Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Program management”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 937 records · Page 52

Winners are not keepers: Characterizing household engagement, gains, and energy patterns in demand response using machine learning in the United States

Demand-response programs can help utilities manage rapidly evolving electric grids, but these programs are subject to the complexities of human behavior. This paper explores a novel method for uncovering heterogeneity in households. In this work, we use a machine-learning method known as a Conditional Inference Tree (c-tree) algorithm to categorize households based on their energy behavior characteristics collected via smart meters, and explore how this translates through into heterogeneity in their real-world response to a DR program. Using data from randomized controlled trial, we generate estimates of the changes in energy use caused by the program within each household group. Our results show that the c-tree approach differentiates households by their energy-use characteristics in a way that increases the spread in enrollment rates and critical peak reduction among household groups, compared with the spreads achieved via several conventional segmentation methods. Thus, the c-tree analysis enables the most tailored targeting of major potential energy savers and could provide the greatest increase in cost-effectiveness of household recruitment into DR programs. Our results also offer fresh insights into the relationships between household energy behavior characteristics – such as peak energy use and “structural winningness” (the ability to save money under a DR program without changing energy-use behaviors) – and household decisions about enrolling in DR programs and reducing energy use. Our research also demonstrates the potential of smart meter data, combined with machine learning and econometric methods, to provide significant value to utilities, program implementers, researchers, and other stakeholders.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

External Review Committee Report on the California Geological Survey

In May and June of 2021, the External Review Committee (ERC) assessed the activities and major programs of the California Geological Survey (CGS). The ERC reviewed materials from the five CGS program areas and upper management, as well as online presentations from program leaders and the California Department of Conservation (DOC), which oversees CGS.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

2014 Building America House Simulation Protocols

As BA has grown to include a large and diverse cross-section of the home building and retrofit industries, it has become more important to develop accurate, consistent analysis techniques to measure progress towards the program's goals. The House Simulation Protocol (HSP) document provides guidance to program partners and managers so they can compare energy savings for new construction and retrofit projects. The HSP provides the program with analysis methods that are proven to be effective and reliable in investigating the energy use of advanced energy systems and of entire houses.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

2014 Building America House Simulation Protocols

As Building America has grown to include a large and diverse cross-section of the home building and retrofit industries, it has become more important to develop accurate, consistent analysis techniques to measure progress towards the program's goals. The House Simulation Protocol (HSP) document provides guidance to program partners and managers so they can compare energy savings for new construction and retrofit projects. The HSP provides the program with analysis methods that are proven to be effective and reliable in investigating the energy use of advanced energy systems and of entire houses.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

The Evolution of LTS at DOE's Hanford Site

Hanford's Long-Term Stewardship (LTS) Program has evolved from a small, informal process, with minimal support, to a robust program that provides comprehensive transitions from cleanup contractors to long-term stewardship for post-cleanup requirements specified in the associated cleanup decision documents. The LTS Program has the responsibility for almost 100,000 acres of land, along with over 200 waste sites and will soon have six cocooned reactors. Close to 2,600 documents have been identified and tagged for storage in the LTS document library. The program has successfully completed six consecutive transitions over the last two years in support of the U.S. DOE Richland Operations Office's (DOE-RL) near-term cleanup objectives of significantly reducing the footprint of active cleanup operations for the River Corridor. The program has evolved from one that was initially responsible for defining and measuring Institutional Controls for the Hanford Site, to a comprehensive, post remediation surveillance and maintenance program that begins early in the transition process. In 2013, the first reactor area -- the cocooned 105-F Reactor and its surrounding 1,100 acres, called the F Area was transitioned. In another first, the program is expected to transition the five remaining cocooned reactors into the program through using a Transition and Turnover Package (TTP). As Hanford's LTS Program moves into the next few years, it will continue to build on a collaborative approach. The program has built strong relationships between contractors, regulators, tribes and stakeholders and with the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Legacy Management (LM). The LTS Program has been working with LM since its inception. The transition process utilized LM's Site Transition Framework as one of the initial requirement documents and the Hanford Program continues to collaborate with LM today. One example of this collaboration is the development of the LTS Program's records management system in which, LM has been instrumental. The development of a rigorous data collection and records management systems has been influenced and built off of LMs success, which also ensures compatibility between what Hanford's LTS Program develops and LM. In another example, we are exploring a pilot project to ship records from the Hanford Site directly to LM for long-term storage. This pilot would gain program efficiencies so that records would be handled only once. Rather than storage on-site, then shipment to an interim Federal Records Center in Seattle, records would be shipped directly to LM. The Hanford LTS Program is working to best align programmatic processes, find efficiencies, and to benchmark site transition requirements. Involving the Hanford LTS Program early in the transition process with an integrated contractor and DOE team is helping to ensure that there is time to work through details on the completed remediation of transitioning areas. It also will allow for record documentation and storage for the future, and is an opportunity for the program to mature through the experiences that will be gained by implementing LTS Program activities over time.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Management on Hazardous Materials During Decommissioning - 18310

