Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Literature Review Investigating Adsorbents for Mercury Removal from Salt Batch Feed Material

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) contains mercury that originated from decades of canyon processing where it was used as a catalyst for dissolving aluminum cladding of reactor fuel. Since the start of radioactive operations, the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has experienced processing difficulties due to the presence of mercury-laden solids. In response to these challenges, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has been requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)/Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) personnel to perform a literature review to assess the feasibility of chemical strikes to salt waste-containing tanks at the SRS as an option to reduce mercury introduction into SWPF. The literature review should evaluate known technologies and chemistries for decreasing mercury concentration and the anticipated efficacy of each technology on various mercury species known to exist in SRS waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Characterization of Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT) Batches 15, 22, and 26 from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes a Monosodium Titanate/Sludge Solids (MST/SS) waste stream received from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) via the Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT). During processing, DWPF is required to provide evidence of compliance with the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS) to ensure acceptance of their vitrified high-level waste (HLW) into the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System. Production Records must document the constituents of the MST/SS material in the PRFT from each salt batch (StB) processed at SWPF. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) has requested Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to analyze PRFT samples representing each SWPF salt batch for thirty-two radionuclides. Additionally, elemental analysis of PRFT slurry and MST/SS solids was performed to aid SRMC in further refinement of the inputs and assumptions used in future frit development and Material Tracking Program calculations. The analyses of PRFT Batches 15, 22, and 26, which corresponds to material from the processing of StB4, StB5, and StB7, respectively, are reported herein. The unwashed dried solids of the PRFT batches were found to be 86-87% MST. Additionally, the total sulfur values are well below the assumed 982 mg of sulfate/kg of PRFT slurry used in Material Tracking Program calculations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluating Liquid Waste Transfers and their Impacts to the SRS Tank Farm to Support Operations and Closure

The Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site, Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), supports the storage, processing, and safe disposition of legacy, radioactive liquid waste. The LW Tank Farms contain approximately 127 million liters (33.5 million gallons) of liquid waste within 43 active, underground waste tanks. To meet mission critical milestones for the closure of waste tanks and processing of 34 million liters (9 million gallons) of salt waste per year by the LW Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), an increase in Tank Farm operations, including waste tank transfers, is required. Waste is compiled in salt and sludge batches in the Tank Farms and transferred to SWPF and the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) for treatment. All waste tank transfers, such as waste removal and batch compilation transfers, must be pre-evaluated to ensure Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) requirements are met via Evaluated Transfer Approval Forms (ETAFs). Facility conditions and configurations may change as a result of a waste transfer. These changes must be reflected in the Tank Farms Emergency Response Datasheet (ERD), which contains data utilized for operation and emergency situations.

Peterson, Shelby R.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Evaluation of a Sulfate Solubility Limit Greater Than 0.65 Weight Percent in Sludge Batch 10 Glasses

Previous laboratory-scale crucible testing with batch chemicals confirmed that the sulfate (SO 4 2- ) limit for Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) was 0.65 weight percent (wt.%) in glass. This limit signifies that 0.65 wt.% SO 4 2- can be retained in the glass without the formation of a sulfate phase. The Defense Waste Processing Facility imposes this constraint in the Material Tracking Program. Based on preliminary calculations to support the Material Tracking Program, it was anticipated that transfer volumes of the monosodium titanate/sludge solids (MST/SS) stream from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) may need to be reduced to maintain projected sulfate concentrations below 0.65 wt.% in glass. Savannah River Mission Completion requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory perform additional sulfate testing to determine whether a sulfate solubility limit greater than 0.65 wt.% is feasible for SB10, which could allow for higher transfer volumes of the MST/SS stream. This report documents the results of the testing at higher sulfate concentrations for the glass composition region defined by the most recent SB10 projection (November 2022) and Frits 473 and 625. Frit 473 was recommended for SB10 and Frit 625 was used during SB9 processing and the SB9 to SB10 transition. A total of twenty-one glass compositions were developed based on the expected compositional variables, which include sludge-only (SO) and coupled processing with the SWPF, waste loading (WL), and frit composition. The target sulfate concentrations were varied from 0.65-0.85 wt.% at 32 and 40% WL. Each glass was prepared from reagent grade chemicals and melted at 1150 °C. Visual observations were used to confirm the presence of a sulfate salt phase on the cooled glass surfaces. Representative samples of each glass were submitted for chemical composition analysis by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy and Cs analysis by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Overall the majority of mean measured values are consistent with the target values for each major oxide of interest with less than 5% error. The percent errors for the measured SO 4 2- concentrations are generally less than 10%, which is comparable with previous sulfate solubility study measurements and acceptable. Only the SO glasses based on Frit 625 formed a sulfate phase at a 0.80 wt.% SO 4 2- target concentration at both 32 and 40% WL. The remainder of the glasses did not form a sulfate layer. Due to the formation of the sulfate phase, the limit is conservatively set at 0.70 wt.% based on the measured sulfate concentrations of 0.71 wt.% and 0.75 wt.% for these two glasses. None of the SO or coupled operation glasses based on Frit 473 formed a sulfate salt phase, which supports a sulfate limit of 0.80 wt.%. The following SO 4 2- concentration limits are recommended during SO and coupled SB10 processing: (1) 0.70 wt.% during processing with Frit 625, and (2) 0.80 wt.% during processing with Frit 473.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Summary of Savannah River Site FY22 Salt Waste Qualification Data

