Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Waste Salt”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,052 records · Page 59
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Produced Water and Waste Heat-aided Blowdown Water Treatment: Using Chemical and Energy Synergisms for Value Creation

The project objective was to develop a cooling blowdown water (BDW) treatment process utilizing produced water (PW) and low-grade heat to maximize water reuse and saleable by-product generation while reducing chemical and energy footprints of the treatment. The proposed treatment process consists of mixing, softening, organics and suspended solids removal, reverse osmosis (RO), thermal desalination, and brine electrolysis. BDW samples collected from a local coal-fired power plant and PW samples from two shale gas production wells were used in this study. Each treatment unit was first designed and tested to quantify its treatment efficiency, and its chemical and energy requirements. In addition, a process model was developed and model simulations were conducted based on the experimental results and literature data to optimize the treatment process. A techno-economic analysis was conducted to quantify chemical and energy savings as well as production of 10-lb brine as a saleable product. With the field-collected BDW and PW samples, mixing experiments determined a volumetric mixing ratio 10:1 (BDW:PW) resulted in the best performance of multivalent ions removal and largest chemical savings for softening. Softening of the BDW/PW mixtures using alkaline chemicals (Na 2 CO 3 and NaOH) achieved 95%-100% removal of scaling-forming cations (Ca, Mg, Fe, Ba, Sr) and 60% of silicon, and 10% of total organic carbon (TOC). The mixing and softening treatments yielded an effluent with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of 23 g/L. Activated carbon (AC) filtration removed TOC to a low level (< 3 mg/L) and further removed remaining scale-forming divalent metals and silica from the softened water. The AC filtration resulted in a slight reduction of TDS from 23 g/L to 20 g/L, leaving behind only mostly monovalent ions (i.e., sodium and chloride) in the filtered water. These pretreatments yielded a feed water that met the criteria of the downstream reverse osmosis (RO) to prevent membrane fouling. A cross-flow RO system was used to further concentrate the TDS of the AC effluent. Various factors including TDS, pH, and applied pressure were examined and optimal conditions were determined for the co-treatment process. An integrated process consisting of mixing, softening, AC filtration and RO was used to treat a continuous flow (0.25 – 1.2 L/min, or 0.07 – 0.32 gpm) and successfully generated RO permeate as product water (TDS < 0.5 g/L) for reuse in cooling operation, and a concentrate (TDS ~ 45 g/L) to be further treated in a thermal desalination unit. These flow rates meet the FOA’s criterion of 0.01 – 1 gpm. Overall, the co-treatment of BDW/PW allowed shorter ramp-up time compared to treatment of BDW alone. It resulted in 40% and 55% savings of Na 2 CO 3(s) and NaOH, respectively, compared to treating the BDW and PW individually for the same level of softening. The co-treatment also resulted in a 29% energy saving compared to treatment of BDW only for the level of TDS concentration. A thermal desalination system was designed using CFD simulations and manufactured in the WVU Innovation Hub for further treatment of the RO concentrate to generate 10-lb brine. The system has a design flow rate of 2 gpm and has been successfully tested. A bench-scale brine electrolysis system was developed for on-site generation of chlorine/hypochlorite (Cl 2 /OCl - ) and caustic soda (NaOH) as useful chemicals for the co-treatment process. Using salt solutions (0.5 M and 1 M), the system achieved faradaic efficiencies of 93%-97% and 70%-77% for caustic soda and chlorine/hypochlorite generation, respectively. An economic analysis showed that the electricity costs for on-site generation of these chemicals were significantly lower than the chemical prices offered by suppliers. An industrial-scale process model consisting of mixing, softening, AC filtration, RO, thermal desalination, and brine electrolysis was developed using the Aspen Plus V9 in conjunction with Aspen Custom Modeler V9. The model serves as a solvable Aspen Plus model and as basis to form the costing infrastructure. In addition, techno-economic analysis considering capital, operating, and transportation costs was conducted. An optimization solution showed that produced water for mixing is still advantageous in low quantities. The optimum solution approaches a leveled cost of water (LCW) of 2 $/m 3 which becomes cost competitive with nominal water treatment prices.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Characterization of Tank 9H Annulus Sample in Support of Residual Material Inventory Determinations