Non-radiological contaminants in site systems, on structures, and in site media (soil, groundwater, sediment, and surface water) often become a significant driver to cost and schedule in nuclear power plant decommissioning. This is borne out by historical experience in decommissioning projects. Management of non-radiological issues in site decommissioning is complicated by the site-specific nature of non-radiological contaminants in systems, structures and media; the variety of regulatory programs potentially applicable to compliance management; how these issues impact planning and execution of decommissioning elements; and interface with the management of site radiological issues in the decommissioning process. To address the importance of management of non-radiological hazards during decommissioning, EPRI recently issued the report Guidance for Management of Hazardous Materials during Decommissioning (EPRI 3002010592) [1]. The report provides an experience-based framework for identifying nonradiological issues at plants early in the decommissioning process, planning for regulatory compliance, options for remedial management, and considerations for integration into the plant decommissioning process. This paper summarizes the content of the EPRI report, including description of a framework for identifying non-radiological issues early in the decommissioning planning process such that site-specific issues can be optimally addressed, and funding to manage those issues can be established. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Successful Implementation of a Natural Resource Restoration Plan at the Fernald Preserve - 19568

The Fernald Preserve, Ohio, Site is a former uranium-processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). It is situated on a 425-hectare (ha) (1050-acre) tract of land, approximately 29 kilometers (km) (18 miles) northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. The US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management is responsible for management of the site. Site remediation and subsequent ecological restoration have converted the site from an industrial production facility to an undeveloped park, encompassing a series of wetlands, prairies, and forested communities. The remediation of buildings and contaminated soil was completed in 2006, but aquifer remediation is ongoing. Portions of the site are open to the public, including approximately 11 km (7 miles) of walking trails that are open year-round and a Fernald Preserve Visitors Center open four days a week. Stakeholders were instrumental in providing recommendations for final land use of the site as an undeveloped park with an emphasis on wildlife. Final land use decisions were also instrumental in the resolution of a CERCLA natural resource damage claim. The State of Ohio sued DOE in 1986 for damages to state natural resources under Section 107 of CERCLA. The suit was stayed until completion of all Records of Decision (RODs) for the site. The last ROD was signed in 1996. DOE, which was both a Natural Resource Trustee (NRT) and a potentially responsible party (PRP) under CERCLA, initiated consultation with other site NRTs in 1993. A Trustee Council was formed that included DOE, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (representing the State of Ohio), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (representing the US Department of the Interior). The NRTs agreed collectively to conduct sitewide ecological restoration, consistent with the stakeholder vision of final land use. A conceptual restoration plan was drafted in 1998. This Natural Resource Restoration Plan (NRRP) developed goals for site restoration, as well as provisions for monitoring and maintenance of restored areas. The NRTs signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2001, and DOE integrated ecological restoration design and construction into remediation and closure activities for the site. The NRT relationship became contentious in the following years as a result of a disagreement over monitoring commitments and compensation for groundwater injury. Final settlement was reached in 2008. As part of the settlement, DOE paid $13.75 million into the NRT fund as compensation for natural resource damages. In addition, the NRRP was finalized, and long-term commitments for monitoring and maintenance of ecologically restored areas were put in place. An Environmental Covenant was established and recorded with Hamilton and Butler Counties that ensures site activity and use limitations remain in place. The NRTs used a portion of the settlement funds to initiate the Paddys Run Conservation Project. This effort is a means to secure development rights and conservation easements within the Paddys Run watershed. Paddys Run is a third-order stream located on the western side of the Fernald Preserve. The NRTs partnered with Three Valley Conservation Trust to obtain assistance with land acquisition and conservation easement management, and since the program's inception in the Fall of 2012, more than 1820 ha (4500 acres) have been permanently protected via easement or purchase. Future decisions by the NRTs regarding monitoring and maintenance of restored areas will be negotiated in 2020. The site Restored Area Maintenance Plan (RAMP) was developed in 2010. The RAMP is a requirement within the NRRP and is scheduled for review following 10 years of implementation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, Revision 1

This Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) provides the overall Quality Assurance (QA) program requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices to be applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) Nevada Program Soils Activity. The QAP requirements are consistent with the Quality Systems for Environmental Data and Technology Programs–Requirements with Guidance for Use (ANSI/ASQ, 2004); the Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (IDQTF, 2005); and 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830.120, Quality Assurance (CFR, 2017a), which apply to specific activities performed under the Soils Activity. The EM Nevada Program owns and is responsible for maintaining this QAP. Individual participants are responsible for implementing the requirements of this QAP in accordance with their own approved programs, processes, plans, and procedures. If a participant’s requirement document differs from this QAP, the stricter requirement will take precedence.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Observation, Analysis, and Recommendations for ND Management Reviews (W88-0/Mk5 ALT 370 Program Report)

Progress and status reviews allow teams to provide updates and targeted information designed to inform the customer of progress and to help the customer understand current risks and challenges. Both presenters and the customer should have well-calibrated expectations for the level of content and information. However, what needs to be covered in systems-level management reviews can too often be poorly defined. These unclear expectations can lead teams to overpreparing or attempting to guess what information the customer considers as most critical. This aspect of the review process is stressful, disruptive, and bad for morale – and time spent overpreparing reports is time spent not focusing on the technical work necessary to stay on schedule. To define and address these issues, this report was designed to observe various aspects of development program coordination and review activities for NNSA and Navy customers, and then to conduct unbiased, independent Human Factors observation and analysis from an outside perspective. The report concludes with suggestions and recommendations for improving the efficiency of information flow related to reviews, with the goals of increasing productivity and benefitting both Sandia and the customer.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Characterizing Surplus US Plutonium for Disposition - 13199

The United States (US) has identified 61.5 metric tons (MT) of plutonium that is permanently excess to use in nuclear weapons programs, including 47.2 MT of weapons-grade plutonium. Surplus inventories will be stored safely by the Department of Energy (DOE) and then transferred to facilities that will prepare the plutonium for permanent disposition. The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) operates a Feed Characterization program for the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (OFMD) of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM). SRNL manages a broad program of item tracking through process history, laboratory analysis, and non-destructive assay. A combination of analytical techniques allows SRNL to predict the isotopic and chemical properties that qualify materials for disposition through the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF). The research also defines properties that are important for other disposition paths, including disposal to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) as transuranic waste (TRUW) or to high-level waste (HLW) systems. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Laboratory Directed Research and Development 2015 Annual Report

Sandia's research strategy arises from its laboratory strategy and is organized through program elements known as Investment Areas, each of which is focused on discipline- or mission-based research priorities set by upper management. The LDRD program elements mirror this structure.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC, Excess Facility Disposition Program - 17289

Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC (CNS), the management and operating contractor for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the Pantex Plant (Pantex) in Amarillo, Texas, has developed an integrated strategy to address badly deteriorating excess facilities presenting risks to people, the environment, and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) mission. The comprehensive, integrated Excess Facilities Disposition Program (EFDP) incorporates NNSA scope for excess facility risk reduction, preparation of facilities to be transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) for demolition, and demolition of non-process contaminated facilities. The Program has been developed using the NNSA Office of Safety, Infrastructure, and Operations (NA-50) Program Management Plan as a guide. The Program has undertaken actions to address the most immediate risks associated with CNS excess facilities. At Y-12, new foam roofs have been installed on Buildings 9201-5 (Alpha 5), 9204-4 (Beta 4), and 9206 to minimize further facility degradation. Tanks and dikes outside of Alpha 5 and Beta 4 are also being disconnected, drained, and filled with concrete. In addition, Beta 4 will be getting a new electrical system as its Manhattan Project-era system will be replaced by a temporary 'construction power' setup that will provide as-needed electricity to the building that is safer, more reliable, and will ease demolition activities in the future. The EFDP is also focusing on the basement of Alpha 5 and is planning to remove the water from the aging facility's flooded basement, which in some areas contains up to 54 inches of water. The EFDP is also planning several efforts to remove excess materials from Alpha 5 and Beta 4, de-inventory the Alpha 5 Mercury House System and numerous transformers, and de-inventory Beta 4 hydraulic pumps and systems. Efforts are also underway to deactivate and decommission non-process-contaminated facilities at Y-12 and at Pantex. The EFDP has prioritized the performance of work to reduce risk while at the same time supporting the preparation of process-contaminated Y-12 facilities for transfer to EM. The Program aligns with the EM goal to have the NNSA scope completed in Alpha 5 and Beta 4 by the end of FY 2020, and Building 9206 completed by the end of FY 2024. These dates and project sequencing will support the Y-12-related DOE EM cleanup initiatives. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments (ECSE) Risk Management Plan

Risk is a factor, element, constraint, or course of action that introduces an uncertainty of outcome that could impact project objectives. Risk is an inherent part of all activities, whether the activity is simple and small, or large and complex. Risk management is a process that identifies, evaluates, handles, and monitors risks that have the potential to affect project success. The risk management process spans the entire project, from its initiation to its successful completion and closeout, including both technical and programmatic (non-technical) risks. This Risk Management Plan (RMP) defines the process to be used for identifying, evaluating, handling, and monitoring risks as part of the overall management of the Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments (ECSE) ‘Project’. Given the changing nature of the project environment, risk management is essentially an ongoing and iterative process, which applies the best efforts of a knowledgeable project staff to a suite of focused and prioritized concerns. The risk management process itself must be continually applied throughout the project life cycle. This document was prepared in accordance with DOE O 413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets, its associated guide for risk management DOE G 413.3-7, Risk Management Guide, and LANL ADPM AP-350-204, Risk and Opportunity Management.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Assessment of defense-related uranium mines in the United States and other US DOE office of legacy management domestic and international uranium initiatives - 15335

US DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM) has taken several initiatives to improve domestic uranium mining and milling operations in the United States and to contribute to the management of legacy uranium mining and milling sites around the world. Initiatives include completing the 2014 Report to Congress on Defense-Related Uranium Mines, managing the Title X Uranium and Thorium Program with the Office of Environmental Management, and assisting IAEA with uranium issues in member state countries. The 2014 Report to Congress identified abandoned uranium mines (AUMs) in the United States that provided uranium ore to the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) between 1947 and 1970. The report identified AUM locations, reclamation/remediation status, radiological risks and other hazards, costs for reclamation and remediation, and potential prioritization schemes for mine cleanup. To develop reclamation and remediation cleanup cost estimates and assess risks, AUMs were grouped into six categories by tons of uranium ore produced, ranging from Small (less than 91 metric tons [100 tons]) to Very Large (greater than 453,900 metric tons [500,000 tons]). Radiological risk was calculated using the RESRAD computer code for five exposure scenarios: offsite resident, onsite resident, occasional visitor, recreational visitor, and mine reclamation worker. Results indicate that 69 percent of the AUMs are in Colorado and Utah and 23 percent are in Arizona, Wyoming, and New Mexico; and that the majority of the AUMs (68 percent) were considered Small or Small/Medium production mines, producing less than 908 metric tons (1,000 tons) of uranium ore. Although New Mexico has fewer AUMs (247) than the other states in the Colorado Plateau region, AUMs in that state (primarily those in the Grants Mineral Belt) produced 45 percent of the 79.5 million tons of AEC-purchased uranium ore. About 50 percent of the AUMs are on public land managed by the US Bureau of Land Management; 435 AUMs are on the Navajo Nation. Risk estimates for the onsite resident scenario (plausible on tribal and non-federal land) could result in an incremental cancer risk greater than 10{sup -4}. Radon inhalation was the dominant contributor to radiological risk for the five exposure scenarios evaluated. Different state and federal agencies are conducting cleanup of some AUMs under various remedial and legal authorities. Activities constituting mine 'reclamation' may reduce radiological risks to humans to acceptable levels for many mines on federal public lands if the occasional visitor and recreational visitor exposure scenarios are assumed. Addressing physical hazards (e.g., open shafts) at mines where conditions could cause serious injuries is typically a priority of public land management agencies. At locations where mine-related groundwater contamination occurs, it is a significant contributor to cleanup costs. However, most Small and Small/Medium AUMs were likely developed above the water table, and some wet mines are located in areas where groundwater has high, naturally occurring levels of the same constituents (including radioactive elements) that are typically associated with uranium mines. LM is also administering, with the US DOE Office of Environmental Management, the Title X program, which was developed by Congress to reimburse private companies (i.e., those that held active operating licenses prior to 1978) for a portion of their reclamation costs for mill sites that processed ore sold to AEC. LM recently updated the program guidance document and established internal protocols for annually auditing companies. LM is assisting IAEA on two different initiatives: assisting developing countries with training on the basic steps to take to perform reclamation of uranium mines, and developing technical guidance and case studies related to safety and environmental assessments and post-closure management of uranium legacy sites as part of the IAEA Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites initiative. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Industrial Assessment Center – integration of education and practice. Final progress report

The goal of the DOE’s Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) program is twofold: first, to help US manufacturing competitiveness by providing assessments and recommendations for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on energy efficiency, productivity, sustainability and competitiveness – including measuring the impacts of these recommendations on reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and second, to address a growing shortage of engineering professionals with applied energy and manufacturing-related skills by training a diverse cross-section of engineering students through hands-on involvement in these assessments. IUPUI has an IAC, which was established in 2011, in the Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI. The IAC has won the awards twice. We have built the center that has the expertise and infrastructure for quality energy assessments to manufactures and commercial building owners and aligned our current research and teaching activities to the DOE’ training mission with programs to train the next generation of industrial energy efficiency experts, with theory and hands-on experience in conducting energy assessment for small and median manufacturing enterprises. We have made recommendations that have the potential to save about $20M annually. We also initiated research projects to meet DOE priorities, specifically in the areas of smart manufacturing and cybersecurity. On the energy assessment side, the Center has provided energy assessments to 144 qualified companies, primarily located in Indiana. On the training side, the center has trained students in various programs, such as the department’s Bachelor of Science (BS) programs in Mechanical Engineering (ME) and BS in Energy Engineering (EEN), both are ABET accredited engineering programs, as well as a graduate level Energy Management and Assessment certificate program. At the present, the center has trained 95 students, 43 or them received the DOE issued certificates. Research projects were developed within the center to advance energy efficiency related technologies, which provided excellent opportunities for our trainees. The center has also been building a professional network with utilities, Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), government agencies, and manufacturing companies, to increase our client base and promote collaborations. The center received the 2019 Center of Excellence of the Year Award and three students received the “Outstanding Achievement in Energy Engineering by an IAC Student” awards in the past five years.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Natrium Demonstration Reactor Support [Abstract]

TerraPower, LLC (TerraPower, Participant) and other private industry partners endeavor to design, license, construct, and operate a sodium-cooled fast-spectrum nuclear reactor technology demonstration plant called Natrium. This demonstration plant is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP; DE-FOA-0002271). TerraPower, together with its technology co-developer GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) and engineering and construction partner Bechtel, submitted a proposal under the program’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Pathway for its Natrium reactor and energy system and recently received an award. TerraPower is partnering with Battelle Memorial Institute, the Management and Operating Contractor of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL, Contractor) under the Natrium project to provide critical research outcomes necessary to demonstrate the reactor technology. Over the expected five-year timeframe of the project, PNNL will provide TerraPower and its partners with vital support in the areas of post-irradiation examination (PIE) of specimens irradiated in test reactors. These efforts will be combined and managed as a program titled “Natrium Demonstration Reactor Support.”

