Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55

Viscosity Measurements of the HLW APPS Glasses

The U.S. Department of Energy is responsible for building the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at the Hanford site in Washington to remediate 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 underground tanks. The Office of River Protection has requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) contribute in areas of recognized capabilities and expertise for glass waste form development to support successful startup of the WTP. SRNL support of this work is defined in the Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan.1 This report provides results from viscosity measurements on a series of simulated nuclear waste glasses designed and fabricated at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The glasses were designated the high-level waste – Aspen Process Performance Simulation (HLW-APPS) study glasses. The data provided in this report is to be used in the development, validation, and implementation of enhanced property/composition models for nuclear waste glasses.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Expansion of the Direct Feed High-Level Waste Glass Composition in the High Al Range

Baseline glass compositions have been developed and demonstrated for successful immobilization of Hanford high-level waste (HLW) prepared through a pretreatment process. Recent enhanced waste glass formulations have shown promise to increase the waste loading of pretreated sludge compositions from a broader range of HLW feeds. This project proposes to increase the loading of minimally pretreated Hanford HLW in glass by expanding the existing database and glass property-composition models. Estimated direct-feed high level waste (DFHLW) compositions were generated by the Hanford Tank Operations Contractor and used by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to determine target glass compositions. Gaps in existing data were identified including one high-priority gap in the high Al compositional region. This report summarizes the data collected during the characterization of the DFHLW High Al Glass Matrix. These glasses were intentionally designed with high aluminum concentrations (15 to 30 wt%) and a high likelihood of nepheline formation, which is known to negatively affect glass durability. Some glasses were expected to either fail or approach property constraints to fill data gaps in poorly understood regions of the compositional space due to lack of data. Out of the 50 glasses tested, 14 glasses formed nepheline, while the model predicted nepheline formation in 20 glasses. All quenched glasses met the product consistency test durability constraint; however, 8 glasses failed this constraint after undergoing the canister centerline cooling treatment. Additionally, 17 glasses did not meet the viscosity constraints, 4 failed the EC constraints, and 2 exceeded the allowable T2% for spinel crystal formation. All glasses satisfied the SO 3 solubility limit. The resulting dataset provides valuable information to improve model accuracy and reduce prediction uncertainty. These insights will ultimately support the development of more robust glass formulation strategies, enabling higher waste loadings, reducing operational risks, and expanding the processing envelope.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Applications of CELSS technology to controlled environment agriculture

Controlled environment agriculture (CEA) is defined as the use of environmental manipulation for the commercial production of organisms, whether plants or animals. While many of the technologies necessary for aquaculture systems in North America is nevertheless doubling approximately every five years. Economic, cultural, and environmental pressures all favor CEA over field production for many non-commodity agricultural crops. Many countries around the world are already dependent on CEA for much of their fresh food. Controlled ecological life support systems (CELSS), under development at ARC, KSC, and JSC expand the concept of CEA to the extent that all human requirements for food, oxygen, and water will be provided regenerated by processing of waste streams to supply plant inputs. The CELSS will likely contain plants, humans, possibly other animals, microorganisms and physically and chemical processors. In effect, NASA will create engineered ecosystems. In the process of developing the technology for CELSS, NASA will develop information and technology which will be applied to improving the efficiency, reliability, and cost effectiveness for CEA, improving its resources recycling capabilities, and lessening its environmental impact to negligible levels.

Bates, Maynard E.↗

Development of Advanced ISS-WPA Catalysts for Organic Oxidation at Reduced Pressure/Temperature

The Water Processor Assembly (WPA) at International Space Station (ISS) processes a waste stream via multi-filtration beds, where inorganic and non-volatile organic contaminants are removed, and a catalytic reactor, where low molecular weight organics not removed by the adsorption process are oxidized at elevated pressure in the presence of oxygen and elevated temperature above the normal water boiling point. Operation at an elevated pressure requires a more complex system design compared to a reactor that could operate at ambient pressure. However, catalysts currently available have insufficient activity to achieve complete oxidation of the organic load at a temperature less than the water boiling point and ambient pressure. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop a more active and efficient catalyst at ambient pressure and a moderate temperature that is less than water boiling temperature. This paper describes our efforts in developing high efficiency water processing catalysts. Different catalyst support structures and coating metals were investigated in subscale reactors and results were compared against the flight WPA catalyst. Detailed improvements achieved on alternate metal catalysts at ambient pressure and 200 F will also be presented in the paper.