The Savannah River National Laboratory analyzed samples from Savannah River Site Waste Tank 41H, 21H and 42H to support qualification of Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Waste Batches 5, 6, and 7 for processing (the FY22 Salt Batch Qualification samples). None of the samples displayed any unusual or unexpected characteristics such as large amounts of solids, floating solids, or unusual color. Characterization of these samples confirmed similar chemical composition and characteristics to previous salt waste batches. These results were initially provided to Savannah River Mission Completion (Liquid Waste Operations subcontractor) as External Sample Results LIMS Reports and the Tank 41H (Salt Batch 5 sample) was also summarized in two separate technical reports. The analytical results (both rapid and long term) are now summarized and discussed in this technical report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Implementation of Increased Salt and Decreased Sludge Volumes in the Defense Waste Processing Facility - 19597

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) safely stores and treats high-level radioactive waste. The LWS consists of 51 waste storage tanks (eight of which are operationally closed and filled with grout), waste evaporators, treatment facilities, and solidification facilities such as the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). The disposition of high-level waste (HLW) into a glass waste form poured into canisters at the DWPF began in 1996. DWPF processed a sludge only flowsheet until 2008 when the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) began treating the salt waste from the underground liquid storage tanks by striking with monosodium titanate (MST) to remove actinides, when necessary to meet downstream acceptance criteria, and removing the MST and entrained sludge solids (SS) by filtration before using an organic solvent to strip the cesium from the salt, creating two new concentrated HLW streams. This change caused the DWPF to begin processing under both a sludge-only and a coupled operations flowsheet where salt streams would only be added when available. This strategy allows for continuous glass canister production at DWPF. Recently, DWPF completed a 10-month melter replacement in December 2017 and the Concentrate, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) has completed repairs to the 3H Evaporator system. These facility outages have caused delays in preparing the next batch of sludge feed for DWPF. Concurrent with these facility outages, the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has been undergoing system testing and commissioning, working toward startup. SWPF is designed to process salt waste in the same manner as ARP/MCU, but with much higher throughput volumes produced per unit time. In order to process the SWPF salt streams efficiently, DWPF will implement a coupled operation only flowsheet. Based on the facility outages mentioned above, efforts have been made to identify strategies to minimize sludge volumes and maximize salt volumes in the DWPF until the next sludge batch is ready for processing in DWPF. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) recently performed an evaluation that examines the effects of reducing the volume of sludge and maximizing the addition of the cesium-rich concentrated salt solution in each Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) batch in order to extend the existing sludge batch as long as possible until the next sludge batch is ready. These effects include a reduction of weight percent solids in the DWPF processing vessels, an increase in cycle time, a new canister heat generation value that remains within regulatory limits, and higher gamma source that remains within bulk facility gamma shielding. Balancing the above parameters resulted in a small reduction of sludge volume per SRAT batch under SWPF operation and maximizing the salt volumes for both ARP/MCU and SWPF operation. This slight reduction in sludge volume and increase in salt volumes allows SRR to mitigate some of the schedule impact incurred by the facility outages. This strategy was evaluated for both ARP/MCU and SWPF operation. This strategy has been successfully implemented under ARP/MCU operation using small step changes in the current process. This paper provides an overview of the evaluation performed for DWPF with ARP/MCU and DWPF with SWPF operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Characterization of Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT) Batches 44 and 49 from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF)

