Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “AEROELASTICITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2014

Static Aeroelastic Scaling and Analysis of a Sub-Scale Flexible Wing Wind Tunnel Model

This paper presents an approach to the development of a scaled wind tunnel model for static aeroelastic similarity with a full-scale wing model. The full-scale aircraft model is based on the NASA Generic Transport Model (GTM) with flexible wing structures referred to as the Elastically Shaped Aircraft Concept (ESAC). The baseline stiffness of the ESAC wing represents a conventionally stiff wing model. Static aeroelastic scaling is conducted on the stiff wing configuration to develop the wind tunnel model, but additional tailoring is also conducted such that the wind tunnel model achieves a 10% wing tip deflection at the wind tunnel test condition. An aeroelastic scaling procedure and analysis is conducted, and a sub-scale flexible wind tunnel model based on the full-scale's undeformed jig-shape is developed. Optimization of the flexible wind tunnel model's undeflected twist along the span, or pre-twist or wash-out, is then conducted for the design test condition. The resulting wind tunnel model is an aeroelastic model designed for the wind tunnel test condition.

Aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRS2015

Aeroelastic Airworthiness Assesment of the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge Flaps

The Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE) demonstrator is a joint task under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project in partnership with the Air Force Research Laboratory and FlexSys, Inc. (Ann Arbor, Michigan). The project goal is to develop advanced technologies that enable environmentally friendly aircraft, such as adaptive compliant technologies. The ACTE demonstrator flight-test program encompassed replacing the Fowler flaps on the SubsoniC Aircraft Testbed, a modified Gulfstream III (Gulfstream Aerospace, Savannah, Georgia) aircraft, with control surfaces developed by FlexSys. The control surfaces developed by FlexSys are a pair of uniquely-designed unconventional flaps to be used as lifting surfaces during flight-testing to validate their structural effectiveness. The unconventional flaps required a multidisciplinary airworthiness assessment to prove they could withstand the prescribed flight envelope. Several challenges were posed due to the large deflections experienced by the structure, requiring non-linear analysis methods. The aeroelastic assessment necessitated both conventional and extensive testing and analysis methods. A series of ground vibration tests (GVTs) were conducted to provide modal characteristics to validate and update finite element models (FEMs) used for the flutter analyses for a subset of the various flight configurations. Numerous FEMs were developed using data from FlexSys and the ground tests. The flap FEMs were then attached to the aircraft model to generate a combined FEM that could be analyzed for aeroelastic instabilities. The aeroelastic analysis results showed the combined system of aircraft and flaps were predicted to have the required flutter margin to successfully demonstrate the adaptive compliant technology. This paper documents the details of the aeroelastic airworthiness assessment described, including the ground testing and analyses, and subsequent flight-testing performed on the unconventional ACTE flaps.

aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRS2015

Development of Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap for Performance Adaptive Aeroelastic Wing

This paper summarizes the recent development of an adaptive aeroelastic wing shaping control technology called variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF). As wing flexibility increases, aeroelastic interactions with aerodynamic forces and moments become an increasingly important consideration in aircraft design and aerodynamic performance. Furthermore, aeroelastic interactions with flight dynamics can result in issues with vehicle stability and control. The initial VCCTEF concept was developed in 2010 by NASA under a NASA Innovation Fund study entitled "Elastically Shaped Future Air Vehicle Concept," which showed that highly flexible wing aerodynamic surfaces can be elastically shaped in-flight by active control of wing twist and bending deflection in order to optimize the spanwise lift distribution for drag reduction. A collaboration between NASA and Boeing Research & Technology was subsequently funded by NASA from 2012 to 2014 to further develop the VCCTEF concept. This paper summarizes some of the key research areas conducted by NASA during the collaboration with Boeing Research and Technology. These research areas include VCCTEF design concepts, aerodynamic analysis of VCCTEF camber shapes, aerodynamic optimization of lift distribution for drag minimization, wind tunnel test results for cruise and high-lift configurations, flutter analysis and suppression control of flexible wing aircraft, and multi-objective flight control for adaptive aeroelastic wing shaping control.

