Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Tour”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1985

Example Solar Electric Propulsion System asteroid tours using variational calculus

Exploration of the asteroid belt with a vehicle utilizing a Solar Electric Propulsion System has been proposed in past studies. Some of those studies illustrated multiple asteroid rendezvous with trajectories obtained using approximate methods. Most of the inadequacies of those approximations are overcome in this paper, which uses the calculus of variations to calculate the trajectories and associated payloads of four asteroid tours. The modeling, equations, and solution techniques are discussed, followed by a presentation of the results.

Burrows, R. R.↗
NASA NTRS1991

The last grand tour opportunity to Pluto

An automated mission design program permits a thorough examination of gravity-assist trajectories such as the Voyager II flight to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The program is applied to the automated design of multiple encounter trajectories to the far outer planets. The most significant result is that the last four-planet grand tour opportunity occurs in 1996 and includes encounters with Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. Other mission designs include Jupiter and one or two other planets and have characteristically short flight times.

Longuski, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Dryden Tour Tape, 1994

This video provides an overview of NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center. This is the program shown to visitors during the tour at Dryden.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2001

An Overview of the Comet Nucleus TOUR Discovery Mission and a Description of Neutral Gas and Ion Measurements Planned

The CONTOUR (Comet Nucleus TOUR) Mission led by its Principal Investigator Professor Joseph Veverka of Cornell is presently under development at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory for launch in July of 2002 with a flyby of Comet Encke scheduled for November 3, 2003 at a solar distance of 1.07 au. A robust Whipple dust shield is designed to allow a close nucleus approach distance (less than 150 km). The 2nd nominal CONTOUR target is Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, although the spacecraft can alternately be directed to a new comet if such an interesting target is discovered. CONTOUR contains 4 instruments: an imaging spectrometer (CRISP) developed at APL that will obtain both high resolution nucleus images through 8 filters and IR spectra (800 to 2550 nm) of the nucleus, a narrow field of view forward imager (CFI) to locate the target days before the encounter, a dust composition time of flight mass spectrometer (CIDA) provided by Dr. J. Kissel and von Hoemer & Sulger, GmbH, and a mass spectrometer (NGIMS) provided by Goddard Space Flight Center to measure neutral gas and ambient ions. Laboratory calibration of the NGIMS has now been completed. NGIMS also includes an in-flight calibration system that we plan to exercise before and after each comet encounter. We will provide an overview of the CONTOUR Mission and discuss more specifically the NGIMS measurement goals for this mission.

Mahaffy, Paul↗
NASA NTRS1998

Nanotubule and Tour Molecule Based Molecular Electronics: Suggestion for a Hybrid Approach

Recent experimental and theoretical attempts and results indicate two distinct broad pathways towards future molecular electronic devices and architectures. The first is the approach via Tour type ladder molecules and their junctions which can be fabricated with solution phase chemical approaches. Second are fullerenes or nanotubules and their junctions which may have better conductance, switching and amplifying characteristics but can not be made through well controlled and defined chemical means. A hybrid approach combining the two pathways to take advantage of the characteristics of both is suggested. Dimension and scale of such devices would be somewhere in between isolated molecule and nanotubule based devices but it maybe possible to use self-assembly towards larger functional and logicalunits.

Srivastava, Deepak↗
NASA NTRS1994

A First Look at Orbit Determination for the Cassini Mission, Part 2: Saturn Tour

This paper completes the presentation of the first round of orbit determination analysis accomplished as part of Cassini navigation studies. The thrust of the analysis was to characterize operational orbit determination accuracy to first order for selected phases of the mission. The previous paper, Part 1, covered early phases from inner solar system cruise through the approach to Saturn and delivery of the Huygens probe to Titan. Part 2 resumes chronologically where Part 1 left off, covering the tour phase after delivery of the Huygens probe.

Cassini mission orbit determination Saturn Titan↗
NASA NTRS1993

Galileo Satellite Tour: Orbit Determination Performance

The Galileo mission is an ambitious attempt to explore the Jovian system by spacecraft. This voyage of exploration is a logical successor to the reconnaissance voyages of Pioneers 10 and 11, Voyagers 1 and 2, and Ulysses. These spacecraft merely flew past Jupiter, spending relatively little time in its system. Galileo differs from these earlier spacecraft in that it will remain within the Jovian system, studying the planet and its four major satellites for a period of two years. Insertion into orbit around Jupiter will occur on December 7, 1995. The portion of the mission encompassing observations of Jupiter and the major and minor satellites, and magnetospheric mapping, has become known as the Jovian tour. During this period Galileo will encounter each of Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto at least three times on trajectories that will bring it to altitudes from 200 to 3100 kilometers.

Haw, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Galileo Icy Satellite Tour

Galileo's orbital tour at Jupiter will involve multiple close passes by the Galilean satellites, typically 10-100 times closer than Voyager encounters.

Galileo↗
NASA NTRS2005

Cassini orbit determination performance during the first eight orbits of the Saturn satellite tour

From June 2004 through July 2005, the Cassini/Huygens spacecraft has executed nine successful close-targeted encounters by three major satellites of the Saturnian system. Current results show that orbit determination has met design requirements for targeting encounters, Hugens descent, and predicting science instrument pointing for targetd satellite encounters. This paper compares actual target dispersion against, the predicte tour covariance analyses.

navigation↗
NASA NTRS2004

Dynamics and Controls of a Conceptual Jovian Moon Tour Spacecraft

The dynamics and control challenges presented by a conceptual Jovian Moon Tour spacecraft are summarized in this paper. Attitude and orbital dynamics interactions are present due to the designed low-thrust trajectory, and controls structure interactions are also present due to the non-collocated sensor-actuator pairs on board the flexible spacecraft. A finite-element based simulation model is described which is capable of handling the complex orbital and attitude dynamics arising during the low-thrust spiraling maneuvers of the spacecraft. A few numerical simulations demonstrate that some of the challenges hitherto identified can be faced via integrated dynamics and control analysis, and that reasonable assessments of the pointing performance can be made.

