Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LIFTING BODY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1989

Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Personnel Launch System (PLS) Lifting-Body Configuration at Mach Numbers from 0.05 to 20.3

A wind-tunnel investigation was performed to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a proposed lifting-body personnel launch system (PLS) configuration over a Mach range of 0.05 to 20.3. The test configuration had a low-aspect-ratio body with a flat undersurface and three fins on the upper aft body. Data are presented with a minimum of analysis. All of the experimental data were placed in a structured data base using the R:BASE system and are included on a CD-ROM available with this report.

Cruz, Christopher I.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Personnel Launch System (PLS) Lifting-Body Configuration at Mach Numbers from 0.05 to 20.3. Supplement

A wind-tunnel investigation was performed to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a proposed lifting-body personnel launch system (PLS) configuration over a Mach range of 0.05 to 20.3. The test configuration had a low-aspect-ratio body with a flat undersurface and three fins on the upper aft body. Data are presented with a minimum of analysis. All of the experimental data were placed in a structured data base using the R:BASE system. This is the CD-ROM that is available for this report.

Cruz, Christopher I.↗
NASA NTRS2014

Human Factors Lessons Learned from Flight Testing Wingless Lifting Body Vehicles

Since the 1960s, NASA, the Air Force, and now private industry have attempted to develop an operational human crewed reusable spacecraft with a wingless, lifting body configuration. This type of vehicle offers increased mission flexibility and greater reentry cross range than capsule type craft, and is particularly attractive due to the capability to land on a runway. That capability, however, adds complexity to the human factors engineering requirements of developing such aircraft.

Human Factors Engineering↗
NASA NTRS1972

Wind-tunnel investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of the M2-F2 lifting-body entry configuration at transonic and supersonic Mach numbers

Results are presented for wind tunnel tests of a one to twelve scale model of the M2-F2 lifting body entry configuration at transonic and supersonic speeds. The Mach number was varied from 0.6 to 2.0. Reynolds numbers ranged from 4 to 13 million. Angles of attack and sideslip varied from minus 8 degrees to plus 20 degrees and minus 4 degrees to plus 6 degrees respectively. A brief history of the development of the configuration is included.

Keener, E. R.↗
NASA NTRS1974

HFL-10 lifting body flight control system characteristics and operational experience

A flight evaluation was made of the mechanical hydraulic flight control system and the electrohydraulic stability augmentation system installed in the HL-10 lifting body research vehicle. Flight tests performed in the speed range from landing to a Mach number of 1.86 and the altitude range from 697 meters (2300 feet) to 27,550 meters (90,300 feet) were supplemented by ground tests to identify and correct structural resonance and limit-cycle problems. Severe limit-cycle and control sensitivity problems were encountered during the first flight. Stability augmentation system structural resonance electronic filters were modified to correct the limit-cycle problem. Several changes were made to control stick gearing to solve the control sensitivity problem. Satisfactory controllability was achieved by using a nonlinear system. A limit-cycle problem due to hydraulic fluid contamination was encountered during the first powered flight, but the problem did not recur after preflight operations were improved.

Painter, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Supersonic aerodynamic characteristics of a lifting-body orbiter model with a blunted delta planform at Mach 2.30 to 4.60

An investigation has been made in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a lifting-body orbiter model with a blunted delta planform. The model was tested at Mach numbers from 2.30 to 4.60, at nominal angles of attack from -4 deg to 60 deg and angles of sideslip from -4 deg to 10 deg, and at a Reynolds number of 2.5 million per foot.

Blair, A. B., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Flight evaluation of the M2-F3 lifting body handling qualities at Mach numbers from 0.30 to 1.61

Percentage distributions of 423 pilot ratings obtained from 27 flights are used to indicate the general level of handling qualities of the M2-F3 lifting body. Percentage distributions are compared on the basis of longitudinal and lateral-directional handling qualities, control system, control system status, and piloting task. Ratings of longitudinal handling qualities at low speed were slightly better than those for transonic and supersonic speed. The ratings of lateral-directional handling qualities were unaffected by speed and configuration. Specific handling qualities problems are discussed in detail, and comparisons are made with pertinent handling qualities criteria.

Kempel, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Aerodynamic interactions from reaction controls for lateral control of the M2-F2 lifting-body entry configuration at transonic and supersonic and supersonic Mach numbers

Tests were conducted in the Ames 6 by 6 foot wind tunnel to determine the interaction of reaction jets for roll control on the M2-F2 lifting-body entry vehicle. Moment interactions are presented for a Mach number range of 0.6 to 1.7, a Reynolds number range of 1.2 x 10 to the 6th power to 1.6 x 10 to the 6th power (based on model reference length), an angle-of-attack range of -9 deg to 20 deg, and an angle-of-sideslip range of -6 deg to 6 deg at an angle of attack of 6 deg. The reaction jets produce roll control with small adverse yawing moment, which can be offset by horizontal thrust component of canted jets.

Bailey, R. O.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Pilot safety for the X-24A lifting body vehicle

The design and operational characteristics of the X-24A are described in detail. Primary emphasis is placed on the safety considerations incorporated in the design and flight test stages. It is pointed out that the inherently high drag of the lifting body configuration together with its relatively low lift/drag ratio, generated considerable concern with respect to the pilot's ability to perform safe landings from gliding flight. The resulting safety procedures taken at each stage of development are discussed.

John Cochrane↗
NASA NTRS1992

Real-time simulation model of the HL-20 lifting body

A proposed manned spacecraft design, designated the HL-20, has been under investigation at Langley Research Center. Included in that investigation are flight control design and flying qualities studies utilizing a man-in-the-loop real-time simulator. This report documents the current real-time simulation model of the HL-20 lifting body vehicle, known as version 2.0, presently in use at NASA Langley Research Center. Included are data on vehicle aerodynamics, inertias, geometries, guidance and control laws, and cockpit displays and controllers. In addition, trim case and dynamic check case data is provided. The intent of this document is to provide the reader with sufficient information to develop and validate an equivalent simulation of the HL-20 for use in real-time or analytical studies.

