Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Bumper”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Alternative MMOD Shielding Concepts

The main types of meteoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) shields are single-layer “monolithic” shields, dual-wall “Whipple” shields, and multi-wall shields (“Stuffed Whipple” and “multi-shock” are common types). Aluminum alloys are typically used for the outer bumper layer and for the rear wall of the dual- and multi-wall shields, although carbon-composites are increasingly employed in MMOD shields given their low-mass and high-strength. Ceramic (NextelTM) and KevlarTM fabrics are commonly used for the intermediate layers of Stuffed Whipple shields. The NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) group is continuously working to improve NASA spacecraft MMOD shielding by evaluating new materials and shielding concepts by test and analysis. HVIT has performed many hypervelocity impact tests over several years to evaluate alternative MMOD shield materials and concepts. This paper will provide results of this work in the following areas: (1) Material substitutions to improve radiation and MMOD protection within Stuffed Whipple shields, (2) Metallic and ceramic foam bumper and intermediate layer materials, (3) Self-sealing materials. In the first two areas listed above, the candidate shield materials were tested under similar test conditions and with fixed shield standoff and mass. Damage to the rear wall was quantified and compared to determine the best performing shield materials. In the self-sealing material evaluations, the test objective was to gauge the ability of different materials and techniques to stop leaks in a rear wall with a 1-atmosphere (air) delta-pressure across the wall. This paper provides results of the investigations and describes forward work to continue the development of the most promising MMOD shield alternatives. KevlarTM is a trademark of DuPont de Nemours, Inc. NextelTM is a trademark of 3M Corporation Note, Trade names and trademarks are used in this report for identification only. Their usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Hypervelocity↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Updated Numerical Analysis Benchmarks for Meteoroid Relevant Materials

Proposal for update of numerical analysis benchmark for meteoroid relevant materials. - Two recently performed shots are proposed to be numerical analysis benchmarks for numerical simulations of impacts of high-density meteoroids (Al 2 O 3 surrogate) and low-density meteoroids (Nylon surrogate). - A pair of general Whipple shields have been studied: - Bumper and rear walls are the same material and thickness between shields - Separation is 4.5 cm for Al 2 O 3 and 1.5 cm for Nylon - Information gathered includes high speed (1 MHz) shadowgraphs of debris cloud, bumper hole size and rear wall hole area.

Orbital Debris↗
NASA NTRS2023

Orion Artemis I as Flown MMOD Analysis

The Orion spacecraft conducted the Artemis I flight around the Moon from November 16 through December 11, 2022. After the flight, the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Group performed a Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris (MMOD) analysis using the Bumper 3 risk assessment tool to predict the number of small impacts that would likely have occurred during the mission. Separately, the same group inspected the Orion capsule for hypervelocity impact damage features. The results of the inspection were compared to those of the analysis to aid in improving the analysis, including the environment models. The comparison showed that Bumper analysis predictions were generally within one integer value of the damage found, which is considered high accuracy. As this was the first large, non-ablative returned surface from a lunar mission, this effort extends the MMOD community’s insight beyond low Earth orbit into cis-lunar space.

Kevin D Deighton↗
NASA NTRS2023

Orion Artemis I as Flown MMOD Analysis

The Orion spacecraft conducted the Artemis I flight around the Moon from November 16 through December 11, 2022. After the flight, the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Group performed a Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris (MMOD) analysis using the Bumper 3 risk assessment tool to predict the number of small impacts that would likely have occurred during the mission. Separately, the same group inspected the Orion capsule for hypervelocity impact damage features. The results of the inspection were compared to those of the analysis to aid in improving the analysis, including the environment models. The comparison showed that Bumper analysis predictions were generally within one integer value of the damage found, which is considered high accuracy. As this was the first large, non-ablative returned surface from a lunar mission, this effort extends the MMOD community’s insight beyond low Earth orbit into cis-lunar space.

MMOD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Analysis Process for Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System

