for Apr. 28, 1972 at 10:30 a.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (2:30 p.m. CST). Recovery forces for Apollo 16, stationed in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, will consist of three ships, nine aircraft and nearly 1,700 personnel. CTF-130 (Manned Spacecraft Recovery Force, Pacific) forces will be stationed south of Hawaii. Three ships, eight helicopters and three Air Force HC-130H aircraft, and nearly 1,100 personnel, will take part. Task Force 140 (Manned Spacecraft Recovery Force, Atlantic), comprising one ship, six HC-130H aircraft, three helicopters and approximately 300 personnel, will be positioned for possible launch abort operations. Two ships in the Atlantic will also be used for acoustical testing. Other forces, primarily aircraft and personnel of the Air Force Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Service will be on alert around the world for contingency recovery support.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1977

Space manufacturing facilities: Space colonies; Proceedings of the Princeton Conference, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., May 7-9, 1975

Reports submitted to the conference encompass: administration and law relating to inhabited space facilities and colonies; space manufacturing and processing; organization and construction of space habitats and management of space colony farms; winning and acquisition of lunar and asteroidal materials for sustaining autonomous space colonies. Attention is given to trajectories between earth, low earth orbit, earth-moon libration points (specifically L5), circumlunar parking orbits, and trajectories in translunar space; effects of low gravity and zero gravity on human physiology and on materials processing; architecture and landscaping for space colonies; closed ecosystems of space colonies. Varieties of human cultures and value hierarchies around the earth are examined for broader perspectives on the social organization of space colonies.

Grey, J.↗
NASA NTRS2011

A Phobos-Deimos Mission as an Element of the NASA Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0

NASA has conducted a series of mission studies over the past 25 years examining the eventual exploration of the surface of Mars by humans. The latest version of this evolutionary series of design reference missions/architectures - Design Reference Architecture 5 or DRA-5 - was completed in 2007. This paper examines the implications of including a human mission to explore the moons of Mars and teleoperate robots in various locations, but not to land the human crews on Mars, as an element of this reference architecture. Such a mission has been proposed several times during this same 25 year evolution leading up to the completion of DRA-5 primarily as a mission of testing the in-space vehicles and operations while surface vehicles and landers are under development. But such a precursor or test mission has never been explicitly included as an element of this Architecture. This paper will first summarize the key features of the DRA-5 to provide context for the remainder of the assessment. This will include a description of the in-space vehicles that would be the subject of a shakedown test during the Mars orbital mission. A decision tree will be used to illustrate the factors that will be analyzed, and the sequence in which they will be addressed, for this assessment. The factors that will be analyzed include the type of interplanetary transfer orbit (opposition class versus conjunction class), the type of parking orbit (circular versus elliptical), and the type of propulsion technology (high thrust chemical versus nuclear thermal rocket). The manner in which each of these factors impacts an individual mission will be described. In addition to the direct impact of these factors, additional considerations impacting crew health and overall programmatic outcomes will be discussed. Numerical results for each of the factors in the decision tree will be grouped with derived qualitative impacts from crew health and programmatic consideration. These quantitative and qualitative results will be summarized in a pros/cons table as a summary for this analysis.

Hoffman, Stephen J.↗
NASA NTRS2000

The Mars Sample Return Project

The Mars Sample Return (MSR) Project is underway. A 2003 mission to be launched on a Delta III Class vehicle and a 2005 mission launched on an Ariane 5 will culminate in carefully selected Mars samples arriving on Earth in 2008. NASA is the lead agency and will provide the Mars landed elements, namely, landers, rovers, and Mars ascent vehicles (MAVs). The French Space Agency CNES is the largest international partner and will provide for the joint NASA/CNES 2005 Mission the Ariane 5 launch and the Earth Return Mars Orbiter that will capture the sample canisters from the Mars parking orbits the MAVs place them in. The sample canisters will be returned to Earth aboard the CNES Orbiter in the Earth Entry Vehicles provided by NASA. Other national space agencies are also expected to participate in substantial roles. Italy is planning to provide a drill that will operate from the Landers to provide subsurface samples. Other experiments in addition to the MSR payload will also be carried on the Landers. This paper will present the current status of the design of the MSR missions and flight articles. c 2000 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

