Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56

Panel Session 57: Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Processor Issues

This panel resulted in senior utility managers discussing issues with commercial LLW processors. LLW processors updated utilities/NPPs on new or different services or technologies being offered to assist in their radioactive waste management goals, changes to their facility license, revisions to their acceptance guidelines, and emerging compliance issues. Presentations proposed include: 1 - EnergySolutions Waste Processing Overview (Joe Heckman, EnergySolutions (USA)); 2 - Perma-Fix: A Nuclear Services and Waste Management Company (John Kelly, Perma-Fix Environmental Services (USA)); 3 - UniTech - 'Expanding to Reduce Costs' LLW Processor Update (Gregg Johnstone, UniTech Services Group, Inc. (USA)); 4 - Low - Level Radioactive Materials Processing (Michael Miller, Veolia Nuclear Solutions (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Site Characterization and Adaptation - Lessons Learned from the Port Granby LLRW Project in Canada - 19255

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is a community-based solution for the long-term management of historic low level radioactive waste (LLRW) resulting from 60 years of uranium and radium processing operations in the Town of Port Hope, Ontario. The Eldorado refinery, on the shores of Lake Ontario, began refining radium-226 from pitchblende ore, later transitioning to the refining of uranium ore. Process residues were deposited at the Welcome Waste Management Facility in the Town of Port Hope until the mid-1950's switching to the Port Granby Waste Management Facility (PGWMF), which continued to accept waste until the late 1980's. The Port Granby Project is part of the broader PHAI being completed by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL). The scope of remediation activities at Port Granby includes: 1) constructing a new, secure long-term waste management facility (LTWMF) and supporting infrastructure, and 2) excavating and relocating LLRW and marginally contaminated soil from the Port Granby Waste Management Facility (PGWMF) to the newly constructed LTWMF. Remediation design required extensive site investigations of waste buried in unmarked and unlined trenches across the PGWMF area. Investigations included reviews of historical records, interviews with past staff of Eldorado and Atomic Energy Canada Limited (the entity managing the PHAI cleanup prior to CNL), radiological surveys, and the advancement of boreholes across the site to facilitate the physical sampling of soil and groundwater contaminants indicative of the presence of LLRW. This paper describes the challenges associated with characterizing and quantifying waste prior to remediation and lessons-learned to adjust procedural adaptations during the characterization phase of a project to better anticipate the unanticipated nature and growth of the contamination profile that often occurs during remediation. Despite substantial pre-remediation investigative efforts, current PGWMF remediation activities have resulted in growth of both the areal and vertical extent of contamination. The contamination profile was shown to be dramatically influenced by leaching of contaminants deeper into native soils. In addition, remedial excavation discovered specific waste types such as unidentified compressed gas cylinders outside of the location indicated by historical records, as well as a quantity of unknown liquids and unmarked drums. These discoveries have resulted in higher waste quantity estimates and have required a partial redesign of the LTWMF mound (a higher final elevation and steeper slopes) to accommodate the increased waste volume. In addition, the means and methods necessary to execute the remedial construction had to be modified to account for the new conceptual model developed from the new contamination data. Despite extensive historical review and site characterization to define the nature and extent of LLRW buried at the PGWMF, actual conditions encountered during remediation efforts necessitated taking an adaptive approach to both the design of the LTWMF and the means and methods used for excavation and transport of waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Panel Session 56: Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - US LLW Disposal Issues

This panel focused on specific disposal site issues with the disposal site operators. Representatives from each of the operating commercial disposal sites presented an update of their facility, license, and waste acceptance criteria (WAC) followed by a panel discussion in response to audience questions. WM attendees that ship their radioactive waste to one or more of these commercial disposal sites attended this panel session. Presentations proposed include: 1 - US Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - US LLW Disposal Issues (Joe Weismann, US Ecology (USA)); 2 - Waste Control Specialists Update 2019 (Dan Burns, Waste Control Specialists LLC (USA)); 3 - Barnwell LLRW Disposal Facility (Mark Lewis, EnergySolutions (USA), Benjamin Smith, Chem Nuclear Systems (USA)); 4 - EnergySolutions Clive Treatment and Disposal Facility Update (Bret Rogers, EnergySolutions (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sorption of Cationic Radionuclides on Chlorite and Sericite formed by the Hydrothermal Alteration - 18180

