Results for “Discrimination Learning” — Page 6

NASA NTRS2017

Parameter Validation for Evaluation of Spaceflight Hardware Reusability

Within recent years, there has been an influx of companies around the world pursuing reusable systems for space flight. Much like NASA, many of these new entrants are learning that reusable systems are complex and difficult to acheive. For instance, in its first attempts to retrieve spaceflight hardware for future reuse, SpaceX unsuccessfully tried to land on a barge at sea, resulting in a crash-landing. As this new generation of launch developers continues to develop concepts for reusable systems, having a systematic approach for determining the most effective systems for reuse is paramount. Three factors that influence the effective implementation of reusability are cost, operability and reliability. Therefore, a method that integrates these factors into the decision-making process must be utilized to adequately determine whether hardware used in space flight should be reused or discarded. Previous research has identified seven features that contribute to the successful implementation of reusability for space flight applications, defined reusability for space flight applications, highlighted the importance of reusability, and presented areas that hinder successful implementation of reusability. The next step is to ensure that the list of reusability parameters previously identified is comprehensive, and any duplication is either removed or consolidated. The characteristics to judge the seven features as good indicators for successful reuse are identified and then assessed using multiattribute decision making. Next, discriminators in the form of metrics or descriptors are assigned to each parameter. This paper explains the approach used to evaluate these parameters, define the Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) for reusability, and quantify these parameters. Using the MOEs, each parameter is assessed for its contribution to the reusability of the hardware. Potential data sources needed to validate the approach will be identified.

Childress-Thompson, Rhonda↗

NASA NTRS2017

Parameter Validation for Evaluation of Spaceflight Hardware Reusability

Within recent years, there has been an influx of companies around the world pursuing reusable systems for space flight. Much like NASA, many of these new entrants are learning that reusable systems are complex and difficult to acheive. For instance, in its first attempts to retrieve spaceflight hardware for future reuse, SpaceX unsuccessfully tried to land on a barge at sea, resulting in a crash-landing. As this new generation of launch developers continues to develop concepts for reusable systems, having a systematic approach for determining the most effective systems for reuse is paramount. Three factors that influence the effective implementation of reusability are cost, operability and reliability. Therefore, a method that integrates these factors into the decision-making process must be utilized to adequately determine whether hardware used in space flight should be reused or discarded. Previous research has identified seven features that contribute to the successful implementation of reusability for space flight applications, defined reusability for space flight applications, highlighted the importance of reusability, and presented areas that hinder successful implementation of reusability. The next step is to ensure that the list of reusability parameters previously identified is comprehensive, and any duplication is either removed or consolidated. The characteristics to judge the seven features as good indicators for successful reuse are identified and then assessed using multiattribute decision making. Next, discriminators in the form of metrics or descriptors are assigned to each parameter. This paper explains the approach used to evaluate these parameters, define the Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) for reusability, and quantify these parameters. Using the MOEs, each parameter is assessed for its contribution to the reusability of the hardware. Potential data sources needed to validate the approach will be identified.

Childress-Thompson, Rhonda↗

NASA NTRS1994

Classification of asteroid spectra using a neural network

The 52-color asteroid survey (Bell et al., 1988) together with the 8-color asteroid survey (Zellner et al., 1985) provide a data set of asteroid spectra spanning 0.3-2.5 micrometers. An artificial neural network clusters these asteroid spectra based on their similarity to each other. We have also trained the neural network with a categorization learning output layer in a supervised mode to associate the established clusters with taxonomic classes. Results of our classification agree with Tholen's classification based on the 8-color data alone. When extending the spectral range using the 52-color survey data, we find that some modification of the Tholen classes is indicated to produce a cleaner, self-consistent set of taxonomic classes. After supervised training using our modified classes, the network correctly classifies both the training examples, and additional spectra into the correct class with an average of 90% accuracy. Our classification supports the separation of the K class from the S class, as suggested by Bell et al. (1987), based on the near-infrared spectrum. We define two end-member subclasses which seem to have compositional significance within the S class: the So class, which is olivine-rich and red, and the Sp class, which is pyroxene-rich and less red. The remaining S-class asteroids have intermediate compositions of both olivine and pyroxene and moderately red continua. The network clustering suggests some additional structure within the E-, M-, and P-class asteroids, even in the absence of albedo information, which is the only discriminant between these in the Tholen classification. New relationships are seen between the C class and related G, B, and F classes. However, in both cases, the number of spectra is too small to interpret or determine the significance of these separations.