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes a Monosodium Titanate/Sludge Solids (MST/SS) waste stream received from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) via the Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT). During processing, DWPF is required to provide evidence of compliance with the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS). Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) has requested Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to analyze PRFT samples representing each SWPF salt batch for thirty-two radionuclides. Additionally, elemental analysis of PRFT slurry and MST/SS solids was performed to aid SRMC in further refinement of the inputs and assumptions used in future frit development and Material Tracking Program calculations. The analyses of PRFT Batches 44 and 49, which correspond to material from the processing of Salt Batches (StB) 12 and 11, respectively, are reported herein. The unwashed dried solids of the PRFT Batches 44 and 49 are predominately MST, ~63-59% MST. The two batches have a much higher amount of Fe, Mn, and Ni compared to all previous batches. For Batch 44 this appears to be due to the use of a sludge simulant filter aid during processing of StB 12 and for Batch 49, it is possibly due to the larger amount of insoluble solids for StB 11 in comparison to all previous salt batches. Like previous PRFT batches, a significant amount of the unwashed dried solids are alkaline earth metals. The total sulfate, in mg/kg of slurry, for PRFT Batches 44 and 49 is 119 and 139, respectively, which is well below the current sulfate concentration used in Material Tracking Program calculations and is in agreement with DWPF laboratory sulfate measurements.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Investigation of potential causes of production limiting fouling within SWPF due to mercury solids formation during pH swings within the SWPF process

The Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) goal to investigate the use a high sodium Salt Batch 5 Qualification sample as the radioactive salt solution for mixing tests meant to evaluate the propensity for solids formation between the 5.6 M sodium clarified salt solution (CSS) and scrub solutions (0.05 M HNO 3 and 0.025 M NaOH solutions) during pH changes has been completed at SRNL. The key results and conclusions from this investigation to evaluate the propensity for solids formation between CSS and scrub solutions because of pH fluctuations include the following: None of the 8 test matrices, involving the mixing/titrating of scrub solution with CSS and vice versa, showed any visible evidence for the formation of solids with pH changes. The average turbidity measurements for these 8 tests, excluding test 7, was 21.6 ± 0.4 NTU. This average turbidity value is within 2 sigma of the baseline turbidity value of 20.5 NTU for the CSS only without added scrub solutions. However, only in test 7, which involved the titrating of CSS into dilute nitric acid scrub solution (0.05 M HNO 3 solution), was a small measurable change in the turbidity of the mixture observed at 31.9 ºC. On the other hand, the equivalent test (instantaneous addition of CSS into 0.05 M HNO 3 ) gave an average turbidity measurement value of 21.6 ± 0.6 NTU at a temperature of 24.0 ºC. This difference in turbidity measurement has been attributed to either instrument performance errors or the effect of temperature. It is recommended that these CSS and scrub solution mixing tests be performed with corresponding simulant solutions in a non-radioactive environment. A simulant environment will aid in the full integration of a pH and turbidity meter equipment with the experimental set up. A new detection method, preferable a laser-based method, may be needed in detecting and confirming the precipitation of fine particulates at the right blending times and pH fluctuations in the solution mixtures. On the other hand, the differing free OH concentrations (~2 M in CSS), H + concentrations (0.05 M HNO 3 ) for the titrants and the bulk solutions, may make it almost impossible to observe a neutral pH or a pH in the range of 7-9, where the potential for solids formation is maximized and leads to possible precipitation of minerals like aluminum hydroxides.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

An Evaluation of the Impact of Glycolate and Glycolate Mitigation on the Defense Waste Processing Facility Recycle Diversion Project Flowsheet

