Safety of rift vehicle launch and flight operations
Nuclear radiation safety of rift vehicle launch & flight operations
NUCLEAR RADIATION↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Nuclear Reactor Testing”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Nuclear power for surface effect vehicle and aircraft propulsion
Nuclear surface effect vehicle and subsonic aircraft for transoceanic cargo shipping, discussing mobile reactor safety tests under high speed impact conditions
Rom, F. E.↗
Interfacial Area Transport through Vertical-Downward Elbows in Air-water Two-phase Flow
In the study of two-phase flow, models are often developed by the data acquired in a test section with fixed orientation and with no flow restrictions. In view of practical nuclear reactor systems, however, two-phase flow through flow restrictions is important. Flow restrictions and orientations can alter both global and local two-phase flow parameters such as: cause additional pressure loss; alter the flow regime transition; change bubble distributions; affect the bubble velocity and the bubble interaction mechanisms. However, there is insufficient database and predictive models that can account for such effects. In view of above, the objectives of the current study are: (1) to establish database for local and global two-phase flow parameters downstream of a horizontal-to-vertical glass elbow with a non-dimensional radius of curvature, R{sub c}/D, of three, (2) to develop predictive models in the elbow region, and (3) to apply the developed model to the interfacial area transport equation (IATE) and evaluate it in elbow regions. (authors)
42 ENGINEERING↗
The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) Description and Capabilities
The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) is a unique, one-of-a-kind nuclear reactor facility operated by Sandia National Laboratories for the National Nuclear Security Administration that is considered by many to be a national treasure. There is no other research reactor in the world that has the attributes and capabilities comparable to that of the ACRR. The ACRR was specifically designed to meet the irradiation testing needs of the U.S. nuclear weapons program. The ACRR has four major attributes that make it unique: 1) a large dry central cavity; 2) an epithermal neutron flux; 3) a large pulsing capability; and 4) a fueled-ring external cavity with a larger dry cavity. This report presents the unique capabilities of the ACRR and documents some of the more important metrics associated with its operation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the Annular Core Research Reactor staff and the Radiation Metrology Laboratory staff for their support of this work.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
FUEL PERFORMANCE MODELING OF REACTIVITY-INITIATED ACCIDENTS USING THE BISON CODE
The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accidents in 2011 sparked considerable interest in the U.S. to develop new nuclear fuel with enhanced accident tolerance. Throughout the development of these new fuel concepts they will be extensively modeled using specialized computer codes and experimentally tested for a variety of different postulated accident scenarios. One accident scenario of interest, reactivity-initiated accident, is a nuclear reactor event involving a sudden increase in fission rate that causes a rapid increase in reactor power and temperature of the fuel which can lead to the failure of the fuel rods and a release of radioactive material. The focus of this work will be on the fuel performance modeling of reactivity-initiated accidents using the BISON code being developed at Idaho National Laboratory. The overall goal of this work is to provide the best possible modeling predictions for future experimental tests. Accurate predictive capability modeling using BISON is important for safe operation of these tests and provides a cheaper alternative to the expensive experiments.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
FFTF main heat transport system/dump heat exchanger testing and performance evaluation (initial pub date April 1978)
This report covers testing of a Main Heat Transport System/Dump Heat Exchanger (MHTS/DHX) for the Fast Flux Test Facility. The primary objective of the test program was to verify the design and generate experience in the installation, operation, and control of the DHX for FFTF. This report discusses test results related to erection, preoperational testing, in-service inspections, and steady-state and transient performance. Emphasis is placed on the effect of the test results on successful DHX operation at FFTF. 36 figures, 9 tables.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Baseline Postirradiation Examination of the FUTURIX-FTA Experiments
