Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “fusion reactor blankets”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

77 records · Page 5

DOE Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Accountable Nuclear Material Needs for Development and Commercialization of Fusion Nuclear Energy

Fusion energy represents a transformative opportunity to deliver a safe, plentiful, and carbon-free source of reliable primary power. In recent years, fusion research and development have accelerated significantly, particularly within the US, driven by decades of foundational public investment. Notably, in 2024 the US Department of Energy (DOE) established a comprehensive Fusion Energy Strategy aimed at collaborating with industry partners to enable the deployment of fusion power plants and grid integration by the 2030s. This strategy is chiefly implemented through the DOE Office of Science (SC) Fusion Energy Sciences program. This project was initiated to identify potential approaches for the Office of Environment, Safety, and Health (NA-ESH-12) within DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration to begin engagement with the fusion community on future accountable material needs. The goal of the project is to inform and influence the supply of and demand for accountable nuclear materials as fusion energy is developed and commercialized. NA-ESH-12 must proactively engage with the fusion community regarding the production and management of accountable nuclear materials. Given the complexity and scale of materials required for research, pilot projects, and eventual commercial reactors, early coordination is vital. The project’s objective is to provide insights that will shape the supply and demand landscape for critical nuclear materials, ensuring that DOE is prepared to effectively support fusion energy development and commercialization. In FY 2025, an initial limited review was conducted to identify the status of the fusion energy community’s progress toward full-scale energy production and the need for accountable nuclear material. This included communications with SC, NA-ESH-12, Savannah River National Laboratory, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and attending the Rutgers University–sponsored Supply Chain Workshop: Scaling the Fusion Industry and the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Ninth DEMO Programme Workshop. The review to date indicates that the amounts of tritium, lithium-6, and deuterium required by the fusion industry will be dependent on fuel type, breeding technology, blankets, and R&D improvements. One concern is that the commercial sector does not have a sufficient supply chain to meet the demand for development and commercialization for fusion energy production. The supply and demand estimates for these materials should be routinely reviewed as fusion technologies mature.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

The spherical tokamak advanced reactor (STAR) fusion power plant design

Scientific and technical advancements have been made that improve fusion’s prospects to provide a new energy source, showing enhanced plasma confinement conditions with plasma temperatures reaching or exceeding 100 million degrees. Overshadowing this progress is the challenge involved in developing an economically viable fusion power plant design. Many proposed next-step DEMO and pilot plant designs are extensions of existing physics-focused experimental devices defined to understand and control plasma operations to achieve and sustain a fusion reaction. Transitioning scientific and technical advancements into a functional power plant requires a dedicated focus on architectural designs that integrate diverse technologies, while optimizing physics conditions, with a focus on economic viability. This holistic approach is essential in turning the promise of fusion energy into a reality. The Spherical Tokamak Advanced Reactor (STAR) is a fusion power plant conceptual design with the architectural focus that strives to balance physics, engineering, and cost considerations. In conclusion, it has been set up to introduce relevant physics, engineering and concept features that an intermediate pilot plant might follow, with the goal of meeting system performances and economic requirements that lead to a commercially competitive fusion power plant.

Blanket segmentation↗

Technological aspects in blanket design: Effects of micro-alloying and thermo-mechanical treatments of EUROFER97 type steels after neutron irradiation

Presently available data on neutron irradiation damage raise doubts on the feasibility of using EUROFER97 steel for a water-cooled starter blanket in a DEMO reactor, since the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT) increases significantly for irradiation temperatures below 350°C. The additional DBTT shift caused by H and He transmutation can only be estimated based on very few results with isotopically tailored EUROFER97 steel. Conservative calculations show that the DBTT of EUROFER97 steel could exceed the operating temperature in water-cooled starter blankets within a relatively short time period. This paper presents results from a EUROfusion funded irradiation campaign that was performed in the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The paper compares ten newly developed reduced activation ferritic-martensitic (RAFM) steels irradiated to a nominal dose of 2.5 dpa at 300°C. The post-irradiation experiments using Small Specimen Test Technology included hardness, tensile, and fracture mechanics tests combined with fractography and microstructure analysis are presented. Results show that micro-alloying EUROFER97-type steels influenced the mechanical properties but a dominating impact on irradiation damage resistance could not be identified. In contrast, specific thermo-mechanical treatments lead to better DBTT behavior. Discussion about irradiation response to heat treatment conditions is also given. Here, despite requiring data also at high dpa values, the results indicate that with these modified materials an increased lifetime and potentially also an increased operating temperature window can be achieved compared to EUROFER97.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

New class of tritium breeders for fusion applications: Metal-reinforced composite breeders

Commercial fusion reactors operating on a D-T fuel cycle will require a steady supply of tritium to maintain the burning plasma required for continuous power generation. Since tritium has a short half-life, there is negligible natural abundance which necessitates fusion reactors to produce their own source of tritium. Tritium is most easily produced by surrounding a fusion reactor core with lithium (Li), which reacts under the intense neutron flux leaving the reactor core to form tritium and helium. Due to the hazards and technical challenges associated with surrounding a fusion reactor core with many tons of molten Li, other Li-bearing tritium breeder materials have been pursued. Unfortunately, most of the liquid breeders historically examined are exceedingly corrosive to reactor structural materials while many solid breeders in the form of ceramics are forced to make tradeoffs between Li content and mechanical integrity. In this work, to break the historic limit between Li-density and mechanical integrity of traditional solid breeders, a new class of solid tritium breeders is developed: metal-reinforced composite (MERC) breeders. Specifically, the high Li-density of lithium oxide (Li 2 O) is exploited through the addition of a metal reinforcing phase, producing a composite breeder material exhibiting high splitting tensile strength and quasi-ductility with a Li-density greater than other leading solid breeder candidates, including lithium orthosilicate (Li 4 SiO 4 ) and lithium metatitanate (Li 2 TiO 3 ). Mechanical testing, microstructural characterization, and neutronic simulation results are presented and discussed in light of fusion reactor design considerations.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Preliminary neutronic and thermal analysis of Inertial Fusion Energy systems with a focus on thick liquid wall concepts

This paper provides an assessment of the neutronic behavior of Inertial Fusion Energy systems using the Serpent 2 Monte Carlo code. The study explores different types of reactor concepts, including dry-wall and thick liquid wall systems. In particular, it characterizes the tritium breeding and energy multiplication performance, as well as the effect of long-term irradiation on structural materials. For this purpose, the displacement per atom (DPA) and the gas production rate in structural materials are calculated. A simplified geometry with varying geometrical parameters is used as a representation for the different kinds of devices. Additionally, the case of the HYLIFE-II concept is used to assess modeling inaccuracies arising from certain approximations. A comparison between the simplified geometry and a realistic one is performed, thanks to Serpent’s capability to run transport calculations on unstructured meshes. The study then addresses the impact of these discrepancies on the temperature distribution in the first wall using the GeN-Foam code for conjugate heat transfer analysis. The results highlight the necessity to consider the heterogeneous nature of the liquid wall, as simplified models tend to underestimate radiation damage metrics and heat loads.

Conjugate heat transfer↗