Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “hydrogen R&D”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Pathway Study for Large-Scale Hydrogen Production from Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Technology

This poster was presented at the 2024 FECM/NETL Spring R&D Project Review Meeting. This data is a summary of a project involving large-scale hydrogen production via SOEC technology to identify a technology pathway to achieve the $1/kg hydrogen goal. The poster lays out the identified pathway and technology changes, assumptions, systems, cost results, and sensitivities along with discussion points.

Buchheit, Kyle L.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Unlocking the Potential of Marine Energy Using Hydrogen Generation Technologies

Marine energy, including ocean waves, ocean currents, ocean thermal gradients, tides, and river currents, is a vast and untapped resource that can be harnessed to help enable the transition to renewable energy. Marine energy is an attractive renewable resource because of its energy density, predictability, and persistence. Further, marine energy has the potential to provide energy for utility-scale applications, remote and distributed applications, and rapidly expanding maritime industries, such as aquaculture and shipping. Marine energy technologies are, however, at a nascent stage of development, and a significant amount of the resource is located far from population centers and transmission infrastructure. Accordingly, to unlock the full potential of marine energy, efficient methods of storing and transporting captured marine energy are needed so that the energy can be used when and where it is needed. A promising solution to these energy storage and transportation challenges is to combine marine energy and hydrogen generation technologies. Herein, we provide a high-level analysis of the unique value proposition and technical challenges of combining marine energy and hydrogen technologies. First, we review marine energy technologies, electrolysis technologies, and hydrogen storage methods. Next, we consider specific applications and opportunities for combining the two technologies. Finally, we identify critical R&D challenges that must be overcome to successfully combine marine energy and hydrogen generation technologies. As part of our fact-finding effort in this area, we held a workshop attended by marine energy and hydrogen technology experts from industry, academia, national labs, and government entities to explore the technical challenges and opportunities for combined marine energy and hydrogen generation systems. Our intent is that this document and the report from the workshop can be used in conjunction to help identify and direct research and development that is needed to realize the potential of marine energy-hydrogen systems.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

Hydrogen Production Cost with Alkaline Electrolysis

Rigorous stakeholder-vetted techno-economic analysis was performed to assess the cost of hydrogen (H 2 ) produced using state-of-the-art Liquid Alkaline (LA) electrolysis. Projected high-volume, untaxed levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) range from 2020US $\$ 1.84$ to $\$ 2.88$/kg-H 2 depending on technology year, process design, and electrolyzer project scale, assuming an electricity price of $\$ 0.03$/kWh. The total installed capital cost for a LA electrolysis plant was estimated from bottom-up stack and installed cost models that account for purchased equipment, installation costs, site preparation, and general overhead costs. For this study, the LA electrolysis plant is assumed to be a stick-built, greenfield project developed by an EPC firm with electrolysis stacks purchased directly from an electrolysis stack manufacturer. The price of the electrolysis stacks is based on a bottom-up cost assessment with business markup for the electrolysis company fabricator. Methods from the Hydrogen Analysis (H 2 A) production model, a peer-reviewed national laboratory-developed discounted cash flow model, were used to calculate the LCOH production in 2020$/kg-H 2 . The baseline electricity price case ($\$ 0.03$/kWh) corresponds to average wholesale electricity prices currently possible in U.S. markets with plentiful wind. Similar low-cost electricity pricing is possible from solar Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) although these prices are typically limited by renewable energy capacity factors.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2024

Baseload Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear and Renewable Energy: A Comparative Analysis

As the global push towards net zero carbon gains momentum, the demand for clean hydrogen is expected to grow rapidly across various sectors, including transportation, industries and electrical grids. To meet this growing hydrogen demand, baseload hydrogen production facilities capable of providing a continuous and reliable supply of hydrogen will be necessary throughout the world. This paper explores the technoeconomic feasibility of establishing baseload electrolytic hydrogen production facilities in the United States, utilizing different clean generation resources. The key criteria include maintaining a consistent supply of clean hydrogen without putting baseload demand stress to already vulnerable power grid. In order to do that, the proposed facilities will host onsite clean power generation and energy storage technologies. The proposed facilities can capitalize on available investment and production incentives and have ability to export excess electricity to the utility at a bulk price. Several scenarios are considered based on the clean energy resources to support the electrolysis process including light water reactors (LWRs) currently evaluating retirement options, wind, solar PVs, and advanced small modular reactors (SMRs). For each scenario, a hypothetical hydrogen production facility is considered in a location in the US where the primary generation resource is at its peak strength. Comparative analysis in this paper reveal that the nuclear power plants are most economically viable for baseload hydrogen production facilities, outperforming renewable-based facilities with significantly lower levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH). Even under best-case scenarios for resource availability, incentives and export prices, renewable-based facilities face challenges due to daily and seasonal generation variability, resulting in large installation sizes and lower capacity factors. Among renewable-based facilities, complementarity hybrids, providing more stable power supply, demonstrate superior economics compared to facilities based on a single renewable technology. While LWR-powered facility can achieve a negative LCOH with incentives, SMR-powered facilities can provide economic hydrogen supply with LCOH below $1/kg with high temperature electrolysis option. The analysis in this paper underscores the pivotal role of nuclear energy in the future hydrogen economy.

