Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “quality monitoring”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58

Recent Low-Earth Orbit Radiation Measurements Using Passive Dosimeters during ISS Expeditions 13, 14 and 15

Current passive radiation measurements in low-Earth orbit (LEO) involve using a combination of thermally/optically stimulated luminescence detectors (TLDs/OSLDs) for the low-LET component (LET<10 keV/micron water) of the space radiation field and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTDs) for the high-LET region (LET>10 keV/micron water), as per National Council on Radiation Protection recommendation (NCRP 132, 2004). This combination of radiation detectors has been successfully implemented at NASA Johnson Space Center for routine crewmember and ISS area monitoring using LiF:Mg,Ti, CaF2:Tm, Al2O3:C and CR-39 material. This paper will present in detail the measurement and data processing techniques employed for passive space radiation measurements by the Space Radiation Analysis Group (SRAG) at JSC. The paper will also summarize the absorbed dose, dose equivalent and quality factor results for the area monitoring during ISS Expeditions 13, 14 and 15.

Gaza, R.↗

2022 Site Environmental Report: Idaho National Laboratory

The INL Site’s operations, as well as the ongoing cleanup mission involve a commitment to environmental stewardship and full compliance with environmental protection laws. As part of this commitment, the INL Site Environmental Report is prepared annually to inform the public, regulators, stakeholders, and other interested parties of the INL Site’s environmental performance during the year. This report is published for U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office (DOE-ID) in compliance with DOE O 231.1B, “Environment, Safety and Health Reporting.” The purpose of the report is to provide the following: (1) Present the INL Site, mission, and programs, (2) Report compliance status with applicable federal, state, and local regulations, (3) Describe the INL Site environmental programs and activities, (4) Summarize results of environmental monitoring, (5) Discuss potential radiation doses to the public residing in the vicinity of the INL Site, (6) Report on ecological monitoring and research conducted by contractors and affiliated agencies and by independent researchers through the Idaho National Environmental Research Park, (7) Describe quality assurance methods used to ensure confidence in monitoring data, and (8) Provide supplemental technical data and reports that support the INL Site Environmental Report (https://idahoeser.inl.gov/publications.html).

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

AAM National Campaign Tech Talk: Data Pipeline Familiarization

NASA's AWS-based Data Pipeline allows real-time data submission and ingestion, with immediate monitoring of data rate, coverage and ingestion quality. Problems are immediately discovered and can be corrected with agility by both Partners and NASA during the a simulation or flight event​.

Data Pipeline↗

Handbook: Collecting Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells in Frenchman Flat, CAU 98

Frenchman Flat basin on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) contains Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 98, which is comprised of ten underground nuclear test locations. Environmental management of these test locations is part of the Underground Test Area (UGTA) Activity conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) (1996, as amended) with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the State of Nevada. A Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Corrective Action Plan (CAP) has been approved for CAU 98 (DOE, 2011). The CADD/CAP reports on the Corrective Action Investigation that was conducted for the CAU, which included characterization and modeling. It also presents the recommended corrective actions to address the objective of protecting human health and the environment. The recommended corrective action alternative is “Closure in Place with Modeling, Monitoring, and Institutional Controls.” The role of monitoring is to verify that Contaminants of Concern (COCs) have not exceeded the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) limits (Code of Federal Regulations, 2014) at the regulatory boundary, to ensure that institutional controls are adequate, and to monitor for changed conditions that could affect the closure conditions. The long-term closure monitoring program will be planned and implemented as part of the Closure Report stage after activities specified in the CADD/CAP are complete. Groundwater at the NNSS has been monitored for decades through a variety of programs. Current activities were recently consolidated in an NNSS Integrated Sampling Plan (DOE, 2014). Although monitoring directed by the plan is not intended to meet the FFACO long-term monitoring requirements for a CAU (which will be defined in the Closure Report), the objective to ensure public health protection is similar. It is expected that data collected in accordance with the plan will support the transition to long-term monitoring at each CAU. The sampling plan is designed to ensure that monitoring activities occur in compliance with the UGTA Quality Assurance Plan (DOE, 2012). The sampling plan should be referenced for Quality Assurance (QA) elements and procedures governing sampling activities. The NNSS Integrated Sampling Plan specifies the groundwater monitoring that will occur in CAU 98 until the long-term monitoring program is approved in the Closure Report. The plan specifies the wells that must be monitored and categorizes them by their sampling objective with the associated analytical requirements and frequency. Possible sample collection methods and required standard operating procedures are also presented. The intent of this handbook is to augment the NNSS Integrated Sampling Plan by providing well-specific details for the sampling professional implementing the Sampling Plan in CAU 98, Frenchman Flat. This handbook includes each CAU 98 well designated for sampling in the NNSS Integrated Sampling Plan. The following information is provided in the individual well sections: 1. The purpose of sampling. 2. A physical description of the well. 3. The chemical characteristics of the formation water. 4. Recommended protocols for purging and sampling. The well-specific information has been gathered from numerous historical and current sources cited in each section, but two particularly valuable resources merit special mention. These are the USGS NNSS website (http://nevada.usgs.gov/doe_nv/ntsarea5.cfm) and the UGTA Field Operations website (https://ugta.nv.doe.gov/sites/Field%20Operations/default.aspx). 2 Land surface elevation and measuring point for water level measurements in Frenchman Flat were a focus during CAU investigations (see Appendix B, Attachment 1 in Navarro-Intera, 2014). Both websites listed above provide information on the accepted datum for each well. A summary is found on the home page for the well on the USGS website. Additional information is available through a link in the “Available Data” section to an “MP diagram” with a photo annotated with the datum information. On the UGTA Field Operations well page, the same information is in the “Wellhead Diagram” link. Well RNM-2s does not have an annotated photo at this time. All of the CAU 98 monitoring wells are located within Area 5 of Frenchman Flat, with the exception of ER-11-2 in Area 11 (Figure 1). The wells are clustered in two areas: the northern area (Figure 2) and the central area (Figure 3). Each well is discussed below in geographic order from north to south as follows: ER-11-2, ER-5-3 shallow piezometer, ER-5-3-2, ER-5-5, RNM-1, RNM-2s, and UE-5n.