Chlorite and sericite formed by the hydrothermal alteration of granite distribute predominantly around the geological repository in deep underground. These minerals often cover the surface of a solid phase and fill the fracture of granite considered as the natural barrier to the migration of radionuclides leaching from radioactive waste. Therefore, to assess the practical performance of the natural barrier, it is necessary to clarify the interaction between radionuclides and these minerals. This study examined the sorption of cationic radionuclides by chlorite and sericite through batch experiments, whereby Cs{sup +}, Sr{sup 2+}, and Eu{sup 3+} were used as tracer ions. In these experiments, powder-form chlorite or sericite was mixed with the solutions of the tracer ions to a liquid/solid ratio of 10 ml/g, and the resulting mixture was allowed to incubate for 2-7 days. The concentration of tracer ions was set to 1 mM and that of NaCl to a specific value in the 0-0.6 M range. The solution pH was 3, 5, or 8. As a result, tracer ions were significantly adsorbed by chlorite and sericite, regardless of pH or NaCl concentration, except when NaCl concentration reached the high value of 0.6 M. The distribution coefficient for europium ions at pH 5 was estimated to be 2-7 mL/g in chlorite and 10{sup 3}-10{sup 4} mL/g in sericite. These values significantly exceeded that measured for feldspar (2-4 mL/g), the predominant component of granite before it undergoes any hydrothermal alteration. These results suggest that cationic radionuclides will be immobilized through sorption in chlorite and sericite filling granite fractures, even if these thermal-fluid-formed minerals cover the surface of granite. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Colloidal Behavior of Plutonium Oxide in Concentrated Electrolyte Solutions

The Hanford Site in Washington State manages legacy high-level radioactive waste streams that display major chemistry and engineering challenges, including the high salt levels and pH values that correspond to conditions under which many classical concepts describing chemical reactivity cannot be applied. One particular challenge that needs to be tackled at Hanford is that Pu concentrations, [Pu], in the soluble phases of the tank wastes are higher than expected based on the solubility of crystalline PuO2, which is widely accepted to be caused by the formation of PuO2 colloid, consisting of nano- to submicron-sized particles (PuO2 NPs). Fundamental research underpinning the behavior of PuO2 NPs under conditions not only relevant to the Hanford tank waste but at high ionic strength in general is needed to reliably predict the chemical reactivity of PuO2 NPs and develop engineering solutions to safely and efficiently process high-level radioactive waste into forms suitable for long-term storage. In this work, we study the behavior of PuO2 NPs (particle size ~100 nm) under high ionic strength conditions by reacting it with highly concentrated (up to 5 M) salt solutions. We explore different electrolyte compositions to elucidate the impact of different anions (NO3-, Cl-, ClO4-, SO42-, C2O42-, CO32-) on the stability of PuO2 NP in the acidic and alkaline pH regime. PuO2 NP aggregation and precipitation as function electrolyte concentration is tracked by a combination of liquid scintillation counting, dynamic light scattering for determination of particle size distributions, and zeta potentials as a proxy for particle charge. At acidic pH, electrolytes containing non-coordinating anions, such as NaNO3, NaCl, and NaClO4 mostly stabilize PuO2 NPs over a large electrolyte concentration range, showing only subtle differences in their reactivity. Other electrolyte anions show a more pronounced effect on the PuO2 NP stability: SO42-, binds directly to the particles’ surface, reverses the particle charge, and precipitates the PuO2 NPs efficiently even at intermediate sulfate concentrations (>0.1 M). In contrast, C2O42- is found to lead to high [Pu] in solution, in the milli-molar range, even at mildly acidic pH (~4). Thermodynamic modeling of the dissolved Pu concentrations using PHREEQC is unable to predict the observed [Pu] in the acidic pH regime, supporting the influence of colloids in maintaining elevated [Pu]. It is noteworthy that the current thermodynamic databases do not include constants for colloidal Pu phases and cannot accurately predict many of the high ionic strength solutions relevant to this work. The mechanisms and models responsible for these observations will need further investigation in the future. At high pH values (~12), PuO2 NPs exhibits classical sol-gel chemistry, meaning that upon destabilization of the colloidal sol, for example by addition of concentrated NaOH, highly porous and viscid PuO2 coagulates are formed that consist of a three-dimensional network likely held together by physical interactions. The PuO2 NP coagulate shows no significant reversibility of the aggregation when contacted with concentrated brines; however, PuO2 NPs can be efficiently resuspended in solution by addition of diluted electrolytes, alkaline solutions containing high amounts of carbonate, or simple addition of water. Especially carbonate is shown to stabilize PuO2 NPs in solution at high pH, characterized by stable colloidal suspensions that are resistant against sedimentation during centrifugation. Thermodynamic modeling of the carbonate system was able to predict an increasing dissolved Pu concentration with increasing carbonate concentration. However, the model was profoundly sensitive to the fixed redox potential and does not include any thermodynamic constants for colloidal Pu species.

