Minimum impulse guidance.
Linearized theory for minimum fuel guidance in neighborhood of minimum fuel space trajectory, unrestricted thrust magnitude and allowances for midcourse impulses
Edelbaum, T. N.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “MIDCOURSE GUIDANCE”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Minimum impulse guidance
Linearized theory for minimum fuel guidance in neighborhood of minimum fuel space trajectory, unrestricted thrust magnitude and allowances for midcourse impulses
Edelbaum, T. N.↗
Advanced Pioneer guidance and navigation requirements for outer planet missions
Three advanced Pioneer missions to the outer planets are analyzed to assess midcourse velocity and navigation requirements. Selecting the results of the Saturn/Uranus mission as representative values for the three missions, the Earth-Saturn midcourse mean plus 3-sigma velocity correction is 80 m/sec. Earth-based radio-only tracking results in a navigational error of 2000 km at Saturn which in turn requires a mean plus 3-sigma velocity correction of 140 m/sec on the Saturn-Uranus leg to nullify this error mapped to Uranus. In contrast to these figures, if a proposed optical V-slit sensor is incorporated into the spacecraft navigational system, a Saturn B-plane error of only 350 km results with a corresponding required mean plus 3-sigma post-Saturn velocity correction of 23.2 m/sec. An 8000 km miss at Uranus results from radio-only tracking at Saturn which can be considerably reduced to 1400 km by utilizing the optical sensor during the Saturn flyby.
Paul, C. K.↗
An inverse dynamics approach to trajectory optimization and guidance for an aerospace plane
The optimal ascent problem for an aerospace planes is formulated as an optimal inverse dynamic problem. Both minimum-fuel and minimax type of performance indices are considered. Some important features of the optimal trajectory and controls are used to construct a nonlinear feedback midcourse controller, which not only greatly simplifies the difficult constrained optimization problem and yields improved solutions, but is also suited for onboard implementation. Robust ascent guidance is obtained by using combination of feedback compensation and onboard generation of control through the inverse dynamics approach. Accurate orbital insertion can be achieved with near-optimal control of the rocket through inverse dynamics even in the presence of disturbances.
Lu, Ping↗
Trajectory optimization and guidance for a hypersonic vehicle
The optimal ascent problem for a hypersonic vehicle is formulated as an inverse dynamic problem. This formulation is essential in solving the trajectory optimization problem via the nonlinear programming approach. Both minimum-fuel and minimax type of performance indices are considered. The results reveal important features of the optimal trajectory and controls, and they are subsequently used to construct a nonlinear feedback midcourse control law. This control law not only greatly simplifies the difficult constrained optimization problem and yields improved solutions, but is also suitable for onboard implementation. Finally, off-nominal trajectory guidance is addressed using combination of feedback compensation and onboard generation of control through the inverse dynamics approach.
Lu, Ping↗
Surveyor Project Final Report: Part 1 - Project Description and Performance, Volume 1
The Surveyor Project planned and conducted seven unmanned lunar missions for which spacecraft were launched between May 1966 and January 1968. Each of the spacecraft was successfully launched with the then newly developed Atlas/Centaur vehicle which utilized for the first time a high-specific-impulse, liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen fueled stage. Five of the spacecraft successfully soft-landed and returned a great quantity of engineering and scientific data on extensive postlanding operations, accomplishing all mission and project objectives. Four of the spacecraft soft-landed at selected mare sites to provide data which were required to support the Apollo Program. The final spacecraft was then successfully used for scientific investigation of a contrasting site in the rugged lunar highlands. Surveyor was a fully attitude-stabilized spacecraft designed to receive and execute a wide variety of earth commands, as well as to perform certain automatic functions including the critical terminal-descent and soft-landing sequences. Significant new and advanced subsystems that were developed and/or used in combination to enable Surveyor to execute the complex terminal phase of flight were: (1) a solid-propellant main retro motor, (2) throttlable liquid-propellant vernier engines (also used for midcourse velocity correction), (3) highly sensitive velocity- and altitude-sensing radars, and (4) an automatic closed-loop guidance and control system. The first Surveyor spacecraft carried a survey television camera which, together with other engineering instrumentation, obtained in-flight and postlanding data. The complement of instruments carried on later missions included various combinations of the following additional devices: (1) a soil mechanics/surface sampler instrument for picking, digging, and handling lunar surface material; (2) an alpha scattering instrument for performing a chemical analysis of the lunar surface material; and (3) magnets attached to the spacecraft for determining magnetic properties of the soil.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory↗
Surveyor Project Final Report: Part 1 - Project Description and Performance, Volume 2
