Additive Manufacturing (AM) Development at NASA for Liquid Rocket Engines
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Additive Manufacturing↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
MAB Phase Ceramics for Lunar Applications
During the ten-week internship my work focused on designing characterization protocol for 3D printed MAB phase ceramics on steel and Tiplates. I was mentored by Dr. Samuel Hocker of NASA and advised by Dr. Gupta from University of North Dakota. I also collaborated with Mackenzie Short from the University of North Dakota. The characterization protocol was divided into following steps; initially, we performed visual inspection of the plates. During this process, the coatings which spalled or delaminated were discarded for further evaluation. During the next step, we performed optical microscopy to discern and document surface features and porosities of the samples. We also noted some decomposition under the optical microscope as well. Thereafter, profilometry analysis was performed to understand the effect of power density on the surface roughness. Due to the deposited powder over the samples, the profilometry was inconclusive. We then cleaned the samples on the steel plate using ethanol and cotton swabs to wipe up the loose powder covering the samples. Detailed SEM analysis was then performed on the cleaned specimens. In parallel, the 3D printed samples on the Tiplate were cleaned by using an ultrasonic bath for 1h. Optical imaging showed that this cleaning process was more effective for cleaning except that small cracks propagated through the layered ceramics. The profilometry data gathered on the titanium plate after cleaning was more conclusive. The SEM data on the steel plate showed that there is decomposition at all wattages although at 100 W the extent of decomposition was lower. We are planning to characterize the steel samples after cleaning in ultrasonic bath for 5-10 min to minimize cracking during the cleaning process. In addition, we are also planning to study the fractured surface by SEM analysis.
Additive Manufacturing, Laser Powder Bed Fusion, S↗
Introduction to Additive Manufacturing for Propulsion and Energy Systems
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Additive Manufacturing↗
Introduction to Metal Additive Manufacturing for Space Applications
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Additive Manufacturing↗
Scaleup of Microwave Powder Bed Fusion for Lunar Infrastructure Construction
NASA and its partners are seeking to establish a sustainable and permanent presence on the Moon. Like explorers on Earth, making use of natural resources upon arrival at the destination will be paramount. In-situ resource utilization of the lunar regolith will enable efficient construction of lunar infrastructure. Transforming the granular regolith into a solid can be achieved in many ways. One method is to use microwave energy to sinter the regolith into various structures. The lunar regolith has a low thermal conductivity, but microwaves can volumetrically heat it to bind the granular particles together in an energy efficient manner. One concept that is being developed and evaluated to sinter the regolith into infrastructure uses the Moon’s surface as a powder bed. Regolith would be added to the sintered lunar structure to build up layers to create structures such as landing pads, blast shields, roads, etc. Microwave systems, concept of operations, and sintering protocols are being developed to create a sub-element structure targeted for a lunar demonstration mission.
microwave↗
Influence of High-Intensity Ultrasound on Ti-6Al-4V Microstructure During Laser Powder Bed Fusion Solidification Conditions
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Powder Bed Fusion↗
Towards Qualification and Certification of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V with In-Situ Process Monitoring and Automated Defect Detection
Qualification and certification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts are two challenges that must be answered to ensure suitability for critical applications. In-situ monitoring using high frame rate thermal and conventional optical imaging sensors is applied to the LPBF build process. Currently, the large volume of data from such sensors becomes untenable for manual inspection in production environments. This presentation serves to address this in-situ monitoring deficiency in two ways. First, a framework for managing data streams from LPBF process monitoring sensors is described. Second, two candidate image analysis techniques are presented: one is a set of heuristics that are easily interpretable, and the other is an uninterpretable convolutional neural network. These strategies are compared in terms of performance, computational expense, and speed. These methodologies represent platforms for connecting processing conditions to process modeling efforts aligned with the qualification and certification mission for LPBF Ti-6Al-4V components.
Qualification↗
In-Situ Process Monitoring, Synchronization, and Mapping Laser Powder Bed Fusion Builds of Ti6Al4V
The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts. Precise monitoring of the LPBF-AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps, the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals, managing very large datasets, and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power & position Ti-6Al-4V LPBF are described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection and optical microscopy observations. Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality.
Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
Observations of Keyhole Porosity and Comparisons to Analytical Models for Ti-6Al-4V Powder Bed Fusion
Keyhole porosity defects are a common concern in powder bed fusion (PBF) processing. Keyhole porosity prediction models have generally fallen into two categories – high fidelity computational fluid dynamics simulations and low fidelity analytical or empirical models based on keyhole vibration dynamics. The low computational cost of low fidelity models allows them to better approach part-scale predictions. However, studies on low fidelity modeling techniques are limited by the lack of experimental data to assess the validity of the calibration over a wide range of processing conditions. This work extracts and quantifies keyhole porosity across 14 laser velocities, two laser powers, and six+ repetitions for a total of 176 independent trials. The measured porosity data are compared to low fidelity keyhole models to assess their success in predictive porosity occurrence. This work impacts the field by providing independent validation of keyhole porosity models for PBF for use in part-scale defect prediction.
powder bed fusion↗
Additive Manufacturing for Propulsion Systems
Additive Manufacturing (AM) has become a prominent technology of interest for manufacturing propulsion components and gaining attention across the aerospace industry. AM is maturing at a rapid pace and providing new design opportunities, novel materials, new industries and supply chains resulting in programmatic and technical performance improvements. The successful use of AM requires a methodical and intentional approach to understanding the concept to utilization lifecycle for AM. This course will provide an overview of the various steps in AM process trades, design, build process, post-processing, certification and infusion of AM. This will provide various lessons learned and experiences that were captured in a recent AIAA textbook titled "Metal Additive Manufacturing for Propulsion Applications" by the session chairs and industry colleagues. This course will include specific liquid rocket engine component examples and that went through the AM lifecycle including hot-fire testing.
Additive Manufacturing↗
Component Applications using Metal Additive Manufacturing Techniques and Materials for Rocket Propulsion
The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has been involved with various forms of metallic additive manufacturing for use in liquid rocket engine component design, development, and testing since 2010. These AM techniques have been demonstrated to significantly reduce hardware cost, shorten fabrication schedules, increase reliability by reducing the number of joints, and improve hardware performance by allowing fabrication of designs not feasible by conventional means. The focus at the NASA MSFC for these metal additive manufacturing techniques include laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF), blown powder directed energy deposition (DED) and arc-based deposition. A variety of components have been evaluated and tested including thrust chamber injectors, injector components such as faceplates, regeneratively-cooled combustion chambers, regeneratively-cooled nozzles, gas generator and preburner hardware, and augmented spark igniters. To support these component applications in harsh environments, NASA has advanced a variety of “standard” additive manufacturing alloys such as those in the superalloy-family and also evolved new alloys including GRCop-84, GRCop-42, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the various programs at the NASA MSFC using AM to develop, fabricate, and test combustion devices hardware and the evolution of the new additive alloys. Additional information will be provided on the development of multi-metallic additive manufacturing, post-processing of AM techniques including surface enhancements (polishing) techniques, material and process characterization, future development programs, and dissemination of data to industry partners.
Additive Manufacturing↗
Additive Manufacturing Development and Hot-Fire Testing of Liquid Rocket Channel Wall Nozzles Using Blown Powder Directed Energy Deposition Inconel 625 and JBK-75 Alloys
Additive manufacturing (AM) is being investigated at NASA and across much of the rocket propulsion industry as an alternate fabrication technique to create complex geometries for liquid engine components that offers schedule and cost saving opportunities. The geometries that can be created using AM offer a significant advantage over traditional techniques. Internal complexities, such as internal coolant channels for combustion chambers and nozzles that would typically require several operations to manufacture traditionally can be fabricated in one process. Additionally, the coolant channels are closed out as a part of the AM build process, eliminating the complexities of a traditional process like brazing or plating. The primary additive manufacturing technique that has been evaluated is powder bed fusion (PBF), or selective laser melting (SLM), but there is a scale limitation for this technique. There are several alternate additive manufacturing techniques that are being investigated for large-scale nozzles and chambers including directed energy deposition (DED) processes. A significant advantage of the DED processes is the ability to adapt to a robotic or gantry CNC system with a localized purge or purge chamber, allowing unlimited build volume. This paper will discuss the development and hot-fire testing of channel-cooled nozzles fabricated utilizing one form of DED called blown powder deposition. This initial development work using blown powder DED is being explored to form the entire channel wall nozzle with integral coolant channels within a single AM build. Much of this development is focused on the design and DED-fabrication of complex and thin-walled features and on characterization of the materials properties produced with this techniques in order to evolve this process. Subscale nozzles were fabricated using this DED technique and hot-fire tested in Liquid Oxygen/Hydrogen (LOX/GH2) and LOX/Kerosene (LOX/RP-1) environments accumulating significant development time and cycles. The initial materials that were evaluated during this testing were high-strength nickel-based Inconel 625 and JBK-75. Further process development is being completed to increase the scale of this technology for large-scale nozzles. This paper will summarize the general design considerations for DED, specific channel-cooled nozzle design, manufacturing process development, property development, initial hot-fire testing and future developments to mature this technology for regeneratively-cooled nozzles. An overview of future development at NASA will also be discussed.