Howell, E. S.↗

NASA NTRS2001

Influence of Solutocapillary Convection on Macrovoid Defect Formation in Polymeric Membranes

Macrovoids (MVs) are large (10-50 micrometers) pores often found in polymeric membranes prepared via phase-inversion techniques. They are generally considered undesirable, as they adversely affect the permeability properties and performance of polymeric membranes for microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis. However, MVs can be useful in certain thin-film applications in which vapor transmission is necessary, or for use as reservoirs for enzymes or liquid membrane material. If more could be learned about the nature and causes of MV formation, it might be possible to devise techniques to control and/or prevent MV formation that are more effective than those currently employed. Two hypotheses for the MV growth mechanism have been advanced. Reuvers proposed that once initiated, MV growth can be attributed to diffusion of (primarily) solvent to the MV nuclei. Because this mechanism does not involve gross movement of the MV, the presence or absence of body forces such as buoyancy should not significantly affect MV growth. On the other hand, Shojaie et al. proposed that solutocapillary convection induced by a steep surface-tension gradient along the MV/bulk solution interface enhances mass transfer to the growing MV. This interfacial convection exerts a force that pulls the growing MV downward into the casting solution. Both buoyancy and viscous drag hinder MV growth by inhibiting this motion. Thus, removing the buoyancy force by casting in microgravity should augment MV growth according to this hypothesis. Whereas neither surface tension nor gravity has a significant effect on MV growth according to the first hypothesis, buoyancy forces should be important if the second hypothesis is correct. The overall goal of this research is to test these two hypotheses in order to improve our understanding of the MV growth processing solvent-cast polymeric membranes. Studying MV growth in low-gravity conditions is pivotal to our ability to discriminate between these two hypotheses.

Pekny, M. R.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Operational Implications from Field Test Results: Sensorimotor Guidelines for Exploration Missions

Two key sensorimotor objectives of the joint NASA-Russian Field Test (FT) study were (1) to quantify functional performance on long duration crewmembers as close to landing as possible, and (2) to develop a recovery timeline back to preflight baseline. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of the FT results and discuss the operational implications for future exploration missions. The NASA and Russian teams conducted a total of 48 Field Tests, including 18 using a reduced Pilot FT (PFT) protocol. The combined PFT/FT cohort included 14 first-time fliers, 4F, and nine cosmonauts who repeated FT during a second mission. The mission durations were 185 ± 42 days, mean ± std. Nominally, the initial postflight session was performed in the medical test at the Soyuz landing site or at the nearby airport (R+2.2 ± 1.3 hrs, mean ± std), and then repeated multiple times throughout the postflight recovery. The common tasks performed across PFT and full FT protocols included sit-to-stand, recovery from fall (prone to stand) and tandem walk, performed in that order of increasing difficulty. The full FT protocol also included seated tasks (eccentric gaze, dysmetria finger to nose, eye-hand coordination on a tablet, grip force discrimination), a standing posture test with an upper body perturbation, a timed up and go mobility test with obstacles, and a dynamic visual acuity task during vertical oscillations. While there was considerable variability in the postflight outcome measures across crewmembers, the level of vestibular/cerebellar and sensorimotor impairment was greater than previously observed during shorter spaceflight missions. Most striking was the higher incidence of motion sickness even without constraining the standard medical interventions. Motion sensitivity prevented some crewmembers from attempting and/or completing the early testing. The recovery timeline varied with task complexity, generally taking longer when either the basis of support was limited (e.g., tandem walk) or visual cues were deprived (eyes closed). Based on this evidence, mission planners need to expect a range of response across individuals and tasks following G-transitions. Individual health assessments are recommended along with development of pre-worked, prioritized content and timelines, with the ability to change roles depending on crew readiness. Handholds and balance aids are recommended to help stabilize the crewmembers to perform specific tasks (e.g., touch screen selection) or to allow the crewmember the ability to rest with onset of symptoms. Based on anecdotal reports and performance on computerized dynamic posturography, multiple testing on landing day appeared to be beneficial for some participants, while others may have pushed beyond their motion tolerance limit in an effort to complete more FT objectives. Instead of delaying planetary surface operations to allow for recovery, our results suggest that early mobility may be important. Early active self-administered retraining, individualized based on the level of initial impairment and motion sensitivity, will enable a more efficient motor learning and enhance crew performance.

S J Wood↗