Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ICAO”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Automated Collision Avoidance (ACA) and Automated Return to Course (ARTC) Requirement and Guidance Review: Final

This report's objectives were to review regulatory and guidance documents to identify requirements and considerations for the design and operation of automated systems that perform the functions of automated collision avoidance (ACA) and/or automated return to course (ARTC). The importance of this work is twofold: 1) to help focus efforts addressing new automated collision avoidance and return to course systems requirements and considerations, and 2) in pulling together available requirements from multiple sources, generate a master resource for these automated system requirements and considerations. Reviewed documents include regulations, industry standards and research papers that specifically address ACA and ARTC systems, other automatedl control and guidance systems, ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) and Eurocontrol documents.

Automation↗
NASA NTRS2020

Emission Characteristics of an Axially Staged Sector Combustor for a Small Core High OPR Subsonic Aircraft Engine

This paper presents the nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter emissions of a single sector axially staged combustor sector designed and fabricated by United Technologies Research Center (UTRC) in partnership with NASA under a compact low-emissions combustor contract supported by the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) N+3 project. The test was conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center's CE-5 combustion test facility. The facility provided inlet air temperatures up to 922 K and pressures up to 19.0 bar. The combustor design concept, called Axially Controlled Stoichiometry (ACS), was developed by Pratt & Whitney (P&W) under NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) program for an N+2 combustor for use in twin-aisle subsonic aircraft engines. Under the N+3 project the ACS combustor was scaled-down for application to small-core N+3 engines for use in single-aisle aircraft. The results show that the NOx and CO emissions characteristics are similar in both the N+2 and N+3 applications. The non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) emissions trends are similar to CO emissions with an exception at high fuel-air ratio, as inlet air temperature and pressure conditions change from taxi to approach. Three NOx correlation equations are generated to describe theNOx emissions of this combustor. The percentage landing and takeoff (LTO) NOx reduction of the N+3 ACS combustor is between 82% and 89% relative to the ICAO CAEP/6 standard, which meets the NASA N+3 goal of exceeding 80% LTO NOx reduction.

He, Zhuohui J.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Emission Characteristics of an Axially Staged Sector Combustor for a Small Core High OPR Subsonic Aircraft Engine

Gaseous (NOx, CO) and non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) emissions from a small-core high-pressure Axially Controlled Stoichiometry (ACS) combustor are reported. NOx and CO emissions characteristics are similar to a previous version of ACS combustor. Emissions of nvPM at low-power (fuel-rich front end) was found to procude significantly higher nvPM emissions compared to a high-power configuration (fuel-lean front end). NOx emissions for the ACS combustor were 82-89% below the ICAO CAEP/6 standard for aggressive NASA N+3 high-pressure cycles based on NOx correlations developed from experimental measurements.

He, Zhuohui J.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Monitoring for Flight Path Management: Inputs to Pilot Monitoring Training

The commercial aviation industry world-wide has identified a need for improved pilot monitoring (e.g., ICAO, 2016). More specifically, aviation safety data indicate that failures in pilots' monitoring for flight path management (FPM) have contributed to a range of undesired outcomes: accidents, major upsets, and non-compliance with ATC guidance. The FAA has further stated that these types of FPM failures are likely to worsen with the increasingly complex air traffic control systems and FPM concepts proposed for NextGen (https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/what_is_nextgen/) operations (e.g., see Hah et al., 2017). An important element of this additional complexity will be the introduction of new automation or artificial intelligence that is intended to work with the flight crew but can add additional monitoring burdens. One potential mitigation for this situation is to enhance pilot training for effective monitoring. NASA Ames Research Center was asked to identify and evaluate training approaches that have the potential to enhance pilots' ability to effectively monitor for FPM (with the result of improved awareness). The focus of this work is to identify, develop or validate training guidance to improve pilot monitoring/awareness regarding FPM and mitigate the recent trend of accidents and incidents, especially Loss of Control (LOC) events. The result of this work should be guidance for FAA training and standards organizations—such as the Air Carrier Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ACT ARC)—to aid in reducing the risk of incidents and accidents due to inadequate pilot monitoring/awareness.