Gradl, Paul R.↗
Large Scale and Multi-Alloy Rocket Engine Component Development using Various Metal Additive Manufacturing Techniques
The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has been involved with various forms of metallic additive manufacturing (AM) for use in liquid rocket engine component design, development, and testing since 2010. These AM techniques have been demonstrated to significantly reduce hardware cost, shorten fabrication schedules, increase reliability by reducing the number of joints, and improve hardware performance by allowing fabrication of designs not feasible by conventional means. The focus at the NASA MSFC for these metal additive manufacturing techniques include laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF), blown powder directed energy deposition (DED), arc-based deposition, and Laser Wire Direct Closeout (LWDC). A variety of components have been evaluated and tested including thrust chamber injectors, injector components such as faceplates, regeneratively-cooled combustion chambers, regeneratively-cooled nozzles, gas generator and preburner hardware, and augmented spark igniters. To support these component applications in harsh environments, NASA has advanced a variety of “standard” additive manufacturing alloys such as those in the superalloy-family and also evolved new alloys including GRCop-84, GRCop-42, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the various component programs at the NASA MSFC using AM to develop, fabricate, and test combustion devices hardware and the evolution of the new additive alloys. One of these projects that will be highlighted is Rapid Analysis and Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT), which includes new process development for large scale AM components, multi-metallic AM components, including unique component designs using additive manufacturing. Additional information will be provided on the development of other components, hot-fire testing, post-processing of AM techniques including surface enhancements (polishing) techniques, material and process characterization, future development programs, and dissemination of data to industry partners.
Additive Manufacturing↗
Additive Manufacturing of Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Multi Principle Element Alloys for Future Aerospace Applications
Oxide Dispersion Strengthened (ODS) materials have long been of interest for their high temperature applications, and additive manufacturing enables their manufacturing viability. The ODS multi-principle element alloy NiCoCr was prepared using powder metallurgy techniques, additively manufactured, and evaluated for its processingmicrostructure-property relationships. The high temperature foundations of nickel-base superalloys and ODS materials were combined with the manufacturing advantages of 3D printing and the chemical simplicity of NiCoCr to inspire this work, which was divided into powder and printed material assessments. The project was achieved through multiple iterative project loops to assess the processing parameters’ impact on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the feedstock powder and printed material. The powder investigations (Chapter 3) focused on understanding the oxide coating that formed on the metal powder following acoustic mixing. Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry was used to semi-quantitatively assess the amount of yttrium on the surface of the mixed powders, and indicated that a combination of higher mixing condition energy and moderate mixing time resulted in the most oxide coating on the NiCoCr powder. The results were supported by a qualitative assessment of scanning electron images of coated powder particles. Following mixing, the ODS NiCoCr was consolidated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. The evaluations of the printed material (Chapter 4) frst considered screening experiments including Archimedes’ density, porosity, and grain size and number metrics from electron backscatter diffraction data. After the ideal additive manufacturing parameters were identifed, both the oxide homogeneity and yield strength were discussed for the idealized printed material. Overall, the project suggests that the combined use of qualitative or semi-quantitative powder surface analysis with Archimedes’ density analyses can be a valid high-throughput technique which can lead to process optimization of Laser Powder Bed Fusion additively manufactured ODS material.