(1996↗

The Austin Chalk/Eagle Ford Field Laboratory (ACEFFL)

This project, led by Texas A&M University, developed a science-based field laboratory in the Austin Chalk/Eagle Ford Shale Formation to determine the stimulated reservoir volume created by the fracturing of multiple wells. Utilizing newly developed monitoring solutions, the team delivered comprehensive high-quality field data on the extent and morphologies of productive fractures created from these wells. Advanced field monitoring was complemented by laboratory testing on cores and drill cuttings, and coupled modeling for design, prediction, calibration, and code validation. The Austin Chalk/Eagle Ford Field Laboratory (ACEFFL) was hosted by SM Energy, which provided access to the wells of opportunity.

02 PETROLEUM↗

Solar Technology Acceleration Center (SolarTAC): Solar Resource & Meteorological Assessment Project (SOLRMAP)

Located in Colorado, near Denver International Airport, Solar Technology Acceleration Center (SolarTAC) is a private, member-based, 74-acre outdoor facility where the solar industry tests, validates, and demonstrates advanced solar technologies. SolarTAC was launched in 2008 by a public-private consortium, including Midwest Research Institute (MRI). As a supporting member of SolarTAC, the U.S. Department of Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has established a high quality solar and meteorological measurement station at this location. This Solar Resource and Meteorological Assessment Project (SOLRMAP) provides high quality measurements to support deployment of power projects in the United States. The no-funds-exchanged collaboration brings NREL solar resource assessment expertise together with industry needs for measurements. The end result is high quality data sets to support the financing, design, and monitoring of large scale solar powered projects for industry in addition to research-quality data for NREL model development. NREL provides consultation for instrumentation and station deployment, along with instrument calibrations, data acquisition, quality assessment, data distribution, and summary reports. Industry participants provide equipment, infrastructure, and station maintenance.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Solar Resource and Meteorological Assessment Project (SOLRMAP): Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (RSR); Escalante Tri-State - Prewitt, New Mexico (Data)

The U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory collaborates with the solar industry to establish high quality solar and meteorological measurements. This Solar Resource and Meteorological Assessment Project (SOLRMAP) provides high quality measurements to support deployment of power projects in the United States. The no-funds-exchanged collaboration brings NREL solar resource assessment expertise together with industry needs for measurements. The end result is high quality data sets to support the financing, design, and monitoring of large scale solar power projects for industry in addition to research-quality data for NREL model development. NREL provides consultation for instrumentation and station deployment, along with instrument calibrations, data acquisition, quality assessment, data distribution, and summary reports. Industry participants provide equipment, infrastructure, and station maintenance.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