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to provide sample preparation and characterization of the Tank 9H annulus sample in support of Residual Material Inventory Determinations. One Tank 9H sample in three vials [HTF-9-25-13, HTF-9-25-14 and HTF-9-25-15], with each vial containing approximately 200 mL of the Tank 9H annulus salt solution, were delivered to the SRNL Shielded Cells for sample preparation and characterizations in February 2025. The density of the “as-received” solution contained in each of the three Tank 9H annulus sample vials were determined followed by a solid-liquid separation on each one using 0.45-micron Nalgene® nylon filter membranes. The resulting filtrates were combined to form the Tank 9H annulus sample with a total volume of about 600 mL. The combined wet solid fractions, about a total of 4.8 grams of salt material, remaining on the filter membranes were air-dried in the Shielded Cells for 72 hours. The total weight of the air-dried solids was 2.1 grams. These air-dried solids were washed with deionized water (DI water) at a phase ratio of 60 mL DI water/gram of solids to recover insoluble solids, if any. No visible or measurable quantity of insoluble solids were recovered after DI water washing of the air-dried solids because the air-dried solids completely dissolved in the DI water. The solid fraction-wash water was not combined with the 600 mL of the filtrate solution, and the resulting solution was not screened or analyzed for radionuclides. Aliquot sample volumes of the undiluted Tank 9H annulus sample were sent to the SRNL analytical services groups for radionuclides, elementals, anions and total mercury analysis by various methods including radiochemical separations/counting methods, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and special preparations. All sample analyses were performed in triplicate. This report presents the analytical characterization results for the Tank 9H annulus sample. The results are also reported where analytical methods yielded additional analytes, other than those requested by SRMC. In the characterization of the Tank 9H annulus sample, the detection limits for all the analytes, as specified in the Technical Task Request (TTR) and Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP), were met.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

FY23 Update: Aerosol Sampling for the Canister Deposition Field Demonstration

This report describes the results of preliminary testing of aerosol monitoring equipment that will be used to continuously monitor the aerosol source term for the multi-year Canister Deposition Field Demonstration (CDFD). These data are required inputs for the development and validation of models for the deposition of dust and potentially corrosive salts on the surface of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) dry storage canisters. Surface salt loads correlate with the extent of corrosion damage on a metal surface, and potentially to the likelihood and timing of initiation of stress corrosion cracks. Aerosols will be monitored at the CDFD site using three instruments. A Dekati ® ELPI+ cascade impactor will be used for real-time monitoring of aerosol particle sizes. It will also collect dust in 14 size bins on impactor targets that can be chemically analyzed to determine the soluble salts present as a function of particle size. However, this instrument can only measure dried aerosols, with a diameter of <10 µm. The second instrument is a Topas laser particle size spectrometer, which provides real-time monitoring of aerosol particle sizes up to ~40 µm in size. It monitors both the ambient (potentially deliquesced) aerosol particle size distributions required for the dust deposition models and the distributions of the equivalent dried particles, allowing correlation with the Dekati ® data. However, it does not discriminate between inert dust particles and salt aerosols, and it does not retain samples of the different particle sizes for later analysis. The third instrument that will monitor aerosols at the CDFD site is a Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) tower, which uses a multiple canister system to collect weekly samples for analysis to total suspended aerosol particle compositions and atmospheric gas concentrations. This status report describes work in FY23 to develop the capabilities for using these tools. In two training exercises, the cascade impactor and laser particle sizer were deployed in two different testing environments, one indoor and one outdoor. For the cascade impactor, the tests provided opportunities for the operators to familiarize themselves with impactor substrate preparation, and post-test sample removal and analysis. For the laser particle sizer, the tests were used to evaluate different instrument parameters, to determine the most appropriate settings for capturing transient events. Data and samples were collected for weeks to months for each test, and the results are presented here. In addition to the preliminary testing, contracts were developed with WSP Analytical Labs for sample preparation and analysis of the cascade impactor samples. The impactor tower from outdoor test was delivered to WSP and used to train the staff there in disassembly, sample extraction, sample analysis, and tower reassembly with new target substrates. These are tasks that WSP will be performing routinely for the CDFD project. The CASTNET system cannot be purchased or tested until an actual site has been selected for the CDFD test. Work for this FY has been restricted to preparation of contracts for purchasing the CASTNET tower, and for sample analysis, once the tower is in operation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Identifying Challenges in Safeguards for Metallic Fuel Fabrication Facilities