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes radioactive High Level Waste (HLW) sludge solids from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF); which includes the SRS Tank Farm and Evaporator facilities, and a concentrated Cs-137 laden stream and a Monosodium Titanate (MST) and sludge solids stream from the SRS Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The waste is chemically adjusted with acids and reductant (currently with 50 wt.% nitric acid and ~90 wt.% formic acid, but eventually formic acid will be substituted with ~70 wt.% glycolic acid), and frit is added so that a durable, borosilicate glass waste form can be produced when the material is vitrified in the melter. As a result of the evaporation of water during both the melter feed preparation and the melter feed vitrification steps in DWPF, a recycle waste stream is generated, neutralized, and sent back to the CSTF. The recycle waste is a dilute aqueous stream originating from the collection of condensate liquids containing some minor sludge, MST, and frit solids and other waste components resulting from melter feed entrainment during foamover events and transfer of volatile species into the condensate. The recycle stream volume is significant and is expected to approach 3 million gallons per year once SWPF reaches full operation, requiring the use of multiple large CSTF tanks for storage. The recycle waste is currently collected in the SRS Tank Farm and periodically evaporated in the 242-16H (2H) Evaporator to conserve storage space.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Plutonium Solubility and Supernate Concentration for Neutralized Fast Critical Assembly Discards to Savannah River Site Tank Waste

The Savannah River Site (SRS) plans to dissolve non-irradiated stainless steel (SS)-clad bundles of Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) materials in eighteen batches.1 FCA dissolution is currently underway in the 6.3D dissolver by simultaneous chemical and electrolytic dissolution, which is required to generate the harsh conditions necessary for dissolution of metal-oxide (MOX) and non-aluminum spent nuclear fuels (NASNFs).2 Nitric acid and potassium fluoride are used to promote chemical dissolution.2 Gadolinium will be added during processing as a thermal neutron poison for criticality control. There are no plans for recovering plutonium from this waste stream. After FCA dissolution, the acidic (HNO3/KF) “discards” containing the dissolved metals will be neutralized by addition of 50 wt% sodium hydroxide to a final free hydroxide concentration of 1.2 M.1 Neutralization will precipitate a slurry of insoluble solids, predominantly metal oxides/hydroxides of plutonium, uranium, and SS components. Small fractions of the SS components, Pu, U, and Gd will remain dissolved in the supernate. The neutralized slurry will be composited to existing radioactive waste storage tanks within the SRS Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) containing other similar sludge batch (SB) materials.1 The fate of soluble plutonium and freshly-precipitated, colloidal plutonium from this process are of concern since the total Pu can challenge the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) at the downstream SRS Liquid Waste (LW) facility. Supernate decants including the neutralized FCA discards (nFCAd) within the CSTF will be composited with salt batch (StB) materials and transferred to the SRS Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), where total plutonium is also of concern.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Application of Process Chemical Modeling to Optimize Radioactive Waste Disposal at the Savannah River Site - 24242

The Technical Optimization Model (TOM) is used by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to carry out facility-wide material balance and validate chemistrydependent processes for the purpose of their System Plan.The TOM simulates material movement and chemical reactions at the Tank Farm (TF), Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF).

Georgiou, Andreas↗
DOE OSTI2016

Sharing Lessons Learned 'Across the Pond' on Two Major Construction Projects: Evaporator D and SWPF - 16050

This paper compares and contrasts two projects, the Salt Waste Processing Facility at Savannah River in the US and Evaporator D at Sellafield in the UK, to highlight the similar challenges that each project has experienced since contract award and how these challenges have been addressed. The paper compares the life-cycles of the projects, project strategy, design, construction, and regulatory issues, along with cost and schedule performance. There is also some discussion about the anticipated challenges in the future as the projects move into the startup and commissioning phase. Overall, the paper identifies some of the common areas that have affected these projects and how these similarities have been the subject of sharing and collaborating lessons learned on a broader scale, even though the delivery organizations operate in different countries under different regulatory and Government frameworks. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Selection of Glasses to Confirm the 0.65 Weight Percent Sulfate Solubility Limit for Sludge Batch 10