Feary, Mike↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

TPSAS-NF1676L-13674-DND

Sonic Boom Modeling Overview What are we trying to do? Understand the impact of sonic booms from new low-boom aircraft designs on community residents What is our approach? - Atmospheric Propagation: Develop more accurate sonic boom propagation models - Structural Response & Modeling: Examine sonic boom transmission into small and large structures - Human Response & Modeling: Develop psychoacoustic model of human response to low booms (both outdoors and indoors) for single and multiple events - Work cooperatively with regulators (FAA, ICAO) and other researchers (industry, academia, JAXA, others) What are the payoffs if we are successful? - Replace current prohibition of civil supersonic overland flight with a noise-based standard for aircraft certification

Alexandra Loubeau↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

IEIR2019 + NASA Aeronautics Overview

Summarizing the chapters in an existing ICAO document (# 10127) on alternative configurations and approaches, and public NASA aeronautics directions relative to alternative configurations relevant to international civil aviation. all content is drawn from publicly available info.

Aviation↗
NASA NTRS2020

Strategic Deconfliction Performance: Results and Analysis from the NASA UTM Technical Capability Level 4 Demonstration

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) refers to the service-based, cooperative approach to the management of small UAS in the National Airspace System that is safe, scalable, and fair. UTM provides the means to manage the airspace in a complementary manner that does not burden the current air traffic control workforce or infrastructure but allows the Air Navigation Service Provider to maintain its regulatory and operational authority of the airspace. A key feature of UTM is the ability to provide operators the means to strategically deconflict operations from others in the airspace through the digital exchange of information via supporting services. Through this approach, the four-dimensional operation volumes that encompass the intent of operators in a given area are discoverable and can be used for airspace awareness as well as planning conflict free operations that account for and avoid other operations. In certain cases, it is also possible to negotiate volume intersections for shared airspace use without the need to re-plan. In the NASA UTM concept, strategic deconfliction is the first layer of three in the overall conflict management model. The three layers of the conflict management model, which follow the International Civil Aviation Organization’s scheme [ICAO 2005] are: strategic conflict management, separate provision, and collision avoidance. In UTM, the strategic layer mostly occurs prior to departure, but is applicable to en route operations with sufficient planning horizon. The initial requirements for a strategic deconfliction capability within UTM are defined in a NASA publication [Rios 2018]. Within the concept and implementation of service-provided strategic deconfliction is the notion of priority. It is understood that there are instances in which an operation requires a priority designation within the UTM system and special handling accordingly to provide situation awareness and facilitate appropriate responses from other airspace users. Examples of situations requiring priority designation include: when an operator declares an emergency due to problems with the vehicle or its immediate surroundings; operations that are in support of certain organizations (e.g., public safety and first responders); or special missions that also require priority use of airspace (e.g., emergency medical deliveries). UAS Volume Reservations (UVRs) also relate to the topic of priority in the sense that the airspace that the volume encompasses has a different status or classification in which unassociated operations must vacate if inside, or avoid if outside, through strategic deconfliction with the volume. Operations that are specially permitted to access the UVR area are typically assigned priority status given the nature of their mission and their associated credentials. The ability to perform strategic deconfliction, handle certain operations with a priority distinction, and establish UVRs that are communicated throughout the UTM system, is predicated on an architecture that has been established through an evolutionary process in response to close collaboration with stakeholders from government and industry. Another important and influential aspect of these capabilities and architecture is the live, distributed flight tests that have been conducted across the Technical Capability Levels (TCLs) that culminated with a set of complex tests performed as part of TCL4 [Rios 2020]. The TCL4 flight test involved two FAA-designated UAS test sites building teams to collaborate with NASA’s UTM Project on the execution of several detailed, small UAS scenarios in urban environments.