Postirradiation Examination (PIE) results from the baseline examination of the FUTURIX-FTA irradiation experiment are presented in this report. The FUTURIX-FTA irradiation was designed to study the fuel performance of candidate transmutation fuels. The FUTURIX-FTA experiment was conducted in the true fast neutron spectrum conditions of the Phénix sodium fast test reactor in France. FUTURIX-FTA contained several compositions that were also irradiated as part of the AFC-1 test in cadmium filtered positions in the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) that approximate the neutron spectrum of a fast reactor. This experiment was a joint collaboration between the Department of Energy (DOE) in the U.S. and the Commissariat á l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA) in France. A joint agreement between DOE and CEA was established in 2004 to conduct an irradiation experiment of metallic and nitride fuels in the Phénix reactor at CEA. Both the FUTURIX-FTA tests and the AFC-1 tests were conducted for the DOE Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) that is part of Fuel Cycle Research & Development (FCRD) program. These programs seek to develop and demonstrate the technologies needed to transmute long-lived transuranic actinide isotopes contained in spent nuclear fuel via fast reactor technology. The long term goal of this work is to reduce the radiotoxicity of future high level waste repositories. Post-irradiation examination of irradiated fuels experiments provides data related to in reactor fuel performance and input into future fuel design choices. The compositions of the FUTURIX-FTA pins were designed to test if minor actinides could be incorporated into the fuel of a fast reactor without significantly changing fuel performance observed for previously well studied fuels. The fuel performance of metallic fuel in fast reactors has been well documented. Likewise the irradiation performance of nitride fuels in fast reactors has also been documented. However the existing database for nitride fuels is much smaller than the database for metal fuels.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
TREAT neutronics analysis and design support, Part I: Multi-SERTTA
Experiment vehicle design is necessary in preparation for Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility restart and the resumption of transient testing to support Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) characterization and other future fuels testing requirements. Currently the most mature vehicle design is the Multi-SERTTA (Static Environments Rodlet Transient Test Apparatuses), which can accommodate up to four concurrent rodlet-sized specimens under separate environmental conditions. Robust test vehicle design requires neutronics analyses to support design development, optimization of the power coupling factor (PCF) to efficiently maximize energy generation in the test fuel rodlets, and experiment safety analyses. Calculations were performed to support analysis of a near-final design of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle, the design process for future TREAT test vehicles, and establish analytical practices for upcoming transient test experiments. Models of the Multi-SERTTA vehicle containing typical PWR-fuel rodlets were prepared and neutronics calculations were performed using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries. Calculation of the PCF for reference conditions of a PWR fuel rodlet in clean water at operational temperature and pressure provided results between 1.10 and 1.73 W/g-MW depending on the location of the four Multi-SERTTA units with the stack. Basic changes to the Multi-SERTTA secondary vessel containment and support have minimal impact on PCF; using materials with less neutron absorption can improve expected PCF values, especially in the primary containment. An optimized balance is needed between structural integrity, experiment safety, and energy deposition in the experiment. Type of medium and environmental conditions within the primary vessel surrounding the fuel rodlet can also have a significant impact on resultant PCF values. The estimated reactivity insertion worth into the TREAT core is impacted more by the primary and secondary Multi-SERTTA vehicle structure with the experiment content and contained environment having a near negligible impact on overall system reactivity. Additional calculations were performed to evaluate the peak-to-average assembly powers throughout the TREAT core, as well as the nuclear heat generation for the various structural components of the Multi-SERTTA assembly. Future efforts include the evaluation of flux collars to shape the PCF for individual Multi-SERTTA units during an experiment such as to achieve uniformity in test unit environmental conditions impacted by the non-uniform axial flux/power profile of TREAT. Upon resumption of transient testing, experimental results from both the Multi-SERTTA and Multi-SERTTA-CAL will be compared against calculational results and methods for further optimization and design strategies. (authors)
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Sensors for measuring thermal conductivity and related methods
A sensor for measuring thermal conductivity includes an insulator, a test material over the insulator, a conductor over the test material, and a gas within an open volume adjacent the test material and the conductor. An electrical source is configured to provide an alternating current through the conductor to heat the test material. Leads are connected to the conductor and configured to connect to a voltmeter. A method of measuring thermal conductivity includes disposing the sensor in a reactor core in which a nuclear fuel undergoes irradiation and radioactive decay. An alternating current is provided from the electrical source through the conductor to heat the test material. A voltage is measured as a function of time at the leads connected to the conductor. A thermal conductivity of the test material is calculated based on the voltage measured as a function of time. Methods of forming a sensor are also disclosed.