08 - HYDROGEN↗
NASA NTRS1995

Spectroscopic Parameters of H2S Polyads Between 3400 and 8000 cm x 10 to -1 exponent

The absorption spectra of hydrogen sulfide from 0.8 to 5 micro- meters were recorded with three spectral resolutions using the Fourier transform spectrometer at Kitt Peak National Observatory. Twenty bands were previously assigned so that accurate band origins and vi- brational parameters could be determined. Described are the analyses of the rotational structure of resonating hydrogen sulfide states.

molecular spectroscopy hydrogen sulfide absorption↗
NASA NTRS1976

On the distance to the candidate star coincident with A0620-00

High-dispersion echelle spectra of the candidate star for the transient X-ray source A0620-00 are discussed. No absorption or emission lines attributed to the star were found under visual examination of the spectra, but interstellar sodium D lines were clearly visible. Results are presented for measurements of the profiles and central velocities of the sodium absorption lines, and other observations of interstellar features in the general direction of the star are summarized. While the exact distance to the star cannot be determined due to the patchy distribution of the interstellar gas, it is suggested that the star is located between 1.5 and 2.5 kpc; 2 kpc is adopted as the most reasonable value. It is noted that the possibility cannot be ruled out that the star lies beyond 3 kpc and is seen through a hole in the distant neutral hydrogen gas.

Gull, T. R.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Advanced Sensors for Hydrogen Technology

This gap analysis study included all parts of the hydrogen value chain, from hydrogen generation, to storage, and end use, with the exception of transportation applications. While these research projects are not always commercially viable, they are important in advancing technology, and especially in reaching goals such as improved efficiency and reducing emissions. Without emissions targets enforced by the government, or incentives for industry for emissions reduction, investing in advanced technology and manufacturing system upgrades can be exceedingly difficult to justify. This analysis identifies and prioritizes sensor R&D development areas that are critical to enable the hydrogen economy.

08 HYDROGEN↗
NASA NTRS1976

Energy storage possibilities of atomic hydrogen

The possibility of storing large amounts of energy in a free radical system such as atomic hydrogen is analyzed. Attention is focused on theoretical calculations of the ground state properties of spin-aligned atomic triplet hydrogen, deuterium, and tritium. The solid-liquid phase transition in atomic hydrogen is also examined.

Etters, R. D.↗
NASA NTRS1978

USAF nickel hydrogen cell

Air Force activities in nickel hydrogen battery research were summarized. The latest developments for the past year were discussed and applications of the nickel hydrogen batteries were reviewed.

Warnock, D. R.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Atmospheric opacity in the Schumann-Runge bands and the aeronomic dissociation of water vapor

Knowledge of the aeronomic production of odd hydrogen in the dissociation of water vapor is limited by uncertainties in the penetration of solar irradiance in the Schumann-Runge bands of O2 and by incomplete information concerning the products of photolysis at Lyman alpha. Consideration of all error sources involved in computing the H2O dissociation rate in the wavelength region 175-200 nm leads to an estimated uncertainty of plus or minus 35% at an altitude of 90 km for an overhead sun. The uncertainty increases with decreasing altitude such that the true dissociation rate at 60 km for an overhead sun lies between 0.45 and 1.55 times the results computed using the best input parameters currently available. Calculations of the H2O dissociation rate by Lyman alpha should include the variation in O2 opacity across the solar line width. Neglect of this can lead to errors as large as 50% at altitudes where the process is the major source of odd hydrogen.

Frederick, J. E.↗
NASA NTRS2008

J-2X Fuel Turbopump Point of Departure: The Performance of the J-2s Fuel Turbopump Inducer

To aid the J-2X program design effort with detailed performance and environment information, the J-2S fuel turbopump (FTP) inducer has undergone a thorough test series in both water and hydrogen. The test series utilizes both inducer only and a complete pump configuration to assess the inducer interaction to the overall turbopump system. The test goals include verification of suction performance against heritage J-2S data, head production, effects of thermodynamic suppression head (TSH), and evaluation of the inducer dynamic pressure caused by cavitation instabilities. Test facilities at both Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) and NASA s Stennis Space Center (SSC) are employed for the testing. The inducer only water test effort conducted at PWR established performance curves for suction performance, head production, and efficiency over a wide operating range. Because the heritage J-2S suction performance data set is in hydrogen, it is desired to obtain current suction performance data in hydrogen as well, thus avoiding the reliance on a theoretical TSH correlation for direct comparison. This data then provides an empirically based TSH correlation allowing for the comparison of water test suction data to system suction requirements. The FTP testing performed at SSC provides these suction performance relationships as well as inlet duct dynamic pressures during liquid hydrogen operation. The test effort successfully confirms the heritage J-2S suction performance and establishes the amount of TSH between water and hydrogen operation at the design flow coefficient. Correlating data is also obtained for cavitating instability frequency content, illustrating the validity of using the wide flow range water test data to predict hydrogen performance.

Sargent, S. R.↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hydrogen Compatible Materials Workshop

This report serves as the proceedings of the Hydrogen Compatible Materials Workshop held virtually by Sandia National Laboratories on December 2-3, 2020. The purpose of the workshop was to assemble subject matter experts at Sandia and its national laboratory partners within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hydrogen Materials Compatibility (H-Mat) Consortium with public and private stakeholders in the research, development and deployment of hydrogen technologies to discuss the topic of hydrogen compatible materials. This workshop was designed to build on past events and current research and development (R&D) efforts to develop a forward-looking vision that identifies gaps and challenges for the next decade. In particular, the workshop organizers sought to expand their understanding of hydrogen compatible materials needs for power, manufacturing and other industrial uses to enable deeper impact and widespread use of hydrogen while continuing to address open questions in hydrogen-powered transportation of concern to Original Equipment Manufacturers, hydrogen producers, materials & component suppliers and other private entities. The workshop was primarily organized as a series of panel-led discussions on the topics of hydrogen-enabled transportation, heating and power, and industrial uses. Each panel consisted of 2-3 subject matter experts who relayed their perspectives on a set of framing questions developed to facilitate discussion by the broader group of workshop participants. By the workshop's conclusion, the participants identified and prioritized a list of technical challenges for each panel topic where further R&D is warranted.

08 HYDROGEN↗