Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lunar gravity fields”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

New Analysis of Lunar Prospector Radio Tracking Data Brings the Nearside Gravity Field of the Moon with an Unprecedented Resolution

A new analysis of the Doppler tracking data from the Lunar Prospector mission in 1999 revealed a number of previously-unseen gravity anomalies at spatial scales as small as 27 km over the nearside. The tracking data at low altitudes (50 km or below) were better analyzed to resolve the nearside features without dampening from a power law constraint, by partitioning the gravity parameters concentrated on either the nearside or farside. The resulting model presents gravity anomalies correlated with topography with a correlation coefficient of 0.7 or higher from degree 50 to 150, the widest bandwidth yet. The gravity-topography admittance of approx. 70 mGal/km is found from numerous craters of which diameters are 60 km or less. In addition, the new model produces orbits that fit to independent radio tracking data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Kaguya (SELENE) better than previous gravity models. This high-resolution model can be of immediate use to geophysical analysis of small craters. Our technique could be applied to an upcoming mission, the Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory and useful to extract short wavelength signals from the MESSENGER Doppler data.

Han, Shin-Chan↗
NASA NTRS1998

Inferences About the Early Moon From Gravity and Topography

Recent spacecraft missions to the Moon have significantly improved our knowledge of the lunar gravity and topography fields, and have raised some new and old questions about the early lunar history. It has frequently been assumed that the shape of the Moon today reflects an earlier equilibrium state and that the Moon has retained some internal strength. Recent analysis indicating a superisostatic state of some lunar basins lends support to this hypothesis. On its simplest level, the present shape of the Moon is slightly flattened by 2.2 +/- 0.2 km while its gravity field, represented by an equipotential surface, is flattened only about 0.5 km. The hydrostatic component to the flattening arising from the Moon's present day rotation contributes only 7 m. This difference between the topographic shape of the MOon and the shape of its gravitational equipotential has frequently been explained as the "memory" of an earlier moon that was rotating faster and had a correspondingly larger hydrostatic flattening. To obtain this amount of hydrostatic flattening from rotation alone, and accounting for the contribution of the present-day gravity field, the Moon's rotation rate would need to be about 15x greater than at present, leading ot a period of < 2 days. Maintaining its synchronous rotation with Earth would require a radius for the Moon's orbit of approximately 9 Earth Radii. Unfortunately, our confidence in the observed lunar flattening is not as great as we would like. The uncertainty of .02 km may not properly reflect the limitations of the Clementine dataset, which did not sample poleward of latitudes 81 N and 79 S. Also, the large variation of topography +/- 8 km seen on the MOon dwarfs our estimate fo the flattening. Further the lunar south pole is on the edge of, or possibly inside the massive deep, South Pole-Aitken Basin. Thus, polar radii could be underestimated. This would yield a smaller flattening, which would imply a greater lunar rotation period and orbital radius. However, Basin compensation states and analyses of support and relaxation of topography at long wavelengths point to a lunar shape that has retained a flattening from an earlier faster rotation period.

Smith, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Inferences About the Early Moon from Gravity and Topography

Recent spacecraft missions to the Moon have significantly improved our knowledge of the lunar gravity and topography fields and have raised some new and old questions about the early lunar history. It has frequently been assumed that the shape of the Moon today reflects an earlier equilibrium state and that the Moon has retained some internal strength. Recent analysis indicating a superisostatic state of some lunar basins lends support to this hypothesis. On its simplest level the present shape of the Moon is slightly flattened by 2.2 +/- 0.2 km while its gravity field, represented by an equipotential surface, is flattened only about 0.5 km. The hydrostatic component to the flattening arising from the Moon's present-day rotation contributes only 7 m. This difference between the topographic shape of the Moon and the shape of its gravitational equipotential has frequently been explained as the "memory" of an earlier Moon that was rotating faster and had a correspondingly larger hydrostatic flattening. To obtain this amount of hydrostatic flattening from rotation alone, and accounting for the contribution of the present-day gravity field, the Moon's rotation rate would need to be about 15 times greater than at present leading to a period of under 2 days. Maintaining its synchronous rotation with Earth would require a radius for the Moon's orbit of order 9 earth radii. Unfortunately, our confidence in the observed lunar flattening is not as great as we would like.