Daw, Joshua↗
DOME Reactor Testing User Guide
DOME User Guide History DOME User Guide Introduction User Engagement Lifecycle for DOME Phase 1 – Front End Engineering and Experiment Design (FEEED) Phase 2 – Detailed Design & Long Lead Procurement Phase 3 – Fabrication, Training, & Delivery Phase 4 – Installation & Testing Phase 5 – Removal & Disposal Next steps
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Reactivity Insertion Accidents using BISON Fuel Performance Code
The development of Accident Tolerant Fuels (ATF) has expanded into a considerable research program in the wake of the events at the Japanese Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011. The ATF goal is to insert a test assembly into a commercial reactor by 2022. To support this, testing of the ATF design under off-normal conditions is needed to assess the 'enhanced accident tolerance' capability of the fuel rod design over standard UO{sub 2}-Zircaloy concepts. Transient testing capabilities are necessary for off-normal testing of events such as loss of coolant accidents (LOCA) and reactivity insertion accidents (RIA). A transient testing program has been developed to support the testing of ATF designs. The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility has been chosen as the site to perform the transient testing of the ATF designs. TREAT is a versatile test facility capable of subjecting fuel specimens to various off-normal conditions. Historic TREAT experiments were performed in a variety of experimental test vehicles including static environment capsules, once-through flowing systems, and also recirculating flowing systems. The planned TREAT experiments will be operated under PWR conditions. Therefore, a static capsule vehicle is under development to handle required temperatures and pressures. The static capsule, termed the Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (SERTTA), will be used for irradiation tests in TREAT to subject ATF fuel rodlets to a range of power pulse conditions and environments. To aid in the design and analysis of future tests in TREAT, the fuel performance code BISON is being used. Fuel performance codes capable of accident modeling have been developed for some time and they have shown an ability to reproduce experimental results with some degree of adequacy, but they still require extensive verification and validation. Future experiments in TREAT will add to a limited database of past transient tests performed in transient reactors to support LWR systems. These tests can be used for future verification and validation of fuel performance codes. Understanding the impact of the uncertainty of influential parameters is critical for not only analyzing the results of the experiment but also for modeling and validation of codes. For example, uncertainties associated with the initial manufactured state of the sample, instrument measurements, material property models, and planned experiment conditions can provide important insight into model performance, experimental data, and play an important role in experimental design. The objective of this work is to perform an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis on a simplified RIA case of a standard UO{sub 2}-Zircaloy sample using expected nominal conditions in the SERTTA capsule in TREAT. The BISON fuel performance code is used in conjunction with DAKOTA (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Tera-scale Applications) to perform the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. (authors)
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
ECAR-6585 MARVEL Core Support Structure Analysis: Project #33526
Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is developing a small microreactor to produce electrical power utilizing a small nuclear core and stirling engines for power output under the Microreactor Application Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) program. The MARVEL Reactor (Figure 1) will be installed in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility. Walsh Engineering Services, PC (WES) has contracted with the INL to detail the final design. There are six main systems in the MARVEL, one of which is the Fuel and Core System (FCS). The FCS contains a subsystem–the Core Support Structures Subsystem (CSS)–that supports and orients each of the 36 nuclear fuel pins in the MARVEL Reactor System. The FCS (apart from the fixed Beryllium Oxide radial reflectors) is shown in light green and is depicted in more detail in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The main subject of this analysis is the lower grid plate, which is the principal item in the CSS which supports the fuel, see Figure 3. Additionally, the upper grid plate thermal expansion of the upper grid plate is presented in Appendix A.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Development and Standup Testing of a System to Observe Fission Gas Release During Transient Heating of Nuclear Fuel Element Segments
