Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Discovery Program”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2015

In-Flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through Survey Science Orbit at Ceres

The Dawn mission, part of NASA's Discovery Program, has as its goal the scientific exploration of the two most massive main-belt objects, Vesta and Ceres. The Dawn spacecraft was launched from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on September 27, 2007 on a Delta-II 7925H- 9.5 (Delta-II Heavy) rocket that placed the 1218-kg spacecraft onto an Earth-escape trajectory. On-board the spacecraft is an ion propulsion system (IPS) developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory which will provide a total delta V of 11 km/s for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta, orbit capture at Vesta, transfer between Vesta science orbits, departure and escape from Vesta, heliocentric transfer to Ceres, orbit capture at Ceres, and transfer between Ceres science orbits. Full-power thrusting from December 2007 through October 2008 was used to successfully target a Mars gravity assist flyby in February 2009 that provided an additional delta V of 2.6 km/s. Deterministic thrusting for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta resumed in June 2009 and concluded with orbit capture at Vesta on July 16, 2011. From July 2011 through September 2012 the IPS was used to transfer to all the different science orbits at Vesta and to escape from Vesta orbit. Cruise for a rendezvous with Ceres began in September 2012 and concluded with the start of the approach to Ceres phase on December 26, 2015, leading to orbit capture on March 6, 2015. Deterministic thrusting continued during approach to place the spacecraft in its first science orbit, called RC3, which was achieved on April 23, 2015. Following science operations at RC3 ion thrusting was resumed for twenty-five days leading to arrival to the next science orbit, called survey orbit, on June 3, 2015. The IPS will be used for all subsequent orbit transfers and trajectory correction maneuvers until completion of the primary mission in approximately June 2016. To date the IPS has been operated for over 46,774 hours, consumed approximately 393 kg of xenon, and provided a delta V of over 10.8 km/s to the spacecraft. The IPS performance characteristics are very close to the expected performance based on analysis and testing performed pre-launch. This paper provides an overview of Dawn's mission objectives and the results of Dawn IPS mission operations through arrival at the second science orbit at Ceres.

Garner, Charles E.↗
NASA NTRS2017

The Kepler Data Processing Handbook: A Field Guide to Prospecting for Habitable Worlds

The Kepler telescope hurtled into orbit in March 2009, initiating NASA's first mission to discover Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars. Kepler simultaneously collected data for approximately 165,000 target stars at a time over its four-year mission, identifying over 4700 planet candidates, over 2300 confirmed or validated planets, and over 2100 eclipsing binaries. While Kepler was designed to discover exoplanets, the long-term, ultrahigh photometric precision measurements it achieved made it a premier observational facility for stellar astrophysics, especially in the field of asteroseismology, and for variable stars, such as RR Lyrae. The Kepler Science Operations Center (SOC) was developed at NASA Ames Research Center to process the data acquired by Kepler from pixel-level calibrations all the way to identifying transiting planet signatures and subjecting them to a suite of diagnostic tests to establish or break confidence in their planetary nature. Detecting small, rocky planets transiting Sun-like stars presents a variety of daunting challenges, including achieving an unprecedented photometric precision of ~20 ppm on 6.5-hour timescales, and supporting the science operations, management, processing, and repeated reprocessing of the accumulating data stream. A newly revised and expanded version of the Kepler Data Processing Handbook (KDPH) has been released to support the legacy archival products. The KDPH details the theory, design and performance of the algorithms supporting each data processing step. This paper presents an overview of the KDPH and features illustrations of several key algorithms in the Kepler Science Data Processing Pipeline. Kepler was selected as the 10th mission of the Discovery Program. Funding for this mission is provided by NASA, Science Mission Directorate.

high performance computing↗
NASA NTRS2018

Sphene Emotional: How Titanite Was Shocked When the Dinosaurs Died

Accessory mineral geochronometers such as zircon, monazite, baddeleyite, and xenotime are increasingly being recognized for their ability to preserve diagnostic microstructural evidence of hypervelocity processes. However, little is known about the response of titanite to shock metamorphism, even though it is a widespread accessory phase and U-Pb geochronometer. Here we report two new mechanical twin modes in titanite within shocked granitoids from the Chicxulub impact structure, Mexico. Titanite grains in the newly acquired International Ocean Discovery Program Site expedition 364 M0077A core preserve multiple sets of polysynthetic twins, most commonly with composition planes (K1), = ~{1̅11}, and shear direction (η1) = <110>, and less commonly with the mode K1 = {130}, η1 = ~<522>. In some grains, {130} deformation bands have formed concurrently with shock twins, indicating dislocation glide with Burgers vector b = [341] can be active at shock conditions. Twinning of titanite in these modes, the presence of planar deformation features in shocked quartz, and lack of diagnostic shock microstructures in zircon in the same samples highlights the utility of titanite as a shock indicator for a shock pressure range between ~12 and ~17 GPa. Given the challenges of identifying ancient impact evidence on Earth and other bodies, microstructural analysis of titanite is here demonstrated to be a new avenue for recognizing impact deformation in materials where other impact evidence may be erased, altered, or did not manifest due to low shock pressure.