The Surveyor Project planned and conducted seven unmanned lunar missions for which spacecraft were launched between May 1966 and January 1968. Each of the spacecraft was successfully launched with the then newly developed Atlas/Centaur vehicle which utilized for the first time a high-specific-impulse, liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen fueled stage. Five of the spacecraft successfully soft-landed and returned a great quantity of engineering and scientific data on extensive postlanding operations, accomplishing all mission and project objectives. Four of the spacecraft soft-landed at selected mare sites to provide data which were required to support the Apollo Program. The final spacecraft was then successfully used for scientific investigation of a contrasting site in the rugged lunar highlands. Surveyor was a fully attitude-stabilized spacecraft designed to receive and execute a wide variety of earth commands, as well as to perform certain automatic functions including the critical terminal-descent and soft-landing sequences. Significant new and advanced subsystems that were developed and/or used in combination to enable Surveyor to execute the complex terminal phase of flight were: (1) a solid-propellant main retro motor, (2) throttlable liquid-propellant vernier engines (also used for midcourse velocity correction), (3) highly sensitive velocity- and altitude-sensing radars, and (4) an automatic closed-loop guidance and control system. The first Surveyor spacecraft carried a survey television camera which, together with other engineering instrumentation, obtained in-flight and postlanding data. The complement of instruments carried on later missions included various combinations of the following additional devices: (1) a soil mechanics/surface sampler instrument for picking, digging, and handling lunar surface material; (2) an alpha scattering instrument for performing a chemical analysis of the lunar surface material; and (3) magnets attached to the spacecraft for determining magnetic properties of the soil.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory↗
Automated terminal guidance for a Shuttle rendezvous to Space Station Freedom
An automated terminal guidance for a Shuttle rendezvous based on the Clohessy-Wiltshire (CW) linear equations of relative motion is described. The algorithm guides the Shuttle from the last rendezvous midcourse maneuver (MC4) through docking with Space Station Freedom (SSF). The uniqueness of this algorithm is that it makes it possible to use the CW equations to fly a line-of-sight (LOS) Vbar or Rbar in the final-approach docking phase. The algorithm is made of two parts, in and out-of-plane, and can also be used for station keeping during final approaches. Simulation results of the guidance integrated with the Shuttle's flight control system in the Systems Engineering Simulator (SES) at NASA Johnson are discussed. Plans to add a laser radar docking sensor to the SES and integrate it with the Shuttle's rendezvous navigation are examined.
Olszewski, Oscar W.↗
Apollo experience report: Development of guidance targeting techniques for the command module and launch vehicle
The development of the guidance targeting techniques for the Apollo command module and launch vehicle is discussed for four types of maneuvers: (1) translunar injection, (2) translunar midcourse, (3) lunar orbit insertion, and (4) return to earth. The development of real-time targeting programs for these maneuvers and the targeting procedures represented are discussed. The material is intended to convey historically the development of the targeting techniques required to meet the defined target objectives and to illustrate the solutions to problems encountered during that development.
Yencharis, J. D.↗
Postflight Evaluation of Atlas-Centaur AC-6 (Launched August 11, 1965)
The sixth Atlas Centaur vehicle (AC-6) was successfully launched from the Eastern T e s t Range, Complex 36B, on August 11, 1965, at 0931:04.430 EST. A 2084-pound dynamic model of the Surveyor payload was placed in a simulated lunar transfer trajectory. Vehicle systems operated satisfactorily and all the flight objectives were accomplished. Lift-off within 4 seconds of the window opening demonstrated the launch-on-time capability of the vehicle were accurately compensated for by the Centaur guidance system. the Surveyor model into a near-perfect lunar transfer trajectory would have resulted in an impact of the moon without a midcourse correction. To hit the precise target area on the lunar surface, the required correction would have been 4.25 meters per second, which is well within the spacecraft capability. Normal thrust and impulse levels were obtained with both the A t l a s and Centaur propulsion systems. However, a sizeable thrust overshoot on startup of the Centaur engines has not been resolved. A propellant-utilization system used for the first time on the Centaur, accurately controlled the fuel and oxidant consumption. The turnaround and retrothrust maneuver were performed without incident. Relatively high longitudinal modal excitations and lateral payload excitations were obtained at lift-off; these high perturbations are believed t o be related t o the launcher holddown arms. Nominal temperatures were recorded for both the external vehicle skin and the payload compartment; however, abnormally low temperatures were measured in the forward equipment area, which may have resulted from leakage of cold helium purge gas. All vehicle electrical systems performed satisfactorily; the only difficulty with the RF systems was obtained with the C-band transponder. of the vehicle instrumentation yielded valid data. The AC-6 vehicle was constructed with several new lightweight designs including the forward bulkhead, thrust barrel, interstage adapter and tank skin thickness reduction from 0.016 t o 0.014 inch. No deficiencies were observed in any of these new structural elements.