Yu, Ping↗

Decommissioning of the V1 Nuclear Power Plant Jaslovske Bohunice - 20270

The paper focuses on introducing the approach and method applied for decommissioning of the V1 nuclear power plant (further the 'V1 NPP') located in Jaslovske Bohunice in the Slovak Republic, to the conference participants. The Paper outlines activities and steps necessary to comply with the requirements contained in the decision of the Slovak government from 1999 regarding the early shutdown of the V1 NPP. The company responsible for the V1 NPP decommissioning is Jadrova a vyradovacia spolocnost, a.s., (further JAVYS) with the State as a sole shareholder. On the basis of the V1 NPP Decommissioning Conceptual Plan, out of four assessed options, JAVYS selected the immediate decommissioning option (the 'IDO') for the V1 NPP. On the basis of multi-criteria analysis, the IDO specified the approach of immediate and continuous dismantling of equipment followed by demolition of buildings and preparation of the site for its further potential use. The IDO also included the summary of technical, environmental, legislative information as well as the determination of assumed costs for decommissioning of the V1 NPP. Prior to commencement of the V1 NPP decommissioning, within the process of termination of operation, activities connected with de-fuelling, monitoring, processing of historical waste and, not to forget, the process of obtaining the license for the V1 NPP decommissioning were executed. JAVYS decided to divide the decommissioning process into two stages. In 2011, JAVYS obtained a license for the first stage of the V1 NPP decommissioning. Within this stage, dismantling of inactive equipment, demolitions of inactive buildings, monitoring of systems and preparatory works for the upcoming stage of decommissioning were implemented. In 2015, in line with the license for the 2. stage of the V1 NPP decommissioning, the activities of decontamination and dismantling of contaminated and active equipment as well as demolitions of remaining buildings began. In this stage radioactive waste (RAW) produced during the decommissioning is to be processed. After decontamination, the material fulfilling the free release criteria is to be released into the environment, the site is to be cleared from the scope of the Atomic Act and released from the surveillance of the national regulators. Future application of certain methods and techniques for decontamination and dismantling in similar environments might bring an added value to the operators. Paper includes a description of best practices for Nuclear Power Plant VVER type reactors decommissioning. Schedule comparison is given to show how the critical path of certain projects is being managed. Application of the International Standard for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) methodology provides a uniform method which enables comparison of cost estimates to other nuclear facilities under decommissioning. The cost estimate for the V1 NPP decommissioning has been continuously updated based on more advanced and detailed information on the decommissioning activities and projects. Monitoring of progress of the V1 NPP decommissioning is performed via four key-performance indicators. The Earned Value Management (EVM) methodology is used for evaluating time and cost aspect of decommissioning activities while waste conditioning index is calculated by comparing the actually produced waste to planned values of waste for a respective monitored period. Radiological safety index is assessed by comparison of the personnel records on the individual yearly doses received by each respective employee to the boundary value. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Current limitations and challenges in nanowaste detection, characterisation and monitoring