conflict management↗
NASA NTRS2020

Analysis of Pilot Monitoring Skills and a Review of Training Effectiveness

The commercial aviation industry world-wide has identified a need for improved pilot monitoring and awareness (e.g., FAA, 2013, ICAO, 2016). More specifically, aviation safety data indicate that failures in pilots’ flight path management (FPM) monitoring and awareness have contributed to a range of undesired outcomes: accidents, major upsets, and non-compliance with air traffic control (ATC) guidance. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has further stated that these types of FPM failures are likely to worsen with the increasingly complex air traffic control systems and FPM concepts proposed for NextGen (https://www.faa. gov/nextgen/what_is_nextgen/) operations (e.g., see Hah et al., 2017). Adding to this complexity is the introduction of increasingly automated aircraft systems that can increase monitoring burdens. One potential mitigation for this situation is to enhance pilot training for effective monitoring. NASA Ames Research Center was asked to identify and evaluate training approaches that have the potential to enhance pilots’ ability to effectively monitor for FPM (with the result of improved awareness). The focus of this work is to identify, develop or validate training guidance to improve pilot monitoring/awareness regarding FPM and mitigate the recent trend of accidents and incidents, especially loss of control (LOC) events. The result of this work should be input for improved industry standards and FAA guidance to reduce the risk of incidents and accidents due to inadequate pilot monitoring/awareness. This is the first of three reports that were developed for this project.

aviation human factors↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Statistical Considerations for the Design and Execution of NASA's Community Noise Surveys

The World Health Organization defines community noise as noise emitted from all sources apart from noise at an industrial workplace. Example sources include neighborhood and construction noise, noise from road and rail, and air traffic noise. In particular, overland supersonic flights have been banned in the United States since the 1970s based on data accumulated during the 1960s; the degree of reported annoyance from the resulting sonic booms was a key factor leading to the prohibition. In subsequent years, scientific and engineering understanding has led to the potential to produce low amplitude sonic booms, or ‘sonic thumps’, during supersonic flight through aircraft design choices. Aircraft manufacturers have expressed renewed interest in producing supersonic commercial aircraft, but without appropriate changes to regulation, only overseas routes can be traveled supersonically. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will be flying the X-59 demonstrator aircraft in a series of community tests to begin in the 2024 fiscal year. In this presentation we provide some historical context for the current prohibitions on supersonic commercial flight. Using data collected during earlier NASA risk reduction tests, we demonstrate how generalized linear mixed models can be used to inform the functional dose-response response curve. Finally, we discuss some of the challenges in designing the future community studies and generalizing them to a nationally-representative dose-response curve. The study effort will be of national and international importance as the data and models prepared during the community tests will be provided to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in order to help noise regulators determine if supersonic flight will be permitted over land once again and at what demonstrable noise levels.

Nathan B Cruze↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Quantifying Uncertainty of Landing and Takeoff Noise for Commercial Supersonic Aircraft

Of the many challenges faced by manufacturers attempting to offer supersonic travel to the public, the uncertainty in predicting the noise of these aircraft in airport operations has an immediate impact. No noise regulation exists in FAA or ICAO for certifying such aircraft, as these organization require solid data, usually from existing aircraft. Manufacturers are taking large risks to design a vehicle not knowing whether it will be allowed to fly. A partial solution to this conundrum is to use physics-based simulations to provide the “data” used to calibrate system-level prediction methods, carefully documenting the uncertainty of the method for application to supersonic aircraft. A close look at the accuracy of empirical prediction methods points to areas where improvements need to be made if noise studies of supersonic aircraft are to be useful. As NASA embarks on a focused research program to improve predictions of noise from the noise-dominant propulsion noise of commercial supersonic aircraft, this paper documents the work done to baseline the uncertainties found in today’s noise prediction methods. A relatively simplistic method was developed, summarizing the error of the empirical methods on a component basis and following their impact on the total aircraft during landing and takeoff operations using Monte Carlo analysis. By this method it is found that current empirical noise prediction methods have an uncertainty of 1.5 EPNdB cumulative for propulsion noise of a representative conventional subsonic passenger aircraft. When applied to likely near-term supersonic commercial aircraft, the uncertainty is 7.6 EPNdB cumulative, a difference that must be reduced if the prediction methods are to guide decision makers.