The Aura Mission and Its Application to Climate and Air Quality

NASA's Aura satellite is scheduled to launch in the second quarter of 2004 into a polar orbit. The Aura mission is designed to collect data to address three high priority environmental science questions: (1) Is the ozone layer recovering as expected? (2) What are the sources and processes that control tropospheric pollutants? And (3) what is the quantitative impact of constituents on climate change? Aura will answer these questions by globally measuring a comprehensive set of trace gases and aerosols in the troposphere and stratosphere. Aura data will also have applications for monitoring and predicting climate and air quality parameters. Aura s observations will continue the TOMS ozone trend record and provide an assessment as to whether the Montreal Protocol is achieving its objective. Aura will measure gases and aerosols in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere that contribute to climate forcing. These data will be of sufficient coverage, vertical resolution, and accuracy to help constrain climate models. In addition, Aura observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors will have regional as well as intercontinental coverage, which could improve emission inventories. Near real time data will tested for local air quality forecasts in collaboration with the US's Environmental Protection UV-B forecasts from Aura ozone and cloud cover data. An overview of Aura s instruments, data products, validation, and examples of data applications will be presented.

Hilsenrath, Ernest↗

Airborne Radiometry for Calibration, Validation, and Research in Oceanic, Coastal, and Inland Waters

Present-day ocean color satellite sensors, which principally provide reliable data on chlorophyll, sediments, and colored dissolved organic material in the open ocean, are not well suited for coastal and inland water studies for a variety of reasons, including coarse spatial and spectral resolution plus challenges with atmospheric correction. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) airborne mission concepts tested in 2011, 2013, 2017, and 2018 over Monterey Bay, CA, and nearby inland waters have demonstrated the feasibility of improving airborne monitoring and research activities in case-1 and case-2 aquatic ecosystems through the combined use of state-of-the-art above- and in-water measurement capabilities. These competencies have evolved through time to produce a sensor-web approach: imaging spectrometer, microradiometers, and a sun photometer (airborne) with their analogous algorithms, and with corresponding in-water radiometers and ground-based sun photometry. The NASA airborne instrument suite and mission concept demonstrations, leveraging high quality above- and in-water data, significantly improves the fidelity as well as the spatial and spectral resolution of observations for studying and monitoring water quality in oceanic, coastal, and inland water ecosystems. The goal of this series of projects was to develop and fly a portable airborne sensor suite for NASA science missions focusing on a gradient of water types from oligotrophic to turbid waters addressing the challenges of an optically complex coastal ocean zone and inland waters. The airborne radiometry in this range of aquatic conditions and sites has supported improved results of studies of water quality and biogeochemistry and provides capabilities for research areas such as ocean productivity and biogeochemistry; aquatic impacts of coastal landscape alteration; coastal, estuarine, and inland waters ecosystem productivity; atmospheric correction; and regional climate variability.

atmospheric correction↗

On The Processing of Log Files for Monitoring Antenna Health

In order to improve the quality of geodetic results, we have developed an infrastructure for timely processing of telemetry from IVS observing stations. We check every hour for new log files with telemetry from both VLBI observing sessions, single dish experiments, and stow-in data collection and automatically process them. The telemetry data we use is the system temperature, phase calibration phases and amplitudes, system equivalent flux density, and the differences between formatter clock and GPS clock. For the system temperature and phase calibration, processing includes filtering out outliers and computing averages and rms of the scatter in each scan. Furthermore, for the phase calibration we also compute the group delay and detect spurious signals. Cleaned and post-processed telemetry is archived. Our process detects abnormalities, such as, anomalously high system temperature, unstable phase calibration phases, jumps in the GPS and formatter clock differences, and others. With our procedure, the latency of detection of station abnormalities is reduced to less than two hours. Early detection of abnormalities reduces the amount of affected data since station personnel get early alerts. We discuss our experience of running this system since 2022.

Phase Calibration↗

On The Processing of Log Files for Monitoring Antenna Health

In order to improve the quality of geodetic results, we have developed an infrastructure for timely processing of telemetry from IVS observing stations. We check every hour for new log files with telemetry from both VLBI observing sessions, single dish experiments, and stow-in data collection and automatically process them. The telemetry data we use is the system temperature, phase calibration phases and amplitudes, system equivalent flux density, and the differences between formatter clock and GPS clock. For the system temperature and phase calibration, processing includes filtering out outliers and computing averages and rms of the scatter in each scan. Furthermore, for the phase calibration we also compute the group delay and detect spurious signals. Cleaned and post-processed telemetry is archived. Our process detects abnormalities, such as, anomalously high system temperature, unstable phase calibration phases, jumps in the GPS and formatter clock differences, and others. With our procedure, the latency of detection of station abnormalities is reduced to less than two hours. Early detection of abnormalities reduces the amount of affected data since station personnel get early alerts. We discuss our experience of running this system since 2022.