Neumann, Julia↗

Cask RT-100 Type B(U) Self-Certification for DOT 7A, Type A Nuclear Waste Transportation - 20098

The purpose of this Type A certification is to diversify the use of the RT-100 cask by allowing the end user to transport either Type A or Type B radioactive waste in accordance with the handling procedures for each waste category. The project's scope included the development of a matrix that contains all applicable requirements for a Type A package from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 49 for the Department of Transportation (DOT) with a justification for each requirement. Moreover, the scope included the writing of conditions and restrictions list for the transportation of Type A nuclear waste, the writing of a compliance statement, and the design and fabrication of a Type A placard to be permanently placed on the RT-100 cask. Type A packages are self-certified by the end user using one of three methods as permitted by 49 CFR 173.461, either by performance of tests with prototypes or samples of the specimens representing the packaging, or reference to a previous satisfactory demonstration of compliance of a sufficiently similar nature, or calculations or reasoned evaluation using reliable and conservative procedures and parameters. Since the RT-100 cask was licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a Type B cask, Robatel relied on the method of reference to a previous satisfactory demonstration of compliance of a sufficiently similar nature for Type A certification. This method was determined to be acceptable, since Type B packages are evaluated for more demanding transport conditions than those required for Type A packages. This paper presents Robatel's process for certifying the RT-100 cask for Type A shipments, an overview of the DOT regulations related to Type A packages, and the documents that were generated for the end user. This paper is concluded with a discussion on the advantages of having the option to transport both Type A and Type B nuclear waste, and possible future projects to further improve the operation of the cask when making Type A shipments. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

US nuclear waste may have temporary home

Combined developments could break the logjam over disposition of spent nuclear fuel and defense high-level radioactive waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Structural Changes in Molten Salt Fuel and/or Waste Stream Compounds Cs 2 UCl 6 and Cs 2 UO 2 Cl 4 from Room Temperature to Melting and Related Materials [Slides]

Perovskite phases have been explored in recent literature as waste forms for long term storage of radioactive waste from molten salt reactors specifically. Synthesis of new halide perovskite phases can inform these efforts as well as molten salt reactor chemistry in general. Inorganic perovskites have also shown promise as new scintillating materials for detection of X-rays and gamma rays. Modifying the structure and chemistry of these compounds, perhaps with organic components, could be used to synthesize new scintillating compounds or modify the properties of existing ones. Both U 6+ and U 4+ readily form compounds with a striking similarity to vacancy ordered perovskites (Cs 2 UO 2 Cl 4 and Cs 2 UCl 6 ). Each of these compounds is relevant to molten salt reactor chemistry and/or waste streams. These phases could from in uranium chloride salt systems or waste streams: Cs being a fission product.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Further Analyses of the Unburied Goiania Accident Packages - 19161

