Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Benchmark”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58

Benchmarking transition energies and emission strengths for X-ray astrophysics with measurements at the Livermore EBITs

K-shell transitions in astrophysically abundant metals and L-shell transitions in Fe group elements show characteristic signatures in the soft X-ray spectrum in the energy range 0.1–10 keV. These signatures have great diagnostic value for plasma parameters such as electron and ion temperatures and densities, and can thus help understand the physics controlling the energetic processes in astrophysical sources. This diagnostic power increases with advances in spectral resolution and effective area of the employed X-ray observatories. However, to make optimal use of the diagnostic potential – whether through global spectral modeling or through diagnostics from local modeling of individual lines – the underlying atomic physics has to be complete and well known. With the next generation of soft X-ray observatories featuring micro-calorimeters such as the SXS on Astro- H/Hitomi and the X-IFU on Athena, broadband high-resolution spectroscopy with large effective area will become more commonly available in the next decade. With these spectrometers, the accuracy of the plasma parameters derived from spectral modeling will be limited by the uncertainty of the reference atomic data rather than by instrumental factors, as is sometimes already the case for the high-resolution grating observations with Chandra-HETG and XMM-Newton-RGS. To take full advantage of the measured spectra, assessment of the accuracy of and improvements to the available atomic reference data are therefore important. Dedicated measurements in the laboratory are essential to benchmark the theoretical calculations providing the bulk of the reference data used in astrophysics. Experiments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory electron beam ion traps (EBIT-I and SuperEBIT) have a long history of providing this service. In this work, I present new measurements of transition energies and absolute electron impact excitation cross sections geared towards currently open atomic physics data needs.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Benchmarking of DFLAW Solid Secondary Wastes and Processes with UK/Europe Counterparts

This report provides information and background on UK solid wastes and waste processes that are similar to those which will be generated by the Direct-Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) facilities at Hanford. The aim is to further improve the design case for stabilizing and immobilizing of solid secondary wastes, establish international benchmarking and review possibilities for innovation.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

BIGHORN Computational Fluid Dynamics Theory, Methodology, and Code Verification & Validation Benchmark Problems

This document presents the theoretical background for a hybrid finite-element / finite-volume fluid flow solver, namely BIGHORN, based on the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) computational framework developed at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). An overview of the numerical methods used in BIGHORN are discussed and followed by a presentation of the formulation details. The document begins with the governing equations for the compressible fluid flow, with an outline of the requisite constitutive relations. A second-order finite volume method used for solving the compressible fluid flow problems is presented next. A Pressure-Corrected Implicit Continuous-fluid Eulerian (PCICE) formulation for time integration is also presented. The multi-fluid formulation is being developed. Although multi-fluid is not fully-developed, BIGHORN has been designed to handle multi-fluid problems. Due to the flexibility in the underlying MOOSE framework, BIGHORN is quite extensible, and can accommodate both multi-species and multi-phase formulations. This document also presents a suite of verification & validation benchmark test problems for BIGHORN. The intent for this suite of problems is to provide baseline comparison data that demonstrates the performance of the BIGHORN solution methods on problems that vary in complexity from laminar to turbulent flows. Wherever possible, some form of solution verification has been attempted to identify sensitivities in the solution methods, and suggest best practices when using BIGHORN.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

L2 Milestone: Neutron Capture Cross Sections from Surrogate (p, d) Measurements: Determination of the Unknown 87 Y(n, g) Cross Section and Assessment of the Method Via the 90 Zr(n, g) Benchmark Case: Theory Report

Cross sections for compound-nuclear reactions involving unstable targets are important for many applications, but can often not be measured directly. Here we describe a method for extracting cross sections for neutron-capture on unstable isotopes from indirect (surrogate) measurements. The surrogate reaction, which produces the compound nucleus of interest, has to be described and the decay of the nucleus has to be modeled. We outline the approach for one-neutron pickup and report on the determination of the 90 Zr(n, γ ) reaction from surrogate 92 Zr(p,d) data, which is compared to the directly-measured capture cross section and thus provides a benchmark for the method. We then apply the method to determine the 87 Y(n, γ ) cross section, which has not been measured directly. The work was carried out in the context of an LLNL L2 Milestone. This report addresses the theory aspects of the milestone. A complementary document summarizes the experimental efforts [1].