International Cooperation↗
NASA NTRS1993

An approach for finding long period elliptical orbits for precursor SEI missions

Precursors for Solar System Exploration Initiative (SEI) missions may require long period elliptical orbits about a planet. These orbits will typically have periods on the order of tens to hundreds of days. Some potential uses for these orbits may include the following: studying the effects of galactic cosmic radiation, parking orbits for engineering and operational test of systems, and ferrying orbits between libration points and low altitude orbits. This report presents an approach that can be used to find these orbits. The approach consists of three major steps. First, it uses a restricted three-body targeting algorithm to determine the initial conditions which satisfy certain desired final conditions in a system of two massive primaries. Then the initial conditions are transformed to an inertial coordinate system for use by a special perturbation method. Finally, using the special perturbation method, other perturbations (e.g., sun third body and solar radiation pressure) can be easily incorporated to determine their effects on the nominal trajectory. An algorithm potentially suitable for on-board guidance will also be discussed. This algorithm uses an analytic method relying on Chebyshev polynomials to compute the desired position and velocity of the satellite as a function of time. Together with navigation updates, this algorithm can be implemented to predict the size and timing for AV corrections.

Fraietta, Michael F.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Piloted Mars missions using cryogenic and storable propellants

The paper presents an analyses of piloted long-duration stay Mars missions using a chemical or nuclear thermal propulsion Earth-departure stage, storable propellant Mars arrival and departure stages (to avoid propellant boiloff), and an Earth entry vehicle, conducted for three-year segments from 2000 to 2020. The study initially determines the minimum initial mass in low-Earth orbit (IMLEO) missions and then investigates their radiation exposure levels and Mars parking orbit selection. The impact of reducing the outbound (Earth-Mars) transfer time on IMLEO and predicted radiation exposure levels is included. The results indicate that a vehicle using an advanced chemical propulsion system (Isp = 480 s) for Earth departure is feasible throughout 2000-2020 with an IMLEO less than 640 metric tons, while an Earth departure stage using a nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) system with Isp of 925 s is even more appealing with IMLEO's less than 405 tons. Vehicles with 875 and 825 s specific impulse Earth departure stages have only slightly higher IMLEO's than the advanced NTP system (10 and 20 tons higher, respectively). Reducing the time spent in space may not always result in a significantly reduced level of radiation exposure, especially if the mission encounter dates are changed to a less favorable period of the solar cycle.

Striepe, Scott A.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Utilization of Space Station by the Large Deployment Reflector

The Large Deployable Reflector (LDR), a NASA concept of a very large, orbiting, far infrared submillimeter telescope is described. To be launched in the 1990s, LDR has a projected life of 10 years and is to be serviced every 2 to 3 years. A System Concept and Technology Definition Study of LDR for NASA Ames is currently being conducted. Study results indicate that launch of a 20 m LDR, operating in a 700 to 800 km orbit, requires two shuttle loads. The components of LDR are assembled in a lower parking orbit, and the system is checked out and then transferred to the operational orbit. Furthermore, for servicing, LDR may have to be retrieved to the same lower orbit (and later returned to operational altitude) by an orbit transfer vehicle. These requirements bring up the question of a suitable assembly, checkout, and servicing platform. The deployment process is time consuming and may require special equipment not necessarily available from the orbiter itself. The SS is an attractive choice for that platform.