Highlights: • First review on detection of nanomaterials in complex waste samples. • Focus on nanoparticles in solid, liquid and gaseous waste samples. • Summary of current applicable methods for nanowaste detection and characterisation. • Limitations and challenges of characterisation of nanoparticles in waste. - Abstract: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are already extensively used in diverse consumer products. Along the life cycle of a nano-enabled product, ENMs can be released and subsequently accumulate in the environment. Material flow models also indicate that a variety of ENMs may accumulate in waste streams. Therefore, a new type of waste, so-called nanowaste, is generated when end-of-life ENMs and nano-enabled products are disposed of. In terms of the precautionary principle, environmental monitoring of end-of-life ENMs is crucial to allow assessment of the potential impact of nanowaste on our ecosystem. Trace analysis and quantification of nanoparticulate species is very challenging because of the variety of ENM types that are used in products and low concentrations of nanowaste expected in complex environmental media. In the framework of this paper, challenges in nanowaste characterisation and appropriate analytical techniques which can be applied to nanowaste analysis are summarised. Recent case studies focussing on the characterisation of ENMs in waste streams are discussed. Most studies aim to investigate the fate of nanowaste during incineration, particularly considering aerosol measurements; whereas, detailed studies focusing on the potential release of nanowaste during waste recycling processes are currently not available. In terms of suitable analytical methods, separation techniques coupled to spectrometry-based methods are promising tools to detect nanowaste and determine particle size distribution in liquid waste samples. Standardised leaching protocols can be applied to generate soluble fractions stemming from solid wastes, while micro- and ultrafiltration can be used to enrich nanoparticulate species. Imaging techniques combined with X-ray-based methods are powerful tools for determining particle size, morphology and screening elemental composition. However, quantification of nanowaste is currently hampered due to the problem to differentiate engineered from naturally-occurring nanoparticles. A promising approach to face these challenges in nanowaste characterisation might be the application of nanotracers with unique optical properties, elemental or isotopic fingerprints. At present, there is also a need to develop and standardise analytical protocols regarding nanowaste sampling, separation and quantification. In general, more experimental studies are needed to examine the fate and transport of ENMs in waste streams and to deduce transfer coefficients, respectively to develop reliable material flow models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization and CST Batch Contact Equilibrium Testing of Aged TCCR Tank 10H Batch 1A and 2 Process Supernate Samples

The Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system uses ion exchange columns filled with Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media to process radioactive waste solutions for the removal of Cs-137. TCCR currently focuses on dissolving Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H waste (primarily sodium saltcake solids) within the tank followed by at-tank ion exchange column treatment. Previous equilibrium batch contact tests conducted in the SRNL Shielded Cells laboratory and associated analyses indicated that CST cesium removal performance was lower than predicted by ZAM modeling for TCCR Tank 10H Production Supernate Batch 1A. An average cesium distribution coefficient of 1,948 mL/g which corresponds to 94.1% Cs + removal was observed for Batch 1A supernate at 38 °C in January of 2019 using laboratory pretreated IONSIV™ R9120-B a CST from Lot #209900034 (predominant TCCR CST batch) at a phase ratio of 122 mL/g. This cesium loading was approximately 32% lower than model predictions, presumably due to ion exchange competition or fouling associated with alkaline earth or transition metals present in the solutions at low levels. The current testing was designed to: 1) evaluate whether supernate compositional changes during storage would result in improved cesium removal performance with CST, and 2) assist in media selection and handling protocols for future TCCR columns by evaluating several CST manufacturer batches as well as samples of one CST batch which had been pretreated using two different methods (field and laboratory methods).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes

This paper discusses the industrial potential for waste heat recovery (WHR) in harsh environments – defined as a waste heat stream having either a temperature of at least 650 °C or containing reactive constituents that complicate heat recovery. The analysis covers five industries (steel, aluminum, glass, cement, and lime), chosen based on volume of production, discharge of exhaust gases containing components that present harsh environments, possibility of recovering considerably more heat than currently recovered, and current lack of acceptable WHR options. The total potential energy savings identified in harsh environment waste heat streams from these industries is equal to 15.4% (113.6 TWh) of the process heat energy lost in U.S. manufacturing. Existing technologies and materials for these industries are evaluated and the recoverable waste heat from harsh environment gas for each industrial sector is estimated. Finally, an in-depth summary of each waste heat source shows exactly where waste heat can be recovered and what specific issues must be addressed. The most potential lies within steel blast furnaces (46 TWh/year). Other waste heat streams considered include steel electric arc furnaces (14.1 TWh/year), flat glass (3.6 TWh/year), container glass (5.7 TWh/year), glass fiber (1.1 TWh/year), specialty glass (2.2 TWh/year), aluminum melting furnaces (4.7 TWh/year), cement (17.1 TWh/year), and lime (10.5 TWh/year). Furthermore attempts to recover waste heat in harsh environments have been mostly unsuccessful, advances in research and technology could unlock an enormous potential for energy and cost savings.

