DOE OSTI2016
During the Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing process a number of by-products and residues are generated from various sources. In recent years, Westinghouse has characterised and processed around 50,000 drums of residue comprising of numerous different types generated over 60 years from the manufacture of numerous types of fuel for greater than 50 reactors. These include, AGR, Magnox (uranium metal fuel), PWR, fast reactors and various test reactors. Different organisations have different definitions and names for each of these categories but essentially they fall into one of the following categories: Clean Scrap (U{sub 3}O{sub 8}, UO{sub 2}, UO{sub 3}, UF{sub 4}, powders, pellets), Dirty Scrap (U{sub 3}O{sub 8}, UO{sub 2}, UO{sub 3}, UF{sub 4}, powders, pellets), Gd Contaminated Scrap (U{sub 3}O{sub 8}, UO{sub 2}, powders, pellets), Ash, Sludge, Combustible / soft residues (e.g. ventilation filters, gloves, plastic bags), Contaminated metals (including contaminated scrap zirconium tubes), Materials arising from decommissioning. Routes have been developed across the industry for a number of the categories listed above, however in numerous examples, routes have not been established and materials have been stored creating a significant legacy. Westinghouse understands the issues regarding legacy uranic material and the financial and regulatory impact of storage. Interim storage of materials may seem like a low cost option in the short term; however ongoing costs for facilities, manpower and equipment, without a permanent and final solution can result in significant lifetime material management costs. Recovery of uranium and sending materials for safe disposal of enriched uranium residues is not easy because of the criticality risk both during processing and at a disposal site. Therefore quantities of materials than can be sent via permitted disposal routes are very limited The development of regulations often means that finding solutions is becoming more difficult. It is believed that timely resolution is ultimately the most cost effective solution. In addition, the intrinsic value of recycling this material is also high and in some cases can mitigate the cost of processing. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