Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “decommissioning”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

84 records · Page 5

Differential Ranging Experiments with NASA’s High-Gain Deep Space Network Antennas

Radar experiments are currently under way at the Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex (GDSCC) to determine the range of cis-lunar objects using a single high-gain 34m antenna transmitting 20 kW at X-band wavelengths, and two 34m receivers located at the GDSCC. The 34m antennas of the Deep Space Network (DSN) have effective fields-of-view of approximately 1 milli-radians, hence predetermined pointing predicts with accuracies on the order of 1 milli-degree are required. The extremely accurate 1 nano-second timing distribution of the DSN network enables sub-meter level ranging in the radial direction, by measuring delays in phase-modulated pseudonoise (PN) echoes reflected from the target. In this paper we demonstrate experimental verification of the proposed techniques by post-processing radar reflections obtained from a decommissioned geo-synchronous satellite. The characteristics of correlation-based delay measurements obtained simultaneously with two different receiving antennas are described. These are the fundamental quantities used to form the “time difference of arrival” (TDOA) observables commonly used in GPS positioning algorithms, and the results interpreted in the context of hyperbolic position location that could be used in the future to monitor spacecraft in cis-lunar space.

Cheung, Kar-Ming↗

Information and Best Practices Related to NASA Nuclear Flight Safety for Space Flights Involving Space Nuclear Systems

The purpose of this handbook is to facilitate a repeatable and robust process that promotes clear and effective interfaces between activities and stakeholders focused on meeting nuclear flight safety requirements for missions utilizing space nuclear systems (SNS), within the context of NASA’s broader nuclear-related activities and interfaces. NPR 8715.26, Nuclear Flight Safety, requires that the NASA project manager “incorporate nuclear flight safety considerations starting with program or project formulation through the point at which the SNS or other radioactive material no longer has the potential to affect Earth’s biosphere.” NASA’s use of SNS inherently involves partnering with other stakeholders to conduct a range of related activities that interface with nuclear flight safety. From a categorical perspective these include: (i) meeting the authorities and licensing requirements for possession and use of nuclear material, as governed by other Federal authorities; (ii) conducting National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities for nuclear-enabled missions; (iii) meeting Federal nuclear launch authorization requirements; (iv) conducting radiological contingency planning activities, including those associated with international commitments; (v) performing risk communication and public outreach activities; and (vi) ensuring decommissioning and disposal strategies reflect National policies and interests. It is the intent of this handbook to promote an effective interface between nuclear flight safety and these interrelated categorical activities. In addition to activities undertaken with partnering agencies, there are individual nuclear-related activities and programs that have a nexus to nuclear flight safety, and these include: (i) applicable NASA Standing Review Boards; (ii) the US Department of Energy nuclear safety activities conducted in partnership with NASA under Memoranda of Understanding; (iii) the Department of Defense’s Range Safety activities; (iv) NASA’s general involvement in interagency and international dialogues regarding nuclear safety; (v) the NASA-administered Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Board; (vi) NASA’s program and project governance activities and nuclear-specific Technical Discipline Team activities under the Office of the Chief Engineer; and others. It is the intent of this handbook to promote effective leveraging of these additional interrelated organizational activities, as appropriate.

Donald Helton↗

GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation beyond Aura MLS: Assimilating NASA SAGE III/ISS profiles of stratospheric water vapor