VLBI↗

Interannual variability and trends of summertime PM2.5-based air quality in the Intermountain West

Abstract Summertime air quality is a growing public health concern in the populated region of Northern Utah. Whereas winter air pollution is highly linked with local atmospheric temperature inversions associated with upper atmospheric high-pressure and radiational cooling in valleys, the relationship between climate factors and the frequency of poor air quality during summer is still unknown. Analyzing the last 20 years of data, we demonstrated that summertime unhealthy days (as defined by PM2.5 air quality index level) in Northern Utah highly correlate with the number of dry-hot days, wildfire size, and an upper atmospheric ridge over the Northwestern United States. The persistent atmospheric ridge enhances lightning-caused fire burned areas in northwestern states and then transports the wildfire smoke toward Northern Utah. Similarly, climate model simulations confirm observational findings, such as an increasing trend of the upper atmospheric ridge and summertime dry days in the northwestern states. Such metrics developed in this study could be used to establish longer-term monitoring and seasonal forecasting for air quality and its compounding factors, which is currently limited to forecasting products for only several days.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Development of Large Scale Extrusion Deposition for Structural Applications

Large Scale Extrusion Deposition (LSED) is an evolving additive manufacturing (AM) technology that research, such as that taking place at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and companies like Local Motors, are continuing to utilize and develop new applications. A major LSED application of interest has been molds and tooling as it allows for much shorter production time and lower cost. However, interest has been expanding into using LSED for more structural applications due to more frequent use of high performing polymer composites as feedstock. The use of LSED for structural applications is of particular interest to Local Motors as it is currently being used to create commercially viable, energy efficient electric vehicles. LSED offers a unique opportunity when compared to traditional manufacturing methods as it can significantly reduce the number of components necessary, while decreasing embodied energy and carbon emissions. Even with these benefits however, it is important that LSED is properly understood from a structural aspect as this field has not been as heavily researched as tooling. To ensure a high level of safety and repeatability is an essential responsibility of a manufacturer whose products are structural in nature. As such it is important to understand the materials and LSED process to make structural objects that the manufacturer can be confident in. The main goals of this project were to: develop and investigate materials that are of interest for structural LSED applications, further develop and understand the current machines used in LSED and develop simulations tools of LSED and the mechanical properties of the created structure. Material development focused on composite materials that have high mechanical properties and are stable in a variety of environments. The materials were tested to determine their as printed mechanical and thermal properties as these are necessary for simulations. Once the materials were investigated thoroughly, it allowed for simulations to be performed to compare to experimental data with simulations. Materials were also vetted to determine candidates for multi-material printing. The machine development focused around the areas of process monitoring, non-destructive evaluation, and quality control. Finally, the goal of the simulations was to develop a realistic model of printed structures, including in-process simulation and dynamic simulation. The routes to get to some of these goals and the depth in which they were investigated changed throughout the project due to personnel changes and the COVID-19 pandemic. This project resulted in many valuable results such as the development of an nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique for interlayer defects, proof of simulation for warpage in simple parts, the development and utilization of a profilometer to monitor a print for defects or inconsistencies, thorough investigation of a material used commercially for structural LSED applications and valuable experimental data on the applicability and advantages of multi-material crush structures versus their neat counterparts by creation and testing of samples.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Overview of GSICS visible calibration methods.

Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) is an international collaborative effort initiated in 2005 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites (CGMS) to 1-monitor, 2-improve and 3-harmonize the quality of observations from operational weather and environmental satellites of the Global Observing System (GOS). GSICS aims at ensuring consistent accuracy among space-based observations worldwide for climate monitoring, weather forecasting, and environmental applications by 1-monitoring instrument performance, 2-operational inter-calibration of satellite instruments, 3-radiometrically scaling observations to absolute reference standards, 4-recalibration of archived datasets. Although many of the GSIC visible inter-calibration methods are based on medium pixel-level imagers such as MODIS, VIIRS, AVHRR, and geostationary sensors, the methods are applicable to high spatial resolution imagery such as Landsat. For sensor inter-calibration efforts, coincident ray-matched reflectance pairs are used to transfer the calibration from the reference to the target instrument. Spectral band adjustment factors (SBAF) are applied to account for any spectral band differences. For sensor stability monitoring, PICS, deep convective cloud (DCC) and polar ice Earth viewed targets are utilized. GSICS uses the moon for stability monitoring by using the GSICS Implementation of the USGS Robotic Lunar Observatory (ROLO) model (GIRO). GSICS is looking forward to the launch of CLARREO on the international space station (ISS) in 2023. The CLARREO hyperspectral reflective solar band (RSB) sensor will establish an absolute calibration reference in space, which will characterize invariant targets and will inter-calibrate concurrent sensors. Examples of these calibration methods will be presented at the workshop.