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Final Technical Report for U.S.-Japan Hadronic Physics Exchange Program for Studies of Hadron Structure and QCD

Nuclear physics explores the fundamental properties of matter -- how protons and neutrons emerge as quantum systems of elementary particles, how they form the atomic nuclei, and how they give rise to the wide variety of phenomena and applications at biological, technical, and astronomical scales. It is a global scientific effort centered around large-scale experimental user facilities (particle accelerators and detectors), advanced theoretical methods and concepts, and computational techniques and resources. Exchange of knowledge and ideas, scientific collaboration, and workforce development on a global scale are essential for the future of the field. The nuclear physics program envisaged in the 2023 DOE/NSF NSAC Long-Range Plan and pursued at the U.S. National Labs has strong synergies with programs at other facilities worldwide and will realize significant benefits from international collaboration. Nuclear physics is also recognized for promoting international cooperation in the broadest sense through joint construction and operation of experimental equipment, personal contacts between scientists, and education and training. The U.S.-Japan Hadronic Physics Exchange Program (USJPHE) supported collaborative scientific research in hadronic physics and quantum chromodynamics. USJHPE focused on subject areas related to the programs at current and future experimental facilities in the U.S.\ and Japan and supported both experimental and theoretical studies. USJHPE particularly aimed to realize synergies between the hadronic physics programs at Jefferson Lab 12 GeV and J-PARC resulting from the complementarity of electromagnetic and hadronic probes in the multi-GeV energy range. Subject areas of common interest included the quark-gluon structure of hadrons and nuclei, meson and baryon spectroscopy, strangeness and hypernuclear physics, and other related topics. USJHPE also supported research in hadronic physics and nuclear-physics-enabled tests of fundamental symmetries related to the programs at Brookhaven National Lab, Fermilab, KEK, Spring-8, and university-based facilities in the U.S. and Japan. USJHPE especially promoted collaboration between the U.S. and Japanese nuclear physics communities in developing the physics program and instrumentation for the future Electron-Ion Collider. USJHPE was intended to provide travel grants to U.S.-based scientists (primary institutional affiliation with a U.S.\ university, national laboratory, or other research center) to visit Japanese institutions and conduct collaborative research there. The program supported senior researchers, postdoctoral fellows, and students. Continuing the setup of the preceding grant period, J-PARC served as the Japanese “hub” for U.S. physicists for short- and long-term visits, and JLab served as the corresponding U.S. “hub”. The program was officially managed through the U. of Connecticut in Storrs, CT. Support for Japanese physicists visiting the U.S. was provided through funds from Japanese funding agencies. The USJHPE program promoted the scientific exchange and the collaborative spirit in hadronic physics between the two countries.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Scalability and Effectiveness of Smart Charge Management

The rise in electric vehicle (EV) adoption presents growing challenges for power grids, particularly from simultaneous residential charging, which can cause voltage fluctuations and increase feeder peak loads. Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE), with support from the U.S. Department of Energy, initiated a pilot program to evaluate managed residential EV charging through Smart Charge Management (SCM). This study analyzes real-world charging behavior data from the pilot and feeder-level base loads from BGE to simulate residential charging scenarios through 2035 across the Washington, DC–Baltimore region. Grid impacts under unmanaged charging are compared to three SCM strategies: TOU-immediate, TOU-distributed, and Load Balancing. Results show that the magnitude of peak reduction is highly feeder-dependent. Some feeders achieve reductions of more than 40% at high enrollment levels, while others show improvements closer to 10–15%. This heterogeneity reflects differences in baseline feeder load shapes, EV penetration, and plug-in behavior across customers. Results also highlight trade-offs between shifting load away from peak periods and minimizing secondary demand peaks, offering practical insights for future utility program design.

Electric vehicle↗