DOE OSTI2016
The majority of existing dry storage systems used for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) consist of a welded 304 stainless steel container placed within a passively-ventilated concrete or steel overpack. More recently fielded systems are constructed with dual certified 304/304L and in some cases, 316 or 316L. In service, atmospheric salts, a portion of which will be chloride bearing, will be deposited on the surface of these containers. Initially, the stainless steel canister surface temperatures will be high (exceeding the boiling point of water in many cases) due to decay heat from the SNF. As the SNF cools over time, the container surface will also cool, and deposited salts will deliquesce to form potentially corrosive chloride-rich brines. Because austenitic stainless steels are prone to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking (CISCC), the concern has been raised that SCC may significantly impact long-term canister performance. While the susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels to CISCC in the general sense is well known, the behavior of SCC cracks (i.e., initiation and propagation behavior) under the aforementioned atmospheric conditions is poorly understood. A literature survey has been performed to identify SCC crack growth rate (CGR) studies conducted utilizing conditions that may be relevant to existing SNF interim storage canisters, the results of which are presented in this document. The data presented here have been restricted to those representing atmospheric corrosion of stainless steels due to deliquescence of marine salts, or marine salt components, on the metal surface. A suite of experimental studies representing both long-term field tests and accelerated laboratory tests has been identified. Potentially relevant data are summarized in Figures 1-1 (304 SS) and Figure 1-2 (316 SS). In the Figures, when a particular reference utilized a series of samples, the range is shown as a bar, and the average value shown with a symbol. A summary of the test methods, sample geometry, and environmental conditions for each study is given in Table 1-1. While the surveyed studies all explore SCC of austenitic stainless steels under atmospheric conditions, the methods through which each researcher approached the problem do differ, as illustrated in Table 1-1. The surveyed studies utilized a variety of metal treatments including as-fabricated, solution annealed, welded, and sensitized material. Furthermore, different surface treatments (polished vs ground) were also used. In addition, most of these studies were accomplished using techniques that are not generally accepted for high-fidelity crack growth rate measurements, and in cases where more traditional approaches were taken, these methodologies may not be applicable to the atmospheric conditions of interest here. The wide variety of methods and materials results in the observed large scatter in measured CGRs. Each of the data sets in Figures 1-1 and 1-2 is described in more detail in the following sections. A short summary of crack growth rates based on operational experience is also presented.