Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “li-metal anodes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

84 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Towards a high-performance garnet-based solid-state Li metal battery: A perspective on recent advances

Garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries have been widely considered one of the most promising next-generation energy storage systems. However, the performance of these batteries is plagued by various limitations caused by the solid-state electrolyte (SSE). The poor wetting of lithium on the garnet surface diminishes the contact between the anode and electrolyte, leading to extremely high anode interfacial resistance. Similarly, the point-to-point contact between the cathode and electrolyte leads to high impedance on the cathode side. Moreover, although the SSE serves a firm barrier separating the anode and cathode, lithium dendrites can still grow through, causing a short circuit. Lastly, the solid/solid interface cannot be well maintained under cycling at high current density and capacity. Recently, remarkable progress has been achieved in garnet electrolyte to resolve these problems towards the aim of a high-performance solid-state Li metal battery. In this perspective, we highlight various recent advances in the field of garnet-based solid-state battery, including improving the anode/electrolyte interface, lithium dendrite detection, reducing cathode impedance, and electrolyte architecture design.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Elucidating Interfacial Stability between Lithium Metal Anode and Li Phosphorus Oxynitride via In Situ Electron Microscopy

Li phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON) is one of a very few solid electrolytes that have demonstrated high stability against Li metal and extended cyclability with high Coulombic efficiency for all solid-state batteries (ASSBs). However, theoretical calculations show that LiPON reacts with Li metal. Here, we utilize in situ electron microscopy to observe the dynamic evolutions at the LiPON–Li interface upon contacting and under biasing. We reveal that a thin interface layer (~60 nm) develops at the LiPON–Li interface upon contact. This layer is composed of conductive binary compounds that show a unique spatial distribution that warrants an electrochemical stability of the interface, serving as an effective passivation layer. Our results explicate the excellent cyclability of LiPON and reconcile the existing debates regarding the stability of the LiPON–Li interface, demonstrating that, though glassy solid electrolytes may not have a perfect initial electrochemical window with Li metal, they may excel in future applications for ASSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Solubility-Dependent Protective Effects of Binary Alloys for Lithium Anode

Recently, alloys have been widely utilized as protection layers for homogenized Li growth. However, the protective mechanisms for different alloys are not clearly understood. In this work, guided by the binary phase diagrams, Mg, Au, Zn, Al, Fe, and Cu protective layers have been selected for study of their protective abilities and mechanisms. The selected metals can be classified into three categories according to the nature of their associated alloy protective layers: (1) metals with high solubility in Li while not forming any intermediate line compounds, e.g., Mg, which is good for fast Li stripping; (2) metals with limited solid solubility but forming stable line compounds with Li upon the lithiation, e.g., Au, Zn, and Al, where the formed stable line compounds Li x Au, Li x Zn, and Li x Al will hamper Li kinetics; (3) metals with negligible mutual solubility and no line compound formation with Li, e.g., Fe and Cu, which block the Li stripping path and therefore result in the highest polarization voltage.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Suppressing electrolyte-lithium metal reactivity via Li + -desolvation in uniform nano-porous separator

Lithium reactivity with electrolytes leads to their continuous consumption and dendrite growth, which constitute major obstacles to harnessing the tremendous energy of lithium-metal anode in a reversible manner. Considerable attention has been focused on inhibiting dendrite via interface and electrolyte engineering, while admitting electrolyte-lithium metal reactivity as a thermodynamic inevitability. Here, we report the effective suppression of such reactivity through a nano-porous separator. Calculation assisted by diversified characterizations reveals that the separator partially desolvates Li + in confinement created by its uniform nanopores, and deactivates solvents for electrochemical reduction before Li 0 -deposition occurs. The consequence of such deactivation is realizing dendrite-free lithium-metal electrode, which even retaining its metallic lustre after long-term cycling in both Li-symmetric cell and high-voltage Li-metal battery with LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 as cathode. The discovery that a nano-structured separator alters both bulk and interfacial behaviors of electrolytes points us toward a new direction to harness lithium-metal as the most promising anode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of the structure and chemistry of the solid–electrolyte interface by cryo-EM leads to high-performance solid-state Li-metal batteries