As new advanced reactors gain popularity, there is an increasing interest in metallic fuel fabrication for fast reactors. While metallic fuels themselves are not a new idea, as many of the first reactors employed metallic fuels, new designs, compositions, and fabrication methods are appearing throughout the nuclear community. As the interest grows and facilities are constructed, both domestic and international safeguards will need to be heavily involved to support safeguards-by-design (SBD) measures from the start. This work compiles a review of historical and modern fuel types and fabrication methods, fabrication processes, safeguards gaps, and potential safeguards solutions. Metallic nuclear fuel types have been around for many decades and were included in some of the first reactors including the Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR)-I and -II, the Fermi 1 reactor, the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR), and the Dounreay Fast Reactor (DFR). These reactors used various compositions including pure uranium (U) metal, U-zirconium (Zr) alloys, plutonium (Pu)-aluminum (Al) alloys, U-fissium (Fs) alloys, U-Pu-Zr alloys, and U-molybdenum (Mo) alloys [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. These small alloying additions are included to improve the material properties of the pure U metal. The alpha-phase U (stable below 661C) suffers elongation in one direction causing grain boundary cracking and increasing creep rate due to irradiation growth, thermal cycling, and preferential crystal orientation. It is ideal to utilize the gamma-phase U (typically stable above 769C) by adding small amounts of alloying elements such as Zr or Mo to stabilize this phase down to room temperature [3]. Additionally, some research has been focused on U with transuranic (TRU) elements present, typically coming from the used fuel recycling process. Including these elements in fast reactor fuel can aid in the reduction of nuclear waste by burning minor long-lived actinides. However, the additions of TRU elements can cause concerns to arise when trying to fabrication or safeguard metallic fuels. A typical metallic fuel element is shown in Figure 1. Sodium is added into the cladding to create a thermal bond between the fuel slug and cladding wall. The fuel slug is then inserted and the end plug is welded on to the top of the fuel element. A gas plenum is left to create a headspace for gaseous fission products to escape rather than continue to build in the fuel itself [1, 5]. Other fuel element geometries exist as well, such as the Lightbridge twisted cruciform geometry shown in Figure 2 [6]. This design allows for better cooling performance and provides room for fuel rod swelling without impacting the fuel rod diameter. There are many different fabrication methods for metallic fuels, which is one of the many benefits of these fuel types. Many of these fabrication methods are relatively easy and cost-efficient. The most popular fabrication method is injection casting, sometimes called vacuum induction melting (VIM), shown in Figure 3 [4, 8, 9, 7, 10]. This method was largely used for EBR-II fuel fabrication. The injection casting system is contained inside of a vessel consisting of a Y2O3-coated graphite crucible surrounded by an induction coil with ZrO2-coated quartz molds suspended above the crucible. The fuel feedstock is placed inside of the graphite crucible and melted using the induction furnace. The induction furnace utilizes a dual frequency with the high frequency melting the feedstock and the low frequency causing stirring of the melted feedstock to form a homogeneous mixture. The mixture is heated to approximately 1600C in an argon environment. The vessel is evacuated and then the quartz molds are lowered into the graphite crucible containing the molten metal and the vessel is repressurized to inject the metal fuel upwards into the molds. The molds are removed and then shattered to release the fuel slugs. This fabrication method was used to fabricate 39,000 metallic fuel pins for EBR-II. While injection casting has been the most common metallic fuel fabrication method throughout the decades, many other methods have been explored including low-pressure gravity casting, microwave casting, continuous casting, centrifugal casting, coextrusion, and many others [11, 12, 8, 13, 14, 15]. Some of these methods aim to mitigate challenges that arise with americium (Am) volatilization during the casting process for TRU-containing fuel feedstocks, an issue with injection casting. Coextrusion is one of the methods explored at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and has been utilized for the initial fabrication tests of Lightbridge's unique fuels, as well as other metallic fuels with cladding coextruded. In this process, large billets are formed and machined and then inserted into a molten salt bath for approximately 30 minutes. The billets are then loaded into the extrusion press and extruded. This process can be seen in Figure 4 [15].

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Use of Groundwater Flow, Solute Transport, and Geochemical Modeling To Evaluate Long-Term Nitrate Plume Concentrations Following Phreatophyte Source Control - 17262

