Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Programming Models”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Adaptive cache management based on programming model information

A processing system selectively allocates space to store a group of one or more cache lines at a cache level of a cache hierarchy having a plurality of cache levels based on memory access patterns of a software application executing at the processing system. The processing system generates bit vectors indicating which cache levels are to allocate space to store groups of one or more cache lines based on the memory access patterns, which are derived from data granularity and movement information. Based on the bit vectors, the processing system provides hints to the cache hierarchy indicating the lowest cache level that can exploit the reuse potential for a particular data.

Na, Weon Taek↗

The Minos Computing Library: Efficient Parallel Programming for Extremely Heterogeneous Systems

Hardware specialization has become the silver bullet to achieve efficient high performance, from Systems-on-Chip systems, where hardware specialization can be ``extreme'', to large-scale HPC systems. As the complexity of the systems increases, so does the complexity of programming such architectures in a portable way. This work introduces the Minos Computing Library (MCL), as system software, programming model, and programming model runtime that facilitate programming extremely heterogeneous systems. MCL supports the execution of several multi-threaded applications within the same compute node, performs asynchronous execution of application tasks, efficiently balances computation across hardware resources, and provides performance portability. We show that code developed on a personal desktop automatically scales up to fully utilize powerful workstations with 8 GPUs and down to power-efficient embedded systems. MCL provides up to 17.5x speedup over OpenCL on NVIDIA DGX-1 systems and up to 1.88x speedup on single-GPU systems. In multi-application workloads, MCL dynamically resource allocation provides up to 2.43x performance improvement over manual, static allocation of computing resources.

Gioiosa, Roberto↗

Leveraging Compiler-Based Translation to Evaluate a Diversity of Exascale Platforms

Accelerator-based heterogeneous computing is the de facto standard in current and upcoming exascale machines. These heterogeneous resources empower computational scientists to select a machine or platform well-suited to their domain or applications. However, this diversity of machines also poses challenges related to programming model selection: inconsistent availability of programming models across different exascale systems, lack of performance portability for those programming models that do span several systems, and inconsistent performance between different models on a single platform. We explore these challenges on exascale-similar hardware, including AMD MI100 and NVIDIA A100 GPUs. By extending the sourceto-source compiler OpenARC, we demonstrate the power of automated translation of applications written in a single frontend programming model (OpenACC) into a variety of backend models (OpenMP, OpenCL, CUDA, HIP) that span the upcoming exascale environments. This translation enables us to compare performance within and across devices and to analyze programming model behavior with profiling tools.

Lambert, Jacob↗

Modeling Bilevel Programs in Pyomo

We describe new capabilities for modeling bilevel programs within the Pyomo modeling software. These capabilities include new modeling components that represent subproblems, modeling transformations for re-expressing models with bilevel structure in other forms, and optimize bilevel programs with meta-solvers that apply transformations and then perform op- timization on the resulting model. We illustrate the breadth of Pyomo's modeling capabilities for bilevel programs, and we describe how Pyomo's meta-solvers can perform local and global optimization of bilevel programs.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Computational simulation of a 100 kW dual circulating fluidized bed reactor processing coal by chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling

Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) is a promising carbon capture technology that utilizes two interconnected fluidized-bed reactors to separate oxygen from air using a metal oxide, and then to use that oxygen to combust fuel in a nitrogen-free environment. CLOU is particularly well suited for solid fuels such as coal since released O 2 will readily combust with solid char. This study presents simulations of the University of Utah's dual fluidized bed chemical looping process development unit (PDU) operating as a CLOU system at 100 kW th , using CPFD Software's Barracuda-VR™ CFD modeling program. A full 3D model of the PDU was used including both reactors, as well as loop seals and cyclone separators. Hydrodynamic settings and the drag model are based on previous cold-flow validation experiments. Mechanisms describing CLOU reaction kinetics for cuprous oxide oxidation in the air reactor and cupric oxide reduction in the fuel reactor were adapted from previously completed experimental work. Coal char kinetics were based on the carbon-hydrogen-nitrogen-oxygen-sulfur, CHNOS, method. Submodels for devolatilization, gasification, and homogenous gas-phase reactions used relationships from the literature. Results predict volatile burnout almost immediately, though coal combustion continues into the upper portions of the fuel reactor and cyclone. Lastly, nitrogen gas leakage into the fuel reactor is shown to be mostly carryover from the air reactor