Laura G Wilson↗
Development and Hotfire Testing of Additively Manufactured Copper Combustion Chambers for Liquid Rocket Engine Applications
NASA and industry partners are working towards fabrication process development to reduce costs and schedules associated with manufacturing liquid rocket engine components with the goal of reducing overall mission costs. One such technique being evaluated is powder-bed fusion or selective laser melting (SLM), commonly referred to as additive manufacturing (AM). The NASA Low Cost Upper Stage Propulsion (LCUSP) program was designed to develop processes and material characterization for GRCop-84 (a NASA Glenn Research Center-developed copper, chrome, niobium alloy) commensurate with powder bed AM, evaluate bimetallic deposition, and complete testing of a full scale combustion chamber. As part of this development, the process has been transferred to industry partners to enable a long-term supply chain of monolithic copper combustion chambers. To advance the processes further and allow for optimization with multiple materials, NASA is also investigating the feasibility of bimetallic AM chambers. In addition to the LCUSP program, NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has completed a series of development programs and hot-fire tests to demonstrate SLM GRCop-84 and other AM techniques. MSFC’s efforts include a 4,000 pounds-force thrust liquid oxygen/methane (LOX/CH4) combustion chamber. Small thrust chambers for 1,200 pounds-force LOX/hydrogen (H2) applications have also been designed and fabricated with SLM GRCop-84. Similar chambers have also completed development with an Inconel 625 jacket bonded to the GRCop-84 material, evaluating direct metal deposition (DMD) laser- and arc-based techniques. The same technologies for these lower thrust applications are being applied to 25,000-35,000 pounds-force main combustion chamber (MCC) designs. This paper describes the design, development, manufacturing and testing of these numerous combustion chambers, and the associated lessons learned throughout their design and development processes.
Gradl, Paul R.↗
Development and Hot-fire Testing of Additively Manufactured Copper Combustion Chambers for Liquid Rocket Engine Applications
NASA and industry partners are working towards fabrication process development to reduce costs and schedules associated with manufacturing liquid rocket engine components with the goal of reducing overall mission costs. One such technique being evaluated is powder-bed fusion or selective laser melting (SLM), commonly referred to as additive manufacturing (AM). The NASA Low Cost Upper Stage Propulsion (LCUSP) program was designed to develop processes and material characterization for GRCop-84 (a NASA Glenn Research Center-developed copper, chrome, niobium alloy) commensurate with powder-bed AM, evaluate bimetallic deposition, and complete testing of a full scale combustion chamber. As part of this development, the process has been transferred to industry partners to enable a long-term supply chain of monolithic copper combustion chambers. To advance the processes further and allow for optimization with multiple materials, NASA is also investigating the feasibility of bimetallic AM chambers. In addition to the LCUSP program, NASA has completed a series of development programs and hot-fire tests to demonstrate SLM GRCop-84 and other AM techniques. NASA's efforts include a 4K lbf thrust liquid oxygen/methane (LOX/CH4) combustion chamber and subscale thrust chambers for 1.2K lbf LOX/hydrogen (H2) applications that have been designed and fabricated with SLM GRCop-84. The same technologies for these lower thrust applications are being applied to 25-35K lbf main combustion chamber (MCC) designs. This paper describes the design, development, manufacturing and testing of these numerous combustion chambers, and the associated lessons learned throughout their design and development processes.
Gradl, Paul R.↗
Additive Manufacturing Developments for Rocket Engines: Applications, Advanced Materials and Large Scale Techniques
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Additive Manufacturing↗
An Assessment of Nondestructive Evaluation Capability for Complex Additive Manufacturing Aerospace Components
The primary focus of this work is to investigate some of the fundamental relationships between processing, mechanical testing, materials characterization, and NDE for additively manufactured (AM) components using the powder bed fusion direct melt laser sintered process. The goal is to understand the criticality of defects unique to the AM process and then how conventional nondestructive evaluation methods as well as some of the more non-traditional methods such as computed tomography, are effected by the AM material. Specific defects including cracking, porosity and partially/unfused powder will be addressed. Besides line-of-site NDE, as appropriate these inspection capabilities will be put into the context of complex AM geometries where hidden features obscure, or inhibit traditional NDE methods.
Walker, James↗