Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the S// Transitions
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Electron Excitation↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “electron cross sections”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the 3s(sup 2)3p(sup 2)(sup 3)P -->3s3p(sup 3) (sup 5)S(sup o) Transition in S(sup 2+)
In the experimental approach, use is made of the electron energy-loss method with merged electron and ion beams.
excitation highly-charged ions Io torus R-matrix a↗
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the 2s(sup 2)2p(sup 3) (sup 4)S -> 2s(sup 2)2p(sup 3) (sup 2d) ->2s2p(sup 4) (sup 4p) (Resonance) Transitions in Oil
Experimental and theoretical excitation cross sections are reported for the first forbidden transition xxx and the first allowed (resonance) transition xxx in OII. Use is made of electron-energy loss and merged beams methods. The electron energy range covered is 3.33 eV (threshold) to 15 eV for the S->D transition, and 14.9 eV (threshold) to 40 eV for the S->P transition. Care was taken to assess and minimize the metastable fraction of the OII beam. An electron mirror was designed and tested to reflect inelastically back-scattered electrons into the forward direction to account for the full range of polar scattering angles. Comparisons are made between present experiments and 11-state R-Matrix calculations. Calculations are also presented for the xxx transition.
electron excitation↗
Total Born-approximation cross sections for single-electron loss by atoms and ions colliding with atoms
The first Born approximation (FBA) is applied to the calculation of single-electron-loss cross sections for various ions and atoms containing from one to seven electrons. Screened hydrogenic wave functions are used for the states of the electron ejected from the projectile, and Hartree-Fock elastic and incoherent scattering factors are used to describe the target. The effect of the target atom on the scaling of projectile ionization cross sections with respect to the projectile nuclear charge is explored in the case of hydrogenlike ions. Also examined is the scaling of the cross section with respect to the target nuclear charge for electron loss by Fe(25+) in collision with neutral atoms ranging from H to Fe. These results are compared with those of the binary-encounter approximation (BEA) and with the FBA for the case of ionization by completely stripped target ions. Electron-loss cross sections are also calculated for the ions O(i+) (i = 3-7) and N(i+) (i = 0-6) in collision with He targets in the energy range of approximately 0.1 to 100 MeV/nucleon. These results are found to be in excellent agreement with the available data near the peak of the ionization cross section.
Rule, D. W.↗
Kuang's Semi-Classical Formalism for Calculating Electron Capture Cross Sections: A Space- Physics Application
Accurate estimates of electroncapture cross sections at energies relevant to the modeling of the transport, acceleration, and interaction of energetic neutral atoms (ENA) in space (approximately few MeV per nucleon) and especially for multi-electron ions must rely on detailed, but computationally expensive, quantum-mechanical description of the collision process. Kuang's semi-classical approach is an elegant and efficient way to arrive at these estimates. Motivated by ENA modeling efforts for apace applications, we shall briefly present this approach along with sample applications and report on current progress.
Barghouty, A. F.↗
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the S II Transitions
Experimental excitation cross sections are reported for the tranitions 3s23p3 S0 goes to 3s23p3 2D0, 3s23p3 P0 and 3s3P4 4P in SII.
electron excitation↗
Semiclassical calculation of inelastic cross sections for electron-cesium atomic collisions
Calculation of inelastic cross sections for electron-cesium atomic collisions
INELASTIC COLLISION↗
Electron excitation cross sections for the 2s(2)2p(3)4S(O) -- 2s(2)2p(3)2D(O) (forbidden) and 4S(O) -- 2s2p(4) 4P (resonance) transitions in O II
Experimental and theoretical excitation cross sections are reported for the first forbidden transition 4S(O) -- 2S(2)2p(3) 2D(O) (lambda-lambda 3726, 3729) and the first allowed (resonance) transition 4S(O) -- 2s2p(4) 4P(lambda-833) in O II. Use is made of electron energy loss and merged-beams methods. The electron energy range covered is 3.33 (threshold) to 15 eV for the S -- D transition, and 14.9 (threshold) to 40 eV for the S -- P transition. Care was taken to assess and minimize the metastable fraction of the O II beam. An electron mirror was designed and tested to reflect inelastically backscattered electrons into the forward direction to account for the full range of polar scattering angles. Comparisons are made between present experiments and 11-state R-matrix calculations. Calculations are also presented for the 4S(O) -- 2s(2)2p(3)2P(O) (lambda-2470) transition.
Zuo, M.↗
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the C // Transitions 2s(sup 2)wp (sup 2)Pdegree -- 2s2p(sup 2) (sup 4)P, (sup 2)D and (sup 2)S
Experimental and theoretical excitation cross sections are reported for the transitions 2s22p 2Po 2s2p2 4P, 2D and 2S in C //. The transition wavelengths (energies) are l 2324 A (5.34 eV), l 1335 A (9.29 eV), and l 1036 A (11.96 eV), respectively. Use is made of electron energy-loss and merged- beams methods. The energy range covered is from below each threshold (4-11 eV) to 22-25 eV. As in previous work with O //, care was taken to assess and minimize the metastable fraction in the C //beam, to account for contributions from nearby energy-loss features, and to collect the full angular range of inelastically-scattered electrons. Comparison is made for each transition between experiment and a new 8-state R-matrix calculations.