Visible calibration methods↗

MO-A-16A-01: QA Procedures and Metrics: In Search of QA Usability

Radiation therapy has undergone considerable changes in the past two decades with a surge of new technology and treatment delivery methods. The complexity of radiation therapy treatments has increased and there has been increased awareness and publicity about the associated risks. In response, there has been proliferation of guidelines for medical physicists to adopt to ensure that treatments are delivered safely. Task Group recommendations are copious, and clinical physicists' hours are longer, stretched to various degrees between site planning and management, IT support, physics QA, and treatment planning responsibilities.Radiation oncology has many quality control practices in place to ensure the delivery of high-quality, safe treatments. Incident reporting systems have been developed to collect statistics about near miss events at many radiation oncology centers. However, tools are lacking to assess the impact of these various control measures. A recent effort to address this shortcoming is the work of Ford et al (2012) who recently published a methodology enumerating quality control quantification for measuring the effectiveness of safety barriers. Over 4000 near-miss incidents reported from 2 academic radiation oncology clinics were analyzed using quality control quantification, and a profile of the most effective quality control measures (metrics) was identified.There is a critical need to identify a QA metric to help the busy clinical physicists to focus their limited time and resources most effectively in order to minimize or eliminate errors in the radiation treatment delivery processes. In this symposium the usefulness of workflows and QA metrics to assure safe and high quality patient care will be explored.Two presentations will be given:Quality Metrics and Risk Management with High Risk Radiation Oncology ProceduresStrategies and metrics for quality management in the TG-100 Era Learning Objectives: Provide an overview and the need for QA usability metrics: Different cultures/practices affecting the effectiveness of methods and metrics. Show examples of quality assurance workflows, Statistical process control, that monitor the treatment planning and delivery process to identify errors. To learn to identify and prioritize risks and QA procedures in radiation oncology. Try to answer the question: Can a quality assurance program aided by quality assurance metrics help minimize errors and ensure safe treatment delivery. Should such metrics be institution specific.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Surface Characterization of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers by Picosecond Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Adhesive bonding of composite materials requires reliable monitoring and detection of surface contaminants as part of a vigorous quality control process to assure robust and durable bonded structures. Surface treatment and effective monitoring prior to bonding are essential in order to obtain a surface which is free from contaminants that may lead to inferior bond quality. In this study, the focus is to advance the laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique by using pulse energies below 100 μJ (μLIBS) for the detection of low levels of silicone contaminants in carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Various CFRP surface conditions were investigated by LIBS using ∼10 ps, 355 nm laser pulses with pulse energies below 30 μJ. Time-resolved analysis was conducted to optimize the gate delay and gate width for the detection of the C I emission line at 247.9 nm to monitor the epoxy resin matrix of CFRP composites and the Si I emission line at 288.2 nm for detection of silicone contaminants in CFRP. To study the surface sensitivity to silicone contamination, CFRP surfaces were coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), the active ingredient in many mold release agents. The presence of PDMS was studied by inspecting the Si I emission lines at 251.6 nm and 288.2 nm. The measured PDMS areal densities ranged from 0.15 to 2 μg/cm(sup 2). LIBS measurements were performed before and after laser surface ablation. The results demonstrate the successful detection of PDMS thin layers on CFRP using picosecond μLIBS.

Rodolfo Ledesma↗

West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER) for Calendar Year 2023

The report, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project office (DOE-WVDP), summarizes the environmental protection program at the WVDP for calendar year (CY) 2023. Monitoring and surveillance of the facilities used by the DOE are conducted to verify protection of public health and safety and the environment. The report is a key component of DOE’s effort to keep the public informed of environmental conditions at the WVDP. The quality assurance protocols applied to the environmental monitoring program ensure the validity and accuracy of the monitoring data. In addition to demonstrating compliance with environmental laws, regulations, and directives, evaluation of data collected in 2023 continued to indicate that WVDP activities pose no threat to public health or safety, or to the environment.

Record of Decision↗