In preparation for Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) processing, projections of sulfate (SO 4 2- ) in glass at 36% waste loading (WL) were calculated in May 2020 for Tank 40 blend projections representing 0.7M and 0.85M Na wash endpoints. The projected SO 4 2- ) concentrations for either sludge-only (SO) or coupled processing with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) were either near or exceeded the current Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) limit of 0.65 weight percent (wt.%). Four nominal glass compositions were selected based on SO and coupled processing for the 0.85M Na wash endpoint Tank 40 blend projection to conduct an initial evaluation of the SB10 sulfate solubility behavior. A sulfate salt phase was absent from each of the prepared glasses, which provided preliminary results that supported the 0.65 wt.% SO 4 2- ) limit for SB10.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Measurement Acceptance Region (MAR) Assessment Results Based on Confirmation Sample Sludge Batch 10 Projections

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is currently preparing to initiate processing of Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), which is comprised of material from Tanks 11H, 13H, 15H, 26F, 40H (heel only), and Alternate Feed Stock-2 and Sodium Reactor Experiment material from H-Canyon. Frit 473 was recommended for sludge-only (SO) and coupled processing with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) based on previous assessments of SB10 projections with the DWPF Product Composition Control System (PCCS) glass property models and their associated Measurement Acceptance Region (MAR) constraints. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) subsequently pursued Wash Cycle Y to further reduce the total sulfur in the sludge batch and increase processing flexibility at DWPF. In October 2022, SRMC System Planning provided an updated SB10 Tank 40H blend baseline projection based on the Tank 51 confirmation sample results. Due to the reduced Na concentration relative to previous SB10 projections, two additional projections based on the addition of 7,000 gallons of caustic were provided in November 2022.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Evaluation of the 0.65 Weight Percent Sulfate Solubility Limit for Sludge Batch 10 Based on November 2022 Projections

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is currently preparing to initiate processing of Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), which is comprised of material from Tanks 11H, 13H, 15H, 26F, 40H (heel only), and Alternate Feed Stock-2 and Sodium Reactor Experiment material from H-Canyon. Frit 473 was recommended for sludge-only (SO) and coupled processing with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) based on previous assessments of SB10 projections with the DWPF Product Composition Control System glass property models and their associated Measurement Acceptance Region constraints. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) subsequently pursued Wash Cycle Y to further reduce the total sulfur in the sludge batch and increase processing flexibility at DWPF. In October 2022, SRMC System Planning provided an updated SB10 Tank 40H blend baseline projection based on the Tank 51 confirmation sample results. Due to the reduced Na concentration relative to previous SB10 projections, two additional projections based on the addition of 7,000 gallons of caustic were provided in November 2022.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Measurement Acceptance Region (MAR) Assessment Results Based On Sludge Batch 10 Projections from December 2021, February 2022 and August 2022