The Monument Valley, Arizona, Processing Site is a former uranium mill site within the Navajo Nation in northeastern Arizona. Milling activities between 1955 and 1968 resulted in contamination of groundwater in the shallow alluvium at the site. Remedial action was completed under Title I of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. Site remediation activities between 1992 and 1994 removed surficial source material and other site-related contamination, but contamination of deeper soil, primarily by nitrate, remained between the excavation depth and the water table. Residual nitrate in these soils, from uranium ore processing at the mill, has continued to be a source of groundwater contamination. To evaluate the potential for native phreatophytes to control remaining source material, four-wing salt-bush and black grease-wood were planted in 2000 and 2005 within the footprints of the former tailings piles. The objectives of the plantings were to increase nitrate removal from soil water through root uptake and, because phreatophyte water usage is expected to equal or exceed annual precipitation, to halt nitrate loading to groundwater. Recent evaluation showed more than an 80% decrease in soil nitrate concentrations and no effective groundwater recharge in the planting area. Numerical groundwater flow, solute transport, and geochemical modeling were performed to evaluate the long-term response of the existing nitrate plume to the phreatophyte source control measures. This modeling will help determine if 100-year natural flushing is a viable compliance strategy for the nitrate plume. Results showed that nitrate concentrations in the alluvial aquifer are expected to drop below the standard of 10 mg/L as N in approximately 70 years as a result of the phreatophyte planting. Companion sensitivity analysis was also performed to better understand how uncertainty in groundwater flow model and solute transport model inputs would impact cleanup times. Even considering input uncertainty, nitrate concentrations are expected to reach the standard in the alluvial aquifer within 100 years. Recognizing that model predictions are not absolute, but represent the general potential for an event to occur, the model was used to identify key sampling locations to verify that the nitrate plume will attenuate as predicted. This evaluation identified locations that can be used to assess the viability of the modeling predictions within the next 50 years. If the source diminishes or no longer exists, modeling predicts that concentrations of nitrate and ammonium in these wells should show significant declines over the next 10-55 years. If downward concentration trends do not occur as predicted, other remedial strategies may need to be evaluated to meet groundwater standards within the specified 100-year duration. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Hydrogen uptake in graphite matrix at high temperature

Tritium management is a critical challenge for the next generation of nuclear reactors, such as Fluoride Salt Cooled High Temperature Reactors (FHRs) and High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs), due to the higher production rate (up to 10,000 times) than conventional Light Water Reactors (LWRs). Graphitic materials employed as moderator, reflector, and fuel pebbles offer a potential pathway for tritium recovery by serving as a sink for tritium. Prediction of uptake capacity under reactor relevant conditions remains a challenge due to a lack of low partial pressure data and significant inter-grade variability of graphite. This study addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive characterization of hydrogen (as a tritium surrogate) uptake and release behavior in the A3-3 graphite matrix (GM) used in fuel pebbles. Uptake measurements are performed at reactor relevant temperatures of 600- 800 °C, 1-200 Torr hydrogen pressure, and 15-120 min equilibration time, followed by thermal desorption spectroscopy up to 1100 °C. Uptake experiments at different equilibration times demonstrate the role of kinetics in hydrogen uptake, which can be modeled as a diffusion-with-trapping process. In the thermodynamics limit, the Sips adsorption model is shown to capture the uptake in A3-3 GM well. Our campaign provides a set of new results for hydrogen uptake in A3-3, including limiting uptake capacity at 600 °C, apparent diffusion coefficient at 600 °C, and the first estimates of the FHR/HTGR relevant (600 °C, 20 Pa partial pressure) equilibrium uptake capacity and time to saturation. Desorption data highlights a new site for hydrogen uptake, not observed in nuclear graphite, which we attribute to the non-graphitized binder. Using the Kissinger method, we estimate activation energy for release from the desorption peaks, confirming the activation energy for release from the basal planes and providing the first estimate for the activation energy of release from the binder.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

High-resolution Groundwater Investigation at a FUSRAP Site with an Aging Water-supply Infrastructure: Former Harshaw Chemical Company, Ohio - 16146

