Results of some recent transport calculations for electrons and bremsstrahlung
Electron and bremsstrahlung transport calculations with Fortran and Monte Carlo method
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Electron and bremsstrahlung transport calculations with Fortran and Monte Carlo method
Free and near-free molecular flow via cylindrical ducts using Monte Carlo method and high speed digital computer
By application of simple computer graphics techniques, the statistical performance of two Monte Carlo methods used in the simulation of rarefied gas flows are assessed. Specifically, two direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) methods developed by Bird and Nanbu are considered. The graphics techniques are found to be of great benefit in the reduction and interpretation of the large volume of data generated, thus enabling important conclusions to be drawn about the simulation results. Hence, it is discovered that the method of Nanbu suffers from increased statistical fluctuations, thereby prohibiting its use in the solution of practical problems.
It is anticipated that many future manned space operations will be radiation limited and that laminated wall structures and the use of new materials will be required to reduce radiation exposure. Methods for electron shield analysis are reviewed in light of anticipated needs in the space program. The most general method is still the Monte Carlo method, which is of limited usefulness for shield analysis due to excessive computer requirements. Methods based on energy deposition coefficients or energy transmission and reflection factors are quite accurate, but are currently limited to aluminum shield material. Analytical methods based on Mar's approximation for the electron transmission factor are relatively general and computer efficient but seriously underestimate shield requirements. A correction to methods using Mar's approximate transmission factor is derived herein and results in a slightly conservative estimate of shield requirements. Techniques for laminated shield design are still lacking.
Testing large-scale systems is expensive in terms of both time and money. Running simulations early in the process is a proven method of finding the design faults likely to lead to critical system failures, but determining the exact cause of those errors is still time-consuming and requires access to a limited number of domain experts. It is desirable to find an automated method that explores the large number of combinations and is able to isolate likely fault points. Treatment learning is a subset of minimal contrast-set learning that, rather than classifying data into distinct categories, focuses on finding the unique factors that lead to a particular classification. That is, they find the smallest change to the data that causes the largest change in the class distribution. These treatments, when imposed, are able to identify the settings most likely to cause a mission-critical failure. This research benchmarks two treatment learning methods against standard optimization techniques across three complex systems, including two projects from the Robust Software Engineering (RSE) group within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center. It is shown that these treatment learners are both faster than traditional methods and show demonstrably better results.
Radiative heat transfer to a nonisothermal absorbing and emitting gray gas between gray walls analyzed, using monte carlo method
Improved spacecraft shield design requires early entry of radiation constraints into the design process to maximize performance and minimize costs. As a result, we have been investigating high-speed computational procedures to allow shield analysis from the preliminary design concepts to the final design. In particular, we will discuss the progress towards a full three-dimensional and computationally efficient deterministic code for which the current HZETRN evaluates the lowest-order asymptotic term. HZETRN is the first deterministic solution to the Boltzmann equation allowing field mapping within the International Space Station (ISS) in tens of minutes using standard finite element method (FEM) geometry common to engineering design practice enabling development of integrated multidisciplinary design optimization methods. A single ray trace in ISS FEM geometry requires 14 ms and severely limits application of Monte Carlo methods to such engineering models. A potential means of improving the Monte Carlo efficiency in coupling to spacecraft geometry is given in terms of re-configurable computing and could be utilized in the final design as verification of the deterministic method optimized design. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of COSPAR.
Steady flow of highly rarefied ionized gas through channel with magnetic field solved by Monte Carlo method obtaining density, energies, wall shear stress, etc
Couette flow and heat transfer of rarefied gas between parallel plates analyzed by Monte Carlo method
Computer program for evaluating flight performance reserve requirements for Centaur vehicle using Monte Carlo method
Monte Carlo method solution of heat transfer in rarefied gas between infinite flat plates
Monte carlo method for cascades of high energy nuclear particles
Monte Carlo method for determination of touchdown dynamics for soft lunar landing
Monte Carlo method for developing design reliability goal compatible with small sample requirements
Meteoritic origin from Monte Carlo method analysis of large number of cases from various starting conditions to termination
Monte Carlo method for computing Atlas/Centaur flight performance reserve
Monte Carlo method, and radiant heat transfer to analyze impact pressure probes
Multi-model Monte Carlo methods are efficient strategies to perform forward uncertainty quantification studies in entry, descent, and landing (EDL) applications. These multi-model methods are based on the classical Monte Carlo estimator, but fuse predictions from several low-fidelity models to obtain estimators with greater precision given a prescribed computational budget. The effectiveness of these approaches relies on the magnitudes of correlations between the low-fidelity models and the high-fidelity model, as well as the relative computational costs of all models. Identifying and exploiting the best trade-off between correlation and cost, which ultimately depends on the selection of hyperparameters in the low-fidelity models, is a task often performed by hand or simply inspired by the deterministic understanding available for a specific application. This work extends a preliminary effort,