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Evaluation of U.S. Building Energy Benchmarking and Transparency Programs: Attributes, Impacts, and Best Practices

In the last decade, a new policy area has emerged to boost energy efficiency in buildings that focuses on the simple action of measuring energy use as compared to buildings of similar type and size, and making that data publicly available. These efforts, referred to as benchmarking and transparency (B&T) policies, seek to unlock new energy efficiency opportunities in the country’s existing buildings by promoting data-driven decision-making and creating stronger market signals. This report focuses on the 24 state and local jurisdictions that (as of December 31, 2016) require owners of privately owned commercial buildings, multifamily buildings, or both to comply with a B&T policy. The report provides a summary of U.S. B&T policy design and implementation characteristics, reports results and impacts for jurisdictions with B&T policies, and discusses opportunities for increasing the efficacy of B&T policies, as well as suggested areas for further research. Among the findings, all but one of the B&T policy evaluation studies reviewed indicate some reduction (from 1.6% to 14%) in energy use, energy costs, or energy intensity over the two- to four-year period of the analyses. More specifically, most of the studies reviewed indicate 3% to 8% reductions in gross energy consumption or energy use intensity over a two- to four-year period of B&T policy implementation. Two additional evaluation studies indicate that there is a causal relationship between B&T policies and energy savings or energy cost savings. These documented impacts should be reviewed with some caution. While consistently showing energy savings benefits associated with B&T policies, these savings estimates should be considered preliminary because of the limited period of analyses and inconsistencies in analysis methods for the various studies. A nationally standardized method for data collection, reporting, and evaluation of B&T policies—developed with an advisory group of state and local jurisdictions, energy efficiency and evaluation experts, building owner and real estate associations, and other stakeholders—could improve the consistency and quality of B&T impact studies, providing policymakers and others with a more complete understanding of the present and future impacts of these policies.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Deploy Nalu/Kokkos algorithmic infrastructure with performance benchmarking.

The former Nalu interior heterogeneous algorithm design, which was originally designed to manage matrix assembly operations over all elemental topology types, has been modified to operate over homogeneous collections of mesh entities. This newly templated kernel design allows for removal of workset variable resize operations that were formerly required at each loop over a Sierra ToolKit (STK) bucket (nominally, 512 entities in size). Extensive usage of the Standard Template Library (STL) std::vector has been removed in favor of intrinsic Kokkos memory views. In this milestone effort, the transition to Kokkos as the underlying infrastructure to support performance and portability on many-core architectures has been deployed for key matrix algorithmic kernels. A unit-test driven design effort has developed a homogeneous entity algorithm that employs a team-based thread parallelism construct. The STK Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) infrastructure is used to interleave data for improved vectorization. The collective algorithm design, which allows for concurrent threading and SIMD management, has been deployed for the core low-Mach element- based algorithm. Several tests to ascertain SIMD performance on Intel KNL and Haswell architectures have been carried out. The performance test matrix includes evaluation of both low- and higher-order methods. The higher-order low-Mach methodology builds on polynomial promotion of the core low-order control volume nite element method (CVFEM). Performance testing of the Kokkos-view/SIMD design indicates low-order matrix assembly kernel speed-up ranging between two and four times depending on mesh loading and node count. Better speedups are observed for higher-order meshes (currently only P=2 has been tested) especially on KNL. The increased workload per element on higher-order meshes bene ts from the wide SIMD width on KNL machines. Combining multiple threads with SIMD on KNL achieves a 4.6x speedup over the baseline, with assembly timings faster than that observed on Haswell architecture. The computational workload of higher-order meshes, therefore, seems ideally suited for the many-core architecture and justi es further exploration of higher-order on NGP platforms. A Trilinos/Tpetra-based multi-threaded GMRES preconditioned by symmetric Gauss Seidel (SGS) represents the core solver infrastructure for the low-Mach advection/diffusion implicit solves. The threaded solver stack has been tested on small problems on NREL's Peregrine system using the newly developed and deployed Kokkos-view/SIMD kernels. fforts are underway to deploy the Tpetra-based solver stack on NERSC Cori system to benchmark its performance at scale on KNL machines.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Development of a LOCA Experimental Benchmark for BISON - Milestone L2:FMC.P15.08