Timms, Nicholas E.↗
NASA NTRS2016

In-Flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through the Low Altitude Mapping Orbit at Ceres

The Dawn mission, part of NASA’s Discovery Program, has as its goal the scientific exploration of the two most massive main-belt objects, Vesta and Ceres. The Dawn spacecraft was launched from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on September 27, 2007 on a Delta-II 7925H- 9.5 (Delta-II Heavy) rocket that placed the 1218-kg spacecraft onto an Earth-escape trajectory. On-board the spacecraft is an ion propulsion system (IPS) developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta, orbit capture at Vesta, transfer between Vesta science orbits, departure and escape from Vesta, heliocentric transfer to Ceres, orbit capture at Ceres, transfer between Ceres science orbits, and orbit maintenance maneuvers. Full-power thrusting from December 2007 through October 2008 was used to successfully target a Mars gravity assist flyby in February 2009 that provided an additional ΔV of 2.6 km/s. Deterministic thrusting for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta resumed in June 2009 and concluded with orbit capture at Vesta on July 16, 2011. From July 2011 through September 2012 the IPS was used to transfer to all the different science orbits at Vesta and to escape from Vesta orbit. Cruise for a rendezvous with Ceres began in August 2012 and completed in late December 2014. From December 2014 through June 2016 the IPS was used for transiting the spacecraft to the Approach phase, survey orbit, the high altitude mapping orbit (HAMO), and the low altitude mapping orbit (LAMO) with arrival to LAMO on December 13, 2015, almost eight years after the start of deterministic thrusting to Vesta. The LAMO orbit, at a mean altitude above Ceres of approximately 385 km, is the spacecraft’s final destination and there are no plans to move the spacecraft from LAMO once science operations there are completed. Since arrival at LAMO Dawn’s IPS has been used for occasional orbit maintenance maneuvers while the spacecraft performs scientific investigations. Dawn has successfully completed its science goals and Dawn’s primary mission is scheduled to end June 30, 2016. To date the IPS has been operated for approximately 48,458 hours, consumed approximately 401 kg of xenon, and provided a delta-V of over 11.0 km/s, a record for an on-board propulsion system. The IPS performance characteristics are close to the expected performance based on analysis and testing performed pre-launch. Dawn’s IPS continues to be fully operational as of June 2016. This paper provides an overview of Dawn’s mission objectives and the results of Dawn IPS mission operations from Survey orbit through the completion of Dawn’s primary mission.

Garner, Charles E.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Orbit Transfers for Dawn's Ceres Operations: Navigation and Mission Design Experience at a Dwarf Planet

Dawn, a mission belonging to NASA’s Discovery Program, was launched on September 27, 2007 to explore two objects in the main asteroid belt in order to yield insights into important questions about the formation and evolution of the solar system. Successfully completing all mission objectives at Vesta, Dawn arrived at dwarf planet Ceres in March 2015 and continued its journey to a series of four near circular polar science orbits. Dawn became the first mission to orbit around two extraterrestrial targets; such a mission would have been impossible without the low thrust ion propulsion system (IPS). Maneuvering a spacecraft using only the IPS for the transfers between the mapping orbits posed many technical challenges to Dawn’s flight team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Failure of the second reaction wheel assembly, shortly before leaving Vesta, added another challenge for Dawn’s flight team. This paper discusses the mission design and navigational experience and challenges during Dawn’s Ceres operations.

Han, Dongsuk↗
NASA NTRS2016

In-flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through the Low Altitude Mapping Orbit at Ceres