42 ENGINEERING↗

A Prediction Method for Catchment Efficiency Loss due to Coaxial Nozzle Wear in Powder Fed Directed Energy Deposition Systems

Abstract Powder fed laser directed energy deposition systems show significant promise and their widespread adoption could greatly advance manufacturing technology; however, a significant amount of gas atomized metal powder is wasted during material deposition. As contaminated powder must be collected and disposed of as hazardous waste, this process is often criticized for its low catchment efficiency. This presents potential implementation and scaling issues, as widespread use of this technology would directly increase the amount of contaminated powder in need of safe disposal. A direct contribution to this waste issue was identified in past work as wearing exterior and interior surfaces on a replaceable nozzle component within the additive head of such a system integrated into a hybrid manufacturing machine tool. A computational fluid dynamics simulation is developed specifically for use within the manufacturing process by predicting catchment efficiency losses before a deposition operation is performed. The model is robust enough to calculate a catchment efficiency estimate within a reasonable transition time before deposition and is designed to replace visual estimation of nozzle deterioration by the machine operator. Both of two previously identified wear modes are represented in the simulation. Their effects on powder stream geometry are discussed in detail and the results are compared with in-situ measurements of powder stream geometry and concentrations. The resulting work contributes to the growing understanding of using prediction and prevention methods on catchment efficiency related part defects within these systems.

DeWitte, Lisa↗

Suitability of Gray Water for Hydroponic Crop Production Following Biological and Physical Chemical and Biological Subsystems

The water present in waste streams from a human habitat must be recycled in Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS) to limit resupply needs and attain self-sufficiency. Plants play an important role in providing food, regenerating air, and producing purified water via transpiration. However, we have shown that the surfactants present in hygiene waste water have acute toxic effects on plant growth (Bubenheim et al. 1994; Greene et al., 1994). These phytotoxic affects can be mitigated by allowing the microbial population on the root surface to degrade the surfactant, however, a significant suppression (several days) in crop performance is experienced prior to reaching sub-toxic surfactant levels and plant recovery. An effective alternative is to stabilize the microbial population responsible for degradation of the surfactant on an aerobic bioreactor and process the waste water prior to utilization in the hydroponic solution (Wisniewski and Bubenheim, 1993). A sensitive bioassay indicates that the surfactant phytotoxicity is suppressed by more than 90% within 5 hours of introduction of the gray water to the bioreactor; processing for more than 12 hours degrades more than 99% of the phytotoxin. Vapor Compression Distillation (VCD) is a physical / chemical method for water purification which employees sequential distillation steps to separate water from solids and to volatilize contaminants. The solids from the waste water are concentrated in a brine and the pure product water (70 - 90% of the total waste water volume depending on operating conditions) retains non of the phytotoxic effects. Results of the bioassay were used to guide evaluations of the suitability of recovered gray water following biological and VCD processing for hydroponic lettuce production in controlled environments. Lettuce crops were grown for 28 days with 100% of the input water supplied with recovered water from the biological processor or VCD. When compared with the growth of plants in control hydroponic solution containing pure deionized water, no growth difference could be measured resulting from any of the recovered water treatments. Both biological treatment and VCD offer alternative technology approaches to recovering water from waste streams appropriate for input into a crop production system. A high level of crop performance (food, air, and water production) can be maintained with either processor; selection decisions can be based on other factors regarding system integration.