Introduction: Micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) risk analyses for the Mars Sample Return (MSR) Earth Entry System (EES) have been significantly more rigorous than previously flown missions because of its categorization as a Class V restricted return mission. This means the returned samples present significant concern for biogenic contamination. These analyses seek to determine if a micrometeoroid or orbital debris strike would result in loss of containment assurance and are summarized in the flowchart in Fig. 1. Methodology: The mission is considered in two MMOD phases: a pre-release phase where the EES is protected by a Micrometeoroid Protection System (MMPS) and a post-release phase called “free-flight” where the EES is exposed directly to the MMOD environment. These phases correspond to interplanetary cruise and imminent re-entry, respectively. To inform the MMPS design, a 30-shot high velocity impact testing (HVIT) series on candidate configurations at NASA White Sands Test Facility was completed in the summer of 2022. Sample post-shot images are shown in Fig 2 [1]. These data are used to baseline the MMPS design and to tune the hydrocode simulations. ALE3D, CTH, and SPHC are the hydrocodes that simulate physics of high-speed impacts [2]. Results generated with these populate a penetration depth versus energy space beyond the testable velocity regime of HVIT (~7 km/s). The penetration depth versus energy space data are used to define a critical projectile diameter function called a Ballistic Limit Equation (BLE), where the projectile “criticality” is determined by zone dependent failure criteria defined a-priori [3]. For example, the nose of the heatshield has a failure criterion of 50% TPS penetration, assigned because the landing loads are concentrated on that region and no substructure damage is permitted. The BLEs for each vehicle material zone are input into the BUMPER 3 code, along with the vehicle surface mesh and the corresponding space environment model, to calculate a probability of penetration or number of penetrations. The environment models, MEM3 for MM and ORDEM 3.2 for OD, simulate the meteoroid environment from 0.2 to 2 au based on the Grün flux equation, and the debris environment up to 40,000 km altitude from Earth surface, respectively [4,5]. Presentation Focus: The presentation or poster will present the results to-date focusing on the full risk analysis process flow seen in Fig. 1. Details on the derivation of the failure criteria will be discussed, along with HVIT results and how these influenced the MMPS configuration baseline decision. Further, results of hydrocode simulations will be presented and the tuning to HVIT outputs will be described. Finally, the strategies that direct the BLE formulation will be reviewed, specifically, for the EES elements that are most exposed to the MMOD environment.

mmod↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multi-objective automatic discovery of optimized metamaterials for varying velocity impact protection

Mechanical metamaterials have demonstrated exceptional impact performance while remaining lightweight. Impact resistance has traditionally been investigated using quasi-static simulations, often with the assumption that performance will translate to high-velocity impact scenarios. However, critical crash protection parameters—such as peak stress and absorbed energy—are highly sensitive to impact velocity, leading to inconsistent performance under dynamic loading. To address this, we introduce a strain-rate-aware, active deep learning framework that enables multi-objective optimization of impact protection metrics across a wide range of impact velocities. Our framework captures the strain-rate sensitivity of architected lattices by learning to control spatial gradation in cellular metamaterials, resulting in over 200 % enhancement in impact protection relative to state-of-the-art designs such as Voronoi and re-entrant lattices. We demonstrate its practical utility by designing next-generation lattice structures for automotive bumper systems that satisfy multiple, velocity-specific safety criteria—capabilities beyond those of conventional designs. More than just a predictive tool, this framework marks the first step towards enabling adaptable impact-resistant structures across dynamic regimes.

Deep learning↗
DOE OSTI2020

The energy footprint of automotive electronic sensors

We discuss how Information and communication technologies (ICT) have emerged as one of the leading technologies to reduce global emissions, particularly in the mobility sector. Automotive electronics, such as sensors/actuators and microcontrollers (commonly known as electronic control units (ECU) which control one or more of the electrical systems or subsystems in a vehicle), play a key role in ICT. Sensors/actuators are key in electronic ICT devices, starting with the data collection and data communication with the internet. The latest two big trends of electrification and automation in vehicles, are projected to increase the use of worldwide automotive sensors from 7.5 billion units in 2017 to 11.0 billion units by the year 2024. A representative state-of-the art automotive sensor system, (i.e., an ultrasonic backup system), including the ECUs controlling the vehicle electrical systems/subsystems, has been considered to estimate the energy footprint in terms of manufacturing and operational energy of global automotive sensors use. A widely used life cycle energy assessment method (i.e., cumulative energy demand) was used as both direct and indirect (including the extraction, manufacturing, and disposal of the raw and auxiliary materials) energy use can be considered for the energy footprint estimation. The embodied manufacturing energy impacts of the system was estimated to be 559 MJ/system, compared to the 417 MJ/system for lifetime system power and additional gasoline use. The share of purchased energy to the embodied energy where the upstream energy isn't included in the former case, is less than 10% and ~ 85% for the component manufacturing and vehicle operation energy uses, respectively. As the purpose of this ultrasonic backup system is to prevent rear crashes, an estimated 1.0 MJ/system is avoided from reduced lifetime vehicular repairs (from an estimated 11% chance of requiring a rear bumper replacement). While all of this is small compared to the overall automotive manufacturing and use energy, the 11 billion automotive sensors expected to be produced in 2024 could require 1540 PJ for manufacturing and those sensors would require an additional 780–1150 PJ for lifetime energy use.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2024