Since 2013 CASL has been planning and working towards a PWR LOCA Challenge Problem. Since BISON is the CASL fuel rod simulation platform, it plays a central role in that activity. The goal of the FY-17 CASL milestone reported here was to develop an Experimental Benchmark for LOCA analysis using BISON. Activities encompassed both code development and validation. This report provides a current snapshot of BISON’s capability for LOCA behavior including: 1) a summary of code extensions to facilitate accident analysis, 2) a series of separate effects tests, and 3) initial code validation to complex integral rod LOCA behavior. Conclusions from each of these main activities are summarized below. The key material and behavior models required to address transient high-temperature phenomena occurring during LOCAs in a standard PWR have now been implemented in BISON. These apply specifically to UO2 fuel, Zircaloy cladding and water coolant. During FY-17 important new capability to address axial UO2 fuel relocation (for 1.5D geometry) and account for oxidation energy deposition in cladding, were included. Planned future development efforts include extending the axial fuel relocation model from 1.5D to 2D/3D and improving BISON’s fission gas release model to include transient gas release associated with the high burnup structure (HBS) in high burnup fuel. Additionally, investigation of potential anisotropic creep behavior in Zircaloy cladding is planned, assuming sufficient experimental data are available to support this effort. A substantial number of separate effects validation cases (42 tests from 3 experimental series) have been completed to compare BISON predictions to measured ballooning and burst behavior for Zircaloy cladding. Such experiments include a wide variety of pressures, temperatures and loading rates. In general, BISON predictions of burst temperature, pressure and burst time are very reasonable. For one experimental series, however, involving both very high temperatures and strain rates, BISON systematically over-predicts the cladding hoop strain. Investigation of this discrepancy is an important and planned activity. With another experiment an effort was made to investigate 3D cladding response due to an azimuthal temperature variation. Results indicated 3D effects are potentially important in fuel rod analysis during LOCAs and will be further investigated in the future. BISON validation to a series of integral fuel rod experiments has also been completed. These experiments involve all fuel and cladding phenomena relevant to LOCA conditions, and can include complexities associated with irradiated fuel relative to fresh fuel. Such experiments also generally include complex thermal-hydraulic boundary conditions. Four experiments (6 rods) have been considered to date including simulated fuel (ZrO2) and both fresh and high-burnup UO2. Test rods ranged from rodlets to full length commercial PWR fuel rods. As with the separate effects experiments, BISON predictions of burst temperature, pressure and burst time are generally very reasonable. Comparisons to cladding peak strain and rod outer diameter axial profiles are less satisfactory, and identify material models and possibly modeling approximations (e.g., 2D-RZ vs 3D geometries) requiring additional investigation. Validation of BISON for integral rod LOCA behavior is by no means complete, with additional cases planned.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

AGR-1 Depletion Benchmark

The AGR-1 TRISO particle irradiation test was the first Advanced Gas Reactor test irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The TRISO particle fuel was 350 μm diameter uranium oxy-carbide (UCO) kernels enriched to 19.75 wt% U-235. The particles were embedded in cylindrical graphite compacts, placed in test capsules, and irradiated over a period of three years or 13 ATR power cycles. The fuel compacts achieved burnups approaching 20% FIMA and accumulated fast fluence up to 4.25E+25 n/m 2 (E n >0.18 MeV). This report describes the AGR-1 test train, capsules, compacts, and TRISO particle fuel in sufficient detail for a physics analyst to model the AGR-1 experiment as part of a larger ATR neutron transport model and perform a depletion calculation. The intent of the data herein is to define a practical numerical TRISO particle depletion benchmark problem for the AGR 1 irradiation test.