dynamics↗
NASA NTRS2013

NASA Pathways Co-op Tour Johnson Space Center Fall 2013

This report outlines the tasks and objectives completed during a co‐operative education tour with National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA) at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. I worked for the Attitude & Pointing group of the Flight Dynamics Division within the Mission Operations Directorate at Johnson Space Center. NASA's primary mission is to support and expand the various ongoing space exploration programs and any research and development activities associated with it. My primary project required me to develop and a SharePoint web application for my group. My secondary objective was to become familiar with the role of my group which was primarily to provide spacecraft attitude and line of sight determination, including Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) communications coverage for various NASA, International, and commercial partner spacecraft. My projects required me to become acquainted with different software systems, fundamentals of aerospace engineering, project management, and develop essential interpersonal communication skills. Overall, I accomplished multiple goals which included laying the foundations for an updated SharePoint which will allow for an organized platform to communicate and share data for group members and external partners. I also successfully learned about the operations of the Attitude & Pointing Group and how it contributes to the Missions Operations Directorate and NASA's Space Program as a whole

Masood, Amir↗
NASA NTRS2014

Co-op Essay - Tour 1

The Mission Operations Directorate (MOD) is responsible for the training, planning and performance of all U.S. manned operations in space. Within this directorate all responsibilities are divided up into divisions. The EVA, Robotics & Crew Systems Operations Division performs ground operations and trains astronauts to carry out some of the more "high action" procedures in space. For example they orchestrate procedures like EVAs, or ExtraVehicular Activities (spacewalks), and robotics operations external to the International Space Station (ISS). The robotics branch of this division is responsible for the use of the Mobile Servicing System (MSS). This system is a combination of two robotic mechanisms and a series of equipment used to transport them on the ISS. The MSS is used to capture and position visiting vehicles, transport astronauts during EVAs, and perform external maintenance tasks on the ISS. This branch consists of two groups which are responsible for crew training and flight controlling, respectively. My first co-op tour took place Fall 2013. During this time I was given the opportunity to work in the robotics operations branch of the Mission Operations Directorate at NASA's Johnson Space Center. I was given a variety of tasks that encompassed, at a base level, all the aspects of the branch.

Porter, Derrick↗
NASA NTRS2014

Dorothy Jorgensen - Co-Op Tour Summary

NASA is a household name in this day and age, known commonly as America's government-run powerhouse of innovation and space exploration. It is a common dream for students to be a part of NASA's workforce, but I did not realize that it was my dream until I found that I could not imagine working anywhere else. From August to December, I had the privilege of a co-op tour with NASA at the Johnson Space Center. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) first formed in the early hysteria of the Cold War, and in its early days it received enormous funding and political support. It was America's response to the Russian Sputnik, which was a not only a stark symbol of what was suddenly possible, but also of how far behind the United States had fallen in the race for technology. The political atmosphere in the world has since changed, but NASA's drive to push the boundaries of the impossible has not faded: NASA's primary mission has been exploration for the betterment of mankind, and it works towards that mission to this day. The specific NASA site that I worked in was by a coast near Houston, TX, at the Johnson Space Center (Figure 1). I was led on my first day of work to a building dedicated to Structural Engineering (Building 13), which was where I would be spending most of my time in the months to come. It was here that I had my desk and cubicle, and would later do the bulk of my computer modeling and theoretical planning. Later that day we traveled to the Vibrations and Acoustics Test Facility (Building 49), and here I was shown the parts we would use for our technical project and the locations we would work in. I worked in the Loads and Dynamics Branch of the Structural Engineering Division, in the Engineering Directorate.

Jorgensen, Dorothy↗
NASA NTRS2017

Voyager's Grand Tour

In the early days of the Space Age, scientists realized that given the right planetary alignments it might be possible to use the gravity of one planet to change the trajectory of a spacecraft and send it on to another planet without expending any fuel. This slingshot or gravity assist trajectory principle was first tested by Mariner 10, which used the gravity of Venus to slingshot its way to Mercury in 1974. A very rare planetary alignment would occur in the late 1970's allowing a spacecraft to visit all the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto) using gravity assists at each planet to send it on to the next. This unique alignment would not occur again for another 175 years! The initial ambitious plan, called the Grand Tour, was to send two pairs of spacecraft, one pair to visit Jupiter, Saturn and Pluto, the other to fly by Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune. However, the original plan was scaled back in the budget conscious early 1970's to just two less capable spacecraft visiting only Jupiter and Saturn, and Titan, Saturn's largest moon Taking advantage of this alignment would be two Voyager spacecraft, both beginning their long journeys in 1977. Voyager 2 launched first, on August 20, followed by Voyager 1 on September 5. Both spacecraft would first fly by Jupiter and use that planet's massive gravity to bend their trajectories to then fly by Saturn. Voyager 1 would also be targeted to fly by Saturn's moon Titan, which was known to have a dense atmosphere, a trajectory that would preclude any future planetary flybys. But the option was kept open, if Voyager 1's Titan flyby was successful, to retarget Voyager 2 to send it on to Uranus and maybe even Neptune - assuming it would survive that long! Just 13 days after its launch, Voyager 1 scored the first of its many firsts: at a distance of 7.25 million miles, it turned its camera back toward Earth and snapped the first ever photograph of the Earth-Moon system in a single frame, giving a sneak preview of the discoveries that lay ahead.

Uri, Joihn J.↗