Electron Excitation↗
Validation of the SCEPTRE Boltzmann-CSD Solver
A new Boltzmann-CSD solver has been developed within the SCEPTRE radiation-transport code, based on the 1st-order form of the transport equation, using discontinuous finite elements in space and energy and discrete ordinates in angle. The Boltzmann-CSD solver has been validated against experimental data for electron energy deposition distributions and for electron emission spectra. Comparison of the calculated results with experimental data shows excellent agreement for many of the test configurations and reasonable agreement for other test configurations. The tests have also been modeled with the ITS Monte Carlo code, which also shows excellent to reasonable agreement with the SCEPTRE results and experimental data. The SCEPTRE Boltzmann-CSD solver relies on electron cross sections generated by the legacy CEPXS code, which currently is limited to electron-only Boltzmann-CSD cross sections. Performing full electron-photon radiation transport with the Boltzmann-CSD solver will require further development in the cross section generating code. For the energy- deposition calculations, neglecting photon transport results in at most about 5% overprediction of the energy deposition for high-energy electrons on high-Z targets, and relatively insignificant difference for the other test configurations.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the C II Transitions 2s(exp 2)2p P-2(exp 0) yields 2s2p(exp 2) P-4, D-2, and S-2
Experimental and theoretical excitation cross sections are reported for the transitions 2s(exp 2) 2p-2(exp 0) yield 2s2p(exp 2)P-4, D-2, and S-2 in C II. The transition wavelengths (energies) are 2324 A (5.34 eV), 1335 x (9.29 eV), and 1036 A (11.97 eV), respectively. Use is made of electron energy-loss and merged beams methods. The energy range covered is from below each threshold (4 - 11 eV) to 15-24 eV. As in previous work with O II, care was taken to assess and minimize the metastable fraction in the C II beam, to account for contributions from nearby energy-loss features, and to collect the full angular range of inelastically scattered electrons. A comparison is made for each transition between experiment and new 8-state R-matrix calculations. Subject headings: atomic data ultraviolet: general
Smith, Steven J.↗
Electron excitation cross sections for the 2s^2 2p ^2p^o-2s2p^2 ^4p and 2s2p^2 ^2D transitions in O^3+
Comparison is made with results of new calculations in a 25-state R-matrix theory and with results in a previous eight-state R-matrix calculation. The presence of rich resonance structure is confirmed in both experiment and theory.
electron excitation electron temperature and densi↗
Electron Excitation Cross Sections for the S II Transitions: 3s(exp 2)3p(exp 3) 4S(exp o) approaches 3s(exp 2)3p(exp 3) 2D(exp o), 2P(exp o), and 3s3p(exp 4) 4P
Experimental and theoretical collisional excitation cross sections are reported for the transitions 3s(exp 2)3p(exp 3)4S(exp o) approaches 3s(exp 2)3p(exp 3) 2D(exp o), 2P(exp o), and 3s3P(exp 4) 4P in S II. The transition wavelengths (energies) are 6716 A (1.85 eV), 4069 A (3.05 eV), and 1256 A (9.87 eV), respectively. In the experiments, use is made of the energy-loss merged-beams method. The metastable fraction of the S II beam was assessed and minimized. The contribution of elastically scattered electrons was reduced by the use of a lowered solenoidal magnetic field and a modulated radio-frequency voltage on the analyzing plates and by retarding grids to reject the elastically scattered electrons with larger Larmor radii. For each transition, comparisons are made among experiments, the new 19 state R-matrix calculation, and three other close-coupling calculations.
Liao, C.↗
How analytic choices can affect the extraction of electromagnetic form factors from elastic electron scattering cross section data
Scientists often try to incorporate prior knowledge into their regression algorithms, such as a particular analytic behavior or a known value at a kinematic endpoint. Unfortunately, there is often no unique way to make use of this prior knowledge, and thus, different analytic choices can lead to very different regression results from the same set of data. In this paper, to illustrate this point in the context of the proton electromagnetic form factors, we use the Mainz elastic data with its 1422 cross section points and 31 normalization parameters. Starting with a complex unbound non-linear regression, we will show how the addition of a single theory-motivated constraint removes an oscillation from the magnetic form factor and shifts the extracted proton charge radius. We then repeat both regressions using the same algorithm, but with a rebinned version of the Mainz dataset. These examples illustrate how analytic choices, such as the function that is being used or even the binning of the data, can dramatically affect the results of a complex regression. These results also demonstrate why it is critical when using regression algorithms to have either a physical model in mind or a firm mathematical basis
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
GENIE Event Generator Implementation of Total Inclusive Quasielastic Electron Scattering Cross Sections and Two-Body Dynamics for Future Neutrino Experiments
Joint Theory-Experiment Neutrino Physics Meeting
Andreoli, Lorenzo↗
Prediction of electron density and collision cross section. Volume 2 - Equilibrium electron density prediction, a mathematical model Final report
Mathematical model for prediction of electron density at equilibrium
Mc Dermit, J. H.↗
Vacuum-ultraviolet excitation cross sections by electron impact on NO.
Absolute excitation functions were measured for the NO(+) A l super Pi-Chi 1 super Sigma (+) molecular band system, the nitrogen 1200-, 1243-, and 1493-A multiplets, and oxygen 1304-A multiplet. Excitation was by electron impact on NO from threshold to approximately 250 eV. Results are plotted and tabulated.
Mentall, J. E.↗