Bandermann, L. W.↗
NASA NTRS1963

LATERAL-RANGE AND HYPERSONIC LIFT-DRAG-RATIO REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFICIENT FERRY SERVICE FROM A NEAR-EARTH MANNED SPACE STATION

The operation of any long-term manned space station will require some type of ferry vehicle to transport men and equipment to and from the station with regularity and reliability. Such a vehicle, designed for entry at near-orbital speeds, could also be useful in the return from any deeper space mission if either an earth-orbit rendezvous terminal maneuver or a maneuver combining atmospheric braking and a near-earth parking orbit is used. This study was undertaken to determine the class of vehicle which could be most efficiently used as a ferry vehicle between a near-earth space station and the earth. One measure of this efficiency is the ability of the vehicle to reach pre-chosen landing sites with some prescribed frequency. In considering this frequency of return it is necessary to consider not only the normal mode of operation in which only infrequent returns are scheduled at desirable times, but also operation under various degrees of emergency, which dictate quick or even immediate return to earth. In extreme emergencies, when immediate return to earth is necessary, choice of landing site becomes impractical. In most cases, however, although it might be required to abandon the station quickly, the ferry vehicle could remain in orbit for some time before initiating reentry in order to land at a prechosen site. The allowable delay time in orbit would be determined primarily by the capabilities of the ferry life-support system. This paper will examine the geometry of the ferry ranging problem, that is, the lateral ranges required to reach chosen landing sites from various near-earth orbits, and will investigate and compare several means of achieving these ranges. The particular case considered is that of returning from a space station which is in a circular orbit at an altitude of 200 statute miles, but the results obtained are not sensitive to orbit altitude for orbits within a few hundred miles of the surface. From this orbit, the vehicle will retro and reenter at very close to satellite velocity. The downrange problem can be handled by proper timing of the retrofiring , and the desired lateral range can be achieved by aerodynamics, space propulsion to change orbit plane, atmospheric propulsion, or combinations of these methods. The relative cost in terms of weight of using these different methods to achieve lateral range will be discussed.

Hypersonic vehicle↗
NASA NTRS1972

Design and systems analysis of a chemical interorbital shuttle. Volume 1: Executive summary

An interorbital shuttle that can be utilized to carry payloads between low earth orbit (180 n mi, 37.6 deg) and lunar or geosynchronous orbits, and also to interplanetary trajectories is discussed. After each mission the stage returns to its earth parking orbit where it delivers the inbound payloads, and where it is maintained and refueled for the subsequent missions. The stage can also be utilized to carry large payloads (150 to 200 KLBS) to the Space Station orbit (270 n mi, 55 deg) when it is used as a second or parallel burn stage to the space shuttle booster. The mission and systems analysis, as well as the results of structural, mechanical and propulsion, and avionics subsystems analysis and design are described. A development plan and cost estimates are also included.

Nissim, W.↗
NASA NTRS2008

Development Status of the J-2X

In June 2006, the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne began development of an engine for use on the Ares I crew launch vehicle and the Ares V cargo launch vehicle. The development program will be completed in December 2012 at the end of a Design Certification Review and after certification testing of two flight configuration engines. A team of over 600 people within NASA and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne are currently working to prepare for the fall 2008 Critical Design Review (CDR), along with supporting an extensive risk mitigation test program. The J-2X will power the Ares I upper stage and the Ares V earth departure stage (EDS). The initial use will be in the Ares I, used to launch the Orion crew exploration vehicle. In this application, it will power the upper stage after being sent aloft on a Space Shuttle-derived. 5-segment solid rocket booster first stage. In this mission. the engine will ignite at altitude and provide the necessary acceleration force to allow the Orion to achieve orbital velocity. The Ares I upper stage, along with the J-2X. will then be expended. On the Ares V. first stage propulsion is provided by five RS-68B engines and two 5-segment boosters similar to the Ares I configuration. In the Ares V mission. the J-2X is first started to power the EDS and its payload. the Altair lunar lander. into earth orbit, then shut-down and get prepared for its next start. The EDS/Altair will remain in a parking orbit, awaiting rendezvous and docking with Orion. Once the two spacecraft are mated, the J-2X will be restarted to achieve earth departure velocity. After powering the Orion and Altair, the EDS will be expended. By using the J-2X Engine in both applications, a significant infrastructure cost savings is realized. Only one engine development is required, and the sustaining engineering and flight support infrastructures can be combined. There is also flexibility for changing, the production and flight manifest because a single production line can support both missions with minimal differences between each engine configuration kit.

Kynard, Mike↗