In 1987, in the city of Goiania, Brazil, a derelict teletherapy machine was disassembled by scavengers and Cs-137 was released in the environment, unleashing the biggest radiological accident in Brazil. During the 15 days before the accident was acknowledged, some contaminated materials were sold and delivered to recycling factories in a few cities in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in the form of metal scrap and recycled paper bales. The contaminated material was then collected, the metal scrap was conditioned in forty-three 200-liter drums, and the paper bales were stored in fifty 1.6 cubic meter steel boxes at the interim storage of the Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN), in the city of Sao Paulo, and there remained ever since. In 2017, 30 years later, initial analyses were performed at a sample of these boxes, checking for their activity, weight, and incongruences between the original values recorded at the time of collection and the measurement results 30 years later. The results indicated that none of the boxes checked were close to the clearance limit and that, without any sort of treatment, this radioactive waste should be stored for at least 150 years more. Visual inspection could not be performed at that time. Nowadays, some of the boxes were opened and samples from the contaminated material inside were taken for analysis. The main objective of this work is to report the results from the evaluation of the physical state of this material. After these analyses, the treatment options for volume reduction that were previously proposed were reviewed, and the method that best suits the current characteristics of the waste was chosen. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Approaches to consider covers and liners in a low-level waste disposal facility performance assessment - 15300

On-site disposal cells are in use and being considered at several US DOE sites as the final disposition for large amounts of waste associated with cleanup of contaminated areas and facilities. These disposal cells are typically regulated by States and/or the USEPA in addition to having to comply with requirements in DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. The US DOE-EM Office of Site Restoration formed a working group to foster improved communication and sharing of information for personnel associated with these Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) disposal cells and work towards more consistent assumptions, as appropriate, for technical and policy considerations related to performance and risk assessments in support of a Record of Decision and Disposal Authorization Statement. One task completed by the working group addressed approaches for considering the performance of covers and liners/leachate collections systems in the context of a performance assessment (PA). A document has been prepared which provides recommendations for a general approach to address covers and liners/leachate collection systems in a PA and how to integrate assessments with defense-in-depth considerations such as design, operations and waste acceptance criteria to address uncertainties. Specific information and references are provided for details needed to address the evolution of individual components of cover and liner/leachate collection systems. This information is then synthesized into recommendations for best practices for cover and liner system design and examples of approaches to address the performance of covers and liners as part of a performance assessment of the disposal system. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Conducting Gamma Radiation Surveys on Municipal Roadways in Support of the Port Hope Area Initiative - 16602

The Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) is a community-based solution for the long-term management of historic low level radioactive waste (LLRW) resulting from 60 years of uranium and radium processing operations in the Town of Port Hope, Ontario. The project aims to remediate approximately 1.7 million cubic metres LLRW through the consolidation of waste within two Long-term Waste Management facilities to be constructed within the municipalities of Port Hope and Clarington. Within the Town of Port Hope, surveys are being conducted at approximately 5000 individual properties to confirm the presence of LLRW, delineate its extent and develop cost estimates for remediation. Identification of the presence of LLRW is based on multiple lines of evidence including reviews of historical information, gamma radiation surveys and sampling for four signature contaminants. Of the 5000 properties, a number are municipal rights of way, largely municipal roads, that may have been impacted through spillage of LLRW when it was historically transported through the community for disposal and/or through its use as construction backfill. This paper describes the completion of gamma radiation surveys on these municipal rights of way and the challenges that needed to be addressed working on travelled roadways in an active community. To maximize efficiency and minimize inconvenience to motorists the gamma surveys are conducted using a mobile platform that provides high resolution spectral gamma logging coupled to GPS for geo-spatial referencing. The system employs large volume, spectroscopy grade, sodium iodide detectors that permit the collection radiological spectra allowing for effective discrimination of gamma radiation signals emitted from naturally occurring background sources (e.g. potassium 40) from the gamma emissions associated with the specific contaminants of concern (e.g. Ra-226). The system can be deployed on any platform including a backpack. For the majority of the roadways surveyed a small, self-contained, road-legal trailer attached to a motorized tow vehicle (e.g. side-by-side UTV or small pick-up truck) is used as the survey platform. This accommodates the mounting of multiple detectors and allows the surveys to be conducted without the need for closing traffic lanes thus improving productivity and safety while minimizing inconvenience to motorists. Data quality objectives are readily achieved through the use of multiple passes over the same target area providing a geo-spatially rich dataset for post-processing and imaging. Topics covered in the paper include: the logistics of completing high quality gamma surveys on travelled roadways; health, safety and traffic considerations; community outreach and response; and a comparison of isotopically-speciated data vs total gamma readings evaluating the influence of background sources. The lessons learned will be applicable to anyone planning on conducting similar surveys in urban settings. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Niagara Falls Storage Site - Interim Waste Containment Structure - 16199

The Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS) is a 77.3-hectare (ha) (191-acre) property that is owned by the United States Government and located in the township of Lewiston, Niagara County, New York. The NFSS is part of the former Lake Ontario Ordnance Works (LOOW) that was used by the War Department beginning in 1942 for the production of trinitrotoluene (TNT). During the 1940's and 1950's, the Manhattan Engineer District and the Atomic Energy Commission brought various radioactive wastes and uranium processing byproducts (residues) resulting from our nation's atomic energy program to the LOOW for storage. Site operations caused soil, sediment, and groundwater contamination that lead to several remedial actions, which culminated in the construction of the Interim Waste Containment Structure (IWCS) on the NFSS. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)-Buffalo District is the lead Federal agency for Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) remediation of the NFSS. As the lead agency, USACE is conducting a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) pursuant to the protocols set forth in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLA activities at the NFSS have transitioned from the site RI activities to the FS evaluation of potential remediation alternatives. USACE recognizes the need to implement a focused CERCLA FS process and, therefore, has established three separate operable units (OUs) for NFSS: the IWCS OU, the Balance of Plant (BOP) OU [i.e., all on-site areas outside the boundary of the IWCS], and the Groundwater OU. This paper will discuss the following: - Provide background information on the NFSS including the nature of the materials within the IWCS. - Explain the steps of the CERCLA and associated processes the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) employs. - Describe the OUs for the NFSS property and the subunit designations used in the FS evaluations for the IWCS OU. - Provide the current project status within the CERCLA framework and path forward for all OUs and Vicinity Properties (VPs). Identify the Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) preferred by USACE and the regulatory agencies and explain the differences between the two positions. - Provide the comparative evaluation of the remedial alternatives assessed in the FS. - Identify the justifications for the USACE - Buffalo District selecting the preferred remedial alternative within the Proposed Plan. The remedial action objectives for the IWCS OU are designed to provide short- and long-term protection of human health and the environment. CERCLA requires that any action taken be protective of human health and the environment as well as be compliant with identified ARARs. USACE evaluated 'No Action' and four potential remedial alternatives for the IWCS OU that ranged from leaving all of the wastes in-place and installing a final cover to partial and full removal of the contents. The four alternatives met the remedial action objectives defined identified for the IWCS OU. In accordance with the statutory requirements of CERCLA Section 121, remedial alternatives must comply with two threshold criteria, overall protection of human health and the environment and compliance with ARARs, in order to be carried forward for further evaluation. If a remedial alternative meets the threshold criteria, it is evaluated against the following five balancing criteria: - Long-term effectiveness and permanence; - Reduction in toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment; - Short-term effectiveness; - Implementability; and, - Cost. The Feasibility Study evaluation led to the preferred remedial alternative selection and this will be the focus of this paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Current Problems and Solutions for the Long-term Storage of LLW in Germany - 17512

The primary aim of the Lower Saxony regulating authority is that all radioactive waste in long-term interim storage is made safe and their contents precisely documented. The requirements for regulating authority include: documentation, recovery, inspection, reconditioning, longer-term interim storage with full accessibility for inspection and transfer to the national disposal facility. The waste acceptance requirements of the disposal site Konrad as well as requirements for the interim storage facilities have to be met for all stored waste packages. Beside this, some challenges came up in the last few years, e.g. waste products with restrictions concerning the stability because of corrosion, fouling or fermentation processes. Some of these examples are shown. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Revision of the Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation - 16315

