LANL ARM Benchmarking Efforts
This report gives an overview of LANL ARM benchmarking efforts, mini-app performance characteristics, ASC/IC app performance resutls, and ARM future technologies.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Benchmark”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Benchmarking Wind Power Operating Costs in the United States: Results from a Survey of Wind Industry Experts
This paper draws on a survey of wind industry professionals to clarify trends in the operational expenditures (OpEx) of U.S. land-based wind power plants. The paper also highlights key drivers of those trends. We find that average all-in lifetime OpEx has declined from approximately $\$$80/kW-yr ($\$$35/MWh) for projects built in the late 1990s to a level that is approaching $\$$40/kW-yr ($\$$11/MWh) for projects under construction in 2018. Turbine operations and maintenance (O&M) costs—inclusive of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance—represent the single largest component of overall OpEx and the primary source of cost reductions over the last decade. We observe wide ranges of OpEx over time; for example, survey respondents cite a range in average expected costs for projects commissioned between 2015 and 2018 from $\$$33/kW-yr to $\$$59/kW-yr. Notably, these broad ranges include high levels of variability in both turbine O&M costs and non-turbine OpEx. Potential technical and strategic drivers of this variability are highlighted. We also use historical OpEx learning rates, showing a 9% OpEx reduction for each doubling of global installed wind capacity, to project a further $\$$5–$\$$8/kW-yr (12%–18%) OpEx reduction from 2018 to 2040. When compared with the broader literature, these findings suggest that continued OpEx reductions may contribute 10% or more of the expected reductions in land-based wind’s levelized cost of energy. Moreover, these estimates may understate the importance of OpEx owing to the multiplicative effects through which operational advancements influence not only O&M costs but also component reliability, performance, and plant-level availability—thereby affecting levelized costs though OpEx reduction and by enhancing annual energy production and plant lifetimes. Given the limited quantity and comparability of previously available OpEx data, the data and trends reported here may usefully inform OpEx assumptions used by electric system planners, analysts, modelers, and research and development managers. The results may also provide useful benchmarks to the wind industry, helping developers and asset owners compare their OpEx expectations with historical experience and other industry projections.
17 WIND ENERGY↗
Big Ten MCNP6 Unstructured Mesh Benchmark
The purpose of this report is to document a benchmarking effort for the MCNP6 Unstructured Mesh (UM) geometry description method applied to a large and fairly complex critical assembly, Big Ten. A secondary goal of this effort is to provide a set of best practices for modeling a critical assembly with the MCNP UM method. Specification of geometry using UM requires creating a mesh from a solid geometry model and there are some important considerations when using this method for criticality problems. These considerations will be discussed along with suggested practices for correctly modeling these types of problems.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Benchmarking Algorithm for Radio Nuclide Identification (BARNI) Literature Review
This is a literature review of published radioisotope identification (ID) methods, and an attempt at systematic organization of the approaches for solving this problem. In addition, there is an overview of the related open and closed source software, and patents related to radioisotope identification. This document is also part of the development plan for BARNI (Benchmarking Algorithm for RadioNuclide Identification) software, since it is meant to be a comparison tool, a summary of radiation ID performance evaluations is also included.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
LANL ARM Benchmarking Efforts
Overview of LANL ARM benchmarking efforts; ASC application performance on current ARM systems; ARM future technologies investigations; and external collaborations.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Laghos summary for CTS2 benchmark
Laghos (LAGrangian High-Order Solver) is a miniapp that solves the time-dependent Euler equations of compressible gas dynamics in a moving Lagrangian frame using unstructured highorder finite element spatial discretization and explicit high-order time-stepping. Results and benchmark tarball are for the cts2 version from the CEED/Laghos repository.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Development of Reactor Physics Benchmark Evaluations for Power Burst Facility Experiments
The PBF is an open vessel with a closed loop water cooling system that can handle up to 28MW of heat generation during steady state operations. This project details the facility characteristics relevant to performing simulation benchmarks for the intent of inclusion in the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP).