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is currently preparing to initiate processing of Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), which is comprised of material from Tanks 11H, 13H, 15H, and 26F, Alternate Feed Stock-2 and Sodium Reactor Experiment material from H-Canyon. Frit 473 (8B 2 O 3 -8Li 2 O-5Na 2 O-79SiO 2 , in weight percent) was recommended for sludge-only (SO) and coupled processing with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) based on previous assessments of SB10 projections with the DWPF Product Composition Control System (PCCS) glass property models and their associated Measurement Acceptance Region (MAR) constraints. Due to the lower processing rate of Sludge Batch 9 (SB9), the heel in Tank 40 is anticipated to be greater than 40 inches at the projected start of SB10 processing to meet the upcoming Accelerated Basin Deinventory addition dates in Tank 51 for Sludge Batch 11. In December 2021 and February 2022, Savannah River Remediation System Planning provided updated SB10 Tank 40 blend projections based on heels of 74 inches, 84 inches, 94 inches and 103.4 inches. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) subsequently pursued Wash Cycle Y to further reduce the total sulfur in the sludge batch and increase processing flexibility at DWPF. In August 2022, SRMC System Planning provided an updated SB10 Tank 40 blend projection with a 76 inch-heel representing Decant Y2 and 60 kilogallons of bearing water inleakage that is anticipated during the Tank 51 to Tank 40 transfer. The objectives of this task were to: • Determine the impact on the operating windows for SO and coupled processing • Determine whether any composition gaps exist between the already completed SB10 variability study and the reprojected SB10 glass composition region • Compare the SB10 reprojected glass composition region to the DWPF PCCS model development and validation ranges to ensure that compositional gaps do not exist between the data sets. This report documents the results of these evaluations. Calculation-based frit assessments were performed using the DWPF PCCS glass property models and their associated MAR constraints. Evaluated parameters for coupled processing included the following transfer volumes per Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank batch: 5700 gallons of Tank 40 sludge, 2400-4500 gallons of the SWPF monosodium titanate (MST) and sludge solids stream, and 15,000 gallons of strip effluent. Based on these MAR assessment results, Frit 473 remains viable for SB10 processing. A target waste loading (WL) of 36% is possible for SO operation and single strike (0.4 g/L MST) coupled processing up to 600 mg/L of SB9 insoluble sludge solids at a nominal transfer volume of ~2800 gallons. Increasing the single strike transfer volume to 4500 gallons may reduce the maximum WL below 40%. Operating windows are 12 percentage points for SO processing and 14-16 percentage points for coupled processing. Frit 625 allows for a target WL of 36% and is acceptable for use during the SB9 to SB10 transition to deplete remaining inventory as needed. Operating windows are 8 percentage points for SO processing and 12-14 percentage points for coupled processing. Predictive PCCS evaluations performed at DWPF will provide insight into batch-specific acceptability at desired WLs for compositions having expected oxide ratios during processing versus the extreme vertices (corner points) evaluated in this study. The reprojected SB10 glass composition region generally overlaps the previously evaluated SB10 variability study composition region. Thus, the minor composition shift of these updated SB10 projections indicates that no additional glasses are necessary to demonstrate acceptability relative to the chemical durability of the Environmental Assessment benchmark glass and predictability using the current PCCS models for durability. Based on a comparison of the PCCS model development and validation data to the reprojected SB10 glass composition region, the viscosity and liquidus temperature models will reliably predict SB10 compositions. No additional glasses are necessary to demonstrate predictability of these models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Uranium Solubility and Supernate Enrichment Testing for Accelerated Basin De-Inventory Discards to Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities

After future Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) enriched uranium discards into sludge batches (SB), portions of supernate decants during SB preparation will be blended into salt batches (StB) and the resulting feeds must meet the nuclear safety requirements for the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). During previous SB10 sampling and testing, which involved H-Canyon material containing enriched uranium being mixed with Tank 51 sludge shortly after the H-Canyon stream was neutralized, it was identified that the uranium isotopic enrichment in the supernate deviated from the uranium isotopic enrichment in the slurry. The higher uranium isotopic enrichment in the supernate introduced the risk of challenging the feed requirements of SWPF. The ABD material added to SB11 was isotopically diluted with depleted uranium, mitigating any downstream impacts. However, H-Canyon desires to eliminate or minimize future depleted uranium additions in order to meet the mission schedule.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Evaluation Of Chemical Additives For Glycolate Destruction In The Recycle Collection Tank

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has completed a work scope in support of the Savannah River Remediation (SRR) Nitric-Glycolic flowsheet. Glycolic acid will replace formic acid as a reducing agent in the pre-processing of High-Level Waste sludge performed at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). Glycolic acid will perform the same function as formic acid, namely reduction of mercury and adjustment of feed rheology and melter oxidation/reduction potential, while significantly reducing the potential for hydrogen generation in DWPF processing. Development testing has demonstrated glycolic acid virtually eliminates hydrogen production in the pre-processing steps. The Nitric-Glycolic flowsheet significantly improves DWPF’s ability to address Savannah River Site’s key challenge - the incorporation of effluent received from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). SWPF will deliver significant effluent volume to DWPF, resulting in a concurrent increase in DWPF effluent returned to the Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities (CSTF). This work scope demonstrates that glycolate can be destroyed under the Nitric-Glycolic flowsheet prior to returning the DWPF recycle stream to CSTF. To avoid potential flammability issues due to thermolysis of glycolate in CSTF, SRR tasked SRNL to quantify and mitigate glycolate returns via DWPF recycle stream. The development of a strategy for glycolic mitigation initiated with a system’s engineering workshop. Various chemical and/or physical solutions for how to and where to destroy glycolate were considered – consistent with DWPF operational capabilities and process requirements. The workshop identified chemical oxidation of glycolate within the DWPF Recycle Collection Tank (RCT)a as the most promising option with sodium permanganate and Fenton’s reagent (metallic ion catalyzed hydrogen peroxide) as the two most promising oxidants.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