Bubenheim, David L.↗

Savannah River National Laboratory Collaborative Innovation Pilot Team - 17560

The Collaborative Innovation (COIN) program was established by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) in March 2016. The goal of the SRNL COIN program is to identify innovative options to significantly reduce program and project risks (improve safety, reduce schedule and cost) of high priority Department of Energy Environmental Management, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Nuclear Energy missions. The COIN Advisory Board selected as the target outcome of the first COIN effort a 50% improvement to the Savannah River Site (SRS) H-Canyon spent nuclear fuel (SNF) processing 'baseline,' or current plan, as defined in the SRS Nuclear Materials Planning Roadmap. A small team of SRNL and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions personnel with pertinent experience and expertise was co-located and largely sequestered for eight weeks to identify improvements to H-Canyon processing of SNF. Following the process defined in the SRNL COIN Charter, the COIN Pilot Team analyzed the baseline for processing SNF through H Canyon; generated alternative ideas; tested seemingly viable ideas by reaching out to other subject-matter experts; and identified options for consideration for implementation by the COIN Advisory Board. The COIN Pilot produced a number of important outcomes, including important lessons learned for subsequent COIN efforts. The two principal outcomes are these: 1. The COIN Pilot Team conducted a comprehensive examination of the individual unit operations, the integrated system, and external interfaces to produce a timeline of H-Canyon processing and sampling times that had not previously existed. The general timeline served as the baseline from which the Pilot Team identified processing improvements. In addition, the timeline has already been employed in other planning efforts. 2. The COIN Pilot Team determined that innovations to the H-Canyon Dissolving unit operation alone could increase the number of SNF bundles processed through H Canyon by the target of 50%, but with little margin for error. To ensure that the gains in throughput in the Dissolving unit operation would be maintained throughout the facility, the Pilot Team identified four additional improvements to create greater efficiency and flexibility in downstream H-Canyon unit operations. The COIN Pilot Team's innovations reduce the processing time of a single batch of SNF through H Canyon from about 70 days to about 50 days. This talk will review the COIN process and the results of the pilot of the process. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Minimizing Transuranic Waste Generated in Hot Cells at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Through Use of a Non-Destructive CO{sub 2} Pellet Cleaning System - 19577

Wastes generated in shielded hot cells containing materials contaminated with transuranic (TRU) waste present unique problems in waste disposal at Department of Energy (DOE) sites. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) routinely processes materials contaminated with TRU waste from the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) and from other sources (both on and off-site) in their hot cell facilities, generating wastes that require eventual disposal. The waste streams generated by these processes are often high activity and exhibit high dose rates, driving them into the remote-handled (RH) category at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Reduction of the TRU waste footprint is desirable from a disposal cost perspective due to constraints with RH waste processing and a lack of space availability at the WIPP. Historically TRU waste generated at ORNL has been processed by the TRU Waste Processing Center (TWPC), which belongs to the Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM). Now that Oak Ridge legacy TRU waste is reaching its final stage, DOE-EM has turned over the mission of processing newly-generated TRU waste streams to the DOE Office of Science at ORNL. To reduce the volume of potential TRU waste occupying valuable space in the ORNL Hot Cells, a non-destructive CO{sub 2} pellet cleaning system will be used to capture particulate contaminants removed from the surfaces of waste inside the ORNL Non-Reactor Nuclear Facilities (NNFD) Hot Cells at the Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratories (IFEL). The particulate will be segregated by particle size and captured for disposal later. This action will separate some of the TRU isotopes (particulate) from the larger waste volume (debris waste items), resulting in both lower waste disposal costs and reduced TRU waste volumes. This will be accomplished through a specialized cyclone separator. Secondary wastes are usually generated through other methods of decontamination, such as water jets and abrasive agents. These secondary wastes are absent with the CO{sub 2} pelletized system, due to sublimation of the dry ice upon impact. This is an important consideration with IFEL, a facility whose primary mission is to perform a series of R and D testing on nuclear fuel rods. Liquid is not a feasible method of decontamination as the IFEL's drains in the Hot Cells were plugged years ago due to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations. Constraints at IFEL, such as criticality safety concerns with use of hydrogenous materials, are also alleviated with the non-destructive CO{sub 2} pellet cleaning system. These are a couple of the considerations why this method of decontamination is preferred. Due to concerns with oxidizers at WIPP grouting will be performed on the contaminated particulate produced during the trapping by the cyclone separation phase. This method will comply with mitigating oxidizing properties in TRU waste, required by the recently published Basis of Knowledge (BoK) document as part of Acceptable Knowledge (AK) by WIPP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Food waste management using an electrostatic separator with corona discharge

