Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “shock wave and boundary layer interaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1974

Weak incident shock interactions with Mach 8 laminar boundary layers

Weak shock-wave interactions with boundary layers on a flat plate were investigated experimentally in Mach 8 variable-density tunnel for plate-length Reynolds numbers. The undisturbed boundary layers were laminar over the entire plate length. Pressure and heat-transfer distributions were obtained for wedge-generated incident shock waves that resulted in pressure rises ranging from 1.36 to 4.46 (both nonseparated and separated boundary-layer flows). The resulting heat-transfer amplifications ranged from 1.45 to 14. The distributions followed established trends for nonseparated flows, for incipient separation, and for laminar free-interaction pressure rises. The experimental results corroborated established trends for the extent of the pressure rise and for certain peak heat-transfer correlations.

Kaufman, L. G., II↗
NASA NTRS2011

Uncertainty Assessments of 2D and Axisymmetric Hypersonic Shock Wave - Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Simulations at Compression Corners

This paper is one of a series of five papers in a special session organized by the NASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program that addresses uncertainty assessments for CFD simulations in hypersonic flow. Simulations of a shock emanating from a compression corner and interacting with a fully developed turbulent boundary layer are evaluated herein. Mission relevant conditions at Mach 7 and Mach 14 are defined for a pre-compression ramp of a scramjet powered vehicle. Three compression angles are defined, the smallest to avoid separation losses and the largest to force a separated flow engaging more complicated flow physics. The Baldwin-Lomax and the Cebeci-Smith algebraic models, the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model with the Catrix-Aupoix compressibility modification and two-equation models including Menter SST, Wilcox k-omega 98, and Wilcox k-omega 06 turbulence models are evaluated. Each model is fully defined herein to preclude any ambiguity regarding model implementation. Comparisons are made to existing experimental data and Van Driest theory to provide preliminary assessment of model form uncertainty. A set of coarse grained uncertainty metrics are defined to capture essential differences among turbulence models. Except for the inability of algebraic models to converge for some separated flows there is no clearly superior model as judged by these metrics. A preliminary metric for the numerical component of uncertainty in shock-turbulent-boundary-layer interactions at compression corners sufficiently steep to cause separation is defined as 55%. This value is a median of differences with experimental data averaged for peak pressure and heating and for extent of separation captured in new, grid-converged solutions presented here. This value is consistent with existing results in a literature review of hypersonic shock-turbulent-boundary-layer interactions by Roy and Blottner and with more recent computations of MacLean.

Gnoffo, Peter A.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Direct measurements of wall shear stress by buried wire gages in a shock-wave boundary-layer interaction region

Detailed measurements of wall shear stress (skin friction) were made with specially developed buried wire gages in the interaction regions of a Mach 2.9 turbulent boundary layer with externally generated shocks. Separation and reattachment points inferred by these measurements support the findings of earlier experiments which used a surface oil flow technique and pitot profile measurements. The measurements further indicate that the boundary layer tends to attain significantly higher skin-friction values downstream of the interaction region as compared to upstream. Comparisons between measured wall shear stress and published results of some theoretical calculation schemes show that the general, but not detailed, behavior is predicted well by such schemes.

Murthy, V. S.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Turbulence modeling in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions

The research performed was an experimental program to help develop turbulence models for shock wave boundary layer interactions. The measurements were taken in a Mach 3, 16 deg compression corner interaction, at a unit Reynolds number of 63 x 10(exp 6)/m. The data consisted of heat transfer data taken upstream and downstream of the interaction, hot wire measurements of the instantaneous temperature and velocity fluctuations to verify the Strong Reynolds Analogy, and single- and double-pulsed Rayleigh scattering images to study the development of the instantaneous shock/turbulence interaction.

Smits, A. J.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Normal shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions in transonic flow near separation

The problem of a normal shock wave impinging on a flat plate, turbulent boundary layer is considered for the case where the external flow is transonic. Asymptotic methods are employed. It is shown that there are two outer regions, including the outer part of the boundary layer and the external flow, in which inviscid flow governing equations hold, and two regions near the wall, in which Reynolds and/or viscous stresses need be taken into account. The solutions in the outer regions lead to the pressure distribution on the wall, for which an analytical expression is presented, valid under those conditions when separation is imminent but has not yet occurred. The solutions valid in the inner regions lead to a separation criterion.