On February 25, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Revision 1 of the Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation (CA BTP), culminating a six-year process. This revision provides updated guidance on the interpretation of paragraph 61.55(a)(8) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 'Determination of concentrations in wastes', as it applies to the classification of a variety of different types and forms of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) as Class A, B, or C waste. The waste class determines the minimum safety measures to be applied in order to provide reasonable assurance of safe disposal of the waste. The CA BTP is used by thousands of LLW generators, by the waste processing industry, by all operating LLW disposal sites in the U.S. and by Agreement States. The previous version of the CA BTP, published in 1995, was issued before the NRC adopted its risk-informed and performance-based regulatory policy. The revised CA BTP has been informed by that policy. The revised CA BTP also contains new guidance on acceptable methods that can be used to perform concentration averaging of LLW for the purpose of determining its waste class for disposal. This paper provides background information on why the CA BTP was issued and subsequently updated. This paper summarizes the new guidance found in the revised CA BTP. This paper also explains some of the key issues that required NRC's resolution, and the reasoning that underpins the major decisions reflected in Revision 1 of the CA BTP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Improvements in design and operation of bubblers in the Savannah river site defense waste processing facility melter - 15163

In order to accelerate the closing of High Level Waste (HLW) tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS), it was necessary to process more waste throughout the SRS liquid waste facilities. Therefore the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) needed to increase its production rate of radioactive waste glass filled canisters. To attain the increased production rate, four bubblers were installed in the DWPF Melter in September 2010 to agitate the DWPF Melter glass pool. The four bubblers were designed to be installed in existing nozzles on the top-head of the DWPF Melter. After a few years of successful operation with the original design, several changes have been made to the bubblers. The main change allows for the lower end (inside melter) of the bubbler to be replaced while the top end (outside melter) of the bubbler can be reused. This minimizes cost and waste at the DWPF. Material testing of the Inconel 690 bubbler pipes of used lower bubblers has been performed. Based on the material testing and issue with the integrity of some lower bubbler pipes used in the melter, a protective sleeve at the melt line was also added. Other changes for operational improvement or cost savings have also been made. Overall, performance of the bubblers continues to be excellent as canister production records have been achieved at the DWPF due in large part to the use of bubblers. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Update on Development of a U.S. Rail Transport Capability for Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Waste - 18518

The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) is laying the groundwork for implementing an integrated nuclear waste management system. This includes preparing for future large-scale transport of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) since transport will be a necessary component of an integrated waste management system. This paper provides an overview of the progress to date, and discussion of the path forward related to designing, fabricating and testing prototype railcars for rail transport of SNF from commercial nuclear power reactor sites when a receiving site becomes operational. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Maintenance Plan for the Composite Analysis of the Hanford Site, Southeast Washington.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manuals for radioactive waste management, DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 21 and DOE-STD-5002-2017, require that the Hanford Site maintain site performance assessments and composite analyses (CAs). This document describes the plan for maintaining the CA that supports waste disposal and remedial actions for the Hanford Site. An initial CA of the site was issued in 1998, conditionally approved in 1999, received further analysis to satisfy conditions in an addendum in 2001, and was approved in 2002. This document meets the maintenance plan requirements described in DOE M 435.1-1 Chg 2 and DOE-STD-5002-2017 and implements the requirements of the disposal authorization related to the CA for the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, the responsible field office, and its contractors.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sealed Source Security Challenges and Solutions: The Impact of Increased Commercial Disposal Access - 16557

Several recent developments have transformed the sealed source disposal landscape in the United States in ways unimaginable just a few years ago, including the initiation of operations at the first new commercial LLRW facility to open in the United States in decades; publication by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of revised commercial low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal guidance; and the development and certification by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) of new transportation package designs for high-activity sources/devices. These developments will likely enable LLRW generators to dispose of risk-significant radioactive sealed sources that for decades have been without a commercial disposal pathway. However, challenges remain with regard to ensuring that these new commercial disposal pathways are effective, and that sealed source licensees take advantage of the new options in a timely manner. These challenges include costs related to both transportation and disposal that are likely much higher than most generators expected when they purchased their sources. DOE/NNSA is actively engaged with Federal, State, regional, private sector partners to address these challenges, including measures to encourage financial planning for end-of-life management of radioactive sealed sources. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