Jackson, E. Bruce↗
NASA NTRS2000

A Multidisciplinary Performance Analysis of a Lifting-Body Single-Stage-to-Orbit Vehicle

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works (LMSW) is currently developing a single-stage-to-orbit reusable launch vehicle called VentureStar(TM) A team at NASA Langley Research Center participated with LMSW in the screening and evaluation of a number of early VentureStar(TM) configurations. The performance analyses that supported these initial studies were conducted to assess the effect of a lifting body shape, linear aerospike engine and metallic thermal protection system (TPS) on the weight and performance of the vehicle. These performance studies were performed in a multidisciplinary fashion that indirectly linked the trajectory optimization with weight estimation and aerothermal analysis tools. This approach was necessary to develop optimized ascent and entry trajectories that met all vehicle design constraints. Significant improvements in ascent performance were achieved when the vehicle flew a lifting trajectory and varied the engine mixture ratio during flight. Also, a considerable reduction in empty weight was possible by adjusting the total oxidizer-to-fuel and liftoff thrust-to-weight ratios. However, the optimal ascent flight profile had to be altered to ensure that the vehicle could be trimmed in pitch using only the flow diverting capability of the aerospike engine. Likewise, the optimal entry trajectory had to be tailored to meet TPS heating rate and transition constraints while satisfying a crossrange requirement.

Tartabini, Paul V.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Correlation parameters for the study of leeside heating on a lifting body at hypersonic speeds

Leeside heating was studied with the aim of gaining some insight into: (1) the magnitude of the leeside heating rates and (2) the methods to be used to extrapolate wind tunnel leeside heating rates to the full scale flight condition. This study was based on existing experimental data obtained in a hypersonic shock tunnel on lifting body configurations that are typical of shuttle orbiter vehicles. Heat transfer was first measured on the windward side to determine the boundary layer type. Then the leeside heating was investigated with the classified boundary layer. Correlation data are given on the windward turbulent boundary layer, the windward laminar boundary layer, and the leeside surfaces.

Vidal, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Guidance and control analysis of the entry of a lifting body personnel launch vehicle

NASA is currently involved in definition studies of a Personnel Launch System (PLS) that could be used to transport people to and from low-earth orbit. This vehicle would serve both to complement the Space Shuttle and to provide alternative access to space in the event the Space Shuttle fleet were unavailable for a prolonged period. The PLS would consist of a manned spacecraft launched by an expendable vehicle, e.g., Titan 4. One promising candidate for the manned component of the PLS is the NASA Langley Research Center HL-20 lifting body. Many studies are currently underway to assess this vehicle, and one of the main areas of study is the development of the capability to successfully enter, glide to the landing site, and land. To provide this capability, guidance and control algorithms have been developed, incorporated into a six-degree-of-freedom simulation, and evaluation in the presence of off-nominal atmospheric conditions, consisting of both density variations and steady-state winds. In addition, the impact of atmospheric turbulence was examined for the portion of flight from Mach 3.5 to touchdown. This analysis showed that the vehicle remained controllable and could successfully land even in the presence of off-nominal atmospheric conditions.

Powell, Richard W.↗
NASA NTRS1969

Lifting body flight tests and analysis

Reusable lifting entry vehicle flight tests, investigating handling qualities and subsonic- transonic aerodynamics of M2-F2 /M2-F3/, HL-10 and X-24A

Layton, G. P., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Supersonic aerodynamic characteristics of a proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) lifting-body configuration

An investigation was conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at Mach numbers from 1.6 to 4.5. The model had a low-aspect-ratio body with a flat undersurface. A center fin and two outboard fins were mounted on the aft portion of the upper body. The outboard fins were rolled outboard 40 deg from the vertical. Elevon surfaces made up the trailing edges of the outboard fins, and body flaps were located on the upper and lower aft fuselage. The center fin pivoted about its midchord for yaw control. The model was longitudinally stable about the design center-of-gravity position at 54 percent of the body length. The configuration with undeflected longitudinal controls trimmed near 0 deg angle of attack at Mach numbers from 1.6 to 3.0 where lift and lift-drag ratio were negative. Longitudinal trim was near the maximum lift-drag ratio (1.4) at Mach 4.5. The model was directionally stable over Mach number range except at angles of attack around 4 deg at M = 2.5. Pitch control deflection of more than -10 deg with either elevons or body flaps is needed to trim the model to angles of attack at which lift becomes positive. With increased control deflection, the lifting-body configuration should perform the assured crew return mission through the supersonic speed range.

Ware, George M.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Transonic aerodynamic characteristics of a proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) lifting-body configuration

The investigation was conducted in the Calspan 8-Ft Transonic wind tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 1.2. The 0.07-scale model had a low aspect ratio body with a flat undersurface. A center fin and two tip fins were mounted on the aft upper body. The tip fins were rolled outboard 40 deg from the vertical. Elevon surfaces made up the trailing edges of the outboard fins and body flaps were located on the upper and lower aft fuselage. Results of the investigation indicated that the model was longitudinally and laterally stable about a center-of-gravity position of 0.54 body length. The maximum trimmed lift-drag ratio was about 3.1 at M = 0.6. The small center fin contributed only a small positive increment to lateral stability but was effective as a yaw control device. Protuberances on the forebody had little effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of the configuration. The model with pitch controls undeflected had desirable longitudinal trim characteristics.

Ware, George M.↗