Water vapor in the lower stratosphere is an important trace gas for atmospheric chemistry and radiative budget with direct impact on climate. During the last quarter of the 20th century, the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) missions were crucial in monitoring the stratospheric ozone loss and the subsequent recovery as well as trends in water vapor linked to surface temperature trends. The SAGE III instrument aboard the International Space Station (ISS) continues the SAGE mission record, with high vertical resolution profiles of water vapor (and other constituents) since mid-2017. The NASA GEOS Earth system model has the capability to assimilate multi-constituents from ground and space-based instruments using the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System (CoDAS). Reanalysis products of stratospheric water vapor without data constraints are historically poor, and two recent reanalyses which assimilated stratospheric constituents observed by the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) improve the representation of stratospheric composition, including water vapor, when compared against independent observations. The MLS instrument is on NASA's Aura satellite which is expected to be decommissioned in the coming years. Here we demonstrate that while the number of solar occultation observations a day from SAGE III/ISS is about 1 % of the total number of profiles observed globally by MLS, the chemical timescales of water vapor in the lower stratosphere are long enough that the SAGE III/ISS data can provide a useful constraint on the assimilated product. Analyzed water vapor fields from assimilating only SAGE III/ISS water vapor profiles agree well with independent stratospheric observations, including when compared against the frost-point hygrometers at the three NOAA stations. Over the five-year period from 2017 through 2022, the analyzed water vapor using SAGE III/ISS captures many of the features seen with the assimilation of MLS observations. Note, this ability is reduced over regions where the SAGE III/ISS instrument provides infrequent or no observations (associated with the orbit of the ISS), as highlighted in the case study period following the eruption of the tropical underwater volcano Hunga Tonga in early 2022. Nevertheless, there is a clear benefit to the assimilation of stratospheric water vapor from SAGE III/ISS observations, allowing us to continue to monitor stratospheric composition for climate assessments following the impending loss of Aura.

K. Emma Knowland↗

Optimizing Altitude Sampling and Sensitivity with the Goldstone Orbital Debris Radar

The NASA Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO) has used the Goldstone Orbital Debris Radar (Goldstone) since 1993 to characterize orbital debris (OD) in low Earth orbit too small to be tracked by the U.S. Space Surveillance Network. Operated by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Goldstone can measure OD as small as 3 mm at 1000 km altitude and lower. Goldstone is a bistatic radar that for 25 years used Deep Space Station (DSS)-14 as a transmitter and DSS-15 as a receiver. In early 2018, DSS-15 was decommissioned and replaced with DSS-25 (and occasionally DSS-26) of the Deep Space Network Apollo Cluster. The increased baseline between DSS-14 and DSS-25 significantly reduced the instantaneous altitude coverage of the bistatic beam overlap. Initial measurements in 2018 were focused around 800 km, which has approximately the highest flux of sub-centimeter debris. In 2019, DSS-14 was offline for maintenance, and the ODPO designed an annual survey observation plan to efficiently sample altitudes from 700 km to 1000 km, since many NASA satellites fly in this range. This paper discusses the observation plan, including the development of the pointings, a refinement of the altitudes of interest, and an analysis of the effects of random pointing errors on beam overlap. Additionally, results from measurements taken in 2020 and 2021 are presented, showing that not only is the observation plan effective at sampling 700 km to 1000 km altitude, but it is also producing the most sensitive terrestrial radar measurements at these altitudes to date.

James Murray↗

DPOD2020: A DORIS Extension of the ITRF2020 for Precise Orbit Determination

As one of the tracking systems used to determine orbits of the altimeter mission satellites (such as TOPEX/Poseidon, Envisat, Jason-1/-2/-3, CryoSat-2, Saral/Altika, Sentinel-3A/-3B, HY-2A/C/D, Jason-CS/Sentinel-6A, SWOT), DORIS (Doppler Orbitography Radiopositionning Integrated by Satellite) allows to determine positions and velocities of tracking stations that define a stable reference for the estimation of the precise orbits and thus are fundamental for the quality of the altimeter data and derived mean sea level products. Due to the time evolution of the DORIS ground network, some stations included in the 2020 realization of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2020) have been decommissioned and since 2021.0 a few new stations were added to the tracking network. Therefore, to satisfy operational requirements for POD (Precise Orbit Determination) and routine delivery of geodetic products, the International DORIS Service (IDS) regularly updates the DPOD (DORIS terrestrial reference frame for Precise Orbit Determination). The DPOD solutions include mean positions and velocities of all the DORIS stations since 1993.0 derived from the stacking of the latest IDS weekly combined series aligned to the current ITRF. In this paper, we first present the stacking process of the DPOD2020 version 1.0. Then, we address the validation procedure of the DPO2020 including comparison with ITRF2020 and POD tests. For eighty percent of all the time segments of all the DORIS stations, the station position differences between DPOD2020 version 1.0 and ITRF2020 are smaller than ten millimeters. The major position differences between these two solutions are associated with the DORIS sites either localized in the South Atlantic Anomaly region or with time spans smaller than one year. Compared to DPOD2014, the DPOD2020 shows reduction of the main statistics of the DORIS-to-DORIS tie residuals (differences between the estimated and measured ties). The POD tests showed similar results for DPOD2020 and DPOD2014 for most of the altimetric satellites (TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, CryoSat-2, Jason-3). In addition, we observed better POD results with DPOD2020 for the latest altimetric satellite Sentinel-3A as well as a slight degradation for Jason-2. That degradation was fully explained by slightly worst results for the stations localized in the South Atlantic Anomaly region.