In Malaysia, municipal solid waste contains a high portion of organic matters, typically contributed by food waste. It is estimated that about 45% of the municipal waste are food waste, followed by the non-food waste such as plastics, metals, glass and others. Food waste, while being properly sorted and contamination free from non-food waste, can be reused (e.g. fertiliser) instead of being landfilled. Therefore, recycling of food waste is crucial not only from the view point of waste management, but also with respect to the reduction of resource losses and greenhouse gases emission. A new waste separation process involved food particles, non-food particles and electrostatic discharge was investigated in this study. The empirical results reveal that the corona electrostatic separation is an environmental-friendly way in recovering foods from municipal waste. The efficiency of the separator, under same operating conditions, varies with the particle size of the food and non-food particles. The highest efficiency of 82% is recorded for the particle sizes between 1.5 and 3.0 mm.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Biochar to reduce ammonia emissions in gaseous and liquid phase during composting of poultry manure with wheat straw

Highlights: • Biochar can function as an amendment for low C/N and low porosity raw materials. • Biochar reduced the gaseous emissions of ammonia during poultry manure composting. • Significant ammonia emissions [NH{sub 4}{sup +}] in the condensate were registered. • Biochar has a potential impact on N retention during composting of high N materials. •easuring [NH{sub 4}{sup +}] in condensate allows closing up the N balance during composting. - Abstract: Composting of poultry manure which is high in N and dense in structure can cause several problems including significant N losses in the form of NH{sub 3} through volatilization. Biochar due to its recalcitrance and sorption properties can be used in composting as a bulking agent and/or amendment. The addition of a bulking agent to high moisture raw materials can assure optimal moisture content and enough air-filled porosity but not necessarily the C/N ratio. Therefore, amendment of low C/N composting mixtures with biochar at low rates can have a positive effect on composting dynamics. This work aimed at evaluating the effect of selected doses of wood derived biochar amendment (0%, 5% and 10%, wet weight) to poultry manure (P) mixed with wheat straw (S) (in the ratio of 1:0.4 on wet weight) on the total ammonia emissions (including gaseous emissions of ammonia and liquid emissions of ammonium in the collected condensate and leachate) during composting. The process was performed in 165 L laboratory scale composting reactors for 42 days. The addition of 5% and 10% of biochar reduced gaseous ammonia emission by 30% and 44%, respectively. According to the obtained results, the measure of emission through the condensate would be necessary to assess the impact of the total ammonia emission during the composting process.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

The effect of drying and size reduction pretreatments on recovery of inorganic crop nutrients from inedible wheat residues

Inorganic nutrients can be easily recovered from ALS crop residue solid wastes by aqueous leaching. However, oven drying and milling pretreatment of these residues has been frequently required to accommodate crop scientists and facility storage limitations. As part of a research study that will compare three different bioreactor technologies for processing these wastes, we realized that different drying and size-reduction pretreatments had been utilized for each technology. This paper compares the effects of residue pretreatment on recovery of nutrients by leaching. Pretreatments included three drying methods [fresh, oven-dried (70 degrees C overnight), and freeze-dried] and two size reduction methods [chopped (2 cm length) and milled (2 mm diameter)]. Determination of mass balances (dry weight and ash content of solids) before and after leaching indicated solubilization was least for fresh residues (23% dry weight loss and 50% for ash loss), and most for freeze-dried residues (41-47% dry weight loss and nearly 100% for ash loss). Mineral recovery of major elements (NO3, PO4, K, Ca, and Mg) in leachates was poorest for fresh residues. P and K recovery in leachates were best for oven-dried residues and Ca, Mg, and N recovery best for freeze-dried residues. The differences in recovery for N, P, and K in leachates were minimal between chopping and milling and slightly better for Ca and Mg from milled residues.