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Benchmarking Anticipated Wind Project Lifetimes: Results from a Survey of U.S. Wind Industry Professionals
This paper draws on a survey of wind industry professionals to clarify trends in the expected useful life of land-based wind power plants in the United States. The expected useful life of a project affects expectations about its profitability, the timing of possible decommissioning or repowering, and its levelized costs. We find that most wind project developers, sponsors and long-term owners have increased project-life assumptions over time, from a typical term of ~20 years in the early 2000s to ~25 years by the mid-2010s and ~30 years more recently. Current assumptions range from 25 to 40 years, with an average of 29.6 years. The estimated average levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for new wind projects built in 2018 is $\$ $40.4/MWh (real 2018$\$ $), assuming a 20-year project life. With a 25-year useful life and no change in assumed operations and maintenance (O&M) expenditures or wind plant performance over time, LCOE declines by 10%, to $\$ $36.2/MWh, because capital costs are recovered over five additional years of production. At the now-common 30-year assumed life, levelized costs decrease another 7%, to $\$ $33.5/MWh (under the same unaltered assumptions about O&M and performance). Even longer assumed lifetimes lead to further (but diminishing) LCOE reductions—e.g., to $\$ $31.7/MWh and $\$ $30.3/MWh for 35- and 40-year lives, respectively. The data and trends presented here may inform assumptions used by electric system planners, modelers and analysts. The results may also provide useful benchmarks to the wind industry, helping developers and assets owners to compare their expectations with those of their peers.
17 WIND ENERGY↗
Nuclear Data – Benchmarking 19 F(α,n) Yield Data for Nuclear Safeguards
Fluorine compounds of U and Pu are ubiquitous in the nuclear fuel cycle, so F(α,n) neutrons are an important signature and quantitative source term that needs to be understood for physics-based interpretation of nondestructive assay measurements. Historically there have been large differences in the basic nuclear data for this reaction reported by various groups. UF 6 is the most prominent material in the nuclear fuel cycle, with the potential for short-term production into weaponizable form. Verification of bulk quantities, natural feed, depleted tails, and especially low enriched product in cylinders is particularly important. The principal physical measurement is neutron counting. For enriched material, the 19 F(α,n) reaction, driven by 234U, is the dominant source of neutrons. Basic nuclear data, cross sections, needed to calculate the yield, as well as information on the source spectrum for sensitivity studies are sparse and highly discrepant. This limits defensible physics-based performance evaluations. The same applies to holdup and criticality studies in which hydrated uranyl fluoride is the material of interest which accumulates in enrichment facilities. In the future we anticipate that the physics community will have made improved accelerator-based measurements and undertaken a more thorough evaluation and adjustment of all relevant available data. But in the short term, this does not help the safeguards community face the pressing real-world nondestructive assay requirements. To address this need, we have performed quality neutron measurements on UF6 materials using well-known material and high-capability neutron counters. A robust determination of the n/s/g of 234 U in UF 6 was generated along with a scientifically defensible uncertainty analysis. The weighted average value of the neutron yield is 509 n/s/g 234 U with a random uncertainty of approximately 1%. Dominant sources of systematic uncertainty are in the efficiency determination where we incur approximately 1.1% relative standard deviation associated with the 252 Cf reference source and about 0.9% uncertainty coming from the uncertainty in the F(α,n) spectrum. The stated uncertainties are an order of magnitude better than current data based on accelerator data reported in the literature. Aside from being of immediate and direct use by the safeguards community, this result will serve as an enduring integral benchmark for subsequent data evaluations that will need to match it in order to be credible. In addition to yield normalization, safeguards users of F(α,n) data also need guidance of the neutron emission spectrum. We have generated a neutron emission using a modified version of the well-known SOURCES 4C code, updated with new alpha stopping power coefficients, and a blended microscopic cross section data set. The yield and spectra are available in a form that MCNP users can readily use.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
MSRE TRANSFORM Model for Thermal-Hydraulic Benchmarking (Status Report)