High Velocity Joining of Multi-material Stacks Containing 3rd Generation Advanced High-Strength Stainless Steel and Aluminum Extrusion and Casting (Abstract)

Advanced lightweight materials, including multi-phase steels, aluminum extrusions and aluminum castings, have increasingly replaced mild steel to meet original equipment manufacturer (OEM) demand for increased fuel economy and crash-safety requirements. Third Generation (Gen 3) AHSS provides a superior combination of strength and ductility for crash energy management components in the vehicle body-in-white (BIW). Aluminum extrusions are widely used for bumper, door rocker panel, cradle and battery frame applications. Aluminum castings are increasingly being used in electric vehicles to provide part consolidation, weight saving and increased driving range. Rocker panels are, for example, an important component of the battery electric vehicle (BEV) body structure. The rocker panel serves several purposes, including structural support, crash resistance, protection for the vehicle's underbody and battery tray, and contributing to the overall aesthetics. In order to reduce weight, rocker panels are usually constructed using outer panels consisting of 3rd generation advanced high strength steels (AHSS) and an inner multicell aluminum extrusion structure for energy absorption which protects the batteries in a crash event. It is well known, however, that these material combinations provide significant challenges for joining and are susceptible to liquid metal embrittlement and loss of strength. The overall goal is to find a solution that addresses these challenges in order to produce multi-material vehicle components with reduced weight and minimal galvanic and recyclability issues. The approach being proposed here is to utilize a novel high velocity (HiVe) riveting and clinching technique recently demonstrated by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to join (2T/3T) sheets of aluminum alloys and steel. This process will not only address the aforementioned challenges but also help significantly reduce the joining cycle time. This work will also demonstrate use of HiVe assemblies to be retrofitted to existing body-shop robots thus having minimal impact to existing body shop operations.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Quantum Fourier Transform with Leakage Control

In circuit QED (cQED) systems, one can manipulate the cavity Fock states to use quantum processing unit (QPU). Since the coherence times of the Fock states are long, qudit based computation can be possible. One of the most basic gate that can be engineered in this cQED platform is the displacement gate, $D(\alpha)$. However, accessible number of qudit-levels is finite. The truncated displacement gate on the qudit is the source of theoretical error above the logical states and needs to be addressed. In this work, we monitor and minimize the leakage in qudit systems that involves displacement gate by introducing so-called `bumper' states and a modified cost function.

Kurkcuoglu, D. [Fermilab] (ORCID:0000000311097074)↗
DOE OSTI2026

Influence of Surface Treatment on the Interfacial and Mechanical Performance of Metal-Insert Overmolded Composites

Structural composites with metal inserts are gaining increasing interest enabling light weight design for energy efficiency, provide insulation, corrosion protection without compromising mechanical integrity. Such over molded metal-polymer composites show strong potential in many automotive and aerospace component parts, e.g. car bumper, chassis, door, brackets, fasteners, etc. Despite several advantages, metal-polymer dissimilar interface remains a weak spot in structural design, requiring further investigation to improve interfacial interlocking. The current work focuses on enhancing the metal-polymer adhesion between stainless steel inserts and polymer matrices (e.g. acrylonitrile butadiene styrene resin (ABS), and polyamide 66 (PA66) through surface treatment via chemical etching and mechanical roughening. In the chemical etching process, metal substrates were treated with aqua regia solution for different time intervals to evaluate surface roughness measured by water contact angle and morphology analysis. For mechanical roughening approach, metal inserts were subjected to blasting for surface abrasion. Treated samples were also functionalized with aminosilane coupling agent which showed successful grafting on the surface measured by water contact angle. Metal inserts with micro level surface roughness through etching exhibited significant 21% improvement in adhesion strength compared to untreated inserts; however, the effect of silane treatment on the interfacial strength was found to be highly matrix dependent.

Saha, Subhabrata [ORNL] (ORCID:000000033966064X)↗
NASA NTRS1972

Study of dense aluminum plasmas

Studies directed toward the development of a computer program describing the penetration of a thin aluminum plate by a quartz sphere are reported. The aluminum simulates a bumper plate for micrometeoroids. The ablation of a rock sphere by penetrating a stack of paper sheets is described, and an equation for losses near the surface of the sphere is derived. The expansions of aluminum plasma sphere with initial energies of 44.45, 20.8, and 7.136 eV are investigated, including shock compression during penetration and adiabatic expansion. The equations of state were derived for aluminum and quartz, as well as one of the Mie-Grunesen type. A technique to determine momentum at the bottom surface of the thin plate, and the energy for hypervelocity separation of fragments of the aluminum plate are also considered.

Todd, F. C.↗