Smith, David E.↗
NASA NTRS1992

To the moon: Faster, cheaper - and better

Three lunar missions lasting three years are described that make up the exploratory mapping phase of the Space Exploration Initiative. The three phases are: (1) a polar-orbiting satellite to map surface chemistry and mineralogy; (2) an orbiter to map the lunar terrain and gravity field; and (3) on-site investigation by means of rovers and remote-sensing instruments. The lunar mapping scenario relies on robotics technologies and is expected to cost 100-150 million dollars per phase and to require no more than three years.

Spudis, Paul D.↗
NASA NTRS2019

The Moon's Deep Interior: A Hotbed for Seismicity and the Question of Partial Melt

Terrestrial planets all share a common structural framework (crust, mantle, core) which is developed very shortly after formation and which determines subsequent evolution. The Moon formed under very unique circumstances. Interior properties provide constraints on formation and evolution models, and possible indicators of an early dynamo for magnetic field generation: Layering, Composition, Seismic velocity & density, Presence of partial melt, Core state. Constraints on these properties arise from geophysical observations: Geodetic parameters, Lunar laser ranging, Gravity field, Magnetic induction, Heat flow, Seismology.

Weber, Renee↗
NASA NTRS1990

Lunar Observer - Scouting for a moon base

The proposed 1996 Lunar Observer mission to the moon is described. Lunar Observer is intended to acquire the definitive data set of the moon from which an enduring and flexible lunar base site selection can be made. A mission profile is summarized and mission phases defined. The fourteen proposed experiments are described and their measurement capabilities outlined. The spacecraft, a derivation of the planned Mars Observer spacecraft design, is described. A description is included of a subsatellite, which is used to obtain the first measurements of the lunar far side gravity field.

Parker, G. L.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Analysis of orbital perturbations acting on objects in orbits near geosynchronous earth orbit

The paper presents a numerical investigation of orbital evolution for objects started in GEO or in orbits near GEO in order to study potential orbital debris problems in this region. Perturbations simulated include nonspherical terms in the earth's geopotential field, lunar and solar gravity, and solar radiation pressure. Objects simulated include large satellites, for which solar radiation pressure is insignificant, and small particles, for which solar radiation pressure is an important force. Results for large satellites are largely in agreement with previous GEO studies that used classical perturbation techniques. The orbit plane of GEO satellites placed in a stable plane orbit inclined approximately 7.3 deg to the equator experience very little precession, remaining always within 1.2 percent of their initial orientation. Solar radiation pressure generates two major effects on small particles: an orbital eccentricity oscillation anticipated from previous research, and an oscillation in orbital inclination.

Friesen, Larry J.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Geophysical data and the interior of the moon

Geophysical data and physical properties of the lunar interior are considered, giving attention to density, gravity field, viscosity, the strength of lunar materials, electrical conductivity, and magnetic properties. Seismic data and structure of the lunar interior are discussed, taking into account moonquakes and lunar tectonism, the velocity structure, and the compositional implications of the velocity structure. Questions regarding the thermal state and the evolution of the moon are also explored. The data and the models presented characterize the moon as a differentiated body which evolved relatively early in its history.

Toksoz, M. N.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recent Progress in the International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS)

The International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS) provides Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) and Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) observations and data products with a focus on Earth and Lunar science and engineering applications. The basic observables are the precise two-way time-of-flight of ultra-short laser pulses from ground stations to retroreflector arrays on satellites and the Moon and the one-way time-of-flight measurements to space-borne receivers (transponders). SLR is one of the four space geodetic techniques (along with VLBI, GNSS, and DORIS). The International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) development, maintained by IERS, is based on these geodetic observations. Fundamental data products include accurate satellite ephemerides, Earth orientation parameters, three dimensional coordinates and velocities of the ILRS tracking stations, time-varying geocenter coordinates, static and time-varying coefficients of the Earth’s gravity field, fundamental physical constants, lunar ephemerides and librations, and lunar orientation parameters. The ILRS continues to expand spatial and temporal coverage of SLR observations. New stations with new technologies are being deployed; existing stations are being upgraded. Some of these stations are multi-technique Core Sites. New satellites are expanding applications and strengthening the ILRS contribution to the reference frame. New analysis, modeling, and data processing techniques are improving data products. New campaigns are expanding our applications into relativity and the study of non-gravitational forces. New activities are underway on Lunar Laser Ranging, Time Transfer, and Space Debris Tracking, helping to expand laser ranging applications. This talk will give an update on the current ILRS activities and their impact on ILRS data products.