Solid-state lithium-metal (Li 0 ) batteries are gaining traction for electric vehicle applications because they replace flammable liquid electrolytes with a safer, solid-form electrolyte that also offers higher energy density and better resistance against Li dendrite formation. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are highly promising candidates because of their tunable mechanical properties and easy manufacturability; however, their electrochemical instability against lithium metal (Li 0 ), mediocre conductivity, and poorly understood Li 0 /SPE interphases have prevented extensive application in real batteries. In particular, the origin of the low Coulombic efficiency (CE) associated with SPEs remains elusive, as the debate continues as to whether it originates from unfavored interfacial reactions or lithium dendritic growth and dead lithium formation. In this work, we use state-of-the-art cryo-electromicroscopy (cryoEM) imaging and spectroscopic techniques to characterize the structure and chemistry of the interface between Li 0 and a polyacrylate-based SPE. Contradicting the conventional knowledge, we find that no protective interphase forms, owing to the sustained reactions between deposited Li dendrites and polyacrylic backbones and succinonitrile plasticizer. Due to the reaction induced volume change, large amounts of cracks form inside the Li dendrites with a stress corrosion-cracking behavior, indicating that Li0cannot be passivated in this SPE system. Based on this observation, we then introduce additive engineering leveraging on the knowledge of liquid electrolytes, and demonstrate that the Li 0 surface can be effectively protected against corrosion using fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), leading to densely packed Li 0 domes with conformal and stable solid-electrolyte interphases (SEIs) films. Owing to the high room temperature ionic conductivity of 1.01 mS/cm -1 , the high transference number of 0.57 and the stabilized lithium electrolyte interface, this improved new SPE delivers an excellent lithium plating/stripping CE of 99% and 1800 hours of stable cycling in Li||Li symmetric cells (0.2 mA/cm -2 , 1mAh/cm -2 ). Furthermore, this improved cathodic stability along with the high anodic stability enables record high cycle life of >2000 cycles for Li||LiFePO 4 and >400 cycles for Li||LiCoO 2 full cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Lithium oxidation and electrolyte decomposition at Li-metal/liquid electrolyte interfaces

In this work, we examine the evolution of events occurring when a Li metal surface is in contact with a 2 M solution of a Li salt in a solvent or mixture of solvents, via classical molecular dynamics simulations with a reactive force field allowing bond breaking and bond forming. The main events include Li oxidation and electrolyte reduction along with expansion of the Li surface layers forming a porous phase that is the basis for the formation of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) components. Nucleation of the main SEI components (LiF, Li oxides, and some organics) is characterized. The analysis clearly reveals the details of these physical–chemical events as a function of time, during 20 nanoseconds. The effects of the chemistry of the electrolyte on Li oxidation and dissolution in the liquid electrolyte, and SEI nucleation and structure are identified by testing two salts: LiPF 6 and LiCF 3 SO 3 , and various solvents including ethers and carbonates and mixtures of them. The kinetics and thermodynamics of Li 6 F, the core nuclei in the LiF crystal, are studied by analysis of the MD trajectories, and via density functional theory calculations respectively. The SEI formed in this computational experiment is the “native” film that would form upon contact of the Li foil with the liquid electrolyte. As such, this work is the first in a series of computational experiments that will help elucidate the intricate interphase layer formed during battery cycling using metal anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Modeling Electrodeposition in 3D Porous Architectures for Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries

Li-metal storage in three-dimensional (3D) electrodes is considered a potential dendrite-mitigation strategy. The large surface area and high porosity of these electrodes result in reduced local Li-plating current densities. The porous topology provides a scaffold for Li-deposition and stripping, maintaining both mechanical integrity and Li accessibility. The goal of this study is to understand how characteristics, such as geometry and material properties, affect the current distribution and deposition pattern. To this end, we developed a computational method to track material growth driven by electrodeposition within a complex geometry. This method ensures that the finite-element discretization remains conforming to the moving boundary while preserving an adequate mesh quality, and thus maintains solution accuracy. Using this new computational tool, we analyze the conditions under which porous anode architectures effectively expand the surface area of the charge-transfer interface, and self-regulate current density and dendrite growth.