DORIS↗

An Efficient and Effective Light Gas Gun Design for Millimeter-Scale Hypervelocity Testing

This paper serves to document a design for a light gas gun that was used for 3 decades at NASA’s Langley Research Center. By adapting readily-available equipment and supplies, this apparatus was capable of accelerating projectiles at up to 9 kilometers per second. The lack of a projectile-carrying sabot sacrifices some adaptability in projectile size, but results in a design that can be cleaned and cycled with far less labor input. Overall limitation on the projectile impact energies attainable effectively limit the applications to assessing the relatively thin shields employed for robotic spacecraft (less useful for those used for manned missions). The original gun has been decommissioned, but it is believed that this design has application for robotic spacecraft shield testing in the modern world, allowing cost-effective generation of larger sample sizes than with conventional sabot-based light gas guns.

Scott Hull↗

Impact of DORISx Post Seismic Deformation and Seasonal Corrections on the DPOD2020 Solution

As one of the tracking systems used for the altimeter missions (such as TOPEX/Poseidon, Envisat, Jason-1/-2/-3, CryoSat-2, Saral/AltiKa, Sentinel-3A/-3B, HY-2A/C/D, Jason-CS/Sentinel-6A, SWOT), the position of the DORIS tracking stations provides a fundamental reference for the estimation of the precise orbits and so, by extension is fundamental for the quality of the altimeter data analysis and derived products. Due to the time evolution of the DORIS ground network, stations included in ITRF2020 may have been decommissioned and stations that were added to the tracking network after 2021.0 are, by definition, not part of ITRF2020. Therefore, to satisfy operational requirements for precise orbit determination and routine delivery of geodetic products, the International DORIS Service maintains the DORIS terrestrial reference frame for Precise Orbit Determination (DPOD) solutions. Since 2016, the DPOD products are computed by the IDS Combination Center (CC) as a DORIS cumulative position and linear velocity solution aligned to the latest available ITRF and using the latest IDS weekly combined series. Mid-2023, the IDS CC started the computation of the second version of the DPOD2020 based on the IDS 20 weekly solutions from 1993.0 to 2023.0. With that new solution, the IDS CC will include Post Seismic Deformation (PSD) corrections for some DORIS sites such as Socorro Island. These DPOD PSD corrections are determined from the analysis of DORIS coordinate time series only. The second version will also include optional annual and semi-annual station corrections. The presentation will describe the analysis used for extracting the PSD and seasonal DORIS station corrections, compare such corrections to those derived for ITRF2020, and evaluate the impact these new corrections have on station positioning and satellite POD.

Guilhem Moreaux↗

An Efficient and Effective Light Gas Gun Design for Millimeter-scale Hypervelocity Testing

This paper serves to document a design for a light gas gun that was used for 3 decades at NASA’s Langley Research Center. By adapting readily-available equipment and supplies, this apparatus was capable of accelerating projectiles at up to 9 kilometers per second (when new). The lack of a projectile-carrying sabot sacrifices some adaptability in projectile size, but results in a design that can be cleaned and cycled with far less labor input. Overall limitation on the projectile impact energies attainable effectively limit the applications to assessing the relatively thin shields employed for robotic spacecraft (less useful for those used for manned missions). The original gun has been decommissioned, but it is believed that this design has application for robotic spacecraft shield testing in the modern world, allowing cost-effective generation of larger sample sizes than with conventional sabot-based light gas guns.

