Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Gaussian”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Determination of Cross-Sectional Area of Focused Picosecond Gaussian Laser Beam

Measurement of the waist diameter of a focused Gaussian-beam at the 1/e(sup 2) intensity, also referred to as spot size, is key to determining the fluence in laser processing experiments. Spot size measurements are also helpful to calculate the threshold energy and threshold fluence of a given material. This work reports an application of a conventional method, by analyzing single laser ablated spots for different laser pulse energies, to determine the cross-sectional area of a focused Gaussian-beam, which has a nominal pulse width of approx. 10 ps. Polished tungsten was used as the target material, due to its low surface roughness and low ablation threshold, to measure the beam waist diameter. From the ablative spot measurements, the ablation threshold fluence of the tungsten substrate was also calculated.

Ledesma, Rodolfo↗
NASA NTRS2017

Gaussian Mixture Models for Temporal Depth Fusion

Sensing the 3D environment of a moving robot is essential for collision avoidance. Most 3D sensors produce dense depth maps, which are subject to imperfections due to various environmental factors. Temporal fusion of depth maps is crucial to overcome those. Temporal fusion is traditionally done in 3D space with voxel data structures, but it can be approached by temporal fusion in image space, with potential benefits in reduced memory and computational cost for applications like reactive collision avoidance for micro air vehicles. In this paper, we present an efficient Gaussian Mixture Models based depth map fusion approach, introducing an online update scheme for dense representations. The environment is modeled from an ego-centric point of view, where each pixel is represented by a mixture of Gaussian inverse-depth models. Consecutive frames are related to each other by transformations obtained from visual odometry. This approach achieves better accuracy than alternative image space depth map fusion techniques at lower computational cost.

Matthies, Larry↗
NASA NTRS2021

Application of Gaussian Mixture Regression for the Correction of Low Cost PM2.5 Monitoring Data in Accra, Ghana

Low-cost sensors (LCSs) for air quality monitoring have enormous potential to improve air quality data coverage in resource-limited parts of the world such as sub-Saharan Africa. LCSs, however, are affected by environment and source conditions. To establish high-quality data, LCSs must be collocated and calibrated with reference grade PM2.5 monitors. From March 2020, a low-cost PurpleAir PM2.5 monitor was collocated with a Met One Beta Attenuation Monitor 1020 in Accra, Ghana. While previous studies have shown that multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest regression (RF) can improve accuracy and correlation between PurpleAir and reference data, MLR and RF yielded suboptimal improvement in the Accra collocation (R2 = 0.81 and R2 = 0.81, respectively). We present the first application of Gaussian mixture regression (GMR) to air quality data calibration and demonstrate improvement over traditional methods by increasing the collocated PM2.5 correlation and accuracy to R2 = 0.88 and MAE = 2.2 μg/cu. m. Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) are a probability density estimator and clustering method from which nonlinear regressions that tolerate missing inputs can be derived. We find that even when given missing inputs, GMR provides better correlation than MLR and RF performed with complete data. GMR also allows us to estimate calibration certainty. When evaluated, 95% confidence intervals agreed with reference PM2.5 data 96% of the time, suggesting that the model accurately assesses its own confidence. Additionally, clustering within the GMM is consistent with climate characteristics, providing confidence that the calibration approach can learn underlying relationships in data.

Sensors↗
NASA NTRS2025

Direct Numerical Simulation of Flow Past a Gaussian Bump at a High Reynolds Number

We present the results from a direct numerical simulation of a spanwise-periodic turbulent flow past a Gaussian bump. The problem setup is designed to investigate the interaction of an incoming turbulent boundary layer with the strong favorable and adverse pressure gradients generated by the Gaussian bump as the flow passes over it at a Reynolds number of 340000 based on the bump height, or 4 million based on the bump length. The statistical results from the present simulation are compared against our earlier results at a Reynolds number of 2 million. An internal layer, which forms beneath the strongly accelerated boundary layer over the windward side of the bump, is found to generate its near-wall turbulence stress peaks in closer proximity of the wall in the higher Reynolds-number case. Furthermore, the logarithmic layer of the higher Reynolds-number boundary layer appears more resistant to changes induced by strong acceleration and surface curvature effects over the same region. Despite a nearly identical flow separation point in the two flows, the detached shear layer grows at a faster rate and subsequently reattaches at an earlier point in the higher Reynolds-number flow. The surface pressure and skin-friction distributions over the attached flow region compare well against the corresponding experimental data for both flows. However, some differences appear in the separated flow region, which are attributed to the three-dimensionality of the experimental model setup that is not included in the simulation owing to the spanwise periodic assumption. Comparisons with the stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements on the central plane of the experimental model over the windward side of the bump show reasonable overall agreement in the mean velocity components, but the turbulence stress components do not agree well at some streamwise locations. Comparisons over the leeward side of the bump show that the mean separated shear layer in the simulation is tilted significantly more toward the wall than the experimental shear layer on the central plane. This mismatch in the mean shear layer orientation is due to the experimental model three-dimensionality and tunnel end-wall effects, which are not modeled in the present spanwise-periodic simulation.

Favorable and Adverse Pressure Gradients↗
NASA NTRS1997

Some New Twists to Problems Involving the Gaussian Probability Integral

Using an alternate form of the Gaussian probability integral discovered a number of years ago, it is shown that the solution to a number of previously considered communication problems can be simplified and in some cases made more accurate(i.e., exact rather than bounded).

Gaussian Probability Integral↗