42 ENGINEERING↗

2018 U.S. Utility-Scale Photovoltaics-Plus-Energy Storage System Costs Benchmark

Market growth for utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems has been rapid for several years. Today, with the cost reductions of energy storage technologies, the combining PV and energy storage has become feasible and beneficial, especially for the areas that have only PV standalone systems and need to shift the peak load to meet electricity demand in the evening. Overall, utility-scale PV plus energy storage systems can provide dispatchable energy and reliable capacity. This study details cost factors, including labor costs, material costs, overhead, and permitting costs using a system-level bottom-up cost modeling approach. We use this model to benchmark PV-plus-storage installation system cost and identify the cost difference for AC- and DC-coupled systems and duration variation. Finally, we assess the cost reduction opportunities of colocating PV systems with energy storage systems in order to indicate the possible economic impacts of the PV-plus-storage configuration and help future research and development (R&D) effects in the context of U.S. energy storage policymaking.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark: Q1 2018

NREL has been modeling U.S. photovoltaic (PV) system costs since 2009. This report benchmarks costs of U.S. solar PV for residential, commercial, and utility-scale systems built in the first quarter of 2018 (Q1 2018). Our methodology includes bottom-up accounting for all system and project-development costs incurred when installing residential, commercial, and utility-scale systems, and it models the capital costs for such systems.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark: Q1 2018

NREL has been modeling U.S. photovoltaic (PV) system costs since 2009. This report benchmarks costs of U.S. solar PV for residential, commercial, and utility-scale systems built in the first quarter of 2018 (Q1 2018). Our methodology includes bottom-up accounting for all system and project-development costs incurred when installing residential, commercial, and utility-scale systems, and it models the capital costs for such systems.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

2018 U.S. Utility-Scale Photovoltaics-Plus-Energy Storage System Costs Benchmark

Market growth for utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems has been rapid for several years. Today, with the cost reductions of energy storage technologies, the combining PV and energy storage has become feasible and beneficial, especially for the areas that have only PV standalone systems and need to shift the peak load to meet electricity demand in the evening. Overall, utility-scale PV plus energy storage systems can provide dispatchable energy and reliable capacity. This study details cost factors, including labor costs, material costs, overhead, and permitting costs using a system-level bottom-up cost modeling approach. We use this model to benchmark PV-plus-storage installation system cost and identify the cost difference for AC- and DC-coupled systems and duration variation. Finally, we assess the cost reduction opportunities of colocating PV systems with energy storage systems in order to indicate the possible economic impacts of the PV-plus-storage configuration and help future research and development (R&D) effects in the context of U.S. energy storage policymaking.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Integrated Multi Scale Data Analytics and Machine Learning for the Grid; Benchmarking Algorithms and Data Quality Analysis

Machine Learning and Data Analytics are terms which are utilized now ubiquitously throughout grid analytics forums, as a potential solution to the growing big data challenges for the distribution grid. As sensors become inexpensive and common, and communication networks grow, the analytics themselves must adapt and enable consumers and providers to visualize and utilize the data provided effectively. Machine learning is one of the techniques proposed in order to manage this data deluge. This report is a subset of the work in this activity, funded through the DOE Grid Modernization Initiative, to summarize the benchmarking and review of data quality impact on the algorithm sets being developed within each use case area.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Costs and Sustainable Pricing: 1H 2018 Benchmark and Cost Reduction Road Map