Aircraft↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Modeling and CFD Simulation of Wind-Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling and simulation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind-tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with distributed flaps. A vortex-lattice VSPAERO model of the CRM model is developed. A transonic small disturbance/integral boundary layer correction method is implemented in the VSPAERO model to account for the transonic and viscous flow effects. The structural deformation of the CRM model is calculated using a NASTRAN equivalent beam model. The VSPAERO model is coupled to the NASTRAN equivalent beam model to provide a rapid aero-structural analysis. A validation of the VSPAERO aeroelastic model is conducted by comparing the results to FUN3D CFD aeroelastic simulation results. An aerodynamic database is generated using the developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model for the real-time drag optimization and maneuver load alleviation study of the wind-tunnel scale CRM model.

Aeroelastic Modeling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction

The objective of this work is the development of computational models and analysis of the coupled fluid-structure response of a slat gap filler (SGF) noise treatment applied to the leading-edge-slat component of a high-lift system typical of modern transport aircraft. The representative airframe chosen for this work is NASA’s High-lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) in a baseline high-lift configuration. Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been identified as enabling materials for these structural treatments. Since the technology elements rely upon having a highly reconfigurable structure, designs must be assessed for static aeroelastic deflection as well as dynamic aeroelastic stability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear computational structural dynamics (NL CSD) tools. The technical approach consists of solving for the flow field around the entire vehicle using a global CFD model, followed by extraction of relevant local subdomain data for CFD and NL-CSD co-simulations. The SGF design is assessed using both 2D and 3D co-simulations to predict quasi-static aeroelastic deformations and to assess dynamic aeroelastic stability.

Fluid structure interaction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Analysis of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft

This paper presents an aeroelastic analysis of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing(TTBW) aircraft jig shape using an in-house developed tool based on VSPAERO. A vortex-lattice model of the Mach 0.8 TTBW model is developed, and a transonic and viscous flow correction method is implemented to account for transonic and viscous flow effects. A correction method for the wing-strut interference aerodynamics is developed and applied to the VSPAERO solver. The Galerkin method is used to calculate the geometry deformation under aerodynamic force. The aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO coupled to the mode shapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method provides a rapid aircraft aero-structual analysis. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to verify the results. The aeroelastic simulation results show that the aeroelastic lift coefficient is reduced about0.05∼0.07, drag polar is not affected by aeroelasticity, and the pitching moment is reduced about 30% at Mach0.8 and altitude 40,000 ft.

TTBW Aeroelastic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft using High-Lift Devices and Control Surfaces

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft using the High-lift devices and control surfaces. An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small disturbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to mode shapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method is developed to provide a rapid aircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. Three different flight conditions corresponding to Mach 0.8 are selected for the aeroelastic trim drag optimization at the design and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show that the TTBW aircraft with the optimized deflection of the high-lift devices and control surfaces achieves a drag reduction of about 8.2 counts, 6.5 counts, and 9.7 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.661, 0.695, and 0.729, respectively. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to verify the aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

TTBW↗
NASA NTRS2024

Aeroelastic Stability Assessment Methodology and Application to Slat Noise Treatments on the High-Lift Common Research Model