Report on the ILRS activities↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Notional Artemis Lunar Surface Exploration Package (ArLSEP) based on the Gandalf Staff Platform

Introduction: The Artemis program is planning to deliver crew and cargo to the lunar surface, but there is no current package for supporting lunar in-struments and experiments similar to the Apollo Lunar Surface Exploration Package (ALSEP). This abstract provides a possible concept for such a package using the Gandalf Staff Platform as a common core. Gandalf Staff: The Gandalf Staff is an early prototype system developed over FY’21/FY’22 using NASA Science Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Center Information Fund (CIF) grants to de-sign, build and test “proof-of-concept” components. These components include a 24v battery powered monopole that powers a suite of subsystems, including a Graphical User Interface (GUI) for crew, surface voice and data communications, Lunar Search and Rescue (LunaSAR) navigation and communications, LiDAR, field site external lighting, 360-degree camera, and a geothermal instrument for measuring sub-surface temperature gradient. The staff can be carried independently by an Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) astronaut, or can be mounted into a tripod for “hands free” support at a surface site being investigated. The staff can be attached to an external solar array and power storage system for long-duration operations. [1,2] ALSEP: An ASLEP flew on each mission Apollo 12 to Apollo 17. For Apollo 11, a simplified packaged called the Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Pack-age (EASEP) was flown. Each package included a “Central Station” that provided the power and communications connected to a variety of instruments and sensors. The power was provided by a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) fueled by Plutoni-um-238 generating 70 watts of power (initially, decayed over time) [3]. The communications system provide for direct to Earth data transfer from the lunar surface. Each pack-age was stowed externally in the Lunar Module (LM) Scientific Equipment (SEQ) bay with a mass up to 163 kg (Apollo 17). The crew unloaded the ALSEP from the LM and deployed the instruments on the lunar surface. Although designed to operate for only 1 year, many sites operated for up to 8 years successfully [4]. The Active Seismic Experiment (ASE) included 3 geophones for detecting seismic waves created by mortars and thumpers deployed by the crew. Other active experiments measured the lunar atmosphere, the heat flow in the subsurface, the lunar gravity and potential gravity waves, the lunar magnetic field, the solar wind and plasma interactions in cislunar space. Passive experiments included collectors for dust and cosmic rays, and retroreflectors for precise measurements of distance using a laser from Earth. The ALSEP program continues to generate insights into lunar formation and evolution. ArLSEP Concepts: The lunar surface science package for the Artemis program will hopefully exceed the capability of the ALSEP. There are multiple issues for discussion leading to the design of a new ArLSEP, needing requirements definition from the science community, NASA mission architecture, and NASA budget planners. 1. Delivery Mechanism Two possible projects currently provide capability to deliver scientific cargo to the lunar surface: 1) the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) [5] and the Human Landing System (HLS) [6, 7]. Each project is controlled by a different organization within NASA and budgeted with different criteria although both support lunar exploration. The HLS system delivers crew (and potentially cargo) to human landing sites. If an ArLSEP is “predeployed” to such a site, the design must include power (either from the vehicle or independently) to keep the electronics functioning until deployed by the crew. If an ArLSEP is delivered on a vehicle after the crew is present on the lunar surface, safety protocols require adequate distance from the humans for impact from descent propelled sur-face regolith ejecta. This distance can not exceed the capability of the crew to walk (if no rover) to the vehicle for ArLSEP deployment. 2. Overall Guidelines The general design of ArLSEP will likely follow the ALSEP with a common system for communications and power; however, significant architecture differences between Apollo and Artemis exist. Power: The RTG will not be available for early Artemis missions nor likely follow-on Lunar Exploration Transportation Services (LETS) missions [8]. Thus, ArLSEP power must be supplied by solar arrays with sufficient battery capability to “keep alive” necessary electronics during any lunar surface eclipse period. Communication: The Artemis program is developing a series of communications satellites for lunar orbit to provide surface transmission of data and voice to Earth. Called “LunaNET”, this network is component useful for ArLSEP since south polar locations may not always have direct “line-of-sight” to Earth [9]. 3. Concept of Operations (ConOps) The general ConOps for ArLSEP is to deliver the package to lunar surface before the crew arrives, and then have the crew deploy the package after some period of time. This requires coordinated design (for power systems) and launch window (for schedule) on both the cargo and crew missions. Once the ArLSEP is deployed, it will operate autonomously for a number of years. It should be designed to be EVA compatible for crew maintenance and upgrade. 4. Notional Design (for discussion purpose only) The landing site near the South Pole is expected to have no eclipse cycle exceeding 5 days, so the “keep alive” power is 144 hours (6 days to include margin). A 12v ArLSEP will use rechargeable LiFePO4 cells, which are common in the Electric Vehicle (EV) industry. With a current of 5 amps and a 125 watt system, the mass is about 90kg. The comm. system and structure adds another 10kg, thus the “Central Station” is approximately 100kg. The solar power is collected on four arrays (each 2m above the surface), and the entire ArLSEP is designed to stow in a 2m x 1m x 1m volume. The experiment and instrument design will vary for each installation and add mass to the total (although they are expected to fit within the 2m3 volume). Seismic wave generation will likely not be provided with mortars, thus an electric “thumper” will be required. Active instruments such as imaging systems and sensing instruments will benefit from the additional power and communication capability provided by ArLSEP. Passive systems such as retroreflectors, witness plates, and cosmic dust collectors can be added to either the landing vehicle and/or the ArLSEP. With repeated HLS missions to the same human site, the ArLSEP can be expanded and easily maintained for long duration science collection on the lunar surface.