Over the last several years, there has been renewed interest in the development of molten salt reactor concepts for the next generation of nuclear power plants. The modeling tools used to design these reactors must be validated in order to accurately predict the thermal hydraulic behavior expected during operation. The majority of the practical experience with molten salt reactors comes from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) that operated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) from 1964 until 1969. The work discussed in this paper uses the design information and experimental data from that period to create and validate a detailed model of the MSRE. Once completed, this model’s performance will be compared to other system analysis codes for thermal hydraulic benchmarking, and their ability to predict the thermal hydraulic performance of molten salt reactor systems will also be compared.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Status Report on the MSRE Transform Model for Thermal-Hydraulic Benchmarking
Over the last several years, there has been renewed interest in the development of molten salt reactor concepts for the next generation of nuclear power plants. The modeling tools used to design these reactors must be validated in order to accurately predict the thermal hydraulic behavior expected during operation. The majority of the practical experience with molten salt reactors comes from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) that operated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) from 1964 until 1969. The work discussed in this paper uses the design information and experimental data from that period to create and validate a detailed model of the MSRE. Once completed, this model’s performance will be compared to other system analysis codes for thermal hydraulic benchmarking, and their ability to predict the thermal hydraulic performance of molten salt reactor systems will also be compared.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Documentation Package Supporting Fabrication of Doped UO 2 Samples for MiniFuel Irradiation and Fission Gas Release Benchmarking
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is looking into the fabrication of high performance UO 2 fuel candidates via the addition of dopants to the UO 2 . The addition of dopants is proposed to cause enlarged grains that will slow down fission gas release from the irradiated fuel pellet candidates. The Cr-doped UO 2 pellets were fabricated from a microspherical feedstock, and enlarged grains were observed during the microstructural characterization. Irradiation under the Miniature Fuel program in the High Flux Isotope Reactor at ORNL will enable the study of irradiation response of such potential fuel candidates and will allow fission gas release benchmarking for these fuel candidates.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Benchmarking Utility-Scale PV Operational Expenses and Project Lifetimes: Results from a Survey of U.S. Solar Industry Professionals
This paper draws on a survey of solar industry professionals and other sources to clarify trends in the expected useful life and operational expenditure (OpEx) of utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) plants in the United States. Solar project developers, sponsors, long-term owners, and consultants have increased project-life assumptions over time, from an average of ~21.5 years in 2007 to ~32.5 years in 2019. Current assumptions range from 25 years to more than 35 years depending on the organization; 17 out of 19 organizations surveyed or reviewed use 30 years or more. Levelized, lifetime OpEx estimates have declined from an average of ~$\$$35/kW DC -yr for projects built in 2007 to an average of ~$\$$17/kW DC -yr in 2019. Across 13 sources, the range in average lifetime OpEx for projects built in 2019 is broad, from $\$$13 to $\$$25/kW DC -yr. Operations and maintenance (O&M) costs—one component of OpEx—have declined precipitously in recent years, to $\$$5-8/kW DC -yr in many cases. Property taxes and land lease costs are highly variable across sites, but on average are—together—of similar magnitude. Other OpEx line items include security, insurance, and asset management. Given 2007-2009 values for not only project life and OpEx but also other drivers of the levelized cost of energy (LCOE, excluding the investment tax credit), the LCOE for utility-scale PV projects built from 2007 through 2009 averaged $\$$305 /MWh. Using 2019 values for all parameters yields an average LCOE of $\$$51 /MWh. The decline in LCOE from $\$$305 /MWh to $\$$51 /MWh was predominantly caused by reductions in up-front expenditures (and, to a much lesser extent, by changes in capacity factors, financing costs, and tax rates), but 9% ($\$$22 /MWh) of the overall decline is due to improvements in project life and OpEx. Project life extensions and OpEx reductions have had similarly sized impacts on LCOE over this period, at $\$$11 /MWh each. Had project life and OpEx not improved over the last decade, LCOE in 2019 would have instead been $\$$73 /MWh—43% higher. Given the limited quantity and comparability of previously available data on these cost drivers, the data and trends presented here may inform assumptions used by electric system planners, modelers, and analysts. The results may also provide useful benchmarks to the solar industry, helping developers and assets owners compare their expectations for project life and OpEx with those of their peers.