The Former Harshaw Chemical Company (HCC) Site is located in Cleveland, Ohio, approximately 5 kilometers (km) (3 miles) south of downtown Cleveland, in an industrialized area adjacent to the Cuyahoga River and Big Creek. Developed site parcels include former production areas with legacy buildings, former production area foundations, parking areas associated with previously demolished buildings, and re-developed privately-owned commercial properties. The HCC Site was initially developed 1905 and commercially manufactured chemical solvents, metal salts, fluorides, hydrofluoric acids, and other chemical products. HCC began production activities for the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) in late 1942 in support of the United States' early atomic weapons program. The primary process conducted by the HCC consisted of the refining of uranium oxide to produce several uranium-bearing materials, including uranium hexafluoride (UF{sub 6}), uranium tetrafluoride (UF{sub 4}), and uranium tetrachloride (UCl{sub 4}). The HCC also conducted numerous chemical and radiological research and production activities for the MED and later for the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). Groundwater and soil contamination resulting from these activities is characterized in the site Remedial Investigation Report (USACE 2009) and primarily found near the G-1 process building. A Feasibility Study (USACE 2012) evaluated soil remediation alternatives and their potential impacts to future groundwater conditions. Since there is no groundwater pathway in the assumed industrial future land use, groundwater evaluations are intended to demonstrate that further degradation of groundwater will not occur after potential soil remediation. Total uranium is the primary MED-based groundwater contaminant and was numerically simulated using a site-specific groundwater flow and transport model. Remedial results are judged in terms of no significant impact, significant positive impact (i.e., significantly decreased extent of contamination), or significant negative impact (i.e., significantly increased extent of contamination). A complicating factor in the groundwater simulation and decision-making process for this site is the existence of municipal water-line leakage on and around the site. This aging infrastructure, in conjunction with the generations of modifications, promoted leakage and fresh-water contact with contaminated soils. To optimize the groundwater conceptual site model for numerical model updates, a high-density groundwater well network was installed in conjunction with the demolition of the G-1 building. The results of the detailed groundwater investigation, coincident soil sampling, utility-line termination, municipal water-line repairs, water-level collection, and uranium sampling indicates the groundwater is re-equilibrating and will lead to optimal decisions and site remediation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Non-Neutron Transmutation of Used Nuclear Fuel (Final Report)

The primary goal of this study is to develop a national facility concept for transmuting long-lived fission products (LLFP) to substantially reduce the disposal impact by minimizing the need for a geologic-timescale repository. As a charter for this study, the national transmutation facility was required to reduce the radiotoxicity and decay heat of LLFP isotopes by at least 90% relative to their values at discharge from a commercial LWR, while consuming less than 10% of the reactor's energy. The identified LLFP isotopes are Se-79, Zr-93, Tc-99, I-129, Sn-126, and Cs-135, whose radiotoxicity is about 99% of the total radiotoxicity of all fission products at 1,000 years. Approximately ~72 kg of LLFPs is discharged every year from a 1,000 MWe commercial or advanced nuclear reactor. First, LLFP transmutation options with non-neutron beams (photons and protons) were explored. The study concluded that LLFP transmutation is feasible with high-energy, high-intensity photons or protons, but impractical on an engineering scale due to low transmutation rates and the high energy requirements to produce the desired photon or proton beams. As alternatives, LLFP transmutation options with neutrons from fission, fusion, and spallation reactions were additionally explored. The transmutation options using advanced critical reactors are attractive only for selective LLFP isotopes because the production rates of several LLFP isotopes (Zr-93, Sn-126, and Cs-135) from fission reactions are larger than the transmutation rates. The transmutation options with only spallation neutrons are favorable to transmute all LLFP isotopes, but as a tradeoff, the net transmutation rates are reduced. The national transmutation facility concept was developed following an exploration of transmutation options using various incident particles. The proposed national LLFP transmutation comprises a dedicated molten-salt reactor (MSR), a proton accelerator, and a spallation neutron-based transmuter. The MSR power was set at 300 MWt and 120 MWe, with the thermal power approximately 10% of that of a commercial 1,000 MWe PWR. The electricity generated by the MSR powers the accelerator and transmuter. The accelerator produces 1 GeV, 30 mA protons, which are introduced into the spallation neutron-based transmuter. The spallation neutron-based transmuter consists of a central spallation target and LLFP target pins merged in a heavy water tank. The six LLFP isotopes are separated into two groups. Tc-99, I-129, and Se-79, having larger neutron cross sections, belong to group A, while Zr-93, Sn126, and Cs-135, having smaller neutron cross sections, belong to group B. Then, for effective transmutation, LLFPs in groups A and B are transmuted in the dedicated MSR and in a spallation neutron-based transmuter, respectively. The estimated capital cost of the national transmutation facility is approximately $\$$3.1B, and its annual O&M cost is expected to be ~$\$$182M. Radiotoxicity and decay heat of LLFPs were calculated and compared with those of the original LLFPs. It was assumed that the targets were made with elementwise LLFP rather than isotopic LLFP, owing to the potentially high cost of isotopic separation from used nuclear fuels. The decay heat of LLFPs can be reduced by more than 90% using a single national transmutation facility. However, radiotoxicity decreases by 79–84%, which does not meet the transmutation performance requirement, primarily because Cs-135 is produced rather than depleted. Thus, to meet the design requirement, Cs-135 should be separated from other Cs isotopes and irradiated in a spallation neutron-based transmuter. Then, radiotoxicity decreases by ~92%.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