This work supports a larger effort at NASA to reduce airframe noise and, thus, environmental noise around airports. The leading-edge slat of conventional high-lift systems is a prominent source of airframe noise, and two technologies were previously identified as promising for noise reduction without significant aerodynamic or weight penalty: the slat cove filler (SCF) and the slat gap filler (SGF). NASA fabricated a 10%-scale semispan aircraft model for wind tunnel testing based upon the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). NASA embarked on a test campaign with the 10% CRM-HL to determine the noise reduction effectiveness and other performance metrics of 3D SCF and SGF treatments in flow conditions representative of flight. The highly flexible SCF and SGF treatments posed a risk to the model and aeroelastic instability would compromise research integrity, so aeroelastic stability assessment was required. This work briefly describes the 10% CRM-HL, design of the SCF and SGF treatments to the model, and supporting fluid structure interaction (FSI) research. Relations for static and dynamic aeroelastic similitude are then developed for convenience of reference, and simplifications are introduced of particular utility to the cases considered in this study. The similitude relations are employed to assess the stability of the treatments under wind tunnel flow conditions based upon known behaviors from the supporting research. It is shown that the treatments are safe for test under the anticipated wind tunnel flow conditions with significant margins/factors of safety. It is furthermore demonstrated that the SCF is more susceptible to aeroelastic instability than the SGF, which has implications for flight feasibility.

Similitude↗
NASA NTRS1972

Perspectives in aeroelasticity.

Based on selected topics, the paper is broadly aimed to indicate achievements of the past decade, the state of the art, and trends in aeroelasticity. Topics selected for this end include: brief orientation into the history of the subject, roles of active controls and the concept of aerodynamic energy in load alleviation and in flutter suppression, computerized aeroelastic analysis, aeroelastic effects in stability, aeroelastic optimization, the use of composites, recent applications of lifting surface theory to interfering surfaces and control surfaces, transonic flow considerations, and some problems related to the space shuttle.

Garrick, I. E.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Aeroelastic effects on space shuttle dynamics

A simplified analysis procedure for determining static and dynamic aeroelastic loads for the space shuttle and space shuttle configuration is presented. A computer program, originally developed for the Atlas launch vehicle, was modified for simplifying the turbulence response analysis approach. This approach is compared with a more detailed and time consuming approach to space shuttle response to turbulence which was developed earlier. The simplification in going from interference to lumped aerodynamic data was found to give adequate results for preliminary design aeroelastic analysis. Gust loads were found to be approximately 50% of the maximum static aeroelastic loads. The autopilot became unstable when ten elastic modes were included. Elastic effects were found to be less than 3% in the static aeroelastic analysis.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1972

Perspectives in aeroelasticity

Achievements of the past decade, the state of the art, and trends in aeroelasticity are discussed. Topics selected for this end include: (1) brief orientation into the history of the subject, (2) roles of active controls and the concept of aerodynamic energy in load alleviation and in flutter suppression, (3) computerized aeroelastic analysis, (4) aeroelastic effects in stability, (5) aeroelastic optimization, (6) the use of composites, (7) recent applications of lifting surface theory to interfering surfaces and control surfaces, (8) transonic flow considerations, and (9) some problems related to the space shuttle.

Garrick, I. E.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Effect of modified aerodynamic strip theories on rotor blade aeroelastic stability

Various existing unsteady aerodynamic strip theories which have been developed in the past for both fixed and rotary wing aeroelastic analyses are modified in the paper so as to make them applicable to the coupled flap-lag-torsional aeroelastic problem of a rotor blade in hover. These corrections are primarily due to constant angle of attack, constant inflow and variable free stream velocity due to lead-lag motion. Next, the modified strip theories are incorporated in a coupled flap-lag-torsional aeroelastic analysis of the rotor blade in hover and the sensitivity of the aeroelastic stability boundaries to the aerodynamic assumptions is examined.

Friedmann, P.↗
NASA NTRS1977

The effects of flow separation on shuttle dynamics and aeroelastic stability

The effects of flow separation on the dynamic and aeroelastic stability of various shuttle configurations have been investigated. Flow separation is shown to affect the aeroelastic stability of the 747/Orbiter yaw modes, the orbiter dynamic stability and possibly the aeroelastic stability of the wing torsional mode, and to dominate both the dynamic and aeroelastic stability of the launch configuration. Limit cycle oscillations of certain launch configuration modes are the result of sudden flow separation. The limit cycle oscillations threaten the structural integrity in two ways: (1) by outright overstressing of the structure due to large modal deflection, (2) by fatigue due to the continued flexing of the structure. Fatigue is a more significant consideration for the reusable (100 flights) shuttle than it has been for previous space boosters.

