Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PERC cells”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

74 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Field Testing of PID-p Susceptible Bifacial PERC Modules: Impact of Light, Voltage and Module History ​

This work investigates the potential induced degradation-polarization (PID-p) of bifacial passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) modules installed in the field at the Florida Solar Energy Center. 22 modules were stressed over 1 year under various voltage (-1500V, -3500, +1500V) and mounting configurations (close to ground, 2 meters from ground, close to roof). The positively stressed modules were anticipated to have experiences PID-p on their front side. However, no degradation was observed, as the light-induced recovery effect effectively counteracted the degradation. The negatively stressed modules experienced Pmax drops during 2 weeks before stabilizing at 5-6% loss. I-V and EL characteristics suggest a PID-p degradation on the rear side. Lower degradation rates are observed with lower voltage and when the mounting configuration allows more albedo light on the rear side to compensate for the degradation. PID-p is observed to stabilize at similar level for the voltage and mounting configuration tested with slightly lower Pmax in winter. EL imaging reveals that cells are not degrading at the same rate across a module. Some cells get darker and then brighter which corresponds to the silicon/passivation interface going through depletion and then inversion when enough positive charges are accumulated. After full light-recovery, the modules were tested again along with 22 brand-new ones to assess the impact of the module history. Results confirmed the trends observed in the first year with PID-p occurring at voltage as low as -600V and recovered modules degrading faster than brand-new ones.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2026

PV Lifetime Project - 2025 NLR Annual Report

DOE's PV Lifetime project was initiated in 2016 with the goal of accurately characterizing the early-life evolution of photovoltaic (PV) field performance. Different PV cell and module technologies result in different initial degradation rates due to effects like light-induced degradation (LID) and light and elevated temperature-induced degradation (LeTID). To accurately characterize the initial field degradation of maximum power (Pmp) requires the use of high-accuracy indoor IV curve measurements at standard test conditions. Therefore, PV modules involved in this study are removed from the field once or twice per year and brought indoors for measurement under constant temperature and irradiance conditions. Overall annual degradation rates are as follows: our first modules to be deployed (Jinko, Trina, QCells) have annual median degradation rate between -0.4%/yr and -0.5%/yr mainly concentrated in the first year. Mission Solar, LG and Panasonic modules are all displaying modest degradation, better than -0.3% / year. Indeed, Mission Solar fielded modules degraded less than their control modules which remain indoors and un-exposed. This is also true for the LONGi monofacial modules, which had some field degradation, but not as much as the degradation of the indoor control modules. The LONGi bifacial modules on the other hand have degraded more in the field than their monofacial counterparts, although still a modest amount (-0.4 %/yr). Of the four newest module types in the study, only one has had better than average degradation. REC360NP2 (N-type TOPCon) had a slight performance increase over the first year and a half of field deployment. For the other three new module types (plus one older module type), degradation was more rapid. In our study of 16 module types, four have demonstrated degradation faster than -1%/yr: two N-type Heterojunction, one PERC bifacial and one PERC shingled module. The two heterojunction modules in our study are degrading the most rapidly. Sunpreme n-HIT bifacial modules are showing a loss rate around -1.5%/yr, for over -10% total to date. This is largely attributed to loss in front-side Isc. This is distinct from the REC 405AA-Pure modules which have degraded -6.8% in only a year and a half, for an annualized decline of -3.9 %/yr. For this module type, the decline is roughly half in Voc, with the remaining split between FF and Isc. Of the remaining two module types, Prism Solar PERC bifacial has declined -5% total since 2019, although this loss appears to have stabilized in the most recent measurement. The Solaria PowerX-400R Shingled module type has also lost around -3.2% in the first 1.5 years of field deployment. It remains to be seen if these losses will continue with time.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