Source record↗
A Method of Implementing Cutoff Conditions for Saturn V Lunar Missions Out of Earth Parking Orbit Assuming a Continuous Ground Launch Window
A method of implementing Saturn V lunar missions from an earth parking orbit is presented. The ground launch window is assumed continuous over a four and one-half hour period. The iterative guidance scheme combined with a set of auxiliary equations that define suitable S-IVB cutoff conditions, is the approach taken. The four inputs to the equations that define cutoff conditions are represented as simple third-degree polynomials as a function of ignition time. Errors at lunar arrival caused by the separate and combined effects of the guidance equations, cutoff conditions, hypersurface errors, and input representations are shown. Vehicle performance variations and parking orbit injection errors are included as perturbations. Appendix I explains how aim vectors were computed for the cutoff equations. Appendix II presents all guidance equations and related implementation procedures. Appendix III gives the derivation of the auxiliary cutoff equations. No error at lunar arrival was large enough to require a midcourse correction greater than one meter per second assuming a transfer time of three days and the midcourse correction occurs five hours after injection. Since this result is insignificant when compared to expected hardware errors, the implementation procedures presented are adequate to define cutoff conditions for Saturn V lunar missions.
PARKING ORBIT↗
Orion Optical Navigation Progress Toward Exploration: Mission 1
Optical navigation of human spacecraft was proposed on Gemini and implemented successfully on Apollo as a means of autonomously operating the vehicle in the event of lost communication with controllers on Earth. It shares a history with the "method of lunar distances" that was used in the 18th century and gained some notoriety after its use by Captain James Cook during his 1768 Pacific voyage of the HMS Endeavor. The Orion emergency return system utilizing optical navigation has matured in design over the last several years, and is currently undergoing the final implementation and test phase in preparation for Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) in 2019. The software development is being worked as a Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) project delivered as an application within the Core Flight Software of the Orion camera controller module. The mathematical formulation behind the initial ellipse fit in the image processing is detailed in Christian. The non-linear least squares refinement then follows the technique of Mortari as an estimation process of the planetary limb using the sigmoid function. The Orion optical navigation system uses a body fixed camera, a decision that was driven by mass and mechanism constraints. The general concept of operations involves a 2-hour pass once every 24 hours, with passes specifically placed before all maneuvers to supply accurate navigation information to guidance and targeting. The pass lengths are limited by thermal constraints on the vehicle since the OpNav attitude generally deviates from the thermally stable tail-to-sun attitude maintained during the rest of the orbit coast phase. Calibration is scheduled prior to every pass due to the unknown nature of thermal effects on the lens distortion and the mounting platform deformations between the camera and star trackers. The calibration technique is described in detail by Christian, et al. and simultaneously estimates the Brown-Conrady coefficients and the Star Tracker/Camera interlock angles. Accurate attitude information is provided by the star trackers during each pass. Figure 1 shows the various phases of lunar return navigation when the vehicle is in autonomous operation with lost ground communication. The midcourse maneuvers are placed to control the entry interface conditions to the desired corridor for safe landing. The general form of optical navigation on Orion is where still images of the Moon or Earth are processed to find the apparent angular diameter and centroid in the camera focal plane. This raw data is transformed into range and bearing angle measurements using planetary data and precise star tracker inertial attitude. The measurements are then sent to the main flight computer's Kalman filter to update the onboard state vector. The images are, of course, collected over an arc to converge the state and estimate velocity. The same basic technique was used by Apollo to satisfy loss-of-comm, but Apollo used manual crew sightings with a vehicle-integral sextant instead of autonomously processing optical imagery. The software development is past its Critical Design Review, and is progressing through test and certification for human rating. In support of this, a hardware-in-the-loop test rig was developed in the Johnson Space Center Electro-Optics Lab to exercise the OpNav system prior to integrated testing on the Orion vehicle. Figure 2 shows the rig, which the test team has dubbed OCILOT (Orion Camera In the Loop Optical Testbed). Analysis performed to date shows a delivery that satisfies an allowable entry corridor as shown in Figure 3.
Holt, Greg N.↗