Results for “alkaline pretreatment” — Page 5

DOE OSTI2023

Recent Developments in Revealing the Impact of Complex Metal Oxide Reconstruction on Catalysis

Surface reconstruction of complex metal oxides refers to the alterations of the topmost catalyst surface, relative to the bulk structure, following exposure to pretreatment or reaction conditions during heterogeneous catalysis. (1) This structural and electronic transformation may involve (1) changes of the exposed crystallographic facets, (2) changes in chemical composition, such as the enrichment of specific elements, and, (3) morphological variations, including surface roughness and defects (Scheme 1). Beyond relaxation, surface reconstruction here also encompasses disruptions to the periodicity of the sublayers and changes to its stoichiometry. This change significantly influences the chemical properties of the catalyst surface, such as redox sites, (2) acid/base pairs, hydroxyl groups, (3) and surface defects. Surface reconstruction occurs due to the thermodynamic drive to lower the surface energy of the catalyst under the surrounding environment (e.g., temperature, chemical potential of species present). In addition to the treatment or reaction conditions, the extent of reconstruction also depends on the elements in the metal oxide structure. For instance, annealing ABO 3 perovskites (SrTiO 3 , BaTiO 3 , and BaZrO 3 ) at high temperatures (500 °C) in O 2 has a very different impact on the A/B ratio at the surface (ranging from 0.9 to 2.5), depending on the identity of A and B. (4) Metal oxide surface reconstruction under an electric field and exposure to acidic and alkaline media has recently gained increased attention in electrocatalysis, such as in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER); (5,6) however, in this Viewpoint we focus on the impact of surface reconstruction on thermal catalysis, a critical enduring research theme with ongoing challenges. Here, we start showcasing approaches to characterize surface reconstruction at the topmost surface layer, such as low-energy ion scattering (LEIS), discussing advantages and limitations. Next, we connect characterization of surface reconstruction to site-specific kinetic analysis, enabled via steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA), and we express our viewpoint on building structure–performance relationships by deeply understanding reconstructed surfaces. Later, we comment on the potential of tuning surface reconstruction to enhance catalytic performance. Finally, we explore the interplay between surface reconstruction and the “intelligent behavior”.

alcohol conversion↗

DOE OSTI2026

Findings from Large Bench-Scale Testing of Denitration Electrolyzers for the EDCGe Project

This report highlights the key findings and outcomes relevant to the processability of waste supernatant at Hanford using a denitration electrolyzer. The Electrosynthesis Company issued a Phase 1 report to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), summarizing the evaluation of large bench-scale denitration electrolyzers to support the electrochemical denitration and caustic generation (EDCGe) project. The Electrosynthesis Company’s report (attached as Appendix A) provides insights into the initial steps required to implement an electrolyzer system at Hanford. Phase 1 experiments focused on validating the denitration electrolyzer’s performance, operating parameters, and reaction products. The robustness of the electrochemical denitration process was demonstrated by two electrolyzer flow cell systems (a 100 cm 2 ElectroCell MP and a 150 cm 2 NESI NS01 cell), both of which achieved significant nitrate and nitrite removal (>50%) with a current efficiency of ~95% for both systems. Higher current densities (500 mA cm –2 ) improved nitrate and nitrite removal rates compared to lower current densities (333 mA cm –2 ), while maintaining a current efficiency of ~94%. The NS01 cell achieved a nitrate species removal rate of ~0.41 mol h –1 at 5 kA m –2 (equiv. to 500 mA cm –2 ). The primary reaction product was ammonia (NH 3 ), constituting 78.3–91.6% of the products (excluding OH – formation). NH 3 was predominantly retained in the catholyte liquid phase rather than being off-gassed. Additionally, the NS01 cell reported an NH 3 generation rate of ~0.36 mol h –1 at 5 kA m –2 . Other gas formation included ~7% N 2 , ~7% H 2 , and trace amounts of N 2 O. The estimated power requirement (extrapolated from the 0.015 m 2 cell data) for a full-scale denitration electrolyzer is approximated to be ~1.6 MW (DC-only) to treat 50% of nitrate and nitrite in a waste stream and generates ~2.1 kmol h –1 of NH 3 with an initial concentration of 4 M NO 3 – /NO 2 – at 300 gal h –1 . Simulated waste containing aluminate, carbonate, oxalate, and halogens exhibited no adverse effects on denitration performance. A preliminary experiment comparing alkaline anolyte (5 M NaOH) with a nickel based anode to acidic media (2 M H 2 SO 4 ) with a DSA-O 2 anode showed a lower operating voltage and generated less H 2 than the acid media. Maintaining a stable 5 M OH – concentration in the anolyte through periodic additions of caustic did not significantly impact denitration performance. This operational mode will be required for long-term experiments. All the experiments demonstrated that electrochemical denitration is a promising approach for treating nitrate and nitrite in simulated waste streams, achieving significant conversion and robustness across varying experimental conditions and electrochemical cell configurations. Lastly, the ability to generate a nearly pure NH 3 stream may prove advantageous for processing at other locations within the Hanford site.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