Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “hypersonic”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Inverse-Velocity Transformation Wall Model for Reacting Turbulent Hypersonic Boundary Layers

The present study builds on prior work by taking advantage of the novel framework proposed by Griffin et al. (hereafter referred to as the GFM) as a baseline. The model is progressively extended to multicomponent reacting mixtures, accounting for differential diffusion and finite-rate chemistry in a similar fashion to Di Renzo & Urzay and Di Renzo et al. The accuracy of the present approach, as well the prior model of Di Renzo & Urzay, is assessed in an a priori sense for the first time in a turbulent reacting boundary layer, using the boundary-layer data of Williams et al. Five species are included in the present analysis, i.e., N s = 5, namely N 2 , O 2 , NO, N and O, a neutral mixture most representative of dissociation/recombination phenomena for temperatures below 6000 K. A schematic of a flow over a wedge representative of the described configuration is presented in Figure 1. The brief is organized as follows: In Section 2, the wall-model equations and the computational framework are presented. In Section 3, the a priori results of the proposed model are described and compared to the extended EWM. Finally, in Section 4, some conclusions are offered.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Surface Pressure Fluctuations Induced by a Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Sharp Cone at Angle of Attack

High-fidelity simulations are performed to characterize the turbulence-induced wall pressure fluctuations on a sharp cone at a 5.5° angle-of-attack in a Mach 8 flow. Wall-resolved large-eddy simulation (LES) and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) results are compared to measurements at several locations on the cone body, where comparisons with high-frequency PCB sensors are good, while comparison with low-frequency kulite sensors varies depending on the location. For a given streamwise location, simulation results show significant azimuthal variation in the wall pressure fluctuation statistics. Comparisons between LES and WMLES results indicate that WMLES can accurately reproduce the low-frequency component of the autospectra quite well, while slight sensitivity is apparent in the coherence. A grid sensitivity study for WMLES further demonstrated sensitivity in the wall pressure fluctuation coherence, but not in the autospectra.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