The Dawn mission, part of NASA’s Discovery Program, has as its goal the scientific exploration of the two most massive main-belt objects, Vesta and Ceres. The Dawn spacecraft was launched from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on September 27, 2007 on a Delta-II 7925H- 9.5 (Delta-II Heavy) rocket that placed the 1218-kg spacecraft onto an Earth-escape trajectory. On-board the spacecraft is an ion propulsion system (IPS) developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta, orbit capture at Vesta, transfer between Vesta science orbits, departure and escape from Vesta, heliocentric transfer to Ceres, orbit capture at Ceres, transfer between Ceres science orbits, and orbit maintenance maneuvers. Full-power thrusting from December 2007 through October 2008 was used to successfully target a Mars gravity assist flyby in February 2009 that provided an additional ΔV of 2.6 km/s. Deterministic thrusting for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta resumed in June 2009 and concluded with orbit capture at Vesta on July 16, 2011. From July 2011 through September 2012 the IPS was used to transfer to all the different science orbits at Vesta and to escape from Vesta orbit. Cruise for a rendezvous with Ceres began in August 2012 and completed in late December 2014. From December 2014 through June 2016 the IPS was used for transiting the spacecraft to the Approach phase, survey orbit, the high altitude mapping orbit (HAMO), and the low altitude mapping orbit )LAMO) with arrival to LAMO on December 13, 2015, almost eight years after the start of deterministic thrusting to Vesta. The LAMO orbit, at a mean altitude above Ceres of approximately 385 km, is the spacecraft’s final destination and there are no plans to move the spacecraft from LAMO once science operations there are completed. Since arrival at LAMO Dawn’s IPS has been used for occasional orbit maintenance maneuvers while the spacecraft performs scientific investigations. Dawn has successfully completed its science goals and Dawn’s primary mission is scheduled to end in the summer of 2016. To date the IPS has been operated for over 48,454 hours, consumed approximately 401 kg of xenon, and provided a delta-V of over 11.0 km/s, a record for an on-board propulsion system. The IPS performance characteristics are close to the expected performance based on analysis and testing performed pre-launch. Dawn’s IPS continues to be fully operational as of June 2016. This paper provides an overview of Dawn’s mission objectives and the results of Dawn IPS mission operations from Survey orbit through June 2016.

Garner, Charles E.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Final Mission and Navigation Design for the 2016 Mars InSight Mission

Project Overview: NASA’s 12th Discovery Program mission that will place a single geophysical lander on Mars to study its deep interior using seismic (tidal, marsquake, and impact), rotational, and thermal measurements -First mission to unveil the composition, structure and thermal state of martian crust, mantle and core; Rebuild of the Phoenix flight system, upgraded with Juno/GRAIL avionics -Phoenix cruise stage: 3-axis stabilized, 3.2 square meter UTJ (Ultra Triple-Junction) solar array, X-band telecom -Phoenix aeroshell (heat shield, backshell, parachute) -Phoenix lander: radar, pulsed thrusters, legs, payload deck, 5.1 square meter UTJ solar arrays, two redundant Li-ion batteries, UHF (Ultra High Frequency)/X-band telecom -Dual string: Internally or functionally-redundant equipment; Science Payload -SEIS (Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure) / CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales); Three-axis seismometry, to measure seismic waves traveling through the interior -HP3 (Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe) / DLR (German Aerospace Center) -Subsurface heat probe, to measure the heat flux from the interior - RISE (Rotation and Interior Structure Experiment) / JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) -Radiometric geodesy, to determine precession & nutation of the planet’s rotation axis. 2016 Disclaimer: The InSight launch in 2016 was suspended due to critical issues with the Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) instrument that could not be fixed prior to the planned launch period. This presentation and its corresponding paper represent the state of the design for the 2016 mission. No attempt has been made to reflect the latest developments. [2018 Note: InSight (Mars Lander) was later launched and arrived on Mars on Nov. 26, 2018.]

Abilleira, F.↗
NASA NTRS2020

We Should Search for Life in Mars N. Polar Ground Ice

The 2008 Phoenix Mars lander mission sampled ground ice at 68°N latitude. Mission results, considered along with climate modeling studies, suggest that the site is habitable for life during high obliquity periods. The Icebreaker mission has been proposed to the NASA Discovery program to search for biosignatures produced during habitable periods. This paper explores its rationale and approach.

Stoker, C. R.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Earth return maneuver strategies for Genesis and Stardust

As part of NASA's Discovery Program, Genesis and Stardust will be the first missions since the Apollo Program to return samples collected in deep space. To constrain costs of recovery, entry requirements must be much tighter than those imposed on Apollo. Spacecraft designs were also greatly simplified to limit costs, giving rise to a variety of operational limitations and constraints. In light of these considerations, approach to Earth presents a challenge in terms of both mission planning and navigation. This paper discusses strategies for trajectory correction during the Earth return phases of both missions.

Williams, Kenneth E.↗
NASA NTRS1997

Stardust Mission Design

STARDUST is the fourth mission in a series from the NASA Discovery Program. It is a sample return mission, primarily aimed at returning comet coma samples to Earth for extensive laboratory analysis.