ALSEP↗
NASA NTRS1998

The Moon's Molten Core and Tidal Q

The rotation of the Moon is influenced by solid-body tides and interaction at a liquid-core/solid-mantle boundary. The Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data are sensitive to variations in lunar rotation. Analysis of those ranges reveals four dissipation periodicities in the rotation. These signatures can be explained with the combined effects of tide plus core, but not with either alone. The fluid core detection exceeds three times its uncertainty. The inferred core radius has a 1 -sigma upper limit of 352 km for iron and up to 374 km if sulfur is present. The tidal dissipation is strong, Q at one month is 37 +/- 5 .Q increases for longer periods and is 60 (-15, +40) at one year.Dynamical evidence for a fluid lunar core has previously been presented. These-earlier solutions included three dissipation parameters. New solutions benefit from additional LLR data and an improved gravity field from Doppler tracking of Lunar Prospector. Five dissipation parameters are now solved for. There are several options for dissipation parameters: a core coupling parameter, a time delay for tidal distortion of the moments of inertia, and five periodic terms in the rotation angles. Solutions with different combinations of these are compatible (a theory relates K/C and time delay to a series of periodic terms). The solutions used K/C, time delay, and one periodic term. When dissipation signatures at five rotation frequencies are solved for, four amplitudes (4 to 263 milliarcseconds) are detected above the noise. Attempts to explain these results using either tides alone or core alone fail (less than 3(sigma) discrepancy for the former and 9(sigma), for the latter). A combination of tides and liquid core matches the results well.

Williams, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1997

Collaboration on SEP Missions to the Moon and Small Bodies

In response to the Discovery announcement of opportunity a team consisting of TRW Lewis Research Center, JPL and UCLA with scientific co-investigators from government and University laboratories have proposed to fly the first planetary solar electric propulsion (SEP) mission. Diana is designed to carry an X-ray and gamma ray spectrometer, and imaging spectrometer, a framing camera, a laser altimer an ion spectrometer and a magnetometer. In order to obtain lunar gravity data from the far side of the moon a relay satellite is placed into high polar orbit about the moon to relay the Doppler-shifted telemetry to Earth. Diana will spend two months in a 700 km polar orbit obtaining mineralogical data from a full spectral map of the lunar surface, and then spend a year in a 100 km (or below) polar orbit mapping the lunar elemental composition, its topography, gravity field, ions from its atmosphere and its permanent and induced magnetic fields. After the low altitude mapping phase the ion thrusters propel the spacecraft out of the lunar sphere of influence and onto a heloioscentric trajectory to rendezvous with dormant comet Wilson-Harrington. The ground truth provided by the returned lunar samples to validate the remote sensing instruments for lunar studies will also serve to validate the Wilson-Harrington observations since the same instruments will be used at both bodies.