NASA Center KSC↗

Panel Session 126: US and International Waste Classifications; Differences and Issues

The panel focused and addressed the existing US waste classification scheme set forth in US 10 CFR Part 61 and DOE Order 435.1 focusing upon the commensurate risk associated with the disposal of radioactive Low-Level (LLW) and High-Level Waste (HLW). The panel provided insights on the ongoing efforts by the NRC in conducting its Very LLW Scoping Study, the waste classification scheme used by the IAEA with a comparison of that system to the waste classification regulatory process in the US and the increasing role of RCRA sites in disposal of LLW in the US. The process used for very low activity waste disposal known as Bulk Survey for Release in the State of Tennessee was discussed as well as various studies conducted by EPRI addressing the relative risks of very low activity waste will be addressed. The panel strived to compare the risks of radioactive LLW and HLW to the operational process used for its disposal in the US and Internationally and determine if changes are needed in the process. The audience heard the perspectives from six panelists that addressed issues ranging from the technical basis used to establish the waste classification system specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 61 developed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the approaches and impacts for dispositioning materials with Very Low Levels of Radioactive Waste (VLLRW); approaches used by the Department of Energy (DOE) to disposition Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) in accordance with Order 435.1; and methods adopted by the international community to classify and disposition LLW and Intermediate Level Waste (ILW). A summary of each of the presentations given by the panelists is provided herein. Presentations proposed include: 1 - U.S. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Classification System 10 CFR Part 61 - Basis, Updates, and Issues (Rateb (Boby) Abu Eid, US NRC (USA)); 2 - EPRI Research on the Technical Basis for VLLW Classification (Lisa Edwards, EPRI (USA)); 3 - Division of Radiological Health (Anthony Hogan, State of Tennessee (USA)); 4 - Perspectives on VLLW Based on EPA's Low Activity Waste Effort (Thomas Peake, US EPA (USA)); 5 - US Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification (Justin Marble, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Progress on TRANSCEND Theme 1: Integrated Waste Management - 20194

The management of radioactive waste includes mobilisation, processing, packaging, storage, transport and final disposal. Research in the Integrated Waste Management theme of TRANSCEND focuses on underpinning science and engineering in areas of relevance to hazard reduction and decommissioning and the objectives are to: (1) develop new materials for effluent decontamination; (2) demonstrate predictive modelling of sludge/slurry removal, underpinned by experimental data; (3) transform understanding of radiation-driven processes in nuclear waste sludges; and (4) provide underpinning studies to develop innovative processes and wasteform materials. This paper gives overviews of the 16 research projects that will be done over the next 3 years in this theme. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Impact of Crystalline Silicotitanate Particle Size on Cesium Removal Efficiency

Washington River Protection Solutions is working on a Tank-Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system to remove Cs from Hanford tank waste supernate. Removal of 137 Cs from tank waste supernate by TSCR results in a low-activity waste (LAW) form that can be fed directly to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) LAW vitrification facility, where the supernate can be vitrified into a glass form. Crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media, manufactured by Honeywell UOP, LLC (product IONSIV TM R9140-B), was selected for use as the ion exchange media to remove Cs at TSCR. The particle size used in testing is expected to impact the kinetic performance of the ion exchange media. Therefore, two single-column systems were tested with CST Lot 2002009604. One column contained <25 mesh sieve cut fraction and the other column contained <35 mesh sieve cut fraction. Flowrate through both test systems was adjusted to match the CST contact time expected for the full-scale operation, i.e., matched bed volumes per hour (BV/h) at 1.83 BV/h. The feed was processed downflow through the columns until ~1000 BVs of feed were processed. The waste acceptance criteria (WAC) limit for the WTP LAW vitrification facility is <3.18E-5 Ci 137 Cs per mole Na. For a tank waste containing 156 µCi/mL 137 Cs and 5.6 M Na, up to 0.114% of the influent 137 Cs concentration may be delivered to the WTP (based on 137 Cs content in AP-107 tank waste); this required a Cs decontamination factor of 876. The WAC limit was used as one of the relevant process parameters, along with the 50% breakthrough point, Cs loading per gram of CST, and the mass transfer zone.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