Scott Hull↗

The Historical Greenland Climate Network (GC-Net) Curated and Augmented Level-1 Dataset

The Greenland Climate Network (GC-Net) consists of 31 automatic weather stations (AWSs) at 30 sites across the Greenland Ice Sheet. The first site was initiated in 1990, and the project has operated almost continuously since 1995 under the leadership of the late Konrad Steffen. The GC-Net AWS measured air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, downward and reflected shortwave irradiance, net radiation, and ice and firn temperatures. The majority of the GC-Net sites were located in the ice sheet accumulation area (17 AWSs), while 11 AWSs were located in the ablation area, and two sites (three AWSs) were located close to the equilibrium line altitude. Additionally, three AWSs of similar design to the GC-Net AWS were installed by Konrad Steffen's team on the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctica. After more than 3 decades of operation, the GC-Net AWSs are being decommissioned and replaced by new AWSs operated by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). Therefore, making a reassessment of the historical GC-Net AWS data is necessary. We present a full reprocessing of the historical GC-Net AWS dataset with increased attention to the filtering of erroneous measurements, data correction and derivation of additional variables: continuous surface height, instrument heights, surface albedo, turbulent heat fluxes, and 10 m ice and firn temperatures. This new augmented GC-Net level-1 (L1) AWS dataset is now available at https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/VVXGUT (Steffen et al., 2023) and will continue to be refined. The processing scripts, latest data and a data user forum are available at https://github.com/GEUS-Glaciology-and-Climate/GC-Net-level-1-data-processing (last access: 30 November 2023). In addition to the AWS data, a comprehensive compilation of valuable metadata is provided: maintenance reports, yearly pictures of the stations and the station positions through time. This unique dataset provides more than 320 station years of high-quality atmospheric data and is available following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) data and code practices.

Greenland Climate Network↗

GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation Beyond Aura MLS: Assimilating NASA SAGE III/ISS Profiles of Stratospheric Water Vapor

Water vapor in the lower stratosphere is an important trace gas for atmospheric chemistry and radiative budget with direct impact on climate. During the last quarter of the 20th century, the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) missions were crucial in monitoring the stratospheric ozone loss and the subsequent recovery as well as trends in water vapor linked to surface temperature trends. The SAGE III instrument aboard the International Space Station (ISS) continues the SAGE mission record, with high vertical resolution profiles of water vapor (and other constituents) since mid-2017. The NASA GEOS Earth system model has the capability to assimilate multi-constituents from ground and space-based instruments using the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System (CoDAS). Reanalysis products of stratospheric water vapor without data constraints are historically poor, and two recent reanalyses which assimilated stratospheric constituents observed by the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) improve the representation of stratospheric composition, including water vapor, when compared against independent observations. The MLS instrument is on NASA's Aura satellite which is expected to be decommissioned in the coming years. Here we demonstrate that while the number of solar occultation observations a day from SAGE III/ISS is about 1 % of the total number of profiles observed globally by MLS, the chemical timescales of water vapor in the lower stratosphere are long enough that the SAGE III/ISS data can provide a useful constraint on the assimilated product. Analyzed water vapor fields from assimilating only SAGE III/ISS water vapor profiles agree well with independent stratospheric observations, including when compared against the frost-point hygrometers at the three NOAA stations. Over the five-year period from 2017 through 2022, the analyzed water vapor using SAGE III/ISS captures many of the features seen with the assimilation of MLS observations. Note, this ability is reduced over regions where the SAGE III/ISS instrument provides infrequent or no observations (associated with the orbit of the ISS), as highlighted in the case study period following the eruption of the tropical underwater volcano Hunga Tonga in early 2022. Nevertheless, there is a clear benefit to the assimilation of stratospheric water vapor from SAGE III/ISS observations, allowing us to continue to monitor stratospheric composition for climate assessments following the impending loss of Aura.

