Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “wall modeling”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Wind tunnel wall interference correction for aircraft models

Wall interference correction procedures seek to determine the required changes in certain flow or geometric parameters so that the difference between the flow properties at the model's surface in the tunnel and free air are minimized. A transonic and a linear correction procedure were developed for aircraft models. In addition to Mach number and angle of attack corrections, an estimate of the accuracy of the corrections is provided by the transonic correction procedure. Lift, pitching moment and pressure measurements near the tunnel walls are required. The efficiency and accuracy of the correction procedure are improved. Moreover, correction of both the wing and tail angles of attack is allowed. The procedure is valid for transonic as well as subcritical flows. However, for subcritical flows further approximations and simplifying assumptions are made, leading to a very simple and efficient correction procedure.

Rizk, M. H.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Demonstration of RANS models with wall functions in the spectral element code Nek5000

The spectral element based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Nek5000 has been traditionally used for high-fidelity applications, such as direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES). These techniques require very fine numerical resolution to accurately capture turbulent fluctuations which can be prohibitively expensive for users without access to leadership class computing facilities. For broader application and adoption, significant effort has been invested to develop Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) capabilities in Nek5000. Here, this work presents details of the implementation and demonstration of the standard wall functions for the κ–τ model in Nek5000. Results using the wall-modeled approach are compared to a wall-resolved approach for cases with negligible pressure gradient, viz., channel flow, pipe flow and flow in a reactor subchannel. Results show reasonably good agreement between the two approaches for friction factor and Nusselt number. Some expected differences are identified near the wall. These cases demonstrate the potential for significant computational savings by using much coarser meshes for the wall-modeled approach, with only minor differences between the predicted result. Additionally, several Reynolds numbers up to 1,000,000 are demonstrated for pipe flow and predicted friction factors and Nusselt numbers compared well to available correlations, with the worst below 10%. As the Reynolds number is increased, better agreement is observed between the correlations and the wall-modeled approach. In addition, flow in a molten salt fast reactor (MSFR) core is considered which features an adverse pressure gradient and flow separation. It showcases the inability of standard wall functions to accurately predict flows with adverse pressure gradients. The results, however, match reasonably well in trend in regions of the flow where the boundary layer is attached. Ongoing research is dedicated to include a pressure gradient correction to wall functions to improve the accuracy of flows with separation or reattachment and adverse or favorable pressure gradients.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS1992

Modeling of near wall turbulence and modeling of bypass transition

The objectives for this project are as follows: (1) Modeling of the near wall turbulence: We aim to develop a second order closure for the near wall turbulence. As a first step of this project, we try to develop a kappa-epsilon model for near wall turbulence. We require the resulting model to be able to handle both near wall turbulence and turbulent flows away from the wall, computationally robust, and applicable for complex flow situations, flow with separation, for example, and (2) Modeling of the bypass transition: We aim to develop a bypass transition model which contains the effect of intermittency. Thus, the model can be used for both the transitional boundary layers and the turbulent boundary layers. We require the resulting model to give a good prediction of momentum and heat transfer within the transitional boundary and a good prediction of the effect of freestream turbulence on transitional boundary layers.

Yang, Z.↗