In this paper we provide an overview of the accounting methods and most recent input data used within NREL's bottom-up crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar photovoltaic (PV) module supply chain cost models. The costs accounting framework that is detailed in this paper provides a methodology to prepare bottom-up c-Si PV supply chain cost models in accordance with the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For the polysilicon, ingot, wafer, cell conversion, and module assembly steps of the c-Si supply chain, we outline what is relevant for calculations of the costs of goods sold (consisting of the materials, labor, electricity, maintenance, and depreciation of capital equipment); as well as the additional operating expenses of research and development (R&D); and sales, general, and business administration (S, G, &A). This 2017 benchmark analysis is applied to current state-of-the-art manufacturing sites located within the United States, China, Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Germany. Primarily due to country-dependent labor and electricity rates, tax rates, and cost-of-capital considerations, we calculate differences in minimum sustainable pricing for all of these countries. In this paper we also include technical descriptions and bottom-up cost model results for several emerging c-Si technologies including larger Czochralski (Cz) ingots, kerfless wafers, reduced silicon utilization by thinner wafers and advanced diamond wire wafering, new encapsulants and backsheets, shingled cells, and the cell architectures passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC), bifacial passivated emitter and rear totally diffused (PERT) cells, bifacial heterojunction intrinsic thin layer (HIT) cells, and interdigitated all back-contact cells (IBC).

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

LANL ARM Benchmarking Efforts

This report gives an overview of LANL ARM benchmarking efforts, mini-app performance characteristics, ASC/IC app performance resutls, and ARM future technologies.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Benchmarking Wind Power Operating Costs in the United States: Results from a Survey of Wind Industry Experts

This paper draws on a survey of wind industry professionals to clarify trends in the operational expenditures (OpEx) of U.S. land-based wind power plants. The paper also highlights key drivers of those trends. We find that average all-in lifetime OpEx has declined from approximately $\$$80/kW-yr ($\$$35/MWh) for projects built in the late 1990s to a level that is approaching $\$$40/kW-yr ($\$$11/MWh) for projects under construction in 2018. Turbine operations and maintenance (O&M) costs—inclusive of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance—represent the single largest component of overall OpEx and the primary source of cost reductions over the last decade. We observe wide ranges of OpEx over time; for example, survey respondents cite a range in average expected costs for projects commissioned between 2015 and 2018 from $\$$33/kW-yr to $\$$59/kW-yr. Notably, these broad ranges include high levels of variability in both turbine O&M costs and non-turbine OpEx. Potential technical and strategic drivers of this variability are highlighted. We also use historical OpEx learning rates, showing a 9% OpEx reduction for each doubling of global installed wind capacity, to project a further $\$$5–$\$$8/kW-yr (12%–18%) OpEx reduction from 2018 to 2040. When compared with the broader literature, these findings suggest that continued OpEx reductions may contribute 10% or more of the expected reductions in land-based wind’s levelized cost of energy. Moreover, these estimates may understate the importance of OpEx owing to the multiplicative effects through which operational advancements influence not only O&M costs but also component reliability, performance, and plant-level availability—thereby affecting levelized costs though OpEx reduction and by enhancing annual energy production and plant lifetimes. Given the limited quantity and comparability of previously available OpEx data, the data and trends reported here may usefully inform OpEx assumptions used by electric system planners, analysts, modelers, and research and development managers. The results may also provide useful benchmarks to the wind industry, helping developers and asset owners compare their OpEx expectations with historical experience and other industry projections.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

Big Ten MCNP6 Unstructured Mesh Benchmark

The purpose of this report is to document a benchmarking effort for the MCNP6 Unstructured Mesh (UM) geometry description method applied to a large and fairly complex critical assembly, Big Ten. A secondary goal of this effort is to provide a set of best practices for modeling a critical assembly with the MCNP UM method. Specification of geometry using UM requires creating a mesh from a solid geometry model and there are some important considerations when using this method for criticality problems. These considerations will be discussed along with suggested practices for correctly modeling these types of problems.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Benchmarking Algorithm for Radio Nuclide Identification (BARNI) Literature Review

This is a literature review of published radioisotope identification (ID) methods, and an attempt at systematic organization of the approaches for solving this problem. In addition, there is an overview of the related open and closed source software, and patents related to radioisotope identification. This document is also part of the development plan for BARNI (Benchmarking Algorithm for RadioNuclide Identification) software, since it is meant to be a comparison tool, a summary of radiation ID performance evaluations is also included.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