3D electrode architectures↗
NASA NTRS2015

Development of Li-Metal Battery Cell Chemistries at NASA Glenn Research Center

State-of-the-Art lithium-ion battery technology is limited by specific energy and thus not sufficiently advanced to support the energy storage necessary for aerospace needs, such as all-electric aircraft and many deep space NASA exploration missions. In response to this technological gap, our research team at NASA Glenn Research Center has been active in formulating concepts and developing testing hardware and components for Li-metal battery cell chemistries. Lithium metal anodes combined with advanced cathode materials could provide up to five times the specific energy versus state-of-the-art lithium-ion cells (1000 Whkg versus 200 Whkg). Although Lithium metal anodes offer very high theoretical capacity, they have not been shown to successfully operate reversibly.

battery↗
NASA NTRS2019

Development of Solid State Electrolytes for Li-Metal Based High Capacity Battery

NASA future missions demand safe, high specific energy (>400 Wh/kg) batteries. Current state-of-the-art (SOA) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) can only provide ~150-200 Wh/kg in energy capacity, which is unable to meet NASA's future energy goals, and also pose safety issues due to the use of liquid flammable electrolyte. There are intense on-going development activities to increase battery energy density. The use of Li metal as an anode material has emerged as one highly attractive option for achieving high-energy, next generation batteries. This is because Li has many advantages. It is the lightest metal, but also has the highest theoretical capacity. It also has the lowest potential, which boosts whole cell voltage, and Li metal is 100% active material and requires no binder. Thus, Li metal is an ideal anode material for high energy battery chemistries. Lithium metal based advanced battery chemistries are envisioned to be mission enhancing and, in many cases, mission enabling for future space and aeronautic applications. However, the reliable use of this exceptionally high capacity anode in a commercial rechargeable battery has not been achieved due to safety and reliability concerns resulting from thermal runaway and short-circuit issues due to dendritic growth on the Li metal anode from lithium plating during charge-discharge cycles. A solid state electrolyte, such as garnet/ceramic or solid polymer nanocomposite electrolyte, is a promising approach to make Li metal safely cycling. The solid state electrolyte is non-flammable and eliminates leakage and fire hazard by replacing the liquid flammable electrolyte. However, the low-ionic conductivity and high interfacial impedance are the key issues to be overcome. In this presentation, the research activities on solid state electrolyte development funded by the NASA Advanced Energy Storage System program and by the NASA Center Innovative Fund will be presented, and the progress and results will be also discussed.

Wu, James J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Elastic-Poroelastic Simulation of Locally Resonant Ultrasound for Aging Li-Metal Batteries

An elastic-poroelastic simulation of ultrasound inspection for lithium-metal batteries is presented and compared to empirical reflection spectra measured during battery cycling. Simulated reflection spectra were obtained using a two-dimensional (2D) plane strain model, comprised of dozens of individual microns-thick layers within a Li-metal pouch cell. The simulated reflection spectra were then compared to ultrasonic reflection spectra measurements taken intermittently during cell cycling. A sensitivity analysis and parameter calibration were performed for the pristine pouch cell simulation prior to cycling, providing a baseline to account for difficult to measure poroelastic material parameters. Then, the reduction in solid Li anode thickness and corresponding growth into a mossy lithium layer was modeled to represent aging conditions. Results from both simulations and empirical inspections show similar trends in through-thickness resonance frequencies due to cell aging.