Stardust↗
NASA NTRS2018

How Do You Go From a Concept Idea to a NASA Selected Mission? Formulating the Psyche Discovery Mission with JPL's Concurrent Engineering Teams

JPL’s Office of Formulation provides continuity of support and access to domain subject matter experts, as Principal Investigators mature their mission concepts from “cocktail napkin” ideas to Preliminary Design Reviews [1]. Using NASA’s Psyche mission as a case study, we describe JPL’s concurrent engineering A-Team and Team X support to the Psyche competed concept study team in the areas of 1) Initial Feasibility, 2) Trade Space Exploration, 3) Spacecraft Point Design and Cost Estimate, 4) Science, Technical, Management, and Cost Review, and 5) Strategy and Communication Development. NASA’s Psyche Discovery-class mission started as a grassroots idea from Principal Investigator L.T. ElkinsTanton. Is there a compelling Discovery mission to visit the interior of a body for the first time, by sending a mission to an iron metal asteroid? In less than five years the Psyche concept was selected as a mission under NASA’s Discovery Program. While Psyche had a dedicated concept development team [2], they utilized JPL’s concurrent engineering teams, methods, analysis tools, and subject matter experts throughout their mission concept formulation lifecycle

Ziemer, John↗
NASA NTRS2018

In-Flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through Completion of the Final Orbit Around Dwarf Planet Ceres

The Dawn mission, part of NASA’s Discovery Program, has as its goal the scientific exploration of the two most massive main-belt objects, Vesta and Ceres. The Dawn spacecraft was launched from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on September 27, 2007 on a Delta-II 7925H- 9.5 (Delta-II Heavy) rocket that placed the 1218-kg spacecraft onto an Earth-escape trajectory. On-board the spacecraft is an ion propulsion system (IPS) developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta, orbit capture at Vesta, transfer between Vesta science orbits, departure and escape from Vesta, heliocentric transfer to Ceres, orbit capture at Ceres, transfer between Ceres science orbits, and orbit maintenance maneuvers. Full-power thrusting from December 2007 through October 2008 was used to successfully target a Mars gravity assist flyby in February 2009 that provided an additional DV of 2.6 km/s. Deterministic thrusting for the heliocentric transfer to Vesta resumed in June 2009 and concluded with orbit capture at Vesta on July 16, 2011. From July 2011 through September 2012 the IPS was used to transfer to all the different science orbits at Vesta and to escape from Vesta orbit. Cruise for a rendezvous with Ceres began in August 2012 and completed in late December 2014. From December 2014 through June 2016 the IPS was used for transiting the spacecraft to all science orbits at Ceres including the final orbit for Dawn’s primary mission, called the low altitude mapping orbit (LAMO), a circular orbit at a mean altitude above Ceres of approximately 385 km. Dawn met or exceeded all pre-launch science requirements and Dawn's prime mission concluded on June 30, 2016. Dawn subsequently received NASA approval for two extended missions at Ceres, called XM1 and XM2. During XM1 IPS was used for orbit maintenance and to transit the spacecraft to several new, higher-altitude science orbits, ending in an elliptical orbit at a maximum altitude of approximately 38,000 km. In XM2, IPS operations included transiting the Dawn spacecraft to its final, highly elliptical orbit at Ceres ranging from 35 km perigee to 4,800 km apogee. Science data acquisition will continue in XM2 until the hydrazine is exhausted, which is expected to occur between August and October 2018. Dawn has successfully completed all science goals for both the primary and XM1 extended missions. To date the IPS has been operated for approximately 51,250 hours, consumed approximately 416 kg of xenon, and provided a delta-V of almost 11.5 km/s, a record for an on-board propulsion system. The IPS performance characteristics are close to the expected performance based on analysis and testing performed pre-launch. Dawn’s IPS continues to be fully operational as of June 2018. This paper provides an overview of Dawn’s mission objectives and the results of Dawn IPS mission operations for XM1, and XM2 through June 2018.

Rayman, Marc D.↗
NASA NTRS2018

How Do You Go From a Concept Idea to a NASA Selected Mission? Formulating the Psyche Discovery Mission with JPL's Concurrent Engineering Teams

JPL’s Office of Formulation provides continuity of support and access to domain subject matter experts, as Principal Investigators mature their mission concepts from “cocktail napkin” ideas to Preliminary Design Reviews [1]. Using NASA’s Psyche mission as a case study, we will describe JPL’s concurrent engineering ATeam and Team X support to the Psyche competed concept study team in the areas of 1) Science Feasibility, 2) Trade Space Exploration, 3) Spacecraft Point Design and Cost Estimate, 4) Science, Technical, Management, and Cost Review, and 5) Strategy and Communication Development. NASA’s Psyche Discovery class mission started as a grassroots idea in our A-Team facility, and in less than five years was selected as a mission under NASA’s Discovery Program. While Psyche had a dedicated concept development team [2], they utilized JPL’s concurrent engineering teams, methods, analysis tools, and experts throughout their mission concept lifecycle.