Airport noise↗
NASA NTRS2022

Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimations for 2016-2020 using the Sherlock Air Traffic Data Warehouse

Data and analyses are presented on the utilization of aircraft in the U.S. and the greenhouse gas emissions that they create. Commercial passenger and cargo aviation flight data, captured in the Sherlock data warehouse at NASA Ames over the five years from 2016 to 2020, is used to estimate the miles flown by major aircraft models. The estimates for aggregate annual number of flights are validated against data published by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. The corresponding fuel usage is estimated using the International Civilian Aviation Organization (ICAO) fuel use tables and carbon dioxide emissions are calculated using a fuel-use multiplicative factor. A key conclusion of this analysis is that a small number of long-haul flights (with ranges greater than 2485 statute miles) create a disproportionately large fraction (30%) of annual total U.S. aviation-related carbon dioxide emissions, while a relatively large number of short flights (less than 311 statute miles) contribute a small net amount (less than 5%) of U.S. aviation-related carbon dioxide emissions. These U.S. results are consistent with a similar recent 2020 emissions study conducted by EUROCONTROL.

Emissions↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wake Vortex Effects Between Urban Air Mobility Aircraft

This study models the wake-induced downwash of an Urban Air Mobility (UAM) aircraft and the wake’s effects on a trailing aircraft’s dynamic stability when intersecting the wake trail. The Proctor wake vortex model is used to compute the wake-induced downwash over a 0.8 × 0.8 nautical mile flight area. The model is complemented by core radius growth, Proctor single phase wake decay, wake propagation, and Lamb wake aging. The wake data is then stored and loaded to the trailing aircraft as an atmospheric condition to affect the dynamics. Preliminary simulations include modeling the downwash from multiple UAM aircraft over the flight area and determining the normalized wake reduction at the ICAO 5 nautical mile separation criteria for a LIGHT aircraft trailing a MEDIUM aircraft.

Wake Vortex↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Particle and Trace Gas Emissions Indices Measured During the 2021 Boeing ecoDemonstrator Emissions Ground Test

We present particle and trace gas emissions indices sampled on the ground at 30 meters behind the CFM LEAP-1B engines of the 2021 Boeing ecoDemonstrator, an Alaska Airlines 737-9 aircraft. Testing was carried out at Boeing Field in Seattle, WA, USA in Fall of 2021. Four different fuels were investigated including a 100% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), a petroleum-based Jet A fuel, and two SAF blends. Total and non-volatile particle number concentrations were measured with a pair of condensation particle counters with one operating behind a custom-built thermal denuder heated to 350 degrees Celsius. Similarly, total and non-volatile particle number size distributions were measured with a pair of Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers (SMPSs). Non-volatile particle mass was estimated from particle light absorption techniques using an assumed mass absorption coefficient, while particle chemical speciation was measured by an Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (SP-AMS). A detailed list of instruments is given on the project website [1]. Overall, the results are consistent with expectations based on ICAO Emissions Databank certification data for the LEAP-1B with a stark reduction in non-volatile particle number and mass observed for the higher thrust conditions when the combustor was staged. The production of volatile particles under these conditions as well as experimental considerations related to background subtraction methods will be discussed. References: [1] Boeing ecoDemonstrator Science and Engineering Team (2022). 2021 Boeing ecoDemonstrator Emissions Ground Test Dataset

Richard H Moore↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transient Aircraft Soot Emissions Indicate That Steady-State Measurements Likely Underestimate Real-World, Take-Off Emissions: Time-Varying Aircraft Take-Off Emissions Indices Measured at Los Angeles International Airport

Aircraft engine emissions are unique among mobile pollution sources in that their impacts affect the local air quality near airports as well as upper tropospheric composition and climate over regional-to-hemispheric scales. Furthermore, air travel and its resulting emissions are expected to rebound from the recent COVID-related lows to increase dramatically over the next several decades. Given the multi-decade service lifetime of many commercial aircraft, it is critically important to quantitatively understand the real-world emissions coming from these engines in order to inform environmental assessment and modelling activities. Here, we present a detailed analysis of aircraft emissions during take-off operations at Los Angeles International Airport. The data were collected as part of the NASA Alternative Fuel Effects on Contrails and Cruise Emissions (ACCESS) project in May 2014, and the dataset is publicly available as described by Moore et al. [1]. In particular, we focus on the time-varying nature of the plume concentrations where clear differences in particle size and non-volatile particle fraction are observed during the early portion of the take-off plume relative to the later portion of the plume. We compare the transient emissions indices measured here to engine certification values in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Emissions Databank, which suggests that steady-state measurements may underestimate the real-world, non-volatile particle emissions. The implications of this finding for modelling aircraft particle emissions will be discussed.