Battery↗
DOE OSTI2025

Examples of X-Ray Characterization Techniques in Energy Storage Research

Lithium-ion batteries have revolutionized the portable electronics and transportation sectors. Their performance is often critically dependent on the crystal structures of the anode and cathode electrode materials, which must enable the transport and reversible storage of lithium ions into and out of the lattice. Because lithium is a low-Z element, characterization of materials for lithium-ion batteries can be particularly challenging. Regardless, X-ray techniques enable analysis of material structures to better understand how battery materials perform and degrade, particularly when combined with other materials characterization and electrochemical characterization techniques. While X-ray techniques are most often used in battery research for phase identification of crystal structures, X-ray characterization techniques are also used for a wide variety of other purposes. I will discuss several examples from my research with various collaborators on several projects that highlight the impact that X-ray characterization techniques can have on battery research. The first example will focus on low-temperature microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of vanadium-doped LiFePO4 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. (1,2) Through a combination of electrochemical and materials characterization, we determined that low temperature synthesis resulted in metastable phases that enabled incorporation of higher dopant levels than resulting from high-temperature synthesis of thermodynamically stable phases. Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction data enabled understanding of how lattice parameters changed with doping levels and synthesis temperature. X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy enabled understanding of the vanadium and iron oxidation states to confirm how vacancies in the structure caused by doping were charge compensated. This was important to understand because the literature suggests doping can improve LiFePO4 electrical conductivity, which improves battery charge and discharge rates. The second example will focus on understanding residual strain in lithium metal anodes. Lithium-ion batteries typically use graphite anodes, but the charge-storage capacity can be theoretically improved ~10x by using lithium metal as the anode material instead. However, lithium anodes suffer from growth of high-aspect-ratio features, such as dendrites, that can pierce nanoporous polymer separators and lead to short circuits and fires. External pressure is commonly applied to cells to enable better morphological control. We hypothesized that applied pressure may promote strain and possibly work hardening during electrochemical cycling, which motivated us to look for evidence of residual strain in lithium metal cycled under applied pressure using X-ray diffraction and sin2(..psi..) analysis. We found that lithium electrodeposited under high pressure exhibited in-plane compressive strain and that that lithium electrodeposited under low pressure did not. (3) The residual strain that accompanies electrodeposition under high pressure may lead to work hardening, which may explain how a soft metal like lithium can puncture separators and why higher pressure does not always decrease short circuits. (4-6) References: 1) Harrison, K. L.; Manthiram, A. Microwave-Assisted Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Metastable LiFe1- x (VO) x PO4 Cathodes. Inorganic chemistry 2011, 50(8), 3613-3620. 2) Harrison, K. L.; Bridges, C. A.; Paranthaman, M. P.; Segre, C. U.; Katsoudas, J.; Maroni, V. A.; Idrobo, J. C.; Goodenough, J. B.; Manthiram, A. Temperature Dependence of Aliovalent-Vanadium Doping in LiFePO4 Cathodes. Chemistry of Materials 2013, 25(5), 768-781. 3) Rodriguez, M. A.; Harrison, K. L.; Goriparti, S.; Griego, J. J.; Boyce, B. L.; Perdue, B. R. Use of a Be-Dome Holder for Texture and Strain Characterization of Li Metal Thin Films via Sin2 (..psi..) Methodology. Powder Diffraction 2020, 35(2), 89-97. 4) Jungjohann, K. L.; Gannon, R. N.; Goriparti, S.; Randolph, S. J.; Merrill, L. C.; Johnson, D. C.; Zavadil, K. R.; Harris, S. J.; Harrison, K. L. Cryogenic Laser Ablation Reveals Short-Circuit Mechanism in Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Energy Letters 2021, 6(6), 2138-2144. 5) Harrison, K. L.; Merrill, L. C.; Long, D. M.; Randolph, S. J.; Goriparti, S.; Christian, J.; Warren, B.; Roberts, S. A.; Harris, S. J.; Perry, D. L. Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Reveals That Applied Pressure Promotes Short Circuits in Li Batteries. Iscience 2021, 24(12). 6) Harrison, K. L.; Goriparti, S.; Merrill, L. C.; Long, D. M.; Warren, B.; Roberts, S. A.; Perdue, B. R.; Casias, Z.; Cuillier, P.; Boyce, B. L. Effects of Applied Interfacial Pressure on Li-Metal Cycling Performance and Morphology in 4 M LiFSI in DME. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13(27), 31668-31679.

batteries↗