K. Emma Knowland↗

GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation Beyond Aura MLS: Assimilating NASA SAGE III/ISS Profiles of Stratospheric Water Vapor

Water vapor in the lower stratosphere is an important trace gas for atmospheric chemistry and radiative budget with direct impact on climate. During the last quarter of the 20th century, the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) missions were crucial in monitoring the stratospheric ozone loss and the subsequent recovery as well as trends in water vapor linked to surface temperature trends. The SAGE III instrument aboard the International Space Station (ISS) continues the SAGE mission record, with high vertical resolution profiles of water vapor (and other constituents) since mid-2017. The NASA GEOS Earth system model has the capability to assimilate multi-constituents from ground and space-based instruments using the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System (CoDAS). Reanalysis products of stratospheric water vapor without data constraints are historically poor, and two recent reanalyses which assimilated stratospheric constituents observed by the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) improve the representation of stratospheric composition, including water vapor, when compared against independent observations. The MLS instrument is on NASA's Aura satellite which is expected to be decommissioned in the coming years. Here we demonstrate that while the number of solar occultation observations a day from SAGE III/ISS is about 1 % of the total number of profiles observed globally by MLS, the chemical timescales of water vapor in the lower stratosphere are long enough that the SAGE III/ISS data can provide a useful constraint on the assimilated product. Analyzed water vapor fields from assimilating only SAGE III/ISS water vapor profiles agree well with independent stratospheric observations, including when compared against the frost-point hygrometers at the three NOAA stations. Over the five-year period from 2017 through 2022, the analyzed water vapor using SAGE III/ISS captures many of the features seen with the assimilation of MLS observations. Note, this ability is reduced over regions where the SAGE III/ISS instrument provides infrequent or no observations (associated with the orbit of the ISS), as highlighted in the case study period following the eruption of the tropical underwater volcano Hunga Tonga in early 2022. Nevertheless, there is a clear benefit to the assimilation of stratospheric water vapor from SAGE III/ISS observations, allowing us to continue to monitor stratospheric composition for climate assessments following the impending loss of Aura.

K. Emma Knowland↗

Inter-Calibrating the CERES SW Instrument Fluxes Using Deep Convective Clouds(DCC) Within the Same Sun-Synchronous Orbit

The NASA CERES EBAF product provides the scientific community observed TOA fluxes to monitor the Earth’s energy imbalance and to validate climate models. To provide a seamless EBAF 24-year record, the CERES instrument calibration must be stable and consistent across satellite records. Once the Terra and Aqua spacecraft are decommissioned at the end of 2025, the CERES project will rely on CERES instrument observations on the SNPP and NOAA-20 1:30 PM sun-synchronous orbits. The SNPP and NOAA-20 satellite orbit placement will prevent any time matched observations for inter-calibration efforts. The future Libera instrument, which will continue the CERES record and scheduled for launch in 2028 onboard the NOAA-22 satellite, will also need to be inter-calibrated without the aid of time-matched observations. Deep convective clouds (DCC) are the most Lambertian, brightest, tropical Earth invariant targets located at the tropopause making them ideal to radiometrically scale the CERES SW observed radiance to a common reference. The SNPP, NOAA-20 and future NOAA-22 satellites are in the same 16-day repeatable orbits, allowing the DCC targets to be observed with the same angular configuration. The empirically derived SNPP CERES SW channel Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) can be easily be applied to the NOAA-20 CERES SW channel radiances since they observe the nearly the same DCC systems. The DCC BRDF corrected radiances are analyzed collectively into radiance probability distribution functions (PDF). By comparing the PDF statistics, the SNPP and NOAA-20 CERES SW channel can be inter-calibrated. The inter-calibration coefficients are validated with the CERES instrument calibration team coefficients to optimize the methodology.

David Doelling↗