As part of an effort to increase the burnup of nuclear fuels used in Light Water Reactors, the mechanisms and timing of fission gas release during high temperature transients must be studied. In this work, a system was built to observe fission gas release of fuel element sections under evacuated conditions, at temperatures up to 800 °C. System capabilities and limitations are overviewed in this report. The system was further tested with a hydrogen-infused titanium foils and gas release was observed in agreement with literature observations. Pressure was monitored with two sensors, and temperature was monitored using a thermocouple and a pyrometer with continuous visual imaging.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
On the flow induced vibration of an externally excited nuclear reactor experiment
An in-pile, drop-in experiment design is presently being designed and studied for the near-term deployment within the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) located at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL); this experiment is termed the Miniplate-1 Large-B (MP-1 LB) Experiment. A number of explicit studies are performed during the design- and safety-related stage. Traditionally, a clear and logical methodology has been developed and utilized for analyses such as hydraulics, thermal-loads, mechanical loads, and others for these experiments. Recently a small component from a different experiment assembly mechanically separated while in the reactor’s core. While this experiment didn’t compromise the safety of the reactor, it led to a higher-level question which centered on whether the appropriate level of consideration was being made toward the fluid–structure-interactions of these experiments. The outcome yielded separate flow test experiments of like-for-like geometry in an experimental loop located at Oregon State University which produces experimental data compliant with applicable parts and requirements to ASME’s NQA-1 2008, 2009a standard – suitable for benchmark evaluation. Here, the objectives of this study are to (1) develop a process for handling and interpreting the mechanical response of the test elements during hydraulic testing, to (2) characterize the motion of a specific test element during a flow test which imposes a wide range of hydraulic conditions, and (3) provide objective observations toward the potential safety related implications that are tied to the synthesized data. The outcome of this study has led to a confident process in inspecting the experimental data, synthesized it for interpretation, identified several unique hydraulic characteristics of the experiment design which were previously unknown, and demonstrated that the likelihood for mechanical failure resulting from fluid-structure-interactions in the reactor is far below any criterion for concern of the element’s safety.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Benchmark Modeling and Simulation of the FFTF LOFWOS Test #13 Using SAM
The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) was a 400 MW thermal powered, oxide-fueled, liquid sodium cooled test reactor, built to assist development and testing of advanced fuels and materials for fast breeder reactors. In July 1986, a series of unprotected Loss of Flow Without Scram (LOFWOS) transients were performed in FFTF as part of the Passive Safety Testing (PST) program. The LOFWOS Test #13, which was initiated at 50% power and 100% flow with the pump pony motors left off, has been chosen as a benchmark case by IAEA to support collaborative efforts within international partnerships on the validation of simulation tools and models in the area of sodium fast reactor passive safety in an IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP), launched in October 2018. The System Analysis Module (SAM) is an advanced and modern system analysis tool under development at Argonne National Laboratory for advanced non-LWR safety analysis. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. To participate the IAEA CRP and enhance the SAM validation base for advanced reactor transient safety analysis, benchmark simulations of the FFTF LOFWOS Test #13 are performed using the SAM code. In this first phase of the validation effort, the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the reactor system is the focus and the reactor kinetics is not considered in the SAM FFTF model. Instead, the results of Argonne’s neutronics calculations are directly used, including the power shape of the active core region and the power history during the transient. The simulation results of FFTF at steady state agreed well with the measured data from the test. During the transient, reasonably good agreement were also obtained. Future work to improve the model will focus on introducing the reactivity predictions into the model, as well as better understanding or resolving the current discrepancies with the measured data.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Microreactor Agile Nonnuclear Experimental Testbed Test Plan