Ziemer, John↗
NASA NTRS2020

Evolution of the Preliminary Fault Management Architecture and Design for the Psyche Mission

The Psyche Mission presents the first opportunity toexplore the largest metal asteroid in the solar system, (16)Psyche, which is believed to be the exposed core of a largerplanetesimal that was stripped of its rocky mantle throughmultiple collisions during early solar system formation. Themission was selected in January 2017 for a 2022 launch as partof NASA’s Discovery Program and is uniquely enabled by theintegration of a Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) Chassisdelivered by Maxar Space Solutions with JPL’s core deepspace avionics, flight software, and fault managementarchitectures. One of the key design tasks is the development ofa fault management system capable of being responsive to theunique elements of the combined JPL and Maxar spacecraftarchitecture. This new design leverages the strengths of eachorganization, with Maxar delivering its well-proven highvoltage power bus and low-thrust electric propulsionsubsystem from its GEO communications satellite product line,and JPL delivering its deep space mission expertise and thehardware and software most critical to deep space missiondesign. The development of a robust low-thrust mission andthe integration of design philosophies and hardware from twoorganizations is not without its challenges though.A key challenge in the development of the Psyche faultmanagement architecture and design is in the integration ofdesign philosophies and hardware from JPL and Maxar. Atthe architecture level, Maxar GEO communications satellitesare developed under the premise of highly responsive groundin the loop for the resolution of anomalies, and theimplementation takes a fail-operational approach to minimizedown time for its customers. In contrast, a deep space missionmust be able to maintain safety with long periods of groundcommunication outage. Additionally, with no time-criticalevents after launch, the Psyche spacecraft will generally failsafe in the presence of anomalous conditions; specialconsideration is being given to this approach, however, tominimize the loss of electric propulsion thrust time, which iscritical to low-thrust missions. At the hardware level, thedetailed definition of interfaces between JPL and Maxarhardware presents a unique challenge in the development andflowdown of fault management requirements, the developmentand implementation of fault monitors and responses, and thedevelopment and verification of fault containment boundaries.This paper describes the evolution of the Psyche faultmanagement architecture and design from the concept studyinto the preliminary design phase, with a focus on the uniquechallenges associated with flying GEO communicationssatellite hardware in deep space, implementing a robust lowthrust mission, and the integration of design philosophies andhardware from JPL and Maxar. Details regarding how thesechallenges are addressed in the fault management design inorder to maximize heritage, leverage the strengths of eachorganization, and minimize risk across the design are alsodiscussed.

Marsh, Danielle↗
NASA NTRS2019

Psyche Early Project Verification & Validation Planning Development

The Psyche mission to the asteroid (16) Psyche was selected as the fourteenth mission in the Discovery program in January 2017. The Psyche mission will determine if (16) Psyche is the core of a larger differentiated body. As part of the development of this mission a Verification and Validation (V&V) engineer was assigned early in the project’s design Phase B. This paper will discuss some of the strategies that the Psyche team is using to take full advantage of the early planning for V&V on flight projects and specifically how the Psyche mission is approaching these tasks. This paper will discuss the effects of having a V&V mindset on: 1) The Psyche requirements development process, and how focusing not only on how the team will verify these requirements but also on developing the tools necessary to track and monitor that verification feeds back into the requirement development process. 2) The Psyche testbed development, and how using a verification mindset is useful for identifying holes in the testbed development process, including the required testbed speed and how to think about testbed certification early in the process while encouraging trades and developing relationships with the testbed team. 3) Developing new V&V Tools for Psyche, and how developing tools early in the project development process means that they can influence the development of other requirement and scheduling tools. 4) Verification Activity Planning, which is typically done to a preliminary level during Phase B of the project, and is important for understanding the major testing that is needed to ensure that the system as built represents the design. On Psyche we are not only focused on bringing this planning to a preliminary level, we are also developing a V&V focused schedule to help us de-conflict V&V activities that may require similar resources early on in the program’s development. 5) Validation Planning, for which we are working with the testbed and model development teams to ensure that their models can be effectively validated and that the plans to do so are in place. In this paper we will describe how the Psyche mission is approaching each of these V&V areas and identify lessons that can be taken by other space missions trying to decide how much effort should be put into V&V early in the project lifecycle.

Solish, Benjamin↗