Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “hotel”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

76 records · Page 5

Human Mars Surface Mission Nuclear Power Considerations

A key decision facing Mars mission designers is how to power a crewed surface field station. Unlike the solar-powered Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) that could retreat to a very low power state during a Martian dust storm, human Mars surface missions are estimated to need at least 15 kilowatts of electrical (kWe) power simply to maintain critical life support and spacecraft functions. 'Hotel' loads alone for a pressurized crew rover approach two kWe; driving requires another five kWe-well beyond what the Curiosity rover’s Radioisotope Power System (RPS) was designed to deliver. Full operation of a four-crew Mars field station is estimated at about 40 kWe. Clearly, a crewed Mars field station will require a substantial and reliable power source, beyond the scale of robotic mission experience. This paper explores the applications for both fission and RPS nuclear options for Mars.

Rucker, Michelle A.↗

Scaling a Smart Sub-metered Electrical Data Solution for the Center

Currently, there is no single Center-level point solution that enables facility systems data to be collected and stored from buildings on-site, on-demand, and through a faceted search capability that would enable the cultivation of deeper insights into incipient facility-related issues that would otherwise be overlooked. Such insights would represent a powerful and very valuable tool to aid in data-driven decision making and informing actionable steps for remediation and resolution of these problems. Access to electrically sub-metered data via hardware upgrades is in the process of being restored for Building N232, Sustainability Base, but this is only the first step. The native software capabilities that were originally part of a proposed Agencywide Smart Center initiative project can unlock the ability to access actionable insights. This work would also nicely complement many initiatives that are actively being pursued, under consideration, or pending submission to this same call at the Center. This project is poised to support an NRSAA with Verdigris Technologies, as well as in support of an Agencywide Smart Center initiative. Monitoring electrical consumption usage at the most granular level in Bldg. N232 will be instrumental in accurately quantifying potential utility costs and investments, and monitoring usage trends, as it is being converted into hoteling spaces, to help. This will also help with determining how the capability can scale more broadly across the Center and Agency at large.

Rodney Alexander Martin↗

Scaling a Smart Sub-metered Electrical Data Solution for the Center

Currently, there is no single Center-level point solution that enables facility systems data to be collected and stored from buildings on-site, on-demand, and through a faceted search capability that would enable the cultivation of deeper insights into incipient facility-related issues that would otherwise be overlooked. Such insights would represent a powerful and very valuable tool to aid in data-driven decision making and informing actionable steps for remediation and resolution of these problems. Access to electrically sub-metered data via hardware upgrades is in the process of being restored for Building N232, Sustainability Base, but this is only the first step. The native software capabilities that were originally part of a proposed Agencywide Smart Center initiative project can unlock the ability to access actionable insights. This work would also nicely complement many initiatives that are actively being pursued, under consideration, or pending submission to this same call at the Center. This project is poised to support an NRSAA with Verdigris Technologies, as well as in support of an Agencywide Smart Center initiative. Monitoring electrical consumption usage at the most granular level in Bldg. N232 will be instrumental in accurately quantifying potential utility costs and investments, and monitoring usage trends, as it is being converted into hoteling spaces, to help. This will also help with determining how the capability can scale more broadly across the Center and Agency at large.

Rodney Alexander Martin↗

Habitability and Human Factors Assessment (iSHORT, SHAQ, and SHU)

BACKGROUND As long-duration off-planet habitats become a reality, a consideration of habitability and human factors (HF) is crucial. The habitat is more than just a place to live and work. It is also the crew’s perception of the space, and the psychological impacts of size, layout, and usage over time; all of which can support or strain behavioral health and performance (BHP). A previous International Space Station (ISS) habitability study used the iSHORT (Space Habitability Observation Reporting Tool) to collect detailed data about habitability and human factors and inform NASA Standards. Of the previous iSHORT study, only one of the six ISS subjects had a duration of one year; all other ISS and ground analog subjects had shorter mission durations from one week to six months. It is necessary to collect new data with a focus on long-duration exploration missions of > 6 months and on planetary surface habitat design. New data is also needed to compare the iSHORT to other habitability measures. One measure, the SHAQ (Subjective Habitability and Acceptability Questionnaire), assesses the intersection of psychology and habitability. Another complementary measure, the Scale for Habitat Usability (SHU), is a brief subjective scale that captures how habitat design impacts perceived usability of the built environment in relation to task performance. OBJECTIVE Our study aims to (1) understand how individual well-being and team dynamics may relate to HF concerns over time, (2) capture how habitability and HF change over time, (3) compare the three habitability measures (iSHORT, SHAQ, SHU), (4) assess habitats to capture HF design concerns and related BHP impacts of a planetary habitat, and (5) inform future standards for HF design. METHOD Data are being collected on crews living and working in long-duration spaceflight analogs. Individual-level data collections are repeated at regular intervals throughout the missions on several habitat areas, activities, and key equipment (i.e., points of interest). These points of interest (POIs) include the kitchen/galley, crew quarters, and other work and living areas. Assessments include evaluations of privacy, comfort, convenience, control, efficiency, and social density through the lens of subsequent outcomes like sleep, individual performance, group activities performance, stress, mood, and social interactions. Pre- and post-mission evaluations will also allow comparison with homes, pre- and post-mission hotels, and a retrospective reflection of living and working in a long-duration analog. INITIAL DATA COLLECTIONS In this poster, we will describe the measures and data yield. Since the research protocol was designed, the study team has collected iSHORT Standalone four times, nine collections of SHAQ, and three collections of iSHORT with SHAQ. Data collection is ongoing. SUMMARY A novel assessment suite has been developed to further aid the comparison and complementary understanding of the habitability and human factors measures, which will allow for efficient deployment of these measures in analogs and/or spaceflight in near-term research as well as support well-being and performance through design.

J C W Miller↗