42 ENGINEERING↗

Scheduling and Performance of Asynchronous Tasks in Fortran 2018 with FEATS

Most parallel scientific programs contain compiler directives (pragmas) such as those from OpenMP (Hermanns in Parallel programming in Fortran 95 using openMP, 2002. School of Aeronautical Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, España, 2011), explicit calls to runtime library procedures such as those implementing the Message Passing Interface (MPI) (in A message-passing interface standard version 4.0, 2021. https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-4.0/mpi40-report.pdf), or compiler-specific language extensions such as those provided by CUDA (Ruetsch and Fatica in CUDA Fortran for scientists and engineers: best practices for efficient CUDA Fortran programming, Elsevier, 2013). By contrast, the recent Fortran standards empower developers to express parallel algorithms without directly referencing lower-level parallel programming models (Numrich in Parallel programming with co-arrays, CRC Press, 2018, and Curcic in Modern Fortran: building efficient parallel applications, Manning Publications, 2020). Fortran’s parallel features place the language within the Partitioned Global Address Space (PGAS) class of programming models. When writing programs that exploit data parallelism, application developers often find it straightforward to develop custom parallel algorithms. Problems involving complex, heterogeneous, staged calculations, however, pose much greater challenges. Such applications require careful coordination of tasks in a manner that respects dependencies prescribed by a directed acyclic graph. When rolling one’s own solution proves difficult, extending a customizable framework becomes attractive. Further, the paper presents the design, implementation, and use of the Framework for Extensible Asynchronous Task Scheduling (FEATS), which we believe to be the first task scheduling tool written in modern Fortran. We describe the benefits and compromises associated with choosing Fortran as the implementation language, and we propose ways in which future Fortran standards can best support the use case in this paper.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Adaptive Runtime Features For Distributed Graph Algorithms

Performance of distributed graph algorithms can benefit greatly by forming rapport between algorithmic abstraction and the underlying runtime system that is responsible for scheduling work and exchanging messages. However, due to their dynamic and irregular nature of computation, distributed graph algorithms written in different programming models impose varying degree of workload pressure on the runtime. To cope with such vastly different workload characteristics, a runtime has to make several trade-offs. One such trade-off arises, for example, when the runtime scheduler has to choose among alternatives such as whether to execute algorithmic work, or progress the network by probing network buffers, or throttle sending messages (termed flow control). This tradeoff decides between optimizing the throughput of a runtime scheduler by increasing the rate of execution of algorithmic work, and reducing the latency of the network messages. Another trade-off exists when a decision has to be made about when to send aggregated messages in buffers (message coalescing). This decision chooses between trading off latency for network bandwidth and vice versa. At any instant, such trade-offs emphasize either on improving the quantity of work being executed (by maximizing the scheduler throughput) or on improving the quality of work (by prioritizing better work). However, encoding static policies for different runtime features (such as flow control, coalescing) can prevent graph algorithms from achieving their full potential, thus can undermine the actual performance of a distributed graph algorithm . In this paper, we investigate runtime support for distributed graph algorithms in the context of two paradigms: variants of wellknown Bulk-Synchronous Parallel model and asynchronous programming model. We explore generic runtime features such as message coalescing (aggregation) and flow control and show that execution policies of these features need to be adjusted over time to make a positive impact on the execution time of a distributed graph algorithm. Since synchronous and asynchronous graph algorithms have different workload characteristics, not all of such runtime features may be good candidates for adaptation. Each of these algorithmic paradigms may require different set of features to be adapted over time. We demonstrate which set of feature(s) can be useful in each case to achieve the right balance of work in the runtime layer. Existing implementation of different graph algorithms can benefit from adapting dynamic policies in the underlying runtime.

Firoz, Jesun S.↗

Improving the performance of medical imaging applications using SYCL

As opposed to the Open Computing Language (OpenCL) programming model, in which host and device codes are generally written in different programming languages, SYCL can combine host and device codes for an application in a type-safe way to improve development productivity and performance portability. Hence, this report shows the experimental results of applying the SYCL programming model to medical imaging applications for a study on performance portability and programming productivity between OpenCL and SYCL. Rodinia is a widely used open-source benchmark suite for heterogeneous computing. We choose two medical imaging applications (Heart Wall and Particle Filter) in the benchmark suite, migrate the OpenCL implementations of the applications to the SYCL implementations, and evaluate their performance and productivity on Intel® microprocessors that contain a central processing unit (CPU) and an integrated graphics processing unit (GPU). The maturing SYCL compilers, which are based on a conformant implementation of the SYCL 1.2.1 Khronos specification, have been actively optimized for Intel® computing platforms. The experimental results are promising in terms of the raw performance and productivity. Although the SYCL implementation of the Heart Wall application does not execute successfully on a CPU, the SYCL implementations of the application can achieve comparable or better performance than the OpenCL implementation on Intel® integrated GPUs. For the Particle Filter application, the performance difference between the SYCL and OpenCL implementations is comparable on the GPUs for most cases, but the SYCL implementations are on average 4X faster than the OpenCL implementations on Intel® Xeon® CPUs. For programming productivity, we arguably use lines of code as a way to measure programming productivity in software. The SYCL programs reduce the lines of code of the OpenCL programs by 52% and 38% for the Heart Wall and Particle Filter, respectively. The results indicate that SYCL is a promising programming model for heterogeneous computing with the maturing compilers. We organize the remainder of the report as follows. Section II introduces the SYCL programming model, compares the major differences between an OpenCL program and a SYCL program, and describes the characteristics of the two applications. Section III describes the SYCL programming model in more details, and shows the SYCL implementation of a kernel function in the Particle Filter application as an example. In Section IV, we evaluate the performance of the applications on the CPUs and GPUs. Section V concludes the report.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