Adamson, T. C., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Upstream-influence scaling of fin-generated shock wave boundary-layer interactions

An upstream-influence scaling law, previously formulated through analysis of Mach 3 data, has been extended to Mach numbers from 2.5 through 4. For adiabatic, equilibrium, turbulent boundary layers, there is no Mach number effect on the constants in the Reynolds number parameters of this law. In addition, based on local similarity, a new Mach number parameter, namely, the Mach number component of the incoming stream normal to the farfield upstream influence, is proposed. Scaling by either the incoming Mach number normal to the inviscid shock or by the incoming Mach number normal to the farfield upstream influence is equivalent to scaling by the hypersonic similarity parameter.

Lu, Frank K.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Interaction between a shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer in transonic flow

Interaction between a shock wave and an unseparated turbulent boundary layer is considered. The method of matched asymptotic expansions is used, with solutions valid in the double limit as Reynolds number tends to infinity and Mach number tends to unity. The shock is weak enough that interaction effects can be considered as perturbations to the undisturbed flow; the case considered is that where the sonic line is near the outer edge of the boundary layer. It is shown that, with order estimates for Reynolds stress perturbations, the induced wall pressure distribution can be calculated using only the two outer interaction regions, independent of a specific closure condition and that this solution is in fact a turbulent free interaction solution. A detailed analysis of the inner regions, for which an eddy viscosity model for the Reynolds shear stress is used, provides a description of the variations in velocity, temperature and density near and at the wall.

Adamson, T. C., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1977

An experimental investigation of shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interactions with and without boundary layer suction: A data summary report

Tabulated data from a series of experimental studies of the interaction of a shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer in axisymmetric flow configurations is presented. The studies were conducted at the walls of circular wind tunnels and on the cylindrical centerbody of an annular flow channel. Detailed pitot pressure profiles and wall static pressure profiles upstream of, within and downstream of the interaction region are given. Results are presented for flows at nominal freestream Mach Numbers of 2, 3 and 4. For studies at the tunnel sidewalls, the shock waves were produced by conical shock generators mounted on the centerline of the wind tunnel at zero angle of attack. The annular ring generator was used to produce the shock wave at the centerbody of the annular flow channel. The effects of boundary layer bleed were examined in the investigation. Both bleed rate and bleed location were studied. Most of the bleed studies were conducted with bleed holes drilled normal to the wall surface but the effects of slot suction were also examined. A summary of the principal results and conclusions is given.

Sun, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Modelling of three-dimensional shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions

The accuracy of numerical computations of the three-dimensional sharp fin flow field using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations is examined. Computed flows are compared with a set of benchmark experiments at Mach 3 for two different Reynolds numbers. A detailed comparison is performed between experimental data and separate computational results for the three-dimensional sharp fin for a 10 deg fin angle in order to examine the accuracy of two different turbulence models. The computed surface pressure for the fin at a 20 deg angle is compared with recent experimental data. The computed yaw angle profiles are shown to be sensitive to the turbulence model. In the immediate vicinity of the surface, the calculated results using the Baldwin-Lomax (1978) model are in better agreement with the data than the Jones-Launder (1972) model. Within the inner portion of the boundary layer, both models tend to underpredict the yaw angle.

Knight, D. D.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Numerical investigation of separated transonic turbulent flows with a multiple-time-scale turbulence model

A numerical investigation of transonic turbulent flows separated by curvature and shock wave - boundary layer interaction is presented. The free stream Mach numbers considered are 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.825, 0.85, 0.875, 0.90, and 0.925. In the numerical method, the conservation of mass equation is replaced by a pressure correction equation for compressible flows and thus incremental pressure is solved for instead of density. The turbulence is described by a multiple-time-scale turbulence model supplemented with a near-wall turbulence model. The present numerical results show that there exists a reversed flow region at all free stream Mach numbers considered whereas various k-epsilon turbulence models fail to predict such a reversed flow region at low free stream Mach numbers. The numerical results also show that the size of the reversed flow region grows extensively due to the shock wave - turbulent boundary layer interaction as the free stream Mach number is increased. These numerical results show that the turbulence model can resolve the turbulence field subjected to extra strains caused by the curvature and the shock wave - turbulent boundary layer interaction and that the numerical method yields a significantly accurate solution for the complex compressible turbulent flow.

Kim, S.-W.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Reynolds number effects on shock-wave turbulent boundary-layer interactions - A comparison of numerical and experimental results

An experiment is described that tests and guides computations of a shock-wave turbulent boundary-layer interaction flow over a 20-deg compression corner at Mach 2.85. Numerical solutions of the time-averaged Navier-Stokes equations for the entire flow field, employing various turbulence models, are compared with the data. Each model is critically evaluated by comparisons with the details of the experimental data. Experimental results for the extent of upstream pressure influence and separation location are compared with numerical predictions for a wide range of Reynolds numbers and shock-wave strengths.

Horstman, C. C.↗