SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Computer programs for evaluation of telemetered rendezvous radar tracking data of orbiting command module and lunar module landing site determination
A first order orbital mechanics analysis was conducted to examine the possibility of utilizing the Space Shuttle Orbiter to perform payload delivery missions to lunar orbit. In the analysis, the earth orbit of departure was constrained to be that of Space Station Freedom. Furthermore, no enhancements of the Orbiter's thermal protection system were assumed. Therefore, earth orbit insertion maneuvers were constrained to be all propulsive. Only minimal constraints were placed on the lunar orbits and no consideration was given to possible landing sites for lunar surface payloads. The various phases and maneuvers of the mission are discussed for both a conventional (Apollo type) and an unconventional mission profile. The velocity impulses needed, and the propellant masses required are presented for all of the mission maneuvers. Maximum payload capabilities were determined for both of the mission profiles examined. In addition, other issues relating to the feasibility of such lunar shuttle missions are discussed. The results of the analysis indicate that the Shuttle Orbiter would be a poor vehicle for payload delivery missions to lunar orbit.
Due to lighting conditions, the program decided to only fly to the north pole in June 2022 and south pole in December 2022. Starting with the June 2022 landing sites at the north pole, a trajectory scan was run for one landing per day for the latitudes from 85 up to 88 degrees at 0.5 degree increments. Each landing site was at lunar dawn, which determined the landing site’s longitude as described in the previous section. The results of the June 2022 scan showed that LPL had the capability to reach a landing site at least once per day for the region examined as see in in Figure 12. There appears to be a correlation between the landing site’s altitude and the propellant remaining above the lander’s FPR, Figure 13. This is most likely due to the >10 km altitude constraint at SRM burnout. This constraint was applied to keep the lander high above the lunar terrain to avoid mountains, but can be relaxed when the full terrain data is added. Figure 12. June 2022 Nominal Usable Propellant Remaining vs Landing Date/time Similarly, the December 2022 landing sites were run showing that LPL was also capable of reaching a landing site at the Moon at least once per day. Figure 14 shows the results of the December scan, however, there were 3 landing sites that LPL could not reach. Two were very low in altitude (-5 and -4 km in altitude), which looking at the altitude trends in Figure 15, indicates that these sites may not be feasible with the current mission design. It may be possible to achieve the low altitude landing sites by lowering the SRM burnout altitude constraint, but that requires detailed terrain modeling, planned for a future phase of the analysis. The third non-reachable landing site is most likely due to an optimization error, as its altitude was high enough, at -2 km, that it should not have been a problem for the lander to arrive there. More analysis is required to verify this observation.
Soil mechanics of regolith around Apollo 12 landing site
Chemical analysis of lunar surface at Surveyor 5 landing site
Apollo landing sites and returned soils afford us a unique opportunity to "ground truth" Diviner Lunar Radiometer compositional observations, which are the first global, high resolution , thermal infrared measurements of an airless body. The Moon is the most accessible member of the most abundant class of solar system objects, which includes Mercury, asteroids, and icy satellites. And the Apollo samples returned from the Moon are the only extraterrestrial samples with known spatial context. Here we compare Diviner observations of Apollo landing sites and compositional and spectral laboratory measurements of returned Apollo soils. Diviner, onboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, has three spectral channels near 8 micron that were designed to characterize the mid-infrared emissivity maximum known as the Christiansen feature (CF), a well-studied indicator of silicate mineralogy. It has been observed that thermal infrared spectra measured in simulated lunar environment (SLE) are significantly altered from spectra measured under terrestrial or martian conditions, with enhanced CF contrast and shifted CF position relative to other spectral features. Therefore only thermal emission experiments conducted in SLE are directly comparable to Diviner data. With known compositions, Apollo landing sites and soils are important calibration points for the Diviner dataset, which includes all six Apollo sites at approximately 200 m spatial resolution. Differences in measured CFs caused by composition and space weathering are apparent in Diviner data. Analyses of Diviner observations and SLE measurements for a range of Apollo soils show good agreement, while comparisons to thermal reflectance measurements under ambient conditions do not agree well, which underscores the need for SLE measurements and validates our measurement technique. Diviner observations of Apollo landing sites are also correlated with geochemical measurements of Apollo soils from the Lunar Sample Compendium. In particular, the correlations between CF and FeO and AI203 are very strong, owing to the dependence on the feldspar-mafic ratio. Our analyses suggest that Diviner data may offer an independent measure of soil iron content from the existing optical and gamma-ray spectrometer datasets.