Reding, J. P.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Recent developments in rotary-wing aeroelasticity

The purpose of this review is to present the research done in rotary-wing aeroelasticity during the past eight years in a unified manner. The following topics are reviewed with considerable detail: (1) recent development in the aeroelastic modeling of the coupled flap-lag-torsional problem in hover (2) effect of unsteady aerodynamics on the coupled flap-lag-torsional aeroelastic problem in hover (3) the coupled flap-lag and the coupled flap-lag-torsional problem in forward flight (4) complete rotor and coupled rotor fuselage aeroelastic problems including both hingeless and teetering rotors.

Friedmann, P.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Aeroelastic Analysis for Rotorcraft

Aeroelastic-analysis computer program incorporates an analytical model of aeroelastic behavior of wide range of rotorcraft. Such an analytical model is desirable for both pretest predictions and posttest correlations. Program can be applied in investigations of isolated rotor aeroelasticity and helicopter-flight dynamics and could be employed as basis for more-extensive investigations or aeroelastic behavior, such as automatic control system design.

Johnson, W.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Comparison of wind tunnel and theoretical aeroelastic predictions with flight measured airloads for the B-1 aircraft

An aeroelastic analysis of the B-1 aircraft was generated using the FLEXSTAB computer program. Relatively simple aerodynamic and structural models were employed. Theoretical wing and horizontal stabilizer airloads were compared to wind tunnel predictions and flight data measured during quasi-steady pitch maneuvers at Mach numbers of 0.85 and 1.2 with the wing in the 67.5 degree full aft sweep position. The basic objective was to evaluate the usefulness of the FLEXSTAB program for pre-flight airloads analysis of large flexible aircraft. Significant aeroelastic increments were noted between rigid and flexible vehicle results. FLEXSTAB predicted airloads for the outer wing panel were in good agreement with measured data for both rigid airloads and elastic increments. FLEXSTAB results for the horizontal stabilizer were useful for defining general aeroelastic trends, but absolute load levels were not well predicted due to theoretical limitations and difficulties encountered in modelling the complex B-1 configuration. Overall, the FLEXSTAB program is viewed as a useful integrated tool for static aeroelastic analysis in support of flight programs.

Sims, R. L.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Response studies of rotors and rotor blades with application to aeroelastic tailoring

Various tools for the aeroelastic stability and response analysis of rotor blades in hover and forward flight were developed and incorporated in a comprehensive package capable of performing aeroelastic tailoring of rotor blades in forward flight. The results indicate that substantial vibration reductions, of order 15-40%, in the vibratory hub shears can be achieved by relatively small modifications of the initial design. Furthermore the optimized blade can be up to 20% lighter than the original design. Accomplishments are reported for the following tasks: (1) finite element modeling of rotary-wing aeroelastic problems in hover and forward flight; (2) development of numerical methods for calculating the aeroelastic response and stability of rotor blades in forward fight; (3) formulation of the helicopter air resonance problem in hover with active controls; and (4) optimum design of rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight.

Friedmann, P. P.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Dynamic structural aeroelastic stability testing of the XV-15 tilt rotor research aircraft

For the past 20 years, a significant effort has been made to understand and predict the structural aeroelastic stability characteristics of the tilt rotor concept. Beginning with the rotor-pylon oscillation of the XV-3 aircraft, the problem was identified and then subjected to a series of theoretical studies, plus model and full-scale wind tunnel tests. From this data base, methods were developed to predict the structural aeroelastic stability characteristics of the XV-15 Tilt Rotor Research Aircraft. The predicted aeroelastic characteristics are examined in light of the major parameters effecting rotor-pylon-wing stability. Flight test techniques used to obtain XV-15 aeroelastic stability are described. Flight test results are summarized and compared to the predicted values. Wind tunnel results are compared to flight test results and correlated with predicted values.

Schroers, L. G.↗