14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
Benchmark Solutions for Radiation Transport in Stochastic Media with Inhomogeneous Material Statistics
Accurately solving implicit Monte Carlo (IMC) thermal photon transport problems with mixed material cells is important in realistic applications. The production IMC package at LLNL treats mixed material cells arising from ALE remap and hydrodynamics using the same approximate model. The new Imp IMC thermal photon transport package currently under development has both a material interface reconstruction (MIR) algorithm and a Levermore-Pomraning (LP) stochastic medium algorithm for treating mixed material cells. Existing stochastic medium algorithms for treating mixed material cells in IMC lack a complete theoretical basis. The IMC LP algorithm implementation has been demonstrated to reproduce published deterministic LP solutions for the particular case of spatially homogeneous material statistics. Realistic simulations will include spatially inhomogeneous material statistics (material mean chord lengths). In a previous investigation, the LP-model for transport in binary stochastic media in rod geometry was generalized to accommodate spatially varying material chord lengths, i.e., the mixing statistics were allowed to be nonhomogeneous. Analytical solutions were obtained and used to produce a verifi cation suite for the Imp IMC Levermore-Pomraning implementation for different spatial variations of the chord lengths. However, the accuracy of the LP model when the mixing statistics are nonhomogeneous has not been assessed and leaves open the question of whether local accuracy is improved or further degraded when chord lengths are not uniform. This shortcoming is rectifi ed here by developing benchmark analytic solutions for transport in binary Markovian stochastic mixtures in rod geometry with nonhomogeneous mixing statistics, using spatially varying chord lengths considered in the previous investigation based on the LP model. Methods for sampling a nonhomogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) are first described and used to construct individual realizations of the binary mixtures in rod geometry. Analytic solutions are then obtained for the forward and backward directed fluxes on a given realization, now viewed as a deterministic medium with alternating layers of the two materials with known interface locations. Finally, material averaged scalar fluxes are obtained using these sampling schemes with spatially linear and quadratic chord lengths and used to assess the accuracy of the previously obtained LP-model results.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Goldsim Modeling of Vadose Zone Transport for E-Area Naval Reactor Component Disposal Areas: Model Description and Benchmarking
This report documents the development of a GoldSim® model of flow and radionuclide transport to the water table through the Naval Reactor Components Disposal Area (NRCDA) waste disposal sites and underlying vadose zones. The model is designed to be used for Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis in support of the E-Area Performance Assessment (PA). This report describes the model and shows results obtained from benchmarking the model to best-estimate deterministic results obtained using a PORFLOW model of NRCDA vadose zone transport. The PORFLOW model is three-dimensional while the GoldSim model is a simplified one-dimensional treatment. Nevertheless, the GoldSim model was able to accurately reproduce PORFLOW results with some adjustment to the nominal dispersion coefficient and vadose zone flow area used as “tuning” parameters. An example of the results obtained comparing GoldSim and PORFLOW calculation of releases of I-129, Tc-99, C-14 and Ni-59 from waste disposal containers at the 643-26E site is shown in Figure 1 below. For all of the test cases evaluated, GoldSim predicted peak concentrations within 6% of the PORFLOW values and peak times agreed within 8% with the majority of the results in better agreement. The close agreement between the two models provides confidence that GoldSim will give results accurately reflecting the behavior of releases from the NRCDA under off-normal operating conditions for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Software Requirements Document: Benchmarking Algorithm for RadioNuclide Identification (BARNI)
This document provides the requirements for the Benchmark Algorithm for Radio-Nuclide Identification (BARNI) software, an open-source tool for comparing radionuclide identification algorithm performance. It specifies the requirements for the user interface, maintainability, documentation and testing. In addition, this document outlines the core functionality of the product, which will align with the needs of the Office of Nuclear Smuggling Detection and Deterrence (NSDD). Specifically, these include interoperability with RASE, and compatibility with the FLIR R400.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Benchmark Specification of Advanced Burner Test Reactor
As an effort to assess the Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) suite of fast reactor analysis codes, a numerical benchmark problem was developed using the reference 250 MWt Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR) metallic core fueled with beginning of equilibrium cycle compositions (Chang et al., 2006). Material thermal expansion at operating condition was modeled by adjusting the hexagonal pitch, axial meshes, and the fuel and structure material densities appropriately. Irradiation swelling of metal fuel was considered, and the bond sodium was displaced into the lower part of fission gas plenum.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Best Practices Guide: Benchmarking Energy Efficiency in Laboratories
Purpose and Audience A wide spectrum of laboratory owners, ranging from universities to federal agencies, have explicit goals for energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reductions in their facilities. For example, new federal buildings and major renovations of existing buildings are to reduce fossil fuel-generated energy consumption by 90% in 2025, and 100% in 2030, compared with a 2003 baseline (FEMP n.d.). Minnesota SB2030 standard requires achieving an 80% reduction from the average building baseline for commercial, institutional, and industrial buildings (SB2030 n.d). A laboratory—new or existing—is much more likely to meet energy efficiency goals if quantitative metrics and targets are explicitly specified and tracked over the life cycle of the building, from design through construction, commissioning, operations, and renovations. If efficiency targets are not explicitly and properly defined, any additional capital costs or design time associated with attaining higher efficiencies can be difficult to justify relative to other priorities. The purpose of this guide is to provide guidance on how to specify and compute energy efficiency metrics and benchmarks for laboratories, at the whole-building as well as the system level. The information in this guide can be used to incorporate quantitative metrics and targets into new construction or retrofit of existing facilities. For information on strategies and technologies to achieve energy efficiency, the reader is referred to I2SL resources, including technology best practice guides and case studies.
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