Mechanical properties of lunar surface materials, macroscopic features of local terrain, engine exhaust effects on landing site, and other scientific observations by Surveyor III
The horizontal-to-vertical amplitude ratios of the long-period seismograms are reexamined to determine the shear wave velocity distributions at the Apollo 12, 14, 15, and 16 lunar landing sites. Average spectral ratios, computed from a number of impact signals, were compared with spectral ratios calculated for the fundamental mode Rayleigh waves in media consisting of homogeneous, isotropic, horizontal layers. The shear velocities of the best fitting models at the different sites resemble each other and differ from the average for all sites by not more than 20% except for the bottom layer at station 14. The shear velocities increase from 40 m/s at the surface to about 400 m/s at depths between 95 and 160 m at the various sites. Within this depth range the velocity-depth functions are well represented by two piecewise linear segments, although the presence of first-order discontinuities cannot be ruled out.
Chemical analysis of lunar surface at Surveyor 7 Tycho landing site
Just within the next four years, we expect to see at least 22 lunar surface missions. Half of these missions will occur in the Moon’s south polar region. Due to this upcoming proliferation of actors and activities at or near the lunar south pole, and due to the potential close proximity of operations, NASA and other operators will face challenges never faced before. NASA’s Deputy Administrator and Associate Administrator of the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) tasked the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy (OTPS) with answering two questions related to the Artemis campaign: (1) what technical and policy considerations should NASA take into account in the selection of lunar landing and operations sites, and (2) what technical and policy considerations should NASA take into account when implementing tools such as safety zones in order to protect these operations and U.S. interests? In addition to the challenges inherent in lunar operations, NASA subject-matter experts (SMEs) are concerned about certain challenges to NASA operations that may require policy solutions. The goal of this report is to provide options and recommendations to NASA leadership and program planners so that they can consider policy measures to respond to those challenges. This report also describes options for transparency, coordination, and implementation to increase the effectiveness of these measures.
Radar reflectivity measurement of lunar surface roughness for selecting possible landing sites
This paper describes a typical Apollo lunar landing mission. The particular example chosen provides a 24-hour stay on the lunar surface and has a total duration of slightly more than eight days.
Mission analysis procedure for determining approximate lunar areas of accessibility for mission planning
Lunar surface mechanical properties at Surveyor landing site according to telemetry data and photographs
To obtain information about in-place lunar rocks and soil, a closeup stereoscopic camera capable of photographing small scale surface features was used at the Apollo 12 landing site on the Ocean of Storms. Fifteen stereoscopic photograph pairs were obtained. The stereoscopic pairs were of excellent quality and showed the in-place lunar material in detail. The photographs were analyzed and the results compared with the results of the Apollo 12 core sample analysis and other investigations. Significant information about the physical composition and genesis of the lunar soil at the Apollo 12 landing site was obtained. The cohesive soil on the Ocean of Storms probably results from repetitive bombardment of basalt flows by meteorites over long periods of time.
Near the eastern shore of Oceanus Procellarum, 390 miles from Surveyor I, stands Surveyor III, now motionless and silent after a full lunar day's work during which the spacecraft transmitted to Earth 6315 photographs of its surroundings. A surface sampler, operated by command from the Earth and in view of Surveyor's television camera, conducted many tests of the character and structure of the lunar surface material, as well as digging four trenches. While Surveyor I put man's eyes on the Moon, Surveyor III added an arm and a hand with which to work. In this mission, Surveyor displayed remarkable adaptability and stability. Because the engines did not cut off before touchdown, the spacecraft in effect made three separate landings, giving information on surface bearing strength in several places. The spacecraft came to rest at an angle of about 14° from the vertical, well below the rim of a crater, making possible a detailed study of the floor and walls of a small lunar crater. The tilted position of the spacecraft also made it possible to obtain, for the first time from the surface of the Moon, photographs of a solar eclipse, and of the Earth in color. This report presents the preliminary findings from Surveyor III of the team of scientists and engineers of the Surveyor Program.
Accuracy of spacecraft landing location on lunar surface determined from post-arrival tracking, considering effect of various mission-dependent parameters
Luna-9 soft landing on moon, photographic recording, and radio transmission