Pieters, C. M.↗
NASA NTRS1999

The Lunar Crustal Thickness from Analysis of the Lunar Prospector Gravity and Clementine Topography Datasets

The Lunar Prospector spacecraft has mapped the gravity field of the Moon to a level of resolution never achieved before, and a spherical harmonic representation to degree and order 100 is available. When combined with the topography dataset produced by the Clementine mission, the resulting Bouguer anomaly map is interpreted to model the thickness of the lunar crust. Such models are crucial to understanding the lunar thermal history and the formation of geological features such as mascon basins, several more of which have been newly discovered from this dataset. A two-layer planetary model was used to compute the variations of the depth to the lunar Moho. The thickness values ranged from near 0 to 120 km. There is significant agreement with previous work using the Clementine gravitational field data with differences in specific locations such as South Pole-Aitken Basin, for example.

Asmar, S.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Terrestrial bodies orbiter, LUNAR - A system for detailed global measurements of a planet's properties

The NASA Lunar Polar Orbiter, to be launched by a Delta vehicle in 1980, is designed to perform a global exploration of such moon properties as the gravity field, figure, and surface composition, as well as a lunar resource survey. The paper reviews the mission, spacecraft, and data system concepts in terms of baseline mission sequence, choice of orbits, spacecraft configuration requirements, mission sequence requirements and data system and operations. Scientific experiments planned for the Orbiter mission include geophysical altimetry and gravity experiments, heat flow experiment, magnetic field experiments, measurements of the moon's natural gamma-ray spectrum, X-ray fluorescence of lunar surface materials, sunlight reflectance spectroscopy, and spectro-stereo imaging. Characteristics of instruments designed for use in these investigations are examined. Through the use of advanced sensors and data-system techniques, coupled with well-developed spacecraft systems, the mission promises to return a very large quantity and variety of lunar data at a cost comparable with that of simpler missions in the past.

Burke, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Mars gravity field based on a short-arc technique

The magnitudes of 92 surface mass points at designated locations were estimated from the radio tracking data of the Mariner Mars 1971 (M9) orbiter. This result is the first mass point model of a global field. The derived surface mass distribution correlates positively with the visible topography. The Hellas basin contains a mass deficiency, in contrast to some of the lunar basins which contain mass excesses. The Mars gravity field represented by the four parameters of an optimally located mass point (superimposed on an oblate spheroid) has third- and fourth-degree harmonics comparable to those of the complete model.

Sjogren, W. L.↗
NASA NTRS1975

The gravity and shape of the moon

This review discusses the current knowledge of the gravity and geometry of the moon, and their implications as to lunar structure. Measurements pertaining to the gravity field are, first and foremost, Doppler tracking of spacecraft that have orbited the moon, but also the laser ranging from the earth to the moon and the gravity meters and accelerometers landed with the Apollo spacecraft. Measurements pertaining to the geometry include (1) those related to the shape: the metric photography and laser altimeters on Apollo 15, 16, and 17; the electromagnetic sounder on Apollo 17; the landmark tracking from earlier Apollo orbiters; and occupations, plus (2) measurements related to the orientation: the laser ranging and interferometry from the earth. The review does not cover determinations of topography from photography taken for geologic or landing reconnaissance purposes. The discussion of tectonic implications is limited to inferences of a quantitative nature. The emphasis is on work since 1970; see Kaula [1969, 1971] for reviews of earlier work.

William M. Kaula↗
NASA NTRS1983

Planetary geodesy

The current known geodetic parameters of the planets and their moons are reviewed. A 3:2 spin-orbit resonance has been calculated for Mercury, a planet for which previous mass estimates are suggested to be inaccurate by 30 pct. The Pioneer Venus Orbiter data indicated a Venus diameter of 6051 km, a geoid surface highly-correlated with the surface topography, and regional gravity anomalies. Reflective mirrors on the surface and data from the Lunar Orbiter 4 have produced values for the principal polar moment of inertia homogeneity factor, the earth-moon mass ratio, a fifth degree and order spherical harmonic gravity model, the lunar acceleration, and the lunar potential Love number. The Mars gravity field is now estimated up to 12th degree and order spherical harmonics from Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiters 1 and 2, which also obtained new topographical data. New gravity fields and mass are being calculated for the Jovian and Saturnian moons. The outer planets' radii and rotational periods have recently been revised to greater accuracy. New data will be forthcoming from the Space Telescope and the planned Venus Radar Mapper.

Sjogren, W. L.↗