Richard H. Moore↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Particle and Trace Gas Emissions Indices Measured During the 2021 Boeing ecoDemonstrator Emissions Ground Test

We present particle and trace gas emissions indices sampled on the ground at 30 meters behind the CFM LEAP-1B engines of the Boeing ecoDemonstrator 737-9 aircraft. Testing was carried out at Boeing Field in Seattle, WA, USA in Fall of 2021. Four different fuels were investigated including a 100% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), a petroleum-based Jet A fuel, and two SAF blends. Total and non-volatile particle number concentrations were measured with a pair of condensation particle counters with one operating behind a custom-built thermal denuder heated to 350 degrees Celsius. Similarly, total and non-volatile particle number size distributions were measured with a pair of Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers (SMPSs). Non-volatile particle mass was estimated from particle light absorption techniques using an assumed mass absorption coefficient, while particle chemical speciation was measured by an Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (SP-AMS). A detailed list of instruments is given on the project website [1]. Overall, the results are consistent with expectations based on ICAO Emissions Databank certification data for the LEAP-1B with a stark reduction in non-volatile particle number and mass observed for the higher thrust conditions when the combustor was staged. The production of volatile particles under these conditions as well as experimental considerations related to background subtraction methods will be discussed.

Benjamin A. Nault↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Global Variability in Sonic Boom Exposure due to Macroscopic Effects

Supersonic flight over land has been prohibited since 1973 due to the loudness of sonic booms. NASA is building the X-59 aircraft as part of its Quesst mission to demonstrate low-loudness shaped sonic booms, or “sonic thumps.” The Quesst mission will gather human perception data via a series of community noise surveys across the USA. The noise dose and perceptual response data will be provided to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the Federal Aviation Administration for use in determining potential future supersonic aircraft noise certification standards, effectively changing the prohibition from a speed limit to a noise limit. These noise regulations must be globally effective, as long travel distances see the largest benefit to supersonic flight. The state of the atmosphere through which a sonic boom travels affects the size of the region exposed to sound, the “carpet width” (CW), as well as the loudness. The focus of this dissertation is to understand and quantify the expected loudness and CW of sonic booms due to the macroscopic atmospheric effects around the world. A pair of large-scale propagation simulation studies were conducted using the NASA PCBoom code to compare predicted sonic boom loudness and CW statistics first across the USA and then across the world. For the USA study, near-field data of the X-59 in steady cruise was propagated at 4 cardinal headings at 138 locations through 5 years of Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) atmospheric profiles. Results of a bootstrap forest predictor screening model indicated the importance of climate zone, latitude, ground elevation, season, and heading. It also noted the unimportance of time of day for predicting loudness and CW. The data is visualized in aggregate, and then broken out geographically, by season and heading, and by climate zone. Multiple linear regression models were fit to the data from the 138 locations so that estimates of the loudness and CW can be produced anywhere in the US. The results can aid in planning when and where to fly the X-59. For the global study, near-field data from three aircraft, the X-59 in a quiet and loud configuration, B-58, and Concorde, were propagated at four cardinal headings through data from three atmospheric models, the CFSv2, the Global Forecast System (GFS), and the ECMWF Reanalysis Version 5 (ERA5), at 100 global locations over 1 year. Results of a bootstrap forest predictor screening model indicated the importance of climate zone, ground elevation, season, and heading. Similar to the US study, the model indicated time of day was not an important predictor. The model also indicated that choice of weather model was not important, so the atmospheric model data are effectively interchangeable. The ERA5 model was chosen for use in an extension of the study to include 18 additional locations to ensure sampling of every climate zone. Loudness and CW results are shown in aggregate, and split geographically and by heading, season, and climate. Multiple linear regression models were fit to the data from the 118 locations so that estimates of loudness and CW can be produced around the world. N-waves and shaped booms did not have the same global variability. Koppen-Geiger climate zones were used as the climate zone definition for the global study. These are available as present-day and future climate projections. Making use of the multiple linear regression models, the future climate zones were input to estimate the effect of the changing climate on sonic boom loudness and CW. Results indicate that a changing climate would have little impact on the effectiveness of noise regulations.

X-59↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Energy and Aviation

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aeronautics↗