Microreactors are an attractive technology option for kick-starting nuclear innovation if they can be operated at high temperature, yielding high power conversion thermal efficiencies comparable or better than in commercial light water reactors. Microreactors are currently the smallest variation of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). SMRs are “newer generation reactors designed to generate electric power up to 300 MWe and whose components and systems can be shop-fabricated and then transported as modules to the sites for installation as demand arises.” (IAEA, 2016). Vendors are developing microreactor designs to provide an affordable, potentially mobile source of electricity - see Fig. 1 for an example of a microreactor on a semi-truck. Various microreactor designs are possible including heat pipe- and gascooled options, which are the focus of the nonnuclear testing described in this document. In heat pipe microreactors, high-temperature heat pipes using liquid sodium or potassium working fluid transport fission heat from the core to a heat removal section which in turn transfers heat to the power conversion system working fluid. In a gas-cooled design, He or other gas will flow through a solid monolith of material and transfer heat as the temperature of the gas increases through a heat exchanger to a power conversion unit. The logistics of all these processes will be examined and tested through a series of articles at the nonnuclear test bed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the Microreactor Agile Nonnuclear Experiment Testbed (MAGNET) facility. Microreactors designed to produce power of 0.1-20 MWt offer the potential for more affordable nuclear energy for a range of applications. In a heat pipe microreactor, heat pipes, fuel rods, and/or moderator are intermixed in the reactor core assembly. Heat pipes extend from the core region into the heat removal section where the power conversion unit working fluid flows through holes or channels, transferring heat from the heat pipes to the working fluid. In a gas-cooled microreactor, gas flows through the solid monolith region and up into the heat exchanger region, transferring heat to the working fluid. For initial testing, the heat removal working fluid can be a low pressure gas for testing that addresses thermal stresses. In the final application, heat addition to the power conversion working fluid typically occurs at high pressure, supporting operation of an air-Brayton, supercritical CO 2 (SCO2), or He-recuperated Brayton cycle. Various stages of the steps above will be demonstrated through the tests described in this report.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Critical response to M. Worrall et al. Published in Annals of Nuclear Energy 207 (2024) 110731
M. Worrall et al. recently published a manuscript titled “Fast neutron irradiation capability in existing thermal test reactors” (Worrall, 2024) that summarizes an irradiation vehicle design that would boost the fast neutron flux in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) for testing of nonfuel materials in a neutron flux energy spectrum that is more representative of fast reactors. Here, the authors compare their design with a separate vehicle design that they conceived of that would be implemented within the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). They analyzed both designs and drew conclusions on the most realistic near-term options for shielded nonfuel material irradiations.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Upgrading Limiting Peak-Power Analysis Techniques with Modern Validation and Uncertainty Quantification for the Advanced Test Reactor
Here, this work demonstrates the acceptability of the 2D deterministic transport code, HELIOS, to replace the legacy diffusion code, PDQ, for computing the peak-power performance parameters of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The 95% Confidence Rule, commonly used in the commercial reactor sector, is explored to develop the so-called “reliability factors” which provide statistical confidence that the peak-power limits within the hottest location along a fuel plate, referred to as the hot-stripe, will not be exceeded. Additionally, an alternative “legacy” methodology was explored that attempts to mimic the exact PDQ analysis process used for defining the peak-power limits. The legacy methodology, involves interpolating power between regions at azimuthal boundaries subtending the regions of interest. In order to apply the 95% Confidence Rule, a statistically significant calculation-to-measurement bias must first be established. Unlike the commercial world where thousands of power observations can be collected every cycle using on-line flux mapping instrumentation, the ATR power distribution must be measured during “depressurized” zero-power measurements using fission wires in polyethylene wands. In 2012, fission wire activation data was collected during a flux run in the Advanced Test Reactor – Critical facility. Also to improve statistical validity, archival data from ATR zero power flux runs from 1977, 1986, and 1994 were digitized from scanned reports and used to create new benchmark models. Borrowing from least-squares adjustment methods commonly used for neutron activation spectroscopy, adjusted fission wire powers were calculated for all four datasets. The mean and standard deviation of the bias between a priori calculated and adjusted wire-powers was then taken as the bias and uncertainty used in